Thirty-two Japanese cases of infantile hemangiomas treated with oral propranolol

Intralesional steroid in the era of propranolol for infantile hemangioma-Do we need it?

INTRODUCTION

Despite its effectivity, there are reports of poor response to propranolol in the treatment of infantile hemangioma (IH). The literature is limited to the type of IH that fails to respond to propranolol. This study was conducted to analyze which types of hemangiomas respond poorly to propranolol and the effects of intralesional triamcinolone (IL TMC) in them.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this prospective cohort study, IH was classified as superficial, deep, and mixed. The clinical details were recorded. Propranolol was started in the patients at a dose of 1 mg/kg/day and increased to 2-3 mg/kg/day. The response to the treatment was evaluated as excellent, good, poor, and no response. IL TMC was given in the non-responding group at a dose of 1-2 mg/kg at one-month interval for a total of six doses after stopping propranolol.

RESULTS

Ninety-six patients (median age, 7 months; M/F = 2:1) were treated. Superficial hemangioma was present in 40 (41.7%), deep in 10 (10.4%), and mixed in 46 (47.9%) patients. The response was statistically better if initiated within four months of age. It was not influenced by the sex, number, site, or size. The response was statistically better in superficial hemangioma. IL TMC was administered in the 16 patients. The response was good or excellent in 10 patients.

CONCLUSION

Propranolol will be used as a first-line drug for IH. All superficial IHs are likely to respond. There will be a possibility of non-responding mixed or deep IH. Use of IL TMC seems reasonable for IH not responding to propranolol.

The Role of Systemic and Topical Beta-Blockers in Dermatology: A Systematic Review

INTRODUCTION

Beta-blockers are proven to be safe and cost-effective agents in treating multiple dermatological conditions, which is why they are considered as an interesting and good alternative therapeutic agent by dermatologists. To our knowledge, there has been no comprehensive systematic review to date summarizing the role of both systemic and topical beta-blockers in dermatology.

METHODS

In this systematic review, we aim to review recent and relevant published literature in order to provide a comprehensive evidence-based summary to inform dermatologists.

RESULTS

An electronic-based literature search was carried out during October-December 2021 in the databases PubMed (MEDLINE), SCOPUS (EMBASE), and Cochrane Library. Furthermore, bibliographic sources were also reviewed for the selected articles. We followed The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 (PRISMA) guidelines. We reviewed published literature about the role of beta-blockers in dermatology for the time period (January 2016 to December 2021).

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 126 publications were retrieved from different databases, of which 59 studies were finally included in our review after excluding non-eligible literature in accordance with our inclusion and exclusion criteria. The included articles consisted of meta-analyses, systematic reviews, clinical trials, retrospective and prospective cohort studies, case-control studies, case series, and case reports. In general, data in reviewed literature showed that both systemic and topical beta-blockers were reliable and safe therapeutic options in treating different dermatoses. Their effect has been studied as a mono-therapy, also as an adjuvant therapy combined with other current disease-specific therapeutic modalities such as lasers, radiation, chemotherapy, corticosteroids, or other beta-blockers options. Local and systemic adverse effects were mainly minor and non-significant.

Risk factors of long-term alopecia after pulsed-dye laser treatment for infantile scalp hemangiomas: A retrospective study

Pulsed-dye laser (PDL), as an effective and frequently-used treatment modality for infantile hemangiomas (IH), could render patients at risk of developing long-term alopecia. Data on alopecia caused by PDL treatment remain scant and the contributing factors are not clear. Our objective was to identify the risk factors associated with long-term alopecia resulting from PDL treatment for scalp IH. We conducted a retrospective study incorporating patients with IH diagnosis and PDL intervention via thoroughly reviewing the clinical database of the dermatology department. Scalp IH patients were further screened and their medical records were collected. Long-term alopecia was defined as no signs of terminal hair regrowth for at least 2 years in this study. Of the 1293 IH patients, 47 (14 boys and 33 girls) with a mean age of 4.5 months (standard deviation, 3.2) were diagnosed as scalp IH and had subsequently undergone PDL treatments. Hair growth in the treatment area of 18 patients (38.3%) nearly returned to normal, 22 patients (46.8%) had varying degrees of hair loss, and seven patients (14.9%) had no hair regrowth (long-term alopecia). Compared with the older patients receiving treatment, IH patients younger than 3 months who started PDL treatment had a higher risk of developing long-term alopecia (odds ratio, 30.833; 95% confidence interval, 4.079-232.025; p = 0.01). The total number of PDL sessions, post-treatment blisters, and location of IH were not shown to be significantly associated with the development of long-term alopecia. Collectively, our study provides an important insight into curating treatments for IH in infants younger than 3 months. PDL treatments for scalp IH may perhaps be avoided or delayed to prevent the development of treatment-associated long-term alopecia.

Oral propranolol for infantile hemangiomas beyond the proliferative phase

Infantile hemangiomas grow rapidly during infancy followed by gradual involution. After involution, residual lesions sometimes remain. Despite the prognosis for eventual involution, infantile hemangiomas often cause great psychosocial morbidity that affects patients and their parents. Oral propranolol usually induces earlier involution and redness reduction in infantile hemangiomas in the proliferative phase. However, to evaluate the effectiveness of oral propranolol for infantile hemangiomas beyond the proliferative phase is difficult because of spontaneous regression. We report five Japanese patients treated with 2 mg/kg per day of oral propranolol for infantile hemangiomas beyond the proliferative phase and compared with three untreated patients. After the oral propranolol treatment for 25 weeks, all the treated patients exhibited earlier color fading than untreated patients. Four patients reached nearly complete resolution. Adverse events occurred in three patients: cold, exanthema subitum and suspected of bronchial asthma, respectively. The propranolol treatment for the patient with suspected of bronchial asthma was suspended for 4 months. Recurrence after termination of treatment was not seen. Oral propranolol (2 mg/kg per day) is a safe and effective treatment for Japanese patients with infantile hemangiomas beyond the proliferative phase.