Non-Invasive, Temporally Discrete Feedback of Object Contact and Release Improves Grasp Control of Closed-Loop Myoelectric Transradial Prostheses

Real-time vibrotactile pattern generation and identification using discrete event-driven feedback

This study assesses human identification of vibrotactile patterns by using real-time discrete event-driven feedback. Previously acquired force and bend sensor data from a robotic hand were used to predict movement-type (stationary, flexion, contact, extension, release) and object-type (no object, hard object, soft object) states by using decision tree (DT) algorithms implemented in a field-programmable gate array (FPGA). Six able-bodied humans performed a 2- and 3-step sequential pattern recognition task in which state transitions were signaled as vibrotactile feedback. The stimuli were generated according to predicted classes represented by two frequencies (F1: 80 Hz, F2: 180 Hz) and two magnitudes (M1: low, M2: high) calibrated psychophysically for each participant; and they were applied by two actuators (Haptuators) placed on upper arms. A soft/hard object was mapped to F1/F2; and manipulating it with low/high force was assigned to M1/M2 in the left actuator. On the other hand, flexion/extension movement was mapped to F1/F2 in the right actuator, with movement in air as M1 and during object manipulation as M2. DT algorithm performed better for the object-type (97%) than the movement-type (88%) classification in real time. Participants could recognize feedback associated with 14 discrete-event sequences with low-to-medium accuracy. The performance was higher (76 ± 9% recall, 76 ± 17% precision, 78 ± 4% accuracy) for recognizing any one event in the sequences. The results show that FPGA implementation of classification for discrete event-driven vibrotactile feedback can be feasible in haptic devices with additional cues in the physical context.

Biomimetic versus arbitrary motor control strategies for bionic hand skill learning

A long-standing engineering ambition has been to design anthropomorphic bionic limbs: devices that look like and are controlled in the same way as the biological body (biomimetic). The untested assumption is that biomimetic motor control enhances device embodiment, learning, generalization and automaticity. To test this, we compared biomimetic and non-biomimetic control strategies for non-disabled participants when learning to control a wearable myoelectric bionic hand operated by an eight-channel electromyography pattern-recognition system. We compared motor learning across days and behavioural tasks for two training groups: biomimetic (mimicking the desired bionic hand gesture with biological hand) and arbitrary control (mapping an unrelated biological hand gesture with the desired bionic gesture). For both trained groups, training improved bionic limb control, reduced cognitive reliance and increased embodiment over the bionic hand. Biomimetic users had more intuitive and faster control early in training. Arbitrary users matched biomimetic performance later in training. Furthermore, arbitrary users showed increased generalization to a new control strategy. Collectively, our findings suggest that biomimetic and arbitrary control strategies provide different benefits. The optimal strategy is probably not strictly biomimetic, but rather a flexible strategy within the biomimetic-to-arbitrary spectrum, depending on the user, available training opportunities and user requirements.

Excitation of natural spinal reflex loops in the sensory-motor control of hand prostheses

Sensory feedback for prosthesis control is typically based on encoding sensory information in specific types of sensory stimuli that the users interpret to adjust the control of the prosthesis. However, in physiological conditions, the afferent feedback received from peripheral nerves is not only processed consciously but also modulates spinal reflex loops that contribute to the neural information driving muscles. Spinal pathways are relevant for sensory-motor integration, but they are commonly not leveraged for prosthesis control. We propose an approach to improve sensory-motor integration for prosthesis control based on modulating the excitability of spinal circuits through the vibration of tendons in a closed loop with muscle activity. We measured muscle signals in healthy participants and amputees during different motor tasks, and we closed the loop by applying vibration on tendons connected to the muscles, which modulated the excitability of motor neurons. The control signals to the prosthesis were thus the combination of voluntary control and additional spinal reflex inputs induced by tendon vibration. Results showed that closed-loop tendon vibration was able to modulate the neural drive to the muscles. When closed-loop tendon vibration was used, participants could achieve similar or better control performance in interfaces using muscle activation than without stimulation. Stimulation could even improve prosthetic grasping in amputees. Overall, our results indicate that closed-loop tendon vibration can integrate spinal reflex pathways in the myocontrol system and open the possibility of incorporating natural feedback loops in prosthesis control.

Non-invasive stimulation of the human striatum disrupts reinforcement learning of motor skills

Reinforcement feedback can improve motor learning, but the underlying brain mechanisms remain underexplored. In particular, the causal contribution of specific patterns of oscillatory activity within the human striatum is unknown. To address this question, we exploited a recently developed non-invasive deep brain stimulation technique called transcranial temporal interference stimulation (tTIS) during reinforcement motor learning with concurrent neuroimaging, in a randomized, sham-controlled, double-blind study. Striatal tTIS applied at 80 Hz, but not at 20 Hz, abolished the benefits of reinforcement on motor learning. This effect was related to a selective modulation of neural activity within the striatum. Moreover, 80 Hz, but not 20 Hz, tTIS increased the neuromodulatory influence of the striatum on frontal areas involved in reinforcement motor learning. These results show that tTIS can non-invasively and selectively modulate a striatal mechanism involved in reinforcement learning, expanding our tools for the study of causal relationships between deep brain structures and human behaviour.

Intuitive control of additional prosthetic joints via electro-neuromuscular constructs improves functional and disability outcomes during home use-a case study

Objective.The advent of surgical reconstruction techniques has enabled the recreation of myoelectric controls sites that were previously lost due to amputation. This advancement is particularly beneficial for individuals with higher-level arm amputations, who were previously constrained to using a single degree of freedom (DoF) myoelectric prostheses due to the limited number of available muscles from which control signals could be extracted. In this study, we explore the use of surgically created electro-neuromuscular constructs to intuitively control multiple bionic joints during daily life with a participant who was implanted with a neuromusculoskeletal prosthetic interface.Approach.We sequentially increased the number of controlled joints, starting at a single DoF allowing to open and close the hand, subsequently adding control of the wrist (2 DoF) and elbow (3 DoF).Main results.We found that the surgically created electro-neuromuscular constructs allow for intuitive simultaneous and proportional control of up to three degrees of freedom using direct control. Extended home-use and the additional bionic joints resulted in improved prosthesis functionality and disability outcomes.Significance.Our findings indicate that electro-neuromuscular constructs can aid in restoring lost functionality and thereby support a person who lost their arm in daily-life tasks.

Three Sliding Probes Placed on Forelimb Skin for Proprioceptive Feedback Differentially yet Complementarily Contribute to Hand Gesture Detection and Object-Size Discrimination

The purpose was to assess the effectiveness of three sliding tactile probes placed on the forelimb skin to provide proprioceptive feedback for the detection of hand gestures and discrimination of object size. Tactile contactors representing the first three fingers were driven along the proximodistal axis by linear servo motors. Twenty healthy subjects were involved in the gesture detection test, with 10 of them also participating in the object-size discrimination task. Motors were controlled by computer in the first four sessions of the gesture detection experiment, while the fifth session utilized a sensorized glove. Both the volar and dorsal sides of the forearm were examined. In the object-size discrimination experiment, the method was exclusively assessed on the volar surface under four distinct feedback conditions, including all fingers and each finger separately. The psychophysical data were further analyzed using a structural equation model (SEM) to evaluate the specific contributions of each individual contactor. Subjects consistently outperformed the chance level in detecting gestures. Performance improved up to the third session, with better results obtained on the volar side. The performances were similar in the fourth and fifth sessions. The just noticeable difference for achieving a 75% discrimination accuracy was found to be 2.90 mm of movement on the skin. SEM analysis indicated that the contactor for the index finger had the lowest importance in gesture detection, while it played a more significant role in object-size discrimination. However, all fingers were found to be significant predictors of subjects' responses in both experiments, except for the thumb, which was deemed insignificant in object-size discrimination. The study highlights the importance of considering the partial contribution of each degree of freedom in a sensory feedback system, especially concerning the task, when designing such systems.

Biomimetic computer-to-brain communication enhancing naturalistic touch sensations via peripheral nerve stimulation

Artificial communication with the brain through peripheral nerve stimulation shows promising results in individuals with sensorimotor deficits. However, these efforts lack an intuitive and natural sensory experience. In this study, we design and test a biomimetic neurostimulation framework inspired by nature, capable of "writing" physiologically plausible information back into the peripheral nervous system. Starting from an in-silico model of mechanoreceptors, we develop biomimetic stimulation policies. We then experimentally assess them alongside mechanical touch and common linear neuromodulations. Neural responses resulting from biomimetic neuromodulation are consistently transmitted towards dorsal root ganglion and spinal cord of cats, and their spatio-temporal neural dynamics resemble those naturally induced. We implement these paradigms within the bionic device and test it with patients (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT03350061). He we report that biomimetic neurostimulation improves mobility (primary outcome) and reduces mental effort (secondary outcome) compared to traditional approaches. The outcomes of this neuroscience-driven technology, inspired by the human body, may serve as a model for advancing assistive neurotechnologies.

Human motor augmentation with an extra robotic arm without functional interference

Extra robotic arms (XRAs) are gaining interest in neuroscience and robotics, offering potential tools for daily activities. However, this compelling opportunity poses new challenges for sensorimotor control strategies and human-machine interfaces (HMIs). A key unsolved challenge is allowing users to proficiently control XRAs without hindering their existing functions. To address this, we propose a pipeline to identify suitable HMIs given a defined task to accomplish with the XRA. Following such a scheme, we assessed a multimodal motor HMI based on gaze detection and diaphragmatic respiration in a purposely designed modular neurorobotic platform integrating virtual reality and a bilateral upper limb exoskeleton. Our results show that the proposed HMI does not interfere with speaking or visual exploration and that it can be used to control an extra virtual arm independently from the biological ones or in coordination with them. Participants showed significant improvements in performance with daily training and retention of learning, with no further improvements when artificial haptic feedback was provided. As a final proof of concept, naïve and experienced participants used a simplified version of the HMI to control a wearable XRA. Our analysis indicates how the presented HMI can be effectively used to control XRAs. The observation that experienced users achieved a success rate 22.2% higher than that of naïve users, combined with the result that naïve users showed average success rates of 74% when they first engaged with the system, endorses the viability of both the virtual reality-based testing and training and the proposed pipeline.

Experimental Evaluation of a Hybrid Sensory Feedback System for Haptic and Kinaesthetic Perception in Hand Prostheses

This study proposes a new hybrid multi-modal sensory feedback system for prosthetic hands that can provide not only haptic and proprioceptive feedback but also facilitate object recognition without the aid of vision. Modality-matched haptic perception was provided using a mechanotactile feedback system that can proportionally apply the gripping force through the use of a force controller. A vibrotactile feedback system was also employed to distinguish four discrete grip positions of the prosthetic hand. The system performance was evaluated with a total of 32 participants in three different experiments (i) haptic feedback, (ii) proprioceptive feedback and (iii) object recognition with hybrid haptic-proprioceptive feedback. The results from the haptic feedback experiment showed that the participants' ability to accurately perceive applied force depended on the amount of force applied. As the feedback force was increased, the participants tended to underestimate the force levels, with a decrease in the percentage of force estimation. Of the three arm locations (forearm volar, forearm ventral and bicep), and two muscle states (relaxed and tensed) tested, the highest accuracy was obtained for the bicep location in the relaxed state. The results from the proprioceptive feedback experiment showed that participants could very accurately identify four different grip positions of the hand prosthesis (i.e., open hand, wide grip, narrow grip, and closed hand) without a single case of misidentification. In experiment 3, participants could identify objects with different shapes and stiffness with an overall high success rate of 90.5% across all combinations of location and muscle state. The feedback location and muscle state did not have a significant effect on object recognition accuracy. Overall, our study results indicate that the hybrid feedback system may be a very effective way to enrich a prosthetic hand user's experience of the stiffness and shape of commonly manipulated objects.

Automated Quantifiable Assessments of Sensorimotor Function Using an Instrumented Fragile Object

Accurate assessment of hand dexterity plays a critical role in informing rehabilitation and care of upper-limb hemiparetic stroke patients. Common upper-limb assessments, such as the Box and Blocks Test and Nine Hole Peg Test, primarily evaluate gross motor function in terms of speed. These assessments neglect an individual's ability to finely regulate grip force, which is critical in activities of daily living, such as manipulating fragile objects. Here we present the Electronic Grip Gauge (EGG), an instrumented fragile object that assesses both gross and fine motor function. Embedded with a load cell, accelerometer, and Hall-effect sensor, the EGG measures grip force, acceleration, and relative position (via magnetic fields) in real time. The EGG can emit an audible "break" sound when the applied grip force exceeds a threshold. The number of breaks, transfer duration, and applied forces are automatically logged in real-time. Using the EGG, we evaluated sensorimotor function in implicit grasping and gentle grasping for the non-paretic and paretic hands of 3 hemiparetic stroke patients. For all participants, the paretic hand took longer to transfer the EGG during implicit grasping. For 2 of 3 participants, grip forces were significantly greater for the paretic hand during gentle grasping. Differences in implicit grasping forces were unique to each participant. This work constitutes an important step towards more widespread and quantitative measures of sensorimotor function, which may ultimately lead to improved personalized rehabilitation and better patient outcomes.

A Wearable Device for Hand Sensorimotor Rehabilitation Through Augmented Sensory Feedback

The loss of sensitivity of the upper limb due to central or peripheral neurological injuries severely limits the ability to manipulate objects, hindering personal independence. Non-invasive augmented sensory feedback techniques are used to promote neural plasticity hence to restore the grasping function. We devised a wearable device for hand sensorimotor rehabilitation capable of reliably detect transient tactile events based on custom piezoelectric polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF) sensors and deliver discrete bursts of vibrations upon these events. We integrated the sensors into a fabric glove and tested the device in a pilot bench test exploring its ability to detect object contact and release as well as object slippage. Due to their broad bandwidth, the sensors proved to be suitable for both the applications: they responded with clear peaks when touching or releasing the object and increased the high-frequency content of the signal during slippage.

Nonlinear Mapping From EMG to Prosthesis Closing Velocity Improves Force Control With EMG Biofeedback

When using EMG biofeedback to control the grasping force of a myoelectric prosthesis, subjects need to activate their muscles and maintain the myoelectric signal within an appropriate interval. However, their performance decreases for higher forces, because the myoelectric signal is more variable for stronger contractions. Therefore, the present study proposes to implement EMG biofeedback using nonlinear mapping, in which EMG intervals of increasing size are mapped to equal-sized intervals of the prosthesis velocity. To validate this approach, 20 non-disabled subjects performed force-matching tasks using Michelangelo prosthesis with and without EMG biofeedback with linear and nonlinear mapping. Additionally, four transradial amputees performed a functional task in the same feedback and mapping conditions. The success rate in producing desired force was significantly higher with feedback (65.4±15.9%) compared to no feedback (46.2±14.9%) as well as when using nonlinear (62.4±16.8%) versus linear mapping (49.2±17.2%). Overall, in non-disabled subjects, the highest success rate was obtained when EMG biofeedback was combined with nonlinear mapping (72%), and the opposite for linear mapping with no feedback (39.6%). The same trend was registered also in four amputee subjects. Therefore, EMG biofeedback improved prosthesis force control, especially when combined with nonlinear mapping, which showed to be an effective approach to counteract increasing variability of myoelectric signal for stronger contractions.

A hierarchical sensorimotor control framework for human-in-the-loop robotic hands

Human manual dexterity relies critically on touch. Robotic and prosthetic hands are much less dexterous and make little use of the many tactile sensors available. We propose a framework modeled on the hierarchical sensorimotor controllers of the nervous system to link sensing to action in human-in-the-loop, haptically enabled, artificial hands.

Temporal and spatial characteristics of bone conduction as non-invasive haptic sensory feedback for upper-limb prosthesis

Bone conduction is a promising haptic feedback modality for upper-limb prosthesis users, however, its potential and characteristics as a non-invasive feedback modality have not been thoroughly investigated. This study aimed to establish the temporal and spatial characteristics of non-invasive bone conduction as a sensory feedback interface for upper-limb prostheses. Psychometric human-subject experiments were conducted on three bony landmarks of the elbow, with a vibrotactile transducer affixed to each to provide the stimulus. The study characterized the temporal domain by testing perception threshold and resolution in amplitude and frequency. The spatial domain was evaluated by assessing the ability of subjects to detect the number of simultaneous active stimulation sites. The experiment was conducted with ten able-bodied subjects and compared to two subjects with trans-radial amputation. The psychometric evaluation of the proposed non-invasive bone conduction feedback showed results comparable to invasive methods. The experimental results demonstrated similar amplitude and frequency resolution of the interface for all three stimulation sites for both able-bodied subjects and subjects with trans-radial amputation, highlighting its potential as a non-invasive feedback modality for upper-limb prostheses.

Should bionic limb control mimic the human body? Impact of control strategy on bionic hand skill learning

A longstanding engineering ambition has been to design anthropomorphic bionic limbs: devices that look like and are controlled in the same way as the biological body (biomimetic). The untested assumption is that biomimetic motor control enhances device embodiment, learning, generalization, and automaticity. To test this, we compared biomimetic and non-biomimetic control strategies for able-bodied participants when learning to operate a wearable myoelectric bionic hand. We compared motor learning across days and behavioural tasks for two training groups: Biomimetic (mimicking the desired bionic hand gesture with biological hand) and Arbitrary control (mapping an unrelated biological hand gesture with the desired bionic gesture). For both trained groups, training improved bionic limb control, reduced cognitive reliance, and increased embodiment over the bionic hand. Biomimetic users had more intuitive and faster control early in training. Arbitrary users matched biomimetic performance later in training. Further, arbitrary users showed increased generalization to a novel control strategy. Collectively, our findings suggest that biomimetic and arbitrary control strategies provide different benefits. The optimal strategy is likely not strictly biomimetic, but rather a flexible strategy within the biomimetic to arbitrary spectrum, depending on the user, available training opportunities and user requirements.

Neural evidence for functional roles of tactile and visual feedback in the application of myoelectric prosthesis

Objective. The primary purpose of this study was to investigate the electrophysiological mechanism underlying different modalities of sensory feedback and multi-sensory integration in typical prosthesis control tasks.Approach. We recruited 15 subjects and developed a closed-loop setup for three prosthesis control tasks which covered typical activities in the practical prosthesis application, i.e. prosthesis finger position control (PFPC), equivalent grasping force control (GFC) and box and block control (BABC). All the three tasks were conducted under tactile feedback (TF), visual feedback (VF) and tactile-visual feedback (TVF), respectively, with a simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG) recording to assess the electroencephalogram (EEG) response underlying different types of feedback. Behavioral and psychophysical assessments were also administered in each feedback condition.Results. EEG results showed that VF played a predominant role in GFC and BABC tasks. It was reflected by a significantly lower somatosensory alpha event-related desynchronization (ERD) in TVF than in TF and no significant difference in visual alpha ERD between TVF and VF. In PFPC task, there was no significant difference in somatosensory alpha ERD between TF and TVF, while a significantly lower visual alpha ERD was found in TVF than in VF, indicating that TF was essential in situations related to proprioceptive position perception. Tactile-visual integration was found when TF and VF were congruently implemented, showing an obvious activation over the premotor cortex in the three tasks. Behavioral and psychophysical results were consistent with EEG evaluations.Significance. Our findings could provide neural evidence for multi-sensory integration and functional roles of tactile and VF in a practical setting of prosthesis control, shedding a multi-dimensional insight into the functional mechanisms of sensory feedback.

Haptic shared control improves neural efficiency during myoelectric prosthesis use

Clinical myoelectric prostheses lack the sensory feedback and sufficient dexterity required to complete activities of daily living efficiently and accurately. Providing haptic feedback of relevant environmental cues to the user or imbuing the prosthesis with autonomous control authority have been separately shown to improve prosthesis utility. Few studies, however, have investigated the effect of combining these two approaches in a shared control paradigm, and none have evaluated such an approach from the perspective of neural efficiency (the relationship between task performance and mental effort measured directly from the brain). In this work, we analyzed the neural efficiency of 30 non-amputee participants in a grasp-and-lift task of a brittle object. Here, a myoelectric prosthesis featuring vibrotactile feedback of grip force and autonomous control of grasping was compared with a standard myoelectric prosthesis with and without vibrotactile feedback. As a measure of mental effort, we captured the prefrontal cortex activity changes using functional near infrared spectroscopy during the experiment. It was expected that the prosthesis with haptic shared control would improve both task performance and mental effort compared to the standard prosthesis. Results showed that only the haptic shared control system enabled users to achieve high neural efficiency, and that vibrotactile feedback was important for grasping with the appropriate grip force. These results indicate that the haptic shared control system synergistically combines the benefits of haptic feedback and autonomous controllers, and is well-poised to inform such hybrid advancements in myoelectric prosthesis technology.

Object stiffness recognition and vibratory feedback without ad-hoc sensing on the Hannes prosthesis: A machine learning approach

Introduction

In recent years, hand prostheses achieved relevant improvements in term of both motor and functional recovery. However, the rate of devices abandonment, also due to their poor embodiment, is still high. The embodiment defines the integration of an external object - in this case a prosthetic device - into the body scheme of an individual. One of the limiting factors causing lack of embodiment is the absence of a direct interaction between user and environment. Many studies focused on the extraction of tactile information via custom electronic skin technologies coupled with dedicated haptic feedback, though increasing the complexity of the prosthetic system. Contrary wise, this paper stems from the authors' preliminary works on multi-body prosthetic hand modeling and the identification of possible intrinsic information to assess object stiffness during interaction.

Methods

Based on these initial findings, this work presents the design, implementation and clinical validation of a novel real-time stiffness detection strategy, without ad-hoc sensing, based on a Non-linear Logistic Regression (NLR) classifier. This exploits the minimum grasp information available from an under-sensorized and under-actuated myoelectric prosthetic hand, Hannes. The NLR algorithm takes as input motor-side current, encoder position, and reference position of the hand and provides as output a classification of the grasped object (no-object, rigid object, and soft object). This information is then transmitted to the user via vibratory feedback to close the loop between user control and prosthesis interaction. This implementation was validated through a user study conducted both on able bodied subjects and amputees.

Results

The classifier achieved excellent performance in terms of F1Score (94.93%). Further, the able-bodied subjects and amputees were able to successfully detect the objects' stiffness with a F1Score of 94.08% and 86.41%, respectively, by using our proposed feedback strategy. This strategy allowed amputees to quickly recognize the objects' stiffness (response time of 2.82 s), indicating high intuitiveness, and it was overall appreciated as demonstrated by the questionnaire. Furthermore, an embodiment improvement was also obtained as highlighted by the proprioceptive drift toward the prosthesis (0.7 cm).

Opinions on noninvasive sensory feedback of upper limb prosthetic users

BACKGROUND

Restoring touch perception for individuals with upper extremity limb loss is an ambitious task. It is important to understand how persons with upper limb loss think this would be best achieved.

METHODS

An anonymous online survey was developed to obtain data from prosthetic users. Participants ranked the perceived acceptability and effectiveness of noninvasive sensory feedback to areas of intact sensation not typically involved in sensory feedback (i.e., the arm). The focus was on 4 main types of haptic information-object contact, proprioception, surface texture, and grasp force-as well as how best to convey those senses with various stimuli. The users were asked to grade themselves in certain tasks and then analyze which tasks would be improved with sensory feedback. Associations were explored between demographic characteristics and interest in sensory feedback.

RESULTS

Nationally, prostheses providers sent more than 2000 email invitations to the online survey and received 142 unique responses. Responses indicated interest in sensory feedback through prosthetic limbs by individuals with upper limb loss. The most popular pairing of haptic information with sensory substitution was grasp force paired with gentle vibration. Tasks that most persons taking the survey agreed would benefit from sensory feedback were zipping a jacket, tying shoes, buttoning a shirt, and using a cup. No difference was observed in interest between sex and employment status, but a significant decrease (P = .004) was seen in interest among participants with more years of prosthetic use.

DISCUSSION

The results from this national survey of upper extremity prosthetic users can be used to help guide the development of noninvasive sensory feedback options.

FeetBack–Redirecting touch sensation from a prosthetic hand to the human foot

Introduction

Adding sensory feedback to myoelectric prosthetic hands was shown to enhance the user experience in terms of controllability and device embodiment. Often this is realized non-invasively by adding devices, such as actuators or electrodes, within the prosthetic shaft to deliver the desired feedback. However, adding a feedback system in the socket adds more weight, steals valuable space, and may interfere with myoelectric signals. To circumvent said drawbacks we tested for the first time if force feedback from a prosthetic hand could be redirected to another similarly sensitive part of the body: the foot.

Methods

We developed a vibrotactile insole that vibrates depending on the sensed force on the prosthetic fingers. This self-controlled clinical pilot trial included four experienced users of myoelectric prostheses. The participants solved two types of tasks with the artificial hands: 1) sorting objects depending on their plasticity with the feedback insole but without audio-visual feedback, and 2) manipulating fragile, heavy, and delicate objects with and without the feedback insole. The sorting task was evaluated with Goodman-Kruskal's gamma for ranked correlation. The manipulation tasks were assessed by the success rate.

Results

The results from the sorting task with vibrotactile feedback showed a substantial positive effect. The success rates for manipulation tasks with fragile and heavy objects were high under both conditions (feedback on or off, respectively). The manipulation task with delicate objects revealed inferior success with feedback in three of four participants.

Conclusion

We introduced a novel approach to touch sensation in myoelectric prostheses. The results for the sorting task and the manipulation tasks diverged. This is likely linked to the availability of various feedback sources. Our results for redirected feedback to the feet fall in line with previous similar studies that applied feedback to the residual arm.

Clinical trial registration

Name: Sensor Glove and Non-Invasive Vibrotactile Feedback Insole to Improve Hand Prostheses Functions and Embodiment (FeetBack). Date of registration: 23 April 2019. Date the first participant was enrolled: 3 September 2021. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03924310.

Artificial referred sensation in upper and lower limb prosthesis users: a systematic review

Objective.Electrical stimulation can induce sensation in the phantom limb of individuals with amputation. It is difficult to generalize existing findings as there are many approaches to delivering stimulation and to assessing the characteristics and benefits of sensation. Therefore, the goal of this systematic review was to explore the stimulation parameters that effectively elicited referred sensation, the qualities of elicited sensation, and how the utility of referred sensation was assessed.Approach.We searched PubMed, Web of Science, and Engineering Village through January of 2022 to identify relevant papers. We included papers which electrically induced referred sensation in individuals with limb loss and excluded papers that did not contain stimulation parameters or outcome measures pertaining to stimulation. We extracted information on participant demographics, stimulation approaches, and participant outcomes.Main results.After applying exclusion criteria, 49 papers were included covering nine stimulation methods. Amplitude was the most commonly adjusted parameter (n= 25), followed by frequency (n= 22), and pulse width (n= 15). Of the 63 reports of sensation quality, most reported feelings of pressure (n= 52), paresthesia (n= 48), or vibration (n= 40) while less than half (n= 29) reported a sense of position or movement. Most papers evaluated the functional benefits of sensation (n= 33) using force matching or object identification tasks, while fewer papers quantified subjective measures (n= 16) such as pain or embodiment. Only 15 studies (36%) observed percept intensity, quality, or location over multiple sessions.Significance.Most studies that measured functional performance demonstrated some benefit to providing participants with sensory feedback. However, few studies could experimentally manipulate sensation location or quality. Direct comparisons between studies were limited by variability in methodologies and outcome measures. As such, we offer recommendations to aid in more standardized reporting for future research.

Combined spatial and frequency encoding for electrotactile feedback of myoelectric signals

Electrotactile stimulation has been commonly used in human–machine interfaces to provide feedback to the user, thereby closing the control loop and improving performance. The encoding approach, which defines the mapping of the feedback information into stimulation profiles, is a critical component of an electrotactile interface. Ideally, the encoding will provide a high-fidelity representation of the feedback variable while being easy to perceive and interpret by the subject. In the present study, we performed a closed-loop experiment wherein discrete and continuous coding schemes are combined to exploit the benefits of both techniques. Subjects performed a muscle activation-matching task relying solely on electrotactile feedback representing the generated myoelectric signal (EMG). In particular, we investigated the performance of two different coding schemes (spatial and spatial combined with frequency) at two feedback resolutions (low: 3 and high: 5 intervals). In both schemes, the stimulation electrodes were placed circumferentially around the upper arm. The magnitude of the normalized EMG was divided into intervals, and each electrode was associated with one interval. When the generated EMG entered one of the intervals, the associated electrode started stimulating. In the combined encoding, the additional frequency modulation of the active electrode also indicated the momentary magnitude of the signal within the interval. The results showed that combined coding decreased the undershooting rate, variability and absolute deviation when the resolution was low but not when the resolution was high, where it actually worsened the performance. This demonstrates that combined coding can improve the effectiveness of EMG feedback, but that this effect is limited by the intrinsic variability of myoelectric control. Our findings, therefore, provide important insights as well as elucidate limitations of the information encoding methods when using electrotactile stimulation to convey a feedback signal characterized by high variability (EMG biofeedback).

Virtual/Augmented Reality for Rehabilitation Applications Using Electromyography as Control/Biofeedback: Systematic Literature Review

Virtual reality (VR) and augmented reality (AR) are engaging interfaces that can be of benefit for rehabilitation therapy. However, they are still not widely used, and the use of surface electromyography (sEMG) signals is not established for them. Our goal is to explore whether there is a standardized protocol towards therapeutic applications since there are not many methodological reviews that focus on sEMG control/feedback. A systematic literature review using the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) methodology is conducted. A Boolean search in databases was performed applying inclusion/exclusion criteria; articles older than 5 years and repeated were excluded. A total of 393 articles were selected for screening, of which 66.15% were excluded, 131 records were eligible, 69.46% use neither VR/AR interfaces nor sEMG control; 40 articles remained. Categories are, application: neurological motor rehabilitation (70%), prosthesis training (30%); processing algorithm: artificial intelligence (40%), direct control (20%); hardware: Myo Armband (22.5%), Delsys (10%), proprietary (17.5%); VR/AR interface: training scene model (25%), videogame (47.5%), first-person (20%). Finally, applications are focused on motor neurorehabilitation after stroke/amputation; however, there is no consensus regarding signal processing or classification criteria. Future work should deal with proposing guidelines to standardize these technologies for their adoption in clinical practice.

Sensory substitution of elbow proprioception to improve myoelectric control of upper limb prosthesis: experiment on healthy subjects and amputees

BACKGROUND

Current myoelectric prostheses lack proprioceptive information and rely on vision for their control. Sensory substitution is increasingly developed with non-invasive vibrotactile or electrotactile feedback, but most systems are designed for grasping or object discriminations, and few were tested for online control in amputees. The objective of this work was evaluate the effect of a novel vibrotactile feedback on the accuracy of myoelectric control of a virtual elbow by healthy subjects and participants with an upper-limb amputation at humeral level.

METHODS

Sixteen, healthy participants and 7 transhumeral amputees performed myoelectric control of a virtual arm under different feedback conditions: vision alone (VIS), vibration alone (VIB), vision plus vibration (VIS + VIB), or no feedback at all (NO). Reach accuracy was evaluated by angular errors during discrete as well as back and forth movements. Healthy participants' workloads were assessed with the NASA-TLX questionnaire, and feedback conditions were ranked according to preference at the end of the experiment.

RESULTS

Reach errors were higher in NO than in VIB, indicating that our vibrotactile feedback improved performance as compared to no feedback. Conditions VIS and VIS+VIB display similar levels of performance and produced lower errors than in VIB. Vision remains therefore critical to maintain good performance, which is not ameliorated nor deteriorated by the addition of vibrotactile feedback. The workload associated with VIB was higher than for VIS and VIS+VIB, which did not differ from each other. 62.5% of healthy subjects preferred the VIS+VIB condition, and ranked VIS and VIB second and third, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Our novel vibrotactile feedback improved myoelectric control of a virtual elbow as compared to no feedback. Although vision remained critical, the addition of vibrotactile feedback did not improve nor deteriorate the control and was preferred by participants. Longer training should improve performances with VIB alone and reduce the need of vision for close-loop prosthesis control.

Preliminary Evaluation of the Effect of Mechanotactile Feedback Location on Myoelectric Prosthesis Performance Using a Sensorized Prosthetic Hand

A commonly cited reason for the high abandonment rate of myoelectric prostheses is a lack of grip force sensory feedback. Researchers have attempted to restore grip force sensory feedback by stimulating the residual limb’s skin surface in response to the prosthetic hand’s measured grip force. Recent work has focused on restoring natural feedback to the missing digits directly through invasive surgical procedures. However, the functional benefit of utilizing somatotopically matching feedback has not been evaluated. In this paper, we propose an experimental protocol centered on a fragile object grasp and lift task using a sensorized myoelectric prosthesis to evaluate sensory feedback techniques. We formalized a suite of outcome measures related to task success, timing, and strategy. A pilot study (n = 3) evaluating the effect of utilizing a somatotopically accurate feedback stimulation location in able-bodied participants was conducted to evaluate the feasibility of the standardized platform, and to inform future studies on the role of feedback stimulation location in prosthesis use. Large between-participant effect sizes were observed in all outcome measures, indicating that the feedback location likely plays a role in myoelectric prosthesis performance. The success rate decreased, and task timing and task focus metrics increased, when using somatotopically-matched feedback compared to non-somatotopically-matched feedback. These results were used to conduct a power analysis, revealing that a sample size of n = 8 would be sufficient to achieve significance in all outcome measures.

Psychophysical Evaluation of Proprioceptive Feedback Through a Probe Sliding on the Forearm Skin of Healthy Humans

We have tested the forearm skin of humans as a target organ to deliver proprioceptive feedback via a tactile sensory substitution method. In the proposed method, a contactor probe was actuated by a linear servo motor and moved on the skin in proximo-distal axis depending on the angle of a virtual joint moving on a 180° arc. Twenty healthy subjects were tested to stop the joint at a given target under no-feedback, visual feedback, and tactile (dorsal and volar) feedback conditions. The absolute difference between the target and the response angle was recorded. Tests were repeated 4 times with ~ 1-week intervals. Two joint movement speeds were tested. The subjects performed best with visual feedback, and worst if no feedback was provided. Their performances with tactile feedback were not as good as in the visual feedback condition, but better than in the no-feedback condition. Subjects equally performed with volar and dorsal tactile feedback. The movement speed had no significant effects on tactile feedback. The performance improved with training only in tactile feedback conditions. The proprioceptive information from a motorized prosthesis can be provided through probes moving on the forearm skin, while the efficacy of the feedback may improve with extensive training.

Electrotactile feedback improves grip force control and enables object stiffness recognition while using a myoelectric hand

Current myoelectric hands are limited in their ability to provide effective sensory feedback to the users, which highly affects their functionality and utility. Although the sensory information of a myoelectric hand can be acquired with equipped sensors, transforming the sensory signals into effective tactile sensations on users for functional tasks is a largely unsolved challenge. The purpose of this study aims to demonstrate that electrotactile feedback of the grip force improves the sensorimotor control of a myoelectric hand and enables object stiffness recognition. The grip force of a sensorized myoelectric hand was delivered to its users via electrotactile stimulation based on four kinds of typical encoding strategies, including graded (G), linear amplitude (LA), linear frequency (LF), and biomimetic (B) modulation. Object stiffness was encoded with the change of electrotactile sensations triggered by final grip force, as the prosthesis grasped the objects. Ten able-bodied subjects and two transradial amputees were recruited to participate in a dual-task virtual eggs test (VET) and an object stiffness discrimination test (OSDT) to quantify the prosthesis users' ability to handle fragile objects and recognize object stiffnesses, respectively. The quantified results showed that with electrotactile feedback enabled, the four kinds of encoding strategies allowed subjects to better able to handle fragile objects with similar performance, and the subjects were able to differentiate four levels of object stiffness at favorable accuracies (>86%) and high manual efficiency. Strategy LA presented the best stiffness discrimination performance, while strategy B was able to reduce the discrimination time but the discrimination accuracy was not better than the other three strategies. Electrotactile feedback also enhanced prosthesis embodiment and improved the users' confidence in prosthetic control. Outcomes indicate electrotactile feedback can be effectively exploited by the prosthesis users for grip force control and object stiffness recognition, proving the feasibility of functional sensory restoration of myoelectric prostheses equipped with electrotactile feedback.

A Haptic Sleeve as a Method of Mechanotactile Feedback Restoration for Myoelectric Hand Prosthesis Users

Current myoelectric upper limb prostheses do not restore sensory feedback, impairing fine motor control. Mechanotactile feedback restoration with a haptic sleeve may rectify this problem. This randomised crossover within-participant controlled study aimed to assess a prototype haptic sleeve's effect on routine grasping tasks performed by eight able-bodied participants. Each participant completed 15 repetitions of the three tasks: Task 1—normal grasp, Task 2—strong grasp and Task 3—weak grasp, using visual, haptic, or combined feedback All data were collected in April 2021 in the Scottish Microelectronics Centre, Edinburgh, UK. Combined feedback correlated with significantly higher grasp success rates compared to the vision alone in Task 1 (p < 0.0001), Task 2 (p = 0.0057), and Task 3 (p = 0.0170). Similarly, haptic feedback was associated with significantly higher grasp success rates compared to vision in Task 1 (p < 0.0001) and Task 2 (p = 0.0015). Combined feedback correlated with significantly lower energy expenditure compared to visual feedback in Task 1 (p < 0.0001) and Task 3 (p = 0.0003). Likewise, haptic feedback was associated with significantly lower energy expenditure compared to the visual feedback in Task 1 (p < 0.0001), Task 2 (p < 0.0001), and Task 3 (p < 0.0001). These results suggest that mechanotactile feedback provided by the haptic sleeve effectively augments grasping and reduces its energy expenditure.

Multisensory Integration in Bionics: Relevance and Perspectives

Purpose of review

The goal of the review is to highlight the growing importance of multisensory integration processes connected to bionic limbs and somatosensory feedback restoration.

Recent findings

Restoring quasi-realistic sensations by means of neurostimulation has been shown to provide functional and motor benefits in limb amputees. In the recent past, cognitive processes linked to the artificial sense of touch seemed to play a crucial role for a full prosthesis integration and acceptance.

Summary

Artificial sensory feedback implemented in bionic limbs enhances the cognitive integration of the prosthetic device in amputees. The multisensory experience can be measured and must be considered in the design of novel somatosensory neural prostheses where the goal is to provide a realistic sensory experience to the prosthetic user. The correct integration of these sensory signals will guarantee higher-level cognitive benefits as a better prosthesis embodiment and a reduction of perceived limb distortions.

The science and engineering behind sensitized brain-controlled bionic hands

Advances in our understanding of brain function, along with the development of neural interfaces that allow for the monitoring and activation of neurons, have paved the way for brain-machine interfaces (BMIs), which harness neural signals to reanimate the limbs via electrical activation of the muscles or to control extracorporeal devices, thereby bypassing the muscles and senses altogether. BMIs consist of reading out motor intent from the neuronal responses monitored in motor regions of the brain and executing intended movements with bionic limbs, reanimated limbs, or exoskeletons. BMIs also allow for the restoration of the sense of touch by electrically activating neurons in somatosensory regions of the brain, thereby evoking vivid tactile sensations and conveying feedback about object interactions. In this review, we discuss the neural mechanisms of motor control and somatosensation in able-bodied individuals and describe approaches to use neuronal responses as control signals for movement restoration and to activate residual sensory pathways to restore touch. Although the focus of the review is on intracortical approaches, we also describe alternative signal sources for control and noninvasive strategies for sensory restoration.

Sensory Feedback for Upper-Limb Prostheses: Opportunities and Barriers

The addition of sensory feedback to upper-limb prostheses has been shown to improve control, increase embodiment, and reduce phantom limb pain. However, most commercial prostheses do not incorporate sensory feedback due to several factors. This paper focuses on the major challenges of a lack of deep understanding of user needs, the unavailability of tailored, realistic outcome measures and the segregation between research on control and sensory feedback. The use of methods such as the Person-Based Approach and co-creation can improve the design and testing process. Stronger collaboration between researchers can integrate different prostheses research areas to accelerate the translation process.

Alpha-band activity in parietofrontal cortex predicts future availability of vibrotactile feedback in prosthesis use

Prosthesis disuse and abandonment is an ongoing issue in upper-limb amputation. In addition to lost structural and motor function, amputation also results in decreased task-specific sensory information. One proposed remedy is augmenting somatosensory information using vibrotactile feedback to provide tactile feedback of grasping objects. While the role of frontal and parietal areas in motor tasks is well established, the neural and kinematic effects of this augmented vibrotactile feedback remain in question. In this study, we sought to understand the neurobehavioral effects of providing augmented feedback during a reach-grasp-transport task. Ten persons with sound limbs performed a motor task while wearing a prosthesis simulator with and without vibrotactile feedback. We hypothesized that providing vibrotactile feedback during prosthesis use would increase activity in frontal and parietal areas and improve grasp-related behavior. Results show that anticipation of upcoming vibrotactile feedback may be encoded in motor and parietal areas during the reach-to-grasp phase of the task. While grasp aperture is unaffected by vibrotactile feedback, the availability of vibrotactile feedback does lead to a reduction in velocity during object transport. These results help shed light on how engineered feedback is utilized by prostheses users and provide methodologies for further assessment in advanced prosthetics research.

Towards optimizing the non-invasive sensory feedback interfaces in a neural prosthetic control

Objective. The somatotopic interface (SI) and non-somatotopic interface (NI) are commonly used to provide non-invasive sensory feedback. Nevertheless, differences between SI and NI are rarely reported, and objective evaluations of the corresponding brain response are missing as well. Few studies have reported how to design the stimulation encoding based on the two interfaces. The objective of this study was to investigate the difference in sensory characteristics between SI and NI, and propose an optimal encoding method for non-invasive feedback interfaces. Approach. We recruited seven amputees and compared the tactile sensitivity to stimulated positions and intensities between SI (phantom finger area) and NI (upper arm) in a tactile discrimination task. Electroencephalography (EEG) evaluation task was subsequently conducted to objectively evaluate the stimulus-evoked brain response. Finally, the two kinds of tactile information (stimulated position and intensity) was applied to an object recognition task. Specifically, the object size was reflected by the prosthetic finger position through stimulated position encoding, and the object stiffness was reflected by the contact force of prosthetic fingers through stimulated intensity encoding. We compared the performance under four feedback conditions (combinations between two kinds of tactile information and two interfaces). Results. Behavioral results showed that NI was more sensitive to position information while SI was more sensitive to intensity information. EEG results were consistent with behavioral results, showing a higher sensitivity of sensory alpha ERD for NI in the position discrimination, while the trend was opposite in the intensity discrimination. The feedback encoding allowed amputees to discriminate the size and stiffness of nine objects with the best performance of 62% overall accuracy (84% for size discrimination, 71% for stiffness discrimination) when position and intensity information was delivered on the NI and SI, respectively. Signicance. Our results provided an instructive strategy for sensory feedback via non-invasive solutions.

Biorealistic Control of Hand Prosthesis Augments Functional Performance of Individuals With Amputation

The human hand has compliant properties arising from muscle biomechanics and neural reflexes, which are absent in conventional prosthetic hands. We recently proved the feasibility to restore neuromuscular reflex control (NRC) to prosthetic hands using real-time computing neuromorphic chips. Here we show that restored NRC augments the ability of individuals with forearm amputation to complete grasping tasks, including standard Box and Blocks Test (BBT), Golf Balls Test (GBT), and Potato Chips Test (PCT). The latter two were more challenging, but novel to prosthesis tests. Performance of a biorealistic controller (BC) with restored NRC was compared to that of a proportional linear feedback (PLF) controller. Eleven individuals with forearm amputation were divided into two groups: one with experience of myocontrol of a prosthetic hand and another without any. Controller performances were evaluated by success rate, failure (drop/break) rate in each grasping task. In controller property tests, biorealistic control achieved a better compliant property with a 23.2% wider range of stiffness adjustment than that of PLF control. In functional grasping tests, participants could control prosthetic hands more rapidly and steadily with neuromuscular reflex. For participants with myocontrol experience, biorealistic control yielded 20.4, 39.4, and 195.2% improvements in BBT, GBT, and PCT, respectively, compared to PLF control. Interestingly, greater improvements were achieved by participants without any myocontrol experience for BBT, GBT, and PCT at 27.4, 48.9, and 344.3%, respectively. The functional gain of biorealistic control over conventional control was more dramatic in more difficult grasp tasks of GBT and PCT, demonstrating the advantage of NRC. Results support the hypothesis that restoring neuromuscular reflex in hand prosthesis can improve neural motor compatibility to human sensorimotor system, hence enabling individuals with amputation to perform delicate grasps that are not tested with conventional prosthetic hands.

Conceptualization of a Sensory Feedback System in an Anthropomorphic Replacement Hand

(1) Background: This paper presents a conceptual design for an anthropomorphic replacement hand made of silicone that integrates a sensory feedback system. In combination with a motorized orthosis, it allows performing movements and registering information on the flexion and the pressure of the fingers. (2) Methods: To create the replacement hand, a three-dimensional (3D) scanner was used to scan the hand of the test person. With computer-aided design (CAD), a mold was created from the hand, then 3D-printed. Bending and force sensors were attached to the mold before silicone casting to implement the sensory feedback system. To achieve a functional and anthropomorphic appearance of the replacement hand, a material analysis was carried out. In two different test series, the properties of the used silicones were analyzed regarding their mechanical properties and the manufacturing process. (3) Results: Individual fingers and an entire hand with integrated sensors were realized, which demonstrated in several tests that sensory feedback in such an anthropomorphic replacement hand can be realized. Nevertheless, the choice of silicone material remains an open challenge, as there is a trade-off between the hardness of the material and the maximum mechanical force of the orthosis. (4) Conclusion: Apart from manufacturing-related issues, it is possible to cost-effectively create a personalized, anthropomorphic replacement hand, including sensory feedback, by using 3D scanning and 3D printing techniques.

Closed-loop control of a prosthetic finger via evoked proprioceptive information

Objective.Proprioceptive information plays an important role for recognizing and coordinating our limb's static and dynamic states relative to our body or the environment. In this study, we determined how artificially evoked proprioceptive feedback affected the continuous control of a prosthetic finger.Approach.We elicited proprioceptive information regarding the joint static position and dynamic movement of a prosthetic finger via a vibrotactor array placed around the subject's upper arm. Myoelectric signals of the finger flexor and extensor muscles were used to control the prosthesis, with or without the evoked proprioceptive feedback. Two control modes were evaluated: the myoelectric signal amplitudes were continuously mapped to either the position or the velocity of the prosthetic joint.Main results.Our results showed that the evoked proprioceptive information improved the control accuracy of the joint angle, with comparable performance in the position- and velocity-control conditions. However, greater angle variability was prominent during position-control than velocity-control. Without the proprioceptive feedback, the position-control tended to show a smaller angle error than the velocity-control condition.Significance.Our findings suggest that closed-loop control of a prosthetic device can potentially be achieved using non-invasive evoked proprioceptive feedback delivered to intact participants. Moreover, the evoked sensory information was integrated during myoelectric control effectively for both control strategies. The outcomes can facilitate our understanding of the sensorimotor integration process during human-machine interactions, which can potentially promote fine control of prosthetic hands.

The impact of objective functions on control policies in closed-loop control of grasping force with a myoelectric prosthesis

Objective.Supplemental sensory feedback for myoelectric prostheses can provide both psychosocial and functional benefits during prosthesis control. However, the impact of feedback depends on multiple factors and there is insufficient understanding about the fundamental role of such feedback in prosthesis use. The framework of human motor control enables us to systematically investigate the user-prosthesis control loop. In this study, we explore how different task objectives such as speed and accuracy shape the control policy developed by participants in a prosthesis force-matching task.Approach.Participants were randomly assigned to two groups that both used identical electromyography control interface and prosthesis force feedback, through vibrotactile stimulation, to perform a prosthesis force-matching task. However, the groups received different task objectives specifying speed and accuracy demands. We then investigated the control policies developed by the participants. To this end, we not only evaluated how successful or fast participants were but also analyzed the behavioral strategies adopted by the participants to obtain such performance gains.Main results.First, we observed that participants successfully integrated supplemental prosthesis force feedback to develop both feedforward and feedback control policies, as demanded by the task objectives. We then observed that participants who first developed a (slow) feedback policy were quickly able to adapt their policy to more stringent speed demands, by switching to a combined feedforward-feedback control strategy. However, the participants who first developed a (fast) feedforward policy were not able to change their control policy and adjust to greater accuracy demands.Significance.Overall, the results signify how the framework of human motor control can be applied to study the role of feedback in user-prosthesis interaction. The results also reveal the utility of training prosthesis users to integrate supplemental feedback into their state estimation by designing training protocols that encourage the development of combined feedforward and feedback policy.

Getting a Grip on the Impact of Incidental Feedback From Body-Powered and Myoelectric Prostheses

Sensory feedback from body-powered and myoelectric prostheses are limited, but in different ways. Currently, there are no empirical studies on how incidental feedback differs between body-powered and myoelectric prostheses, or how these differences impact grasping. Thus, the purpose of this study was to quantify differences in grasping performance between body-powered and myoelectric prosthesis users when presented with different forms of feedback. Nine adults with upper limb loss and nine without (acting as controls) completed two tasks in a virtual environment. In the first task, participants used visual, vibration, or force feedback to assist in matching target grasp apertures. In the second task, participants used either visual or force feedback to identify the stiffness of a virtual object. Participants using either prosthesis type improved their accuracy and reduced their variability compared to the no feedback condition when provided with any form of feedback (p < 0.001). However, participants using body-powered prostheses were significantly more accurate and less variable at matching grasp apertures than those using myoelectric prostheses across all feedback conditions. When identifying stiffness, body-powered prosthesis users were more accurate using force feedback (64% compared to myoelectric users' 39%) while myoelectric users were more accurate using visual feedback (65% compared to body-powered users' 53%). This study supports previous findings that body-powered prosthesis users receive limited force and proprioceptive feedback, while myoelectric prosthesis users receive almost no force or proprioceptive feedback from their device. This work can inform future supplemental feedback that enhances rather than reproduces existing incidental feedback.

Testing silicone digit extensions as a way to suppress natural sensation to evaluate supplementary tactile feedback

Dexterous use of the hands depends critically on sensory feedback, so it is generally agreed that functional supplementary feedback would greatly improve the use of hand prostheses. Much research still focuses on improving non-invasive feedback that could potentially become available to all prosthesis users. However, few studies on supplementary tactile feedback for hand prostheses demonstrated a functional benefit. We suggest that confounding factors impede accurate assessment of feedback, e.g., testing non-amputee participants that inevitably focus intently on learning EMG control, the EMG’s susceptibility to noise and delays, and the limited dexterity of hand prostheses. In an attempt to assess the effect of feedback free from these constraints, we used silicone digit extensions to suppress natural tactile feedback from the fingertips and thus used the tactile feedback-deprived human hand as an approximation of an ideal feed-forward tool. Our non-amputee participants wore the extensions and performed a simple pick-and-lift task with known weight, followed by a more difficult pick-and-lift task with changing weight. They then repeated these tasks with one of three kinds of audio feedback. The tests were repeated over three days. We also conducted a similar experiment on a person with severe sensory neuropathy to test the feedback without the extensions. Furthermore, we used a questionnaire based on the NASA Task Load Index to gauge the subjective experience. Unexpectedly, we did not find any meaningful differences between the feedback groups, neither in the objective nor the subjective measurements. It is possible that the digit extensions did not fully suppress sensation, but since the participant with impaired sensation also did not improve with the supplementary feedback, we conclude that the feedback failed to provide relevant grasping information in our experiments. The study highlights the complex interaction between task, feedback variable, feedback delivery, and control, which seemingly rendered even rich, high-bandwidth acoustic feedback redundant, despite substantial sensory impairment.

A soft neuroprosthetic hand providing simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback

Neuroprosthetic hands are typically heavy (over 400 g) and expensive (more than US$10,000), and lack the compliance and tactile feedback of human hands. Here, we report the design, fabrication and performance of a soft, low-cost and lightweight (292 g) neuroprosthetic hand that provides simultaneous myoelectric control and tactile feedback. The neuroprosthesis has six active degrees of freedom under pneumatic actuation, can be controlled through the input from four electromyography sensors that measure surface signals from residual forearm muscles, and integrates five elastomeric capacitive sensors on the fingertips to measure touch pressure so as to enable tactile feedback by eliciting electrical stimulation on the skin of the residual limb. In a set of standardized tests performed by two individuals with transradial amputations, we show that the soft neuroprosthetic hand outperforms a conventional rigid neuroprosthetic hand in speed and dexterity. We also show that one individual with a transradial amputation wearing the soft neuroprosthetic hand can regain primitive touch sensation and real-time closed-loop control.

Feasibility of generating 90 Hz vibrations in remote implanted magnets

Limb amputation not only reduces the motor abilities of an individual, but also destroys afferent channels that convey essential sensory information to the brain. Significant efforts have been made in the area of upper limb prosthetics to restore sensory feedback, through the stimulation of residual sensory elements. Most of the past research focused on the replacement of tactile functions. On the other hand, the difficulties in eliciting proprioceptive sensations using either haptic or (neural) electrical stimulation, has limited researchers to rely on sensory substitution. Here we propose the myokinetic stimulation interface, that aims at restoring natural proprioceptive sensations by exploiting the so-called tendon illusion, elicited through the vibration of magnets implanted inside residual muscles. We present a prototype which exploits 12 electromagnetic coils to vibrate up to four magnets implanted in a forearm mockup. The results demonstrated that it is possible to generate highly directional and frequency-selective vibrations. The system proved capable of activating a single magnet, out of many. Hence, this interface constitutes a promising approach to restore naturally perceived proprioception after an amputation. Indeed, by implanting several magnets in independent muscles, it would be possible to restore proprioceptive sensations perceived as coming from single digits.

Neurophysiology of slip sensation and grip reaction: insights for hand prosthesis control of slippage

Sensory feedback is pivotal for a proficient dexterity of the hand. By modulating the grip force in function of the quick and not completely predictable change of the load force, grabbed objects are prevented to slip from the hand. Slippage control is an enabling achievement to all manipulation abilities. However, in hand prosthetics, the performance of even the most innovative research solutions proposed so far to control slippage remain distant from the human physiology. Indeed, slippage control involves parallel and compensatory activation of multiple mechanoceptors, spinal and supraspinal reflexes, and higher-order voluntary behavioral adjustments. In this work, we reviewed the literature on physiological correlates of slippage to propose a three-phases model for the slip sensation and reaction. Furthermore, we discuss the main strategies employed so far in the research studies that tried to restore slippage control in amputees. In the light of the proposed three-phase slippage model and from the weaknesses of already implemented solutions, we proposed several physiology-inspired solutions for slippage control to be implemented in the future hand prostheses. Understanding the physiological basis of slip detection and perception and implementing them in novel hand feedback system would make prosthesis manipulation more efficient and would boost its perceived naturalness, fostering the sense of agency for the hand movements.

Grasping Embodiment: Haptic Feedback for Artificial Limbs

Upper-limb prostheses are subject to high rates of abandonment. Prosthesis abandonment is related to a reduced sense of embodiment, the sense of self-location, agency, and ownership that humans feel in relation to their bodies and body parts. If a prosthesis does not evoke a sense of embodiment, users are less likely to view them as useful and integrated with their bodies. Currently, visual feedback is the only option for most prosthesis users to account for their augmented activities. However, for activities of daily living, such as grasping actions, haptic feedback is critically important and may improve sense of embodiment. Therefore, we are investigating how converting natural haptic feedback from the prosthetic fingertips into vibrotactile feedback administered to another location on the body may allow participants to experience haptic feedback and if and how this experience affects embodiment. While we found no differences between our experimental manipulations of feedback type, we found evidence that embodiment was not negatively impacted when switching from natural feedback to proximal vibrotactile feedback. Proximal vibrotactile feedback should be further studied and considered when designing prostheses.

A compact system for simultaneous stimulation and recording for closed-loop myoelectric control

Background

Despite important advancements in control and mechatronics of myoelectric prostheses, the communication between the user and his/her bionic limb is still unidirectional, as these systems do not provide somatosensory feedback. Electrotactile stimulation is an attractive technology to close the control loop since it allows flexible modulation of multiple parameters and compact interface design via multi-pad electrodes. However, the stimulation interferes with the recording of myoelectric signals and this can be detrimental to control.

Methods

We present a novel compact solution for simultaneous recording and stimulation through dynamic blanking of stimulation artefacts. To test the system, a feedback coding scheme communicating wrist rotation and hand aperture was developed specifically to stress the myoelectric control while still providing meaningful information to the subjects. Ten subjects participated in an experiment, where the quality of closed-loop myoelectric control was assessed by controlling a cursor in a two degrees of freedom target-reaching task. The benchmark performance with visual feedback was compared to that achieved by combining visual feedback and electrotactile stimulation as well as by using electrotactile feedback only.

Results

There was no significant difference in performance between visual and combined feedback condition with regards to successfully reached targets, time to reach a target, path efficiency and the number of overshoots. Therefore, the quality of myoelectric control was preserved in spite of the stimulation. As expected, the tactile condition was significantly poorer in completion rate (100/4% and 78/25% for combined and tactile condition, respectively) and time to reach a target (9/2 s and 13/4 s for combined and tactile condition, respectively). However, the performance in the tactile condition was still good, with no significant difference in path efficiency (38/8%) and the number of overshoots (0.5/0.4 overshoots), indicating that the stimulation was meaningful for the subjects and useful for closed-loop control.

Conclusions

Overall, the results demonstrated that the developed system can provide robust closed-loop control using electrotactile stimulation. The system supports different encoding schemes and allows placing the recording and stimulation electrodes next to each other. This is an important step towards an integrated solution where the developed unit will be embedded into a prosthetic socket.

Activities of daily living with bionic arm improved by combination training and latching filter in prosthesis control comparison

BACKGROUND

Advanced prostheses can restore function and improve quality of life for individuals with amputations. Unfortunately, most commercial control strategies do not fully utilize the rich control information from residual nerves and musculature. Continuous decoders can provide more intuitive prosthesis control using multi-channel neural or electromyographic recordings. Three components influence continuous decoder performance: the data used to train the algorithm, the algorithm, and smoothing filters on the algorithm's output. Individual groups often focus on a single decoder, so very few studies compare different decoders using otherwise similar experimental conditions.

METHODS

We completed a two-phase, head-to-head comparison of 12 continuous decoders using activities of daily living. In phase one, we compared two training types and a smoothing filter with three algorithms (modified Kalman filter, multi-layer perceptron, and convolutional neural network) in a clothespin relocation task. We compared training types that included only individual digit and wrist movements vs. combination movements (e.g., simultaneous grasp and wrist flexion). We also compared raw vs. nonlinearly smoothed algorithm outputs. In phase two, we compared the three algorithms in fragile egg, zipping, pouring, and folding tasks using the combination training and smoothing found beneficial in phase one. In both phases, we collected objective, performance-based (e.g., success rate), and subjective, user-focused (e.g., preference) measures.

RESULTS

Phase one showed that combination training improved prosthesis control accuracy and speed, and that the nonlinear smoothing improved accuracy but generally reduced speed. Phase one importantly showed simultaneous movements were used in the task, and that the modified Kalman filter and multi-layer perceptron predicted more simultaneous movements than the convolutional neural network. In phase two, user-focused metrics favored the convolutional neural network and modified Kalman filter, whereas performance-based metrics were generally similar among all algorithms.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that state-of-the-art algorithms, whether linear or nonlinear in nature, functionally benefit from training on more complex data and from output smoothing. These studies will be used to select a decoder for a long-term take-home trial with implanted neuromyoelectric devices. Overall, clinical considerations may favor the mKF as it is similar in performance, faster to train, and computationally less expensive than neural networks.

Online Closed-Loop Control Using Tactile Feedback Delivered Through Surface and Subdermal Electrotactile Stimulation

Aim

Limb loss is a dramatic event with a devastating impact on a person’s quality of life. Prostheses have been used to restore lost motor abilities and cosmetic appearance. Closing the loop between the prosthesis and the amputee by providing somatosensory feedback to the user might improve the performance, confidence of the amputee, and embodiment of the prosthesis. Recently, a minimally invasive method, in which the electrodes are placed subdermally, was presented and psychometrically evaluated. The present study aimed to assess the quality of online control with subdermal stimulation and compare it to that achieved using surface stimulation (common benchmark) as well as to investigate the impact of training on the two modalities.

Methods

Ten able-bodied subjects performed a PC-based compensatory tracking task. The subjects employed a joystick to track a predefined pseudorandom trajectory using feedback on the momentary tracking error, which was conveyed via surface and subdermal electrotactile stimulation. The tracking performance was evaluated using the correlation coefficient (CORR), root mean square error (RMSE), and time delay between reference and generated trajectories.

Results

Both stimulation modalities resulted in good closed-loop control, and surface stimulation outperformed the subdermal approach. There was significant difference in CORR (86 vs 77%) and RMSE (0.23 vs 0.31) between surface and subdermal stimulation (all p < 0.05). The RMSE of the subdermal stimulation decreased significantly in the first few trials.

Conclusion

Subdermal stimulation is a viable method to provide tactile feedback. The quality of online control is, however, somewhat worse compared to that achieved using surface stimulation. Nevertheless, due to minimal invasiveness, compactness, and power efficiency, the subdermal interface could be an attractive solution for the functional application in sensate prostheses.

A cutaneous mechanoneural interface for neuroprosthetic feedback

Amputation destroys sensory end organs and does not provide an anatomical interface for cutaneous neuroprosthetic feedback. Here, we report the design and a biomechanical and electrophysiological evaluation of the cutaneous mechanoneural interface consisting of an afferent neural system that comprises a muscle actuator coupled to a natively pedicled skin flap in a cuff-like architecture. Muscle is actuated through electrical stimulation to induce strains or oscillatory vibrations on the skin flap that are proportional to a desired contact duration or contact pressure. In rat hindlimbs, the mechanoneural interface elicited native dermal mechanotransducers to generate at least four levels of graded contact and eight distinct vibratory afferents that were not significantly different from analogous mechanical stimulation of intact skin. The application of different patterns of electrical stimulation independently engaged slowly adapting and rapidly adapting mechanotransducers, and recreated an array of cutaneous sensations. The cutaneous mechanoneural interface can be integrated with current prosthetic technologies for tactile feedback.