Wearable Sensors Quantify Mobility in People With Lower Limb Amputation During Daily Life

Understanding the influence of context on real-world walking energetics

Speeds that minimize energetic cost during steady-state walking have been observed during lab-based investigations of walking biomechanics and energetics. However, in real-world scenarios, humans walk in a variety of contexts that can elicit different walking strategies, and may not always prioritize minimizing energetic cost. To investigate whether individuals tend to select energetically optimal speeds in real-world situations and how contextual factors influence gait, we conducted a study combining data from lab and real-world experiments. Walking kinematics and context were measured during daily life over a week (N=17) using wearable sensors and a mobile phone. To determine context, we utilized self-reported activity logs, GPS data and follow-up exit interviews. Additionally, we estimated energetic cost using respirometry over a range of gait speeds in the lab. Gross and net cost of transport were calculated for each participant, and were used to identify energetically optimal walking speed ranges for each participant. The proportion of real-world steady-state stride speeds within these ranges (gross and net) were identified for all data and for each context. We found that energetically optimal speeds predicted by gross cost of transport were more predictive of walking speeds used during daily life than speeds that would minimize net cost of transport. On average, 82.2% of all steady-state stride speeds were energetically optimal for gross cost of transport for all contexts and participants, while only 45.6% were energetically optimal for net cost of transport. These results suggest that while energetic cost is a factor considered by humans when selecting gait speed in daily life, it is not the sole determining factor. Context contributes to the observed variability in movement parameters both within and between individuals.

Validation of Proprietary and Novel Step-counting Algorithms for Individuals Ambulating With a Lower Limb Prosthesis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy and reliability of 10 different accelerometer-based step-counting algorithms for individuals with lower limb loss, accounting for different clinical characteristics and real-world activities.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

General community setting (ie, institutional research laboratory and community free-living).

PARTICIPANTS

Forty-eight individuals with a lower limb amputation (N=48) wore an ActiGraph (AG) wGT3x-BT accelerometer proximal to the foot of their prosthetic limb during labeled indoor/outdoor activities and community free-living.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), absolute and root mean square error (RMSE), and Bland Altman plots were used to compare true (manual) step counts to estimated step counts from the proprietary AG Default algorithm and low frequency extension filter, as well as from 8 novel algorithms based on continuous wavelet transforms, fast Fourier transforms (FFTs), and peak detection.

RESULTS

All algorithms had excellent agreement with manual step counts (ICC>0.9). The AG Default and FFT algorithms had the highest overall error (RMSE=17.81 and 19.91 steps, respectively), widest limits of agreement, and highest error during outdoor and ramp ambulation. The AG Default algorithm also had among the highest error during indoor ambulation and stairs, while a FFT algorithm had the highest error during stationary tasks. Peak detection algorithms, especially those using pre-set parameters with a trial-specific component, had among the lowest error across all activities (RMSE=4.07-8.99 steps).

CONCLUSIONS

Because of its simplicity and accuracy across activities and clinical characteristics, we recommend the peak detection algorithm with set parameters to count steps using a prosthetic-worn AG among individuals with lower limb loss for clinical and research applications.

Classification of human walking context using a single-point accelerometer

Real-world walking data offers rich insights into a person's mobility. Yet, daily life variations can alter these patterns, making the data challenging to interpret. As such, it is essential to integrate context for the extraction of meaningful information from real-world movement data. In this work, we leveraged the relationship between the characteristics of a walking bout and context to build a classification algorithm to distinguish between indoor and outdoor walks. We used data from 20 participants wearing an accelerometer on the thigh over a week. Their walking bouts were isolated and labeled using GPS and self-reporting data. We trained and validated two machine learning models, random forest and ensemble Support Vector Machine, using a leave-one-participant-out validation scheme on 15 subjects. The 5 remaining subjects were used as a testing set to choose a final model. The chosen model achieved an accuracy of 0.941, an F1-score of 0.963, and an AUROC of 0.931. This validated model was then used to label the walks from a different dataset with 15 participants wearing the same accelerometer. Finally, we characterized the differences between indoor and outdoor walks using the ensemble of the data. We found that participants walked significantly faster, longer, and more continuously when walking outdoors compared to indoors. These results demonstrate how movement data alone can be used to obtain accurate information on important contextual factors. These factors can then be leveraged to enhance our understanding and interpretation of real-world movement data, providing deeper insights into a person's health.

AI in Rehabilitation Medicine: Opportunities and Challenges

Artificial intelligence (AI) tools are increasingly able to learn from larger and more complex data, thus allowing clinicians and scientists to gain new insights from the information they collect about their patients every day. In rehabilitation medicine, AI can be used to find patterns in huge amounts of healthcare data. These patterns can then be leveraged at the individual level, to design personalized care strategies and interventions to optimize each patient's outcomes. However, building effective AI tools requires many careful considerations about how we collect and handle data, how we train the models, and how we interpret results. In this perspective, we discuss some of the current opportunities and challenges for AI in rehabilitation. We first review recent trends in AI for the screening, diagnosis, treatment, and continuous monitoring of disease or injury, with a special focus on the different types of healthcare data used for these applications. We then examine potential barriers to designing and integrating AI into the clinical workflow, and we propose an end-to-end framework to address these barriers and guide the development of effective AI for rehabilitation. Finally, we present ideas for future work to pave the way for AI implementation in real-world rehabilitation practices.

Human-in-the-Loop Adaptive Control of a Soft Exo-Suit With Actuator Dynamics and Ankle Impedance Adaptation

Soft exo-suit could facilitate walking assistance activities (such as level walking, upslope, and downslope) for unimpaired individuals. In this article, a novel human-in-the-loop adaptive control scheme is presented for a soft exo-suit, which provides ankle plantarflexion assistance with unknown human-exosuit dynamic model parameters. First, the human-exosuit coupled dynamic model is formulated to express the mathematical relationship between the exo-suit actuation system and the human ankle joint. Then, a gait detection approach, including plantarflexion assistance timing and planning, is proposed. Inspired by the control strategy that is used by the human central nervous system (CNS) to handle interaction tasks, a human-in-the-loop adaptive controller is proposed to adapt the unknown exo-suit actuator dynamics and human ankle impedance. The proposed controller can emulate human CNS behaviors which adapt feedforward force and environment impedance in interaction tasks. The resulting adaptation of actuator dynamics and ankle impedance is demonstrated with five unimpaired subjects and implemented on a developed soft exo-suit. The human-like adaptivity is performed by the exo-suit in several human walking speeds and illustrates the promising potential of the novel controller.

Challenges and advances in the use of wearable sensors for lower extremity biomechanics

The use of wearable sensors for the collection of lower extremity biomechanical data is increasing in popularity, in part due to the ease of collecting data and the ability to capture movement outside of traditional biomechanics laboratories. Consequently, an increasing number of researchers are facing the challenges that come with utilizing the data captured by wearable sensors. These challenges include identifying/calculating meaningful measures from unfamiliar data types (measures of acceleration and angular velocity instead of positions and joint angles), defining sensor-to-segment alignments for calculating traditional biomechanics metrics, using reduced sensor sets and machine learning to predict unmeasured signals, making decisions about when and how to make algorithms freely available, and developing or replicating methods to perform basic processing tasks such as recognizing activities of interest or identifying gait events. In this perspective article, we present our own approaches to common challenges in lower extremity biomechanics research using wearable sensors and share our perspectives on approaching several of these challenges. We present these perspectives with examples that come mostly from gait research, but many of the concepts also apply to other contexts where researchers may use wearable sensors. Our goal is to introduce common challenges to new users of wearable sensors, and to promote dialogue amongst experienced users towards best practices.

Lower Extremity Inverse Kinematics Results Differ Between Inertial Measurement Unit- and Marker-Derived Gait Data

In-lab, marker-based gait analyses may not represent real-world gait. Real-world gait analyses may be feasible using inertial measurement units (IMUs) in combination with open-source data processing pipelines (OpenSense). Before using OpenSense to study real-world gait, we must determine whether these methods estimate joint kinematics similarly to traditional marker-based motion capture (MoCap) and differentiate groups with clinically different gait mechanics. Healthy young and older adults and older adults with knee osteoarthritis completed this study. We captured MoCap and IMU data during overground walking at 2 speeds. MoCap and IMU kinematics were computed with OpenSim workflows. We tested whether sagittal kinematics differed between MoCap and IMU, whether tools detected between-group differences similarly, and whether kinematics differed between tools by speed. MoCap showed more anterior pelvic tilt (0%-100% stride) and joint flexion than IMU (hip: 0%-38% and 61%-100% stride; knee: 0%-38%, 58%-89%, and 95%-99% stride; and ankle: 6%-99% stride). There were no significant tool-by-group interactions. We found significant tool-by-speed interactions for all angles. While MoCap- and IMU-derived kinematics differed, the lack of tool-by-group interactions suggests consistent tracking across clinical cohorts. Results of the current study suggest that IMU-derived kinematics with OpenSense may enable reliable evaluation of gait in real-world settings.

Application of robotic lower limb orthosis for people with lower limb dysfunction

Due to the aging of the population or diseases, the number of patients with lower limb disorders has increased, causing social concern. Scholars have designed and developed advanced robotic lower limb orthoses, which can guide patients to perform reasonable rehabilitation training with correct limb postures, enhance their daily life participation and quality of life, and help them recover quickly. In recent years, a large number of new and advanced orthopedic equipment have been developed, which require a systematic summary analysis and comparison. This article reviewed typical newly developed, robotic lower limb orthoses and their use effects, as well as the advanced theories and technologies for their applications, and systematically discussed the problems in the research, design, testing, use, and popularization of robotic lower limb orthoses, and predicted their development direction in the future research and design, to enhance the reliability, convenience, and protection functions of orthotic equipment, make its functions closer to life, and give full play to the initiative of patients in the process of rehabilitation training, and reduce costs. Robotic lower limb orthoses is poised for even greater success and development in the future.

Classifying Changes in Amputee Gait following Physiotherapy Using Machine Learning and Continuous Inertial Sensor Signals

Wearable sensors allow for the objective analysis of gait and motion both in and outside the clinical setting. However, it remains a challenge to apply such systems to highly diverse patient populations, including individuals with lower-limb amputations (LLA) that present with unique gait deviations and rehabilitation goals. This paper presents the development of a novel method using continuous gyroscope data from a single inertial sensor for person-specific classification of gait changes from a physiotherapist-led gait training session. Gyroscope data at the thigh were collected using a wearable gait analysis system for five LLA before, during, and after completing a gait training session. Data from able-bodied participants receiving no intervention were also collected. Models using dynamic time warping (DTW) and Euclidean distance in combination with the nearest neighbor classifier were applied to the gyroscope data to classify the pre- and post-training gait. The model achieved an accuracy of 98.65% ± 0.69 (Euclidean) and 98.98% ± 0.83 (DTW) on pre-training and 95.45% ± 6.20 (Euclidean) and 94.18% ± 5.77 (DTW) on post-training data across the participants whose gait changed significantly during their session. This study provides preliminary evidence that continuous angular velocity data from a single gyroscope could be used to assess changes in amputee gait. This supports future research and the development of wearable gait analysis and feedback systems that are adaptable to a broad range of mobility impairments.

Beyond step counts: Including wear time in prosthesis use assessment for lower-limb amputation

Introduction

The purpose of this study was to test a novel activity monitor that tracks the time a prosthesis is worn, and the nature of the ambulatory activity conducted with the prosthesis. These capabilities allow prosthesis users' wear and accommodation practices (e.g., temporary doffing) to be monitored, and the intensity of their activities to be assessed.

Methods

A portable limb-socket motion sensing system was used to monitor doffs, walk bouts (≥5 steps), low locomotion (2-4 steps), stationary positions, and weight shifts in a group of transtibial prosthesis users. The relationship between doff time and active motion time was investigated, and durations of low and high intensity active motions were compared.

Results

For the 14 participants tested, the median prosthesis day duration ranged from 12.8-18.8 h. Eleven participants typically doffed five or fewer times per day, and three participants typically doffed 10 or more times per day. Nine participants demonstrated a positive correlation between daily doff duration and active motion duration. Six participants spent more time in weight shifts than walk bouts, while eight participants spent more time in walk bouts than weight shifts.

Conclusion

Capturing don time and temporary doffs and distinguishing weight shifts from walks may provide insight relevant to patient care. Longer-term monitoring studies should be conducted, and the clinical utility of the data evaluated.

A pilot case series for concurrent validation of inertial measurement units to motion capture in individuals who use unilateral lower-limb prostheses

Introduction

Inertial measurement units (IMUs) may be viable options to collect gait data in clinics. This study compared IMU to motion capture data in individuals who use unilateral lower-limb prostheses.

Methods

Participants walked with lower-body IMUs and reflective markers in a motion analysis space. Sagittal plane hip, knee, and ankle waveforms were extracted for the entire gait cycle. Discrete points of peak flexion, peak extension, and range of motion were extracted from the waveforms. Stance times were also extracted to assess the IMU software's accuracy at detecting gait events. IMU and motion capture-derived data were compared using absolute differences and root mean square error (RMSE).

Results

Five individuals (n = 3 transtibial; n = 2 transfemoral) participated. IMU prosthetic limb data was similar to motion capture (RMSE: waveform ≤4.65°; discrete point ≤9.04°; stance ≤0.03s). However, one transfemoral participant had larger differences at the microprocessor knee joint (RMSE: waveform ≤15.64°; discrete ≤29.21°) from IMU magnetometer interference. Intact limbs tended to have minimal differences between IMU and motion capture data (RMSE: waveform ≤6.33°; discrete ≤9.87°; stance ≤0.04s).

Conclusion

Findings from this pilot study suggest IMUs have the potential to collect data similar to motion capture systems in sagittal plane kinematics and stance time.

Investigating walking speed variability of young adults in the real world

BACKGROUND

Walking speed strongly correlates with health outcomes, making accurate assessment essential for clinical evaluations. However, assessments tend to be conducted over short distances, often in a laboratory or clinical setting, and may not capture natural walking behavior. To address this gap, the following questions are investigated in this work: Is walking speed significantly influenced by the continuity and duration of a walking bout? Can preferred walking speed be inferred by grouping walking bouts using duration and continuity?

METHODS

We collected two weeks of continuous data from fifteen healthy young adults using a thigh-worn accelerometer and a heart rate monitor. Walking strides were identified and grouped into walking periods. We quantified the duration and the continuity of each walking period. Continuity is used to parameterize changes in stepping rate related to pauses during a bout of walking. Finally, we analyzed the influence of duration and continuity on estimates of stride speed, and examined how the distribution of walking speed varies depending on different walking modes (defined by duration and continuity).

RESULTS

We found that continuity and duration can be used to explain some of the variability in real-world walking speed (p<0.001). Speeds estimated from long continuous walks with many strides (42% of all recorded strides) had the lowest standard deviation. Walking speed during these bouts was 1.41ms^-1 (SD = 0.26ms^-1).

SIGNIFICANCE

Walking behavior in the real world is largely variable. Features of real-world walks, like duration and continuity, can be used to explain some of the variability observed in walking speed. As such, we recommend using long continuous walks to confidently isolate the preferred walking behavior of an individual.

Residual and sound limb hip strength distinguish between sedentary and nonsedentary adults with transtibial amputation

Following a transtibial amputation (TTA), physical activity has known benefits for health and quality of life. Adults post-TTA, however, demonstrate reduced physical activity, predisposing them to adverse health outcomes. Identifying adults at the risk of sedentarism post-TTA via commonly used, objective clinical measures may enhance clinical decisions, including prosthesis prescription. The study's purpose was to determine whether residual and sound limb hip strength distinguishes between sedentary and nonsedentary adults post-TTA. A secondary analysis of a cross-sectional dataset (n = 44) was conducted. Participant residual and sound limb hip flexion, extension, abduction and adduction strength were assessed via handheld dynamometry. Physical activity was monitored for 7 days and participants were classified as sedentary (<5000 steps/day; n = 13) or nonsedentary (≥5000 steps/day; n = 31). Receiver operating curves revealed that residual and sound limb hip extension, abduction and adduction strength distinguished between sedentary and nonsedentary adults post-TTA (P < 0.050). Preliminary cut-points for hip strength measures to classify adults at the risk of sedentarism were determined. A hip strength composite score (0-6) estimates a 2.2× increased odds of being sedentary with each additional hip strength deficit. Post-TTA, residual and sound limb hip strength can help identify adults at risk of sedentarism to aid clinical decision making, including prosthesis prescription.

Reported Outcome Measures in Studies of Real-World Ambulation in People with a Lower Limb Amputation: A Scoping Review

BACKGROUND

The rapidly increasing use of wearable technology to monitor free-living ambulatory behavior demands to address to what extent the chosen outcome measures are representative for real-world situations. This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the purpose of use of wearable activity monitors in people with a Lower Limb Amputation (LLA) in the real world, to identify the reported outcome measures, and to evaluate to what extent the reported outcome measures capture essential information from real-world ambulation of people with LLA.

METHODS

The literature search included a search in three databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, and EMBASE) for articles published between January 1999 and January 2022, and a hand-search.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

98 articles met the inclusion criteria. According to the included studies' main objective, the articles were classified into observational (n = 46), interventional (n = 34), algorithm/method development (n = 12), and validity/feasibility studies (n = 6). Reported outcome measures were grouped into eight categories: step count (reported in 73% of the articles), intensity of activity/fitness (31%), type of activity/body posture (27%), commercial scores (15%), prosthetic use and fit (11%), gait quality (7%), GPS (5%), and accuracy (4%). We argue that researchers should be more careful with choosing reliable outcome measures, in particular, regarding the frequently used category step count. However, the contemporary technology is limited in providing a comprehensive picture of real-world ambulation. The novel knowledge from this review should encourage researchers and developers to engage in debating and defining the framework of ecological validity in rehabilitation sciences, and how this framework can be utilized in the development of wearable technologies and future studies of real-world ambulation in people with LLA.

Wearable inertial sensors for human movement analysis: a five-year update

INTRODUCTION

The aim of the present review is to track the evolution of wearable IMUs from their use in supervised laboratory- and ambulatory-based settings to their application for long-term monitoring of human movement in unsupervised naturalistic settings.

AREAS COVERED

Four main emerging areas of application were identified and synthesized, namely, mobile health solutions (specifically, for the assessment of frailty, risk of falls, chronic neurological diseases, and for the monitoring and promotion of active living), occupational ergonomics, rehabilitation and telerehabilitation, and cognitive assessment. Findings from recent scientific literature in each of these areas was synthesized from an applied and/or clinical perspective with the purpose of providing clinical researchers and practitioners with practical guidance on contemporary uses of inertial sensors in applied clinical settings.

EXPERT OPINION

IMU-based wearable devices have undergone a rapid transition from use in laboratory-based clinical practice to unsupervised, applied settings. Successful use of wearable inertial sensing for assessing mobility, motor performance and movement disorders in applied settings will rely also on machine learning algorithms for managing the vast amounts of data generated by these sensors for extracting information that is both clinically relevant and interpretable by practitioners.

The Contribution of Machine Learning in the Validation of Commercial Wearable Sensors for Gait Monitoring in Patients: A Systematic Review

Gait, balance, and coordination are important in the development of chronic disease, but the ability to accurately assess these in the daily lives of patients may be limited by traditional biased assessment tools. Wearable sensors offer the possibility of minimizing the main limitations of traditional assessment tools by generating quantitative data on a regular basis, which can greatly improve the home monitoring of patients. However, these commercial sensors must be validated in this context with rigorous validation methods. This scoping review summarizes the state-of-the-art between 2010 and 2020 in terms of the use of commercial wearable devices for gait monitoring in patients. For this specific period, 10 databases were searched and 564 records were retrieved from the associated search. This scoping review included 70 studies investigating one or more wearable sensors used to automatically track patient gait in the field. The majority of studies (95%) utilized accelerometers either by itself (N = 17 of 70) or embedded into a device (N = 57 of 70) and/or gyroscopes (51%) to automatically monitor gait via wearable sensors. All of the studies (N = 70) used one or more validation methods in which “ground truth” data were reported. Regarding the validation of wearable sensors, studies using machine learning have become more numerous since 2010, at 17% of included studies. This scoping review highlights the current state of the ability of commercial sensors to enhance traditional methods of gait assessment by passively monitoring gait in daily life, over long periods of time, and with minimal user interaction. Considering our review of the last 10 years in this field, machine learning approaches are algorithms to be considered for the future. These are in fact data-based approaches which, as long as the data collected are numerous, annotated, and representative, allow for the training of an effective model. In this context, commercial wearable sensors allowing for increased data collection and good patient adherence through efforts of miniaturization, energy consumption, and comfort will contribute to its future success.

Sparse Visual-Inertial Measurement Units Placement for Gait Kinematics Assessment

This study investigates the possibility of estimating lower-limb joint kinematics and meaningful performance indexes for physiotherapists, during gait on a treadmill based on data collected from a sparse placement of new Visual Inertial Measurement Units (VIMU) and the use of an Extended Kalman Filter (EKF). The proposed EKF takes advantage of the biomechanics of the human body and of the investigated task to reduce sensor inaccuracies. Two state-vector formulations, one based on the use of constant acceleration model and one based on Fourier series, and the tuning of their corresponding parameters were analyzed. The constant acceleration model, due to its inherent inconsistency for human motion, required a cumbersome optimisation process and needed the a-priori knowledge of reference joint trajectories for EKF parameters tuning. On the other hand, the Fourier series formulation could be used without a specific parameters tuning process. In both cases, the average root mean square difference and correlation coefficient between the estimated joint angles and those reconstructed with a reference stereophotogrammetric system was 3.5deg and 0.70, respectively. Moreover, the stride lengths were estimated with a normalized root mean square difference inferior to 2% when using the forward kinematics model receiving as input the estimated joint angles. The popular gait deviation index was also estimated and showed similar results very close to 100, using both the proposed method and the reference stereophotogrammetric system. Such consistency was obtained using only three wireless and affordable VIMU located at the pelvis and both heels and tracked using two affordable RGB cameras. Being further easy-to-use and suitable for applications taking place outside of the laboratory, the proposed method thus represents a good compromise between accurate reference stereophotogrammetric systems and markerless ones for which accuracy is still under debate.

The influence of powered prostheses on user perspectives, metabolics, and activity: a randomized crossover trial

BACKGROUND

Powered prosthetic ankles provide battery-powered mechanical push-off, with the aim of reducing the metabolic demands of walking for people with transtibial amputations. The efficacy of powered ankles has been shown in active, high functioning individuals with transtibial amputation, but is less clear in other populations. Additionally, it is unclear how use of a powered prosthesis influences everyday physical activity and mobility.

METHODS

Individuals with unilateral transtibial amputations participated in a randomized clinical trial comparing their prescribed, unpowered prosthesis and the BiOM powered prosthesis. Participants' metabolic costs and self-selected walking speeds were measured in the laboratory and daily step count, daily steps away from home, and walking speed were measured over two weeks of at-home prosthesis use. Participants also rated their perception of mobility and quality of life and provided free-form feedback. Dependent measures were compared between prostheses and the relationships between metabolic cost, perception of mobility, and characteristics of walking in daily life were explored using Pearson's correlations.

RESULTS

Twelve people were randomly allocated to the powered prosthesis first (n = 7) or unpowered prosthesis first (n = 5) and ten completed the full study. There were no differences in metabolic costs (p = 0.585), daily step count (p = 0.995), walking speed in-lab (p = 0.145) and in daily life (p = 0.226), or perception of mobility between prostheses (p ≥ 0.058). Changes varied across participants, however. There were several medium-sized effects for device comparisons. With the powered prosthesis, participants had increased self-reported ambulation (g = 0.682) and decreased frustration (g = 0.506).

CONCLUSIONS

There were no universal benefits of the powered prosthesis on function in the lab or home environment. However, the effects were subject-specific, with some reporting preference for power and improved mobility, and some increasing their activity and decreasing their metabolic effort. Additionally, self-reported preferences did not often correlate with objective measures of function. This highlights the need for future clinical research to include both perception and objective measures to better inform prosthetic prescription.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

https://clinicaltrials.gov , #NCT02828982. Registered 12 July 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02828982.