1
|
van der Burgh BJ, Filius SJ, Radaelli G, Harlaar J. The efficacy of different torque profiles for weight compensation of the hand. WEARABLE TECHNOLOGIES 2024; 5:e2. [PMID: 38510986 PMCID: PMC10952050 DOI: 10.1017/wtc.2023.23] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2023] [Revised: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 10/27/2023] [Indexed: 03/22/2024]
Abstract
Orthotic wrist supports will be beneficial for people with muscular weakness to keep their hand in a neutral rest position and prevent potential wrist contractures. Compensating the weight of the hands is complex since the level of support depends on both wrist and forearm orientations. To explore simplified approaches, two different weight compensation strategies (constant and linear) were compared to the theoretical ideal sinusoidal profile and no compensation in eight healthy subjects using a mechanical wrist support system. All three compensation strategies showed a significant reduction of 47-53% surface electromyography activity in the anti-gravity m. extensor carpi radialis. However, for the higher palmar flexion region, a significant increase of 44-61% in the m. flexor carpi radialis was found for all compensation strategies. No significant differences were observed between the various compensation strategies. Two conclusions can be drawn: (1) a simplified torque profile (e.g., constant or linear) for weight compensation can be considered as equally effective as the theoretically ideal sinusoidal profile and (2) even the theoretically ideal profile provides no perfect support as other factors than weight, such as passive joint impedance, most likely influence the required compensation torque for the wrist joint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bas J. van der Burgh
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Department of Precision and Microsystems Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Suzanne J. Filius
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Giuseppe Radaelli
- Department of Precision and Microsystems Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
| | - Jaap Harlaar
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, Delft University of Technology, Delft, The Netherlands
- Department of Orthopedics & Sports Medicine, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Filius S, Janssen M, van der Kooij H, Harlaar J. Comparison of Lower Arm Weight and Passive Elbow Joint Impedance Compensation Strategies in Non-Disabled Participants. IEEE Int Conf Rehabil Robot 2023; 2023:1-6. [PMID: 37941250 DOI: 10.1109/icorr58425.2023.10304707] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/10/2023]
Abstract
People with severe muscle weakness in the upper extremity are in need of an arm support to enhance arm function and improve their quality of life. In addition to weight support, compensation of passive joint impedance (pJimp) seems necessary. Existing devices do not compensate for pJimp yet, and the best way to compensate for it is still unknown. The aim of this study is to 1) identify pJimp of the elbow, and 2) compare four different compensation strategies of weight and combined weight and pJimp in an active elbow support system. The passive elbow joint moments, including gravitational and pJimp contributions, were measured in 12 non-disabled participants. The four compensation strategies (scaled-model, measured, hybrid, and fitted-model) were compared using a position-tracking task in the near vertical plane. All four strategies showed a significant reduction (20-47%) in the anti-gravity elbow flexor activity measured by surface electromyography. The pJimp turned out to contribute to a large extent to the passive elbow joint moments (range took up 60%) in non-disabled participants. This underlines the relevance of compensating for pJimp in arm support systems. The parameters of the scaled-model and hybrid strategy seem to overestimate the gravitational component. Therefore, the measured and fitted-model strategies are expected to be most promising to test in people with severe muscle weakness combined with elevated pJimp.
Collapse
|
3
|
Dalla Gasperina S, Longatelli V, Braghin F, Pedrocchi A, Gandolla M. Development and Electromyographic Validation of a Compliant Human-Robot Interaction Controller for Cooperative and Personalized Neurorehabilitation. Front Neurorobot 2022; 15:734130. [PMID: 35115915 PMCID: PMC8804356 DOI: 10.3389/fnbot.2021.734130] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 11/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate training modalities for post-stroke upper-limb rehabilitation are key features for effective recovery after the acute event. This study presents a cooperative control framework that promotes compliant motion and implements a variety of high-level rehabilitation modalities with a unified low-level explicit impedance control law. The core idea is that we can change the haptic behavior perceived by a human when interacting with the rehabilitation robot by tuning three impedance control parameters. METHODS The presented control law is based on an impedance controller with direct torque measurement, provided with positive-feedback compensation terms for disturbances rejection and gravity compensation. We developed an elbow flexion-extension experimental setup as a platform to validate the performance of the proposed controller to promote the desired high-level behavior. The controller was first characterized through experimental trials regarding joint transparency, torque, and impedance tracking accuracy. Then, to validate if the controller could effectively render different physical human-robot interaction according to the selected rehabilitation modalities, we conducted tests on 14 healthy volunteers and measured their muscular voluntary effort through surface electromyography (sEMG). The experiments consisted of one degree-of-freedom elbow flexion/extension movements, executed under six high-level modalities, characterized by different levels of (i) corrective assistance, (ii) weight counterbalance assistance, and (iii) resistance. RESULTS The unified controller demonstrated suitability to promote good transparency and render both compliant and stiff behavior at the joint. We demonstrated through electromyographic monitoring that a proper combination of stiffness, damping, and weight assistance could induce different user participation levels, render different physical human-robot interaction, and potentially promote different rehabilitation training modalities. CONCLUSION We proved that the proposed control framework could render a wide variety of physical human-robot interaction, helping the user to accomplish the task while exploiting physiological muscular activation patterns. The reported results confirmed that the control scheme could induce different levels of the subject's participation, potentially applicable to the clinical practice to adapt the rehabilitation treatment to the subject's progress. Further investigation is needed to validate the presented approach to neurological patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Dalla Gasperina
- NeuroEngineering and Medical Robotics Laboratory (NearLab), Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milan, Milan, Italy
- WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy
| | - Valeria Longatelli
- NeuroEngineering and Medical Robotics Laboratory (NearLab), Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milan, Milan, Italy
- WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy
| | - Francesco Braghin
- WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy
- Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Pedrocchi
- NeuroEngineering and Medical Robotics Laboratory (NearLab), Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milan, Milan, Italy
- WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy
| | - Marta Gandolla
- NeuroEngineering and Medical Robotics Laboratory (NearLab), Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milan, Milan, Italy
- WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dalla Gasperina S, Roveda L, Pedrocchi A, Braghin F, Gandolla M. Review on Patient-Cooperative Control Strategies for Upper-Limb Rehabilitation Exoskeletons. Front Robot AI 2021; 8:745018. [PMID: 34950707 PMCID: PMC8688994 DOI: 10.3389/frobt.2021.745018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/21/2021] [Accepted: 10/25/2021] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Technology-supported rehabilitation therapy for neurological patients has gained increasing interest since the last decades. The literature agrees that the goal of robots should be to induce motor plasticity in subjects undergoing rehabilitation treatment by providing the patients with repetitive, intensive, and task-oriented treatment. As a key element, robot controllers should adapt to patients’ status and recovery stage. Thus, the design of effective training modalities and their hardware implementation play a crucial role in robot-assisted rehabilitation and strongly influence the treatment outcome. The objective of this paper is to provide a multi-disciplinary vision of patient-cooperative control strategies for upper-limb rehabilitation exoskeletons to help researchers bridge the gap between human motor control aspects, desired rehabilitation training modalities, and their hardware implementations. To this aim, we propose a three-level classification based on 1) “high-level” training modalities, 2) “low-level” control strategies, and 3) “hardware-level” implementation. Then, we provide examples of literature upper-limb exoskeletons to show how the three levels of implementation have been combined to obtain a given high-level behavior, which is specifically designed to promote motor relearning during the rehabilitation treatment. Finally, we emphasize the need for the development of compliant control strategies, based on the collaboration between the exoskeleton and the wearer, we report the key findings to promote the desired physical human-robot interaction for neurorehabilitation, and we provide insights and suggestions for future works.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stefano Dalla Gasperina
- NearLab, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.,WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy
| | - Loris Roveda
- Istituto Dalle Molle di studi sull'Intelligenza Artificiale (IDSIA), USI-SUPSI, Lugano, Switzerland
| | - Alessandra Pedrocchi
- NearLab, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy.,WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy
| | - Francesco Braghin
- WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy.,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Gandolla
- WE-COBOT Lab, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy.,Department of Mechanical Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Gandolla M, Antonietti A, Longatelli V, Pedrocchi A. The Effectiveness of Wearable Upper Limb Assistive Devices in Degenerative Neuromuscular Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2020; 7:450. [PMID: 32039171 PMCID: PMC6992540 DOI: 10.3389/fbioe.2019.00450] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2019] [Accepted: 12/18/2019] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: This systematic review summarizes the current evidence about the effectiveness of wearable assistive technologies for upper limbs support during activities of daily living for individuals with neuromuscular diseases. Methods: Fourteen studies have been included in the meta-analysis, involving 184 participants. All included studies compared patients ability to perform functional tasks with and without assistive devices. Results: An overall effect size of 1.06 (95% CI = 0.76-1.36, p < 0.00001) was obtained, demonstrating that upper limbs assistive devices significantly improve the performance in activities of daily living in people with neuromuscular diseases. A significant interaction between studies evaluating functional improvement with externally-assessed outcome measures or self-perceived outcome measures has been detected. In particular, the effect size of the sub-group considering self-perceived scales was 1.38 (95% CI = 1.08-1.68), while the effect size of the other group was 0.77 (95% CI = 0.41-1.11), meaning that patients' perceived functional gain is often higher than the functional gain detectable through clinical scales. Conclusion: Overall, the quality of the evidence ranged from low to moderate, due to low number of studies and participants, limitations in the selection of participants and in the blindness of outcome assessors, and risk of publication bias. Significance: A large magnitude effect and a clear dose-response gradient were found, therefore, a strong recommendation, in favor of the use of assistive devices could be suggested.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Gandolla
- Nearlab@Lecco, Polo Territoriale di Lecco, Politecnico di Milano, Lecco, Italy
| | - Alberto Antonietti
- Nearlab, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Valeria Longatelli
- Nearlab, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | - Alessandra Pedrocchi
- Nearlab, Department of Electronics, Information and Bioengineering, Politecnico di Milano, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Data-Inferred Personalized Human-Robot Models for Iterative Collaborative Output Tracking. J INTELL ROBOT SYST 2018. [DOI: 10.1007/s10846-017-0653-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
7
|
Lobo-Prat J, Janssen MMHP, Koopman BFJM, Stienen AHA, de Groot IJM. Surface EMG signals in very late-stage of Duchenne muscular dystrophy: a case study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017; 14:86. [PMID: 28851391 PMCID: PMC5576133 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0292-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/05/2016] [Accepted: 08/03/2017] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Robotic arm supports aim at improving the quality of life for adults with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) by augmenting their residual functional abilities. A critical component of robotic arm supports is the control interface, as is it responsible for the human-machine interaction. Our previous studies showed the feasibility of using surface electromyography (sEMG) as a control interface to operate robotic arm supports in adults with DMD (22-24 years-old). However, in the biomedical engineering community there is an often raised skepticism on whether adults with DMD at the last stage of their disease have sEMG signals that can be measured and used for control. Findings In this study sEMG signals from Biceps and Triceps Brachii muscles were measured for the first time in a 37 year-old man with DMD (Brooke 6) that lost his arm function 15 years ago. The sEMG signals were measured during maximal and sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions and evaluated in terms of signal-to-noise ratio and co-activation ratio. Beyond the profound deterioration of the muscles, we found that sEMG signals from both Biceps and Triceps muscles were measurable in this individual, although with a maximum signal amplitude 100 times lower compared to sEMG from healthy subjects. The participant was able to voluntarily modulate the required level of muscle activation during the sub-maximal voluntary isometric contractions. Despite the low sEMG amplitude and a considerable level of muscle co-activation, simulations of an elbow orthosis using the measured sEMG as driving signal indicated that the sEMG signals of the participant had the potential to provide control of elbow movements. Conclusions To the best of our knowledge this is the first time that sEMG signals from a man with DMD at the last-stage of the disease were measured, analyzed and reported. These findings offer promising perspectives to the use of sEMG as an intuitive and natural control interface for robotic arm supports in adults with DMD until the last stage of the disease. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12984-017-0292-4) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Lobo-Prat
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, The Netherlands.
| | - Mariska M H P Janssen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Reinier Postlaan 4, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands
| | - Bart F J M Koopman
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, The Netherlands
| | - Arno H A Stienen
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522 NB, The Netherlands
| | - Imelda J M de Groot
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Reinier Postlaan 4, Nijmegen, 6500 HB, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Lobo-Prat J, Nizamis K, Janssen MMHP, Keemink AQL, Veltink PH, Koopman BFJM, Stienen AHA. Comparison between sEMG and force as control interfaces to support planar arm movements in adults with Duchenne: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil 2017; 14:73. [PMID: 28701169 PMCID: PMC5508565 DOI: 10.1186/s12984-017-0282-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2016] [Accepted: 06/26/2017] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Adults with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) can benefit from devices that actively support their arm function. A critical component of such devices is the control interface as it is responsible for the human-machine interaction. Our previous work indicated that surface electromyography (sEMG) and force-based control with active gravity and joint-stiffness compensation were feasible solutions for the support of elbow movements (one degree of freedom). In this paper, we extend the evaluation of sEMG- and force-based control interfaces to simultaneous and proportional control of planar arm movements (two degrees of freedom). METHODS Three men with DMD (18-23 years-old) with different levels of arm function (i.e. Brooke scores of 4, 5 and 6) performed a series of line-tracing tasks over a tabletop surface using an experimental active arm support. The arm movements were controlled using three control methods: sEMG-based control, force-based control with stiffness compensation (FSC), and force-based control with no compensation (FNC). The movement performance was evaluated in terms of percentage of task completion, tracing error, smoothness and speed. RESULTS For subject S1 (Brooke 4) FNC was the preferred method and performed better than FSC and sEMG. FNC was not usable for subject S2 (Brooke 5) and S3 (Brooke 6). Subject S2 presented significantly lower movement speed with sEMG than with FSC, yet he preferred sEMG since FSC was perceived to be too fatiguing. Subject S3 could not successfully use neither of the two force-based control methods, while with sEMG he could reach almost his entire workspace. CONCLUSIONS Movement performance and subjective preference of the three control methods differed with the level of arm function of the participants. Our results indicate that all three control methods have to be considered in real applications, as they present complementary advantages and disadvantages. The fact that the two weaker subjects (S2 and S3) experienced the force-based control interfaces as fatiguing suggests that sEMG-based control interfaces could be a better solution for adults with DMD. Yet force-based control interfaces can be a better alternative for those cases in which voluntary forces are higher than the stiffness forces of the arms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joan Lobo-Prat
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522, NB, The Netherlands.
| | - Kostas Nizamis
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522, NB, The Netherlands
| | - Mariska M H P Janssen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Radboud University Medical Center, Reinier Postlaan 4, Nijmegen, 6500, HB, The Netherlands
| | - Arvid Q L Keemink
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522, NB, The Netherlands
| | - Peter H Veltink
- Department of Biomedical Signals and Systems, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7500, AE, The Netherlands
| | - Bart F J M Koopman
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522, NB, The Netherlands
| | - Arno H A Stienen
- Department of Biomechanical Engineering, University of Twente, Drienerlolaan 5, Enschede, 7522, NB, The Netherlands
- Department of Physical Therapy and Human Movement Sciences, Northwestern University, 645 N Michigan Ave Suite 1100, Chicago (IL), 60611, USA
| |
Collapse
|