Efficacy of bath-psoralen and ultraviolet A therapy for mycosis fungoides - retrospective analysis of 62 cases

Psoralen: a narrative review of current and future therapeutic uses

Psoralen is a family of naturally occurring photoactive compounds found in plants that acquire potential cytotoxicity when activated by specific frequencies of electromagnetic waves. Psoralens penetrate the phospholipid cellular membranes and insert themselves between the pyrimidines of deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA). Psoralens are initially biologically inert and acquire photoreactivity when exposed to certain classes of electromagnetic radiation, such as ultraviolet light. Once activated, psoralens form mono- and di-adducts with DNA, leading to marked cell apoptosis. This apoptotic effect is more pronounced in tumor cells due to their high rate of cell division. Moreover, photoactivated psoralen can inhibit tyrosine kinase signaling and influence the immunogenic properties of cells. Thus, the cytotoxicity of photoactivated psoralen holds promising clinical applications from its immunogenic properties to potential anti-cancer treatments. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the current understanding and research on psoralen and to explore its potential future pharmacotherapeutic benefits in specific diseases.

EORTC consensus recommendations for the treatment of mycosis fungoides/Sézary syndrome - Update 2023

On behalf of the EORTC Cutaneous Lymphoma Tumours Group (EORTC-CLTG) and following up on earlier versions published in 2006 and 2017 this document provides an updated standard for the treatment of mycosis fungoides and Sézary syndrome (MF/SS). It considers recent relevant publications and treatment options introduced into clinical practice after 2017. Consensus was established among the authors through a series of consecutive consultations in writing and a round of discussion. Treatment options are assigned to each disease stage and, whenever possible and clinically useful, separated into first- and second line options annotated with levels of evidence. Major changes to the previous version include the incorporation of chlormethine, brentuximab vedotin, and mogamulizumab, recommendations on the use of pegylated interferon α (after withdrawal of recombinant unpegylated interferons), and the addition of paragraphs on supportive therapy and on the care of older patients. Still, skin-directed therapies are the most appropriate option for early-stage MF and most patients have a normal life expectancy but may suffer morbidity and impaired quality of life. In advanced disease treatment options have expanded recently. Most patients receive multiple consecutive therapies with treatments often having a relatively short duration of response. For those patients prognosis is still poor and only for a highly selected subset long term remission can be achieved with allogeneic stem cell transplantation. Understanding of the disease, its epidemiology and clinical course, and its most appropriate management are gradually advancing, and there is well-founded hope that this will lead to further improvements in the care of patients with MF/SS.

Xanthotoxin (8-methoxypsoralen): A review of its chemistry, pharmacology, pharmacokinetics, and toxicity

Xanthotoxin (XAT) is a natural furanocoumarins, a bioactive psoralen isolated from the fruit of the Rutaceae plant Pepper, which has received increasing attention in recent years due to its wide source and low cost. By collecting and compiling literature on XAT, the results show that XAT exhibits significant activity in the treatment of various diseases, including neuroprotection, skin repair, osteoprotection, organ protection, anticancer, antiinflammatory, antioxidative stress and antibacterial. In this paper, we review the pharmacological activity and potential molecular mechanisms of XAT for the treatment of related diseases. The data suggest that XAT can mechanistically induce ROS production and promote apoptosis through mitochondrial or endoplasmic reticulum pathways, regulate NF-κB, MAPK, JAK/STAT, Nrf2/HO-1, MAPK, AKT/mTOR, and ERK1/2 signaling pathways to exert pharmacological effects. In addition, the pharmacokinetics properties and toxicity of XAT are discussed in this paper, further elucidating the relationship between structure and efficacy. It is worth noting that data from clinical studies of XAT are still scarce, limiting the use of XAT in the clinic, and in the future, more in-depth studies are needed to determine the clinical efficacy of XAT.

Comparison of the Efficacy and Safety of Bexarotene and Photo(Chemo)Therapy Combination Therapy and Bexarotene Monotherapy for Cutaneous T-Cell Lymphoma

Introduction

Cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL) is a chronic condition with low malignancy. The combined use of therapeutic agents and photo(chemo)therapy is widely applied for the treatment of CTCL. The efficacy and safety of bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy were previously confirmed in Japanese patients with CTCL. The efficacy and safety of the bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy was compared with bexarotene monotherapy in Japanese patients with CTCL.

Methods

This was a randomized, open-label, two-parallel-group, active-control specified clinical study in Japanese patients diagnosed with CTCL carried out over 8 weeks with a study extension conducted at two institutions. This study was registered in Japan Registry of Clinical Trials (jRCTs041180094).

Results

In the combination therapy group, 22 subjects received oral bexarotene (300 mg/m² body surface area) once daily, followed by bath-psoralen and ultraviolet (UV) A or narrowband UVB. In the monotherapy group, 24 subjects received oral bexarotene (300 mg/m²) once daily. The efficacy analysis using the modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool, which included 39 patients, showed a response rate of 81.0% (17/21) in the combination therapy group and 83.3% (15/18) in the monotherapy group. No statistically significant difference was detected between groups. In the combination therapy group, four subjects showed a complete clinical response or complete response, and subjects with a partial response exhibited a high rate of skin lesion resolution, significantly better than in the monotherapy group. In the safety analysis, which included 46 treated subjects (22 in the combination therapy group and 24 in the monotherapy group), no adverse events or adverse drug reactions were reported in either group.

Conclusion

Both bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy and bexarotene monotherapy were therapeutically effective in Japanese patients with CTCL and well tolerated. Combination therapy led to a higher skin lesion resolution rate and greater therapeutic effects compared with monotherapy.

Trial Registration

jRCTs041180094.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13555-021-00655-0.

This study evaluated the efficacy and safety of bexarotene monotherapy compared with bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy in Japanese patients with cutaneous T-cell lymphoma (CTCL). The study was a randomized, open-label, two-parallel-group, active-control specified clinical study in patients diagnosed with CTCL performed over an 8-week period with a study extension conducted in two institutions. In the combination therapy group, bexarotene (300 mg/m² body surface area) was administered orally once daily to 22 subjects, followed by treatment with bath-psoralen and ultraviolet A (bath-PUVA) or narrowband UVB. In the bexarotene monotherapy group, bexarotene (300 mg/m²) was administered orally once daily to 24 subjects. Efficacy was assessed using the modified Severity-Weighted Assessment Tool. Among the 39 subjects analyzed for treatment efficacy, the response rate of the combination therapy group was 81.0% (17/21) and that of the monotherapy group was 83.3% (15/18). Differences between the two treatment groups were not statistically significant. Of the 21 subjects in the combination therapy group, 4 had a complete clinical response or complete response, and those with a partial response showed a higher skin lesion resolution rate than in the monotherapy group. The safety analysis revealed no reports of adverse events or adverse drug reactions among the 46 treated subjects (combination therapy group = 22; monotherapy group = 24). Thus, both bexarotene and photo(chemo)therapy combination therapy and bexarotene monotherapy were therapeutically effective and well tolerated in Japanese patients with CTCL. Patients receiving the combined therapy, however, showed a higher rate of skin lesion resolution.