Assessment of Multienergy Interpixel Coincidence Counters (MEICC) for Charge Sharing Correction or Compensation for Photon Counting Detectors With Boxcar Signals

Framework for evaluating photon-counting detectors under pile-up conditions

Purpose

While X-ray photon-counting detectors (PCDs) promise to revolutionize medical imaging, theoretical frameworks to evaluate them are commonly limited to incident fluence rates sufficiently low that the detector response can be considered linear. However, typical clinical operating conditions lead to a significant level of pile-up, invalidating this assumption of a linear response. Here, we present a framework that aims to evaluate PCDs, taking into account their non-linear behavior.

Approach

We employ small-signal analysis to study the behavior of PCDs under pile-up conditions. The response is approximated as linear around a given operating point, determined by the incident spectrum and fluence rate. The detector response is subsequently described by the proposed perturbation point spread function (pPSF). We demonstrate this approach using Monte-Carlo simulations of idealized direct- and indirect-conversion PCDs.

Results

The pPSFs of two PCDs are calculated. It is then shown how the pPSF allows to determine the sensitivity of the detector signal to an arbitrary lesion. This example illustrates the detrimental influence of pile-up, which may cause non-intuitive effects such as contrast/contrast-to-noise ratio inversion or cancellation between/within energy bins.

Conclusions

The proposed framework permits quantifying the spectral and spatial performance of PCDs under clinically realistic conditions at a given operating point. The presented example illustrates why PCDs should not be analyzed assuming that they are linear systems. The framework can, for example, be used to guide the development of PCDs and PCD-based systems. Furthermore, it can be applied to adapt commonly used measures, such as the modulation transfer function, to non-linear PCDs.

Direct energy binning for photon counting detectors: Simulation study

BACKGROUND

Photon counting detectors (PCDs) for x-ray computed tomography (CT) face spectral distortion from pulse pileup and charge sharing. The photon counting scheme used by many PCDs is threshold-subtract (TS) with pulse height analysis (PHA), where each counter counts up-crossing events when pulses exceed an energy threshold. PCD data are not Poisson-distributed due to charge sharing and pulse pileup, but the counting statistics have never been studied yet.

PURPOSE

The objectives of this study were (1) to propose a modified photon counting scheme, direct energy binning (DB), that is expected to be robust against pulse pileup; (2) to assess the performance of DB compared to TS; and (3) to evaluate its counting statistics.

METHODS

With DB scheme, counter k starts a timer upon an up-crossing event of energy threshold k, and adds a count only if the next higher energy threshold (k+1) was not crossed within a short time window (hence, the pulse peak belongs to the energy bin k). We used Monte Carlo (MC) simulation and assessed count-rate curves and count-rate-dependent spectral imaging task performance for conventional CT imaging as well as water thickness estimation, water-bone material decomposition, and K-edge imaging with tungsten as the K-edge material. We also assessed count-rate-dependent measurement statistics such as expectation, variance, and covariance of total counts as well as energy bin outputs. The agreement with counting statistics models was also evaluated.

RESULTS

The DB scheme improved the count-rate curve, that is, mean measured counts as a function of input count-rate, and peaked with 59% higher count-rate capability than the TS scheme (3.5 × 108 counts per second (cps)/mm2 versus 2.3 × 108  cps/mm2 ). The Cramér-Rao lower bounds (CRLB) of the variance of basis line integrals estimation for DB was better than those for TS by 2% for the conventional CT imaging, 30% for water-bone material decomposition, and 32% for K-edge imaging at 1000 mA (at 7.3 × 107  cps/sub-pixel after charge sharing). When count-rates were lower, PCD data statistics were dominated by charge sharing: the variance of total counts and lower energy bins was larger than the mean counts; the covariance of bin data was positive and non-zero. When count-rates were higher, PCD data statistics were dominated by pulse pileup: the variance of data was lower than the mean; the covariance of bin data was negative. The transition between the two regimes occurred smoothly, and pulse pileup dominated the statistics ≥400 mA (when the count-rate after charge sharing was 2.9 × 107  cps/sub-pixel and the probability of count-loss for DB was 37%). Both DB and TS had good agreement with Yu-Fessler's models of total counts; however, DB had a better agreement with Wang's variance and covariance models for energy bin data than TS did.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed DB scheme had several advantages over TS. At low to moderate flux, DB could improve the resilience of PCDs to pulse pileup. Counting statistics deviated from the Poisson distribution due to charge sharing for lower count-rate conditions and pulse pileup for higher count-rate conditions.

Assessment of multi-energy inter-pixel coincidence counters for photon-counting detectors at the presence of charge sharing and pulse pileup: A simulation study

PURPOSE

Spectral distortion due to charge sharing (CS) and pulse pileup (PP) in photon-counting detectors (PCDs) degrades the quality of PCD data. We recently proposed multi-energy inter-pixel coincidence counters (MEICC) that provided spectral cross-talk information related to CS. When PP was absent, the normalized Cramér-Rao lower bounds (nCRLBs) of 225-µm pixel PCDs with MEICC was comparable to those of 450-µm pixel PCD without MEICC. The aim of this study was to assess the performance of PCDs with MEICC in the presence of both CS and PP using computer simulations.

METHODS

An in-house Monte Carlo program was modified to incorporate the following four temporal elements: (1) A pulse shape with a pulse duration of 20 ns, (2) delays of up to 10 ns in anode arrival times when photons were incident on pixel boundaries, (3) offsets proportional to a vertical separation between the primary and secondary charge clouds at the rate of ±4 ns per ±100 µm, and (4) a stochastic fluctuation of anode arrival times for all of the charge clouds with a standard deviation of 2 ns. We assessed the performance of five PCDs, (a)-(f), for three spectral tasks, (A)-(C): (a) The conventional PCD, (b) a PCD with MEICC, (c) a PCD with one coincidence counter (1CC), (d) a PCD with a 3 × 3 analog charge summing scheme (ACS), and (e) a PCD with a 3 × 3 digital count summing scheme (DCS); (A) conventional CT imaging with water (i.e., linear attenuation coefficient maps), (B) water-bone material decomposition, and (C) K-edge imaging with tungsten. The tube current was changed from 1 mA to 1000 mA and the nCRLB was assessed.

RESULTS

The recorded count rate curves were fitted by the non-paralyzable detection model with the effective deadtime parameter. The best fit was achieved by 25.8 ns for the conventional PCD, 18.6 ns for MEICC and 1CC, 140.5 ns for ACS, and 209.0 ns for DCS. The nCRLBs were strongly dependent on count rates. MEICC provided the best nCRLBs for all of the imaging tasks over the count rate range investigated except for a few conditions such as K-edge imaging at 1 mA. PP decreased the merit of MEICC over the conventional PCD in addressing CS. Nonetheless, MEICC consistently provided better nCRLBs than the conventional PCD did. The nCRLBs of MEICC were in the range of 49-58% of those of the conventional PCD for K-edge imaging, 45-76% for water-bone material decomposition, and 81-88% for the conventional CT imaging (i.e., linear attenuation coefficient maps). ACS provided better nCRLBs than the conventional PCD did only when the effect of PP was minor (e.g., when the counting efficiency of the conventional PCD was higher than 0.95 with the tube current of up to 100 mA).

CONCLUSION

Besides a few cases, MEICC provides the best nCRLBs for all of the tasks at all of the count rates. ACS and DCS provide better nCRLBs than the conventional PCD does only when count rates are very low.

Improving digital charge sharing compensation in photon counting detectors with a low-threshold comparator

PURPOSE

Charge sharing is a major non-ideality in photon counting detectors (PCDs) and can increase variance in material decomposition images. Analog charge summing (ACS) is an effective mechanism for charge sharing compensation (CSC), but is complex to implement and may limit the maximum count rate of the PCD. Digital CSC mechanisms such as digital count summing (DCS) may be simpler to implement; however, earlier simulation studies suggest that digital CSC only provides half the benefit of ACS. We propose including an additional low-threshold comparator (LTC) underneath the noise floor of the PCD to improve the effectiveness of digital CSC.

METHODS

We simulated a PCD with four or eight equally spaced energy bins. X-ray photons arrived on the PCD following a Poisson distribution, and charge was allocated to PCD pixels following Monte Carlo techniques. Gaussian electronic noise was added with standard deviation of 2 keV and the signals were processed with four CSC schemes: no CSC, ACS, DCS, and DCS with LTC. The energy bins were placed from 25 to 100 keV at 25 keV intervals (for four bins) or from 25 to 112.5 keV at 12.5 keV intervals (for eight bins), and the LTC threshold was placed at 8 keV in both cases. The binned counts were transformed into estimates of water and iodine material thickness using a linear estimator that was fitted to the data. Our simulations were performed in the low-flux limit without any pileup, assuming a 120 kVp spectrum, 25 cm water object, and 0.3 mm PCD pixel size.

RESULTS

All CSC schemes decreased variance in basis material decomposition. In the four-bin PCD, the relative dose efficiencies (inverse of the variance) for iodine material decomposition were 1.0, 2.4, 3.2, and 4.3 for a PCD without CSC, DCS without LTC, DCS with LTC, and ACS, respectively. In the eight-bin PCD, the relative dose efficiencies were 1.1, 2.5, 3.1, and 4.8, respectively. In a sensitivity analysis, electronic noise had a stronger deleterious effect on ACS than DCS. In simulated visual images, DCS and ACS improved high frequency contrast in material decomposition images.

CONCLUSIONS

Introducing an LTC may reduce the performance differential between DCS and ACS. These findings have been derived from simulation studies only and have not been validated experimentally.

Spectral Photon Counting CT: Imaging Algorithms and Performance Assessment

Photon counting x-ray detectors (PCDs) with spectral capabilities have the potential to revolutionize computed tomography (CT) for medical imaging. The ideal PCD provides accurate energy information for each incident x-ray, and at high spatial resolution. This information enables material-specific imaging, enhanced radiation dose efficiency, and improved spatial resolution in CT images. In practice, PCDs are affected by non-idealities, including limited energy resolution, pulse pileup, and cross talk due to charge sharing, K-fluorescence, and Compton scattering. In order to maximize their performance, PCDs must be carefully designed to reduce these effects and then later account for them during correction and post-acquisition steps. This review article examines algorithms for using PCDs in spectral CT applications, including how non-idealities impact image quality. Performance assessment metrics that account for spatial resolution and noise such as the detective quantum efficiency (DQE) can be used to compare different PCD designs, as well as compare PCDs with conventional energy integrating detectors (EIDs). These methods play an important role in enhancing spectral CT images and assessing the overall performance of PCDs.