Granuloma annulare triggered by SARS-CoV-2 infection. The first reported case

Granuloma annulare and possible relation to purified protein derivative administration: a case report

BACKGROUND

Granuloma annulare is a noninfectious inflammatory granulomatous skin disease characterized by an erythematous or skin colored annulare plaque. The diagnosis of granuloma annulare may be challenging owing to its diverse morphology. In such cases, a correlation between the clinical findings and histologic findings are necessary.

CASE PRESENTATION

We report a case of granuloma annulare after purified protein derivative administration. A 56-year-old Caucasian female patient complained of mildly pruritic rashes which started on both arms and lower extremities, and eventually spread to both thighs, the left popliteal region, left upper back, and the right abdominal area. About 6 weeks prior to the eruption of the rashes, the patient had been given a purified protein derivative tuberculin skin test. Biopsy specimens revealed dermal histiocytes palisading around areas of mucin and degenerated collagen, confirming granuloma annulare. After treatment with 0.1% topical triamcinolone acetanide and 500 mg oral metronidazole, the patient's lesions resolved.

DISCUSSION

Relatively little is known about granuloma annulare's exact etiology. Granuloma annulare has four variations presenting as either localized, generalized, subcutaneous, or perforating and patch granuloma annulare. The clinical prognosis for granuloma annulare varies according to clinical subtypes. Proposed causal mechanisms of subcutaneous granuloma annulare include physical trauma, infections, immunizations, insect bites, diabetes mellitus, and alterations in the cell-mediated immune responses. The disease likely has an inflammatory component. Clinically, granuloma annulare may be confused with many other skin diseases.

CONCLUSION

This case of subcutaneous granuloma annulare was reported since it is a rare dermatologic pathological condition that can be confused with other skin rash disorders. Although it is a benign self-limited disease, definitive diagnosis is important to rule out other pathologies with similar clinical appearances, such as cancer or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Diagnostic confirmation is best made through skin biopsy.

A Rare Association of Disseminated Granuloma Annulare With Recurrent Uveitis

Granuloma annulare is a benign chronic inflammatory granulomatous dermatosis with a variable clinical presentation. The disseminated form of the disease is characterized by a widespread papular eruption, primarily affecting the trunk, neck, and extremities. The development of granuloma annulare in patients with systemic diseases, such as diabetes mellitus, malignancy, or dyslipidemia, has been extensively documented. Still, only a few cases of granuloma annulare associated with recurrent uveitis have been reported. Herein, we present a rare case of generalized granuloma annulare that was associated with concomitant recurrent uveitis in a 60-year-old male patient with a history of type II diabetes mellitus. A general physical exam revealed widespread erythematous papules in an annular pattern on the trunk, characteristic of granuloma annulare. A series of tests were conducted, including autoimmune workup, all within normal limits. Histopathologic findings revealed features consistent with granuloma annulare. The patient was successfully treated with systemic corticosteroids for the uveitis and isotretinoin for the skin lesions. A close follow-up is recommended given the rare association of granuloma annulare and uveitis.

Granuloma annulare after SARS-CoV-2 vaccination: A case report and a literature review

INTRODUCTION

During the Cov-19 pandemic, many studies reported a broad spectrum of cutaneous reactions presenting as erythematous rashes or pernio-like, urticaria-like or vesicular/bullous patterns associated with Cov-19-infection and severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccination.

METHODS

The authors documented the clinical and histopathological features of an unexpected case of granuloma annulare (GA) arising a few days after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and reviewed all GAs reported in the literature following the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination and Cov-19-infection.

CASE REPORT

A 69-year-old woman developed a single reddish lesion on the left deltoid region, where the SARS-CoV-2 vaccine seven days earlier was injected. The clinicians performed a punch skin biopsy, and histology revealed an interstitial GA.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinicians should be aware of the potential, though rare, GA occurrence as a possible adverse event after the SARS-CoV-2 vaccination. This additional case, like what happens after the administration of other vaccines, supports the idea that GA may result from the immune system activation following the vaccination. However, notwithstanding, they should encourage their patients to obtain immunization to assist the public health systems in overcoming the COVID-19 pandemic.

Granuloma Annulare: An Updated Review of Epidemiology, Pathogenesis, and Treatment Options

Granuloma annulare (GA) is an inflammatory granulomatous skin disease that can be localized (localized GA) or disseminated (generalized GA), with patch, perforating, and subcutaneous subtypes being less common variants of this benign condition. Recently, new research has emerged that further elucidates GA epidemiology and etiopathogenesis; importantly, new therapeutic options for GA have also been described, although there remains a paucity of randomized controlled studies. In this review, we summarize recent updates on GA epidemiology and etiopathogenesis and offer an updated review of the therapeutic options for GA currently reported in the literature. We hope that the current review galvanizes randomized controlled studies that will in turn help lead to the recommendation of evidence-based treatments for GA.

Challenging Mimickers in the Diagnosis of Sarcoidosis: A Case Study

Sarcoidosis is a systemic granulomatous disease of unknown cause characterized by a wide variety of presentations. Its diagnosis is based on three major criteria: a clinical presentation compatible with sarcoidosis, the presence of non-necrotizing granulomatous inflammation in one or more tissue samples, and the exclusion of alternative causes of granulomatous disease. Many conditions may mimic a sarcoid-like granulomatous reaction. These conditions include infections, neoplasms, immunodeficiencies, and drug-induced diseases. Moreover, patients with sarcoidosis are at risk of developing opportunistic infections or lymphoma. Reliably confirming the diagnosis of sarcoidosis and better identifying new events are major clinical problems in daily practice. To address such issues, we present seven emblematic cases, seen in our department, over a ten-year period along with a literature review about case reports of conditions misdiagnosed as sarcoidosis.