Phase 1 study of crisaborole in Japanese healthy volunteers and patients with atopic dermatitis

Preclinical pharmacokinetic investigation of the bioavailability and skin distribution of HY-072808 ointment, a novel drug candidate for the treatment of atopic dermatitis, in minipigs by a newly LC-MS/MS method

HY-072808 is a novel phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor clinically used for topical atopic dermatitis treatment. Cytochrome P450 enzymes are involved in transforming it into major metabolite ZZ-24. An efficient UPLC-MS/MS method was established to detect HY-072808 and ZZ-24 in plasma and skin tissues of minipigs.One-step protein precipitation was performed with acetonitrile. Subsequently, elution was served with a methanol and water gradient containing 0.1% formic acid for 3.5 min. The plasma and skin tissue concentrations of HY-072808 and ZZ-24 showed good linearity from 0.200 to 200 ng/mL.The experimental minipigs exhibited low systemic exposure and bioavailability of 3.1-7.6% after transdermal application of 1-4% HY-072808 ointment. Multiple topical administrations over seven consecutive days showed a minor accumulation in systemic exposure, with accumulation factors of 2.3 and 4.0 for HY-072808 and ZZ-24, respectively.The distribution of HY-072808 ointment among different cortical layers in minipigs was studied for the first time. Following transdermal application of 2% HY-072808 ointment, the concentration in plasma and skin tissues in the order of epidermis > dermis > subcutaneous tissue ≈ subcutaneous muscle ≈ plasma; at 48 h after the administration, the epidermis and dermis still had a high concentration of the drug.

Topical treatments for atopic dermatitis (eczema): Systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized trials

BACKGROUND

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common skin condition with multiple topical treatment options, but uncertain comparative effects.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to systematically synthesize the benefits and harms of AD prescription topical treatments.

METHODS

For the 2023 American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology and American College of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology Joint Task Force on Practice Parameters AD guidelines, we searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, CENTRAL, CINAHL, LILACS, ICTRP, and GREAT databases to September 5, 2022, for randomized trials addressing AD topical treatments. Paired reviewers independently screened records, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Random-effects network meta-analyses addressed AD severity, itch, sleep, AD-related quality of life, flares, and harms. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach informed certainty of evidence ratings. We classified topical corticosteroids (TCS) using 7 groups-group 1 being most potent. This review is registered in the Open Science Framework (https://osf.io/q5m6s).

RESULTS

The 219 included trials (43,123 patients) evaluated 68 interventions. With high-certainty evidence, pimecrolimus improved 6 of 7 outcomes-among the best for 2; high-dose tacrolimus (0.1%) improved 5-among the best for 2; low-dose tacrolimus (0.03%) improved 5-among the best for 1. With moderate- to high-certainty evidence, group 5 TCS improved 6-among the best for 3; group 4 TCS and delgocitinib improved 4-among the best for 2; ruxolitinib improved 4-among the best for 1; group 1 TCS improved 3-among the best for 2. These interventions did not increase harm. Crisaborole and difamilast were intermediately effective, but with uncertain harm. Topical antibiotics alone or in combination may be among the least effective. To maintain AD control, group 5 TCS were among the most effective, followed by tacrolimus and pimecrolimus.

CONCLUSIONS

For individuals with AD, pimecrolimus, tacrolimus, and moderate-potency TCS are among the most effective in improving and maintaining multiple AD outcomes. Topical antibiotics may be among the least effective.

Topical Administration of Crisaborole in Mild to Moderate Atopic Dermatitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background. Crisaborole has been considered a promising alternative for topical treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD), mainly supported by AD-301 and AD-302. However, critical insights into these two studies have previously been proposed. Objective. To make a comprehensive assessment of the application of crisaborole in mild to moderate AD. Methods. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted, in which only randomized controlled trials comparing the application of crisaborole twice daily to vehicle or other active treatment in patients with mild to moderate AD were included. The selection of outcomes was based on the recommendation of the HOME initiative. Patient-reported symptoms, clinician-reported signs, health-related quality of life, and the safety of crisaborole were all assessed using appropriate measurement instruments. Results. Eight RCTs with 2266 patients were included in the pooled analysis. Compared to those treated with vehicle, patients on crisaborole experienced a greater improvement in NRS (MD −0.70; 95% CI −0.94 to −0.47), POEM (MD −3.50; 95% CI −4.34 to −2.66), EASI (MD −14.49%; 95% CI −18.24% to −10.73%), ISGA (RR 1.45; 95% CI 1.28 to 1.63), DLQI (MD −1.54; 95% CI −2.17 to −0.92), and DFI (MD −1.16; 95% CI −1.72 to −0.59) during the 4-week treatment. More patients achieved EASI 75 (RR 1.71; 95% CI 1.43 to 2.04) with crisaborole administration. There was no significant difference between two interventions in the incidence of AEs (RR 1.12; 95% CI 0.98 to 1.29), SAEs (RR 1.89; 95% CI 0.47 to 7.60), or AE-related withdrawal (RR 0.87; 95% CI 0.47 to 1.60). One RCT also made comparison between crisaborole and pimecrolimus, suggesting that no significant difference was detected in the improvement of EASI or NRS at most time points. Conclusion. High-quality evidence was provided to demonstrate that the short-term application of crisaborole is safe and efficacious for the treatment of mild to moderate AD. The practical efficacy of crisaborole is similar to that of pimecrolimus.

Safety profile and tolerability of topical phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitors for the treatment of atopic dermatitis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Methods

Results

Conclusions

A phase 2b, randomized, double-blind, multicenter, vehicle-controlled study to assess the efficacy and safety of two crisaborole regimens in Japanese patients aged 2 years and older with mild-to-moderate atopic dermatitis

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by pruritus, xerosis, and eczematous lesions. In Japan, treatment options, such as topical corticosteroids and tacrolimus, are associated with efficacy and safety concerns. Crisaborole ointment, 2%, is a topical non‐steroidal anti‐inflammatory agent approved in several countries for the treatment of mild‐to‐moderate AD. This phase 2b, randomized, double‐blind study (NCT03954158) assessed the efficacy and safety of two crisaborole regimens versus vehicle in the treatment of Japanese patients aged ≥2 years with mild‐to‐moderate AD. Each patient was assigned to one of two age cohorts (≥12 or 2–11 years) and randomized to crisaborole once daily (QD) or twice daily (BID). All patients had two target lesions that were each randomly assigned to crisaborole or vehicle at baseline and treated for 2 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in total sign score (TSS) in crisaborole‐ or vehicle‐treated target lesions on day 15, and secondary endpoints included change from baseline in Investigator’s Static Global Assessment (ISGA) and pruritic assessments (Cohort 1: peak pruritus numeric rating scale [NRS]; Cohort 2: Itch Severity Scale Self‐Report and Caregiver‐Reported Itch Severity NRS) and incidence of treatment‐emergent adverse events (TEAEs). This study comprised 81 patients (Cohort 1: n = 41; Cohort 2: n = 40). Crisaborole‐treated lesions showed statistically significant reductions in TSS versus vehicle‐treated lesions at day 15 (p < 0.01), and numerically larger decreases in TSS were observed with crisaborole BID versus crisaborole QD in both cohorts. Furthermore, crisaborole‐treated lesions generally demonstrated greater decreases in ISGA, peak pruritus NRS, Itch Severity Scale, and Caregiver‐Reported Itch Severity NRS versus vehicle‐treated lesions irrespective of regimen or cohort. Overall, TEAEs were mild; the most frequently reported TEAEs was application site irritation. In summary, both crisaborole regimens, particularly crisaborole BID, demonstrated efficacy and were well tolerated.