Toward Safe Wearer-Prosthesis Interaction: Evaluation of Gait Stability and Human Compensation Strategy Under Faults in Robotic Transfemoral Prostheses

Human factors considerations of Interaction between wearers and intelligent lower-limb prostheses: a prospective discussion

Compared to traditional lower-limb prostheses (LLPs), intelligent LLPs are more versatile devices with emerging technologies, such as microcontrollers and user-controlled interfaces (UCIs). As emerging technologies allow a higher level of automation and more involvement from wearers in the LLP setting adjustments, the previous framework established to study human factors elements that affect wearer-LLP interaction may not be sufficient to understand the new elements (e.g., transparency) and dynamics in this interaction. In addition, the increased complexity of interaction amplifies the limitations of the traditional evaluation approaches of wearer-LLP interaction. Therefore, to ensure wearer acceptance and adoption, from a human factors perspective, we propose a new framework to introduce elements and usability requirements for the wearer-LLP interaction. This paper organizes human factors elements that appear with the development of intelligent LLP technologies into three aspects: wearer, device, and task by using a classic model of the human-machine systems. By adopting Nielsen's five usability requirements, we introduce learnability, efficiency, memorability, use error, and satisfaction into the evaluation of wearer-LLP interaction. We identify two types of wearer-LLP interaction. The first type, direct interaction, occurs when the wearer continuously interacts with the intelligent LLP (primarily when the LLP is in action); the second type, indirect interaction, occurs when the wearer initiates communication with the LLP usually through a UCI to address the current or foreseeable challenges. For each type of interaction, we highlight new elements, such as device transparency and prior knowledge of the wearer with the UCI. In addition, we redefine the usability goals of two types of wearer-LLP interaction with Nelson's five usability requirements and review methods to evaluate the interaction. Researchers and designers for intelligent LLPs should consider the new device elements that may additionally influence wearers' acceptance and the need to interpret findings within the constraints of the specific wearer and task characteristics. The proposed framework can also be used to organize literature and identify gaps for future directions. By adopting the holistic usability requirements, findings across empirical studies can be more comparable. At the end of this paper, we discuss research trends and future directions in the human factors design of intelligent LLPs.

Investigating the Association of Quantitative Gait Stability Metrics With User Perception of Gait Interruption Due to Control Faults During Human-Prosthesis Interaction

This study aims to compare the association of different gait stability metrics with the prosthesis users' perception of their own gait stability. Lack of perceived confidence on the device functionality can influence the gait pattern, level of daily activities, and overall quality of life for individuals with lower limb motor deficits. However, the perception of gait stability is subjective and difficult to acquire online. The quantitative gait stability metrics can be objectively measured and monitored using wearable sensors; however, objective measurements of gait stability associated with human's perception of their own gait stability has rarely been reported. By identifying quantitative measurements that associate with users' perceptions, we can gain a more accurate and comprehensive understanding of an individual's perceived functional outcomes of assistive devices such as prostheses. To achieve our research goal, experiments were conducted to artificially apply internal disturbances in the powered prosthesis while the prosthetic users performed level ground walking. We monitored and compared multiple gait stability metrics and a local measurement to the users' reported perception of their own gait stability. The results showed that the center of pressure progression in the sagittal plane and knee momentum (i.e., residual thigh and prosthesis shank angular momentum about prosthetic knee joint) can potentially estimate the users' perceptions of gait stability when experiencing disturbances. The findings of this study can help improve the development and evaluation of gait stability control algorithms in robotic prosthetic devices.

A Review of Current State-of-the-Art Control Methods for Lower-Limb Powered Prostheses

Lower-limb prostheses aim to restore ambulatory function for individuals with lower-limb amputations. While the design of lower-limb prostheses is important, this paper focuses on the complementary challenge - the control of lower-limb prostheses. Specifically, we focus on powered prostheses, a subset of lower-limb prostheses, which utilize actuators to inject mechanical power into the walking gait of a human user. In this paper, we present a review of existing control strategies for lower-limb powered prostheses, including the control objectives, sensing capabilities, and control methodologies. We separate the various control methods into three main tiers of prosthesis control: high-level control for task and gait phase estimation, mid-level control for desired torque computation (both with and without the use of reference trajectories), and low-level control for enforcing the computed torque commands on the prosthesis. In particular, we focus on the high- and mid-level control approaches in this review. Additionally, we outline existing methods for customizing the prosthetic behavior for individual human users. Finally, we conclude with a discussion on future research directions for powered lower-limb prostheses based on the potential of current control methods and open problems in the field.