1
|
Hayden-Evans M, Milbourn B, D’Arcy E, Chamberlain A, Afsharnejad B, Evans K, Whitehouse AJO, Bölte S, Girdler S. An Evaluation of the Overall Utility of Measures of Functioning Suitable for School-Aged Children on the Autism Spectrum: A Scoping Review. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2022; 19:14114. [PMID: 36360993 PMCID: PMC9659140 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph192114114] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2022] [Revised: 10/25/2022] [Accepted: 10/25/2022] [Indexed: 06/16/2023]
Abstract
A diagnosis of an autism spectrum condition (autism) provides limited information regarding an individual's level of functioning, information key in determining support and funding needs. Using the framework introduced by Arksey and O'Malley, this scoping review aimed to identify measures of functioning suitable for school-aged children on the autism spectrum and evaluate their overall utility, including content validity against the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) and the ICF Core Sets for Autism. The overall utility of the 13 included tools was determined using the Outcome Measures Rating Form (OMRF), with the Adaptive Behavior Assessment System (ABAS-3) receiving the highest overall utility rating. Content validity of the tools in relation to the ICF and ICF Core Sets for Autism varied, with few assessment tools including any items linking to Environmental Factors of the ICF. The ABAS-3 had the greatest total number of codes linking to the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Autism while the Vineland Adaptive Behavior Scales (Vineland-3) had the greatest number of unique codes linking to both the Comprehensive ICF Core Set for Autism and the Brief ICF Core Set for Autism (6-16 years). Measuring functioning of school-aged children on the spectrum can be challenging, however, it is important to accurately capture their abilities to ensure equitable and individualised access to funding and supports.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Hayden-Evans
- Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
- Autism CRC, Long Pocket, Brisbane 4850, Australia
| | - Benjamin Milbourn
- Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
- Autism CRC, Long Pocket, Brisbane 4850, Australia
| | - Emily D’Arcy
- Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
- Autism CRC, Long Pocket, Brisbane 4850, Australia
| | - Angela Chamberlain
- Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
- Autism CRC, Long Pocket, Brisbane 4850, Australia
| | - Bahareh Afsharnejad
- Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
| | - Kiah Evans
- Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
- Autism CRC, Long Pocket, Brisbane 4850, Australia
- School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
| | - Andrew J. O. Whitehouse
- Telethon Kids Institute, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
- Autism CRC, Long Pocket, Brisbane 4850, Australia
- School of Psychological Science, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
| | - Sven Bölte
- Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
- Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, 104 31 Stockholm, Sweden
- Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, 104 31 Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Sonya Girdler
- Curtin Autism Research Group, School of Allied Health, Curtin University, Perth 6102, Australia
- Autism CRC, Long Pocket, Brisbane 4850, Australia
- School of Allied Health, University of Western Australia, Perth 6009, Australia
- Center of Neurodevelopmental Disorders (KIND), Centre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Women’s and Children’s Health, Karolinska Institutet & Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, 104 31 Stockholm, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Alderdice E, Wolfe D, Timmer AJ, Unsworth CA. Use of the AusTOMs-OT to record outcomes in an occupational therapy homeless service. Br J Occup Ther 2022. [DOI: 10.1177/03080226211067427] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Occupational therapists provide services to homeless people internationally, yet relatively little research evidence underpins this practice. This study aimed to describe the process of selecting an outcome measure for use in a homeless occupational therapy service and demonstrate the changes experienced in the occupational performance of individuals participating in this service. Method The Glasgow homeless occupational therapy service staff reviewed eight outcome measures against six pre-determined criteria. The selected tool was then used to collect data pre and post an occupational therapy intervention with 58 participants. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test to determine statistically significant change from admission to discharge in the different domains of the selected outcome measure. Results The AusTOMs-OT was implemented in daily practice and 70% of participants were discharged following achievement of therapy goals. Clients made clinically and statistically significant improvements over their admission as measured on AusTOMs-OT in areas such as Transfers, Self-Care and Domestic Life-Home, across the health domains of activity, participation and wellbeing. Conclusion AusTOMs-OT was successfully implemented and demonstrated that participants improved over their time with the service. This evidence can be used to support the effectiveness of occupational therapy services with people experiencing homelessness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Debra Wolfe
- Glasgow Homeless Occupational Therapy Service, Glasgow, UK
| | - Amanda J Timmer
- Ramsay Health Care-Donvale Rehabilitation Hospital, Donvale, VIC, Australia
| | - Carolyn A Unsworth
- Professor and Discipline Lead in Occupational Therapy, School of Health, Federation University, Churchill, VIC, Australia; and Adjunct Professor, Occupational Therapy, Central Queensland University, Adjunct Professor, Department of Neurosciences, Monash University, Clayton, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Williams CM, Davies N, Kolic J, Caserta A, James AM, Unsworth C. Validity and reliability of the Australian Therapy Outcome Measures - Physiotherapy, for podiatry (AusTOMs-PT for use in podiatry). J Foot Ankle Res 2020; 13:17. [PMID: 32334625 PMCID: PMC7183624 DOI: 10.1186/s13047-020-00385-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/20/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/26/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Valid and reliable outcome measure enable measurement of health care service impact. There are limited valid and reliable outcome measures for use in podiatry practice to measure the impact of treatment. This research aimed to test the face validity of the AusTOMs for Physiotherapy (AusTOMs-PT), it’s adaptability to podiatry clinical practice and the reliability of its use with podiatrists. Methods Stage 1 used a nominal group technique with podiatrists who worked in public and/or private settings. All podiatrists underwent self-directed training in the AusTOMs framework and measures prior to interviews or focus group discussion. Discussion was centred about transferability of the core scales of the AusTOMs-PT and an adjunct measure, AusTOMs for Occupational Therapy (AusTOMs-OT) to podiatry practice. Stage 2 used 10 case studies representative of people who had foot or ankle concerns. Podiatrists were recruited and trained in the use of the relevant AusTOMs-PT scales. Podiatrists individually scored the cases at two timepoints (1 month apart) using the six scales from the AusTOMs-PT deemed by stage 1 as relevant to podiatry. Intra and inter-rater reliability of scales were determined using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs). Results Thirteen podiatrists participated in individual or focus group interviews in Stage 1. Consensus was gained on six of the nine core scales adopted from the AusTOMs-PT. These were 1. Balance and Postural Control, 3. Musculoskeletal Movement Related Functions, 4. Neurological Movement Related Functions, 5. Pain, 7. Sensory Functions, 8. Skin Functions. Each core scale rated the functional domains of Impairment, Activity Limitation, Participation Restriction and Wellbeing/Distress relating to that presentation of goals of the person in the case study. There were 22 podiatrists complete training and scored two rounds of case studies using the six scales in Stage 2. There were 91%(n = 20) participants with an intra-rater ICC > 0.5 (moderate or greater). Each domain had an inter-rater reliability of > 0.9 (excellent) during the first round. Conclusions The AusTOMs-PT for use in podiatry may be implemented to record change in impairment, function, participation and wellbeing of people receiving podiatry treatment. Podiatry specific training and mentoring, together with repeated use could be expected to improve intra-reliability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cylie M Williams
- Allied Health, Peninsula Health, 4 Hastings Rd, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia. .,Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, McMahons Rd, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia.
| | - Nina Davies
- Faculty of Health and Sciences, Staffordshire University, Leek Road, Stoke-on-Trent, ST4 2DF, UK
| | - Jessica Kolic
- Allied Health, Peninsula Health, 4 Hastings Rd, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia
| | - Antoni Caserta
- Department of Physiotherapy, Monash University, McMahons Rd, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia
| | - Alicia M James
- Podiatry Department, Peninsula Health, 4 Hastings Rd, Frankston, VIC, 3199, Australia
| | - Carolyn Unsworth
- School of Health, Medical and Applied Sciences, Central Queensland University, 120 Spencer St., Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Romli MH, Wan Yunus F, Mackenzie L. Overview of reviews of standardised occupation-based instruments for use in occupational therapy practice. Aust Occup Ther J 2019; 66:428-445. [PMID: 30821362 DOI: 10.1111/1440-1630.12572] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 01/29/2019] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Using standardised instruments is one approach to support evidence-based practice. Referring to systematic reviews is an option to identify suitable instruments. However, with an abundance of systematic reviews available, therapists are challenged to identify an appropriate instrument to use. Therefore, this overview of reviews aimed to summarise relevant systematic review findings about standardised occupation-based instruments relevant for occupational therapy practice. METHODS An overview of reviews was conducted. A systematic search was performed on four databases up to March 2018. Included systematic reviews were analysed for quality using A MeaSurement Tool to Assess systematic Reviews (AMSTAR). RESULTS A total of 2187 articles were identified after removing duplicates. Ultimately, 58 systematic reviews were identified that yielded 641 instruments. From those, 45 instruments were selected for appraisal as they met the inclusion criteria of being developed mainly by occupational therapists and were recommended in the summarised findings from the systematic reviews. The instruments were classified according to the following occupation domains: (i) multidimensional, (ii) activities of daily living, (iii) productivity, (iv) social, (v) sleep/rest, (vi) sexuality and (vii) spirituality. No systematic review was identified that specifically focussed on occupations related to school/education, leisure and play. DISCUSSION Certain occupation domains such as activities of daily living, social and sleep/rest received high attention amongst researchers. There is a need for systematic reviews of instruments to measure education/school, play and leisure. Limited numbers of instruments were developed by occupational therapists outside the occupation domain of activities of daily living, and in areas of practice other than children and older people. Nevertheless, this overview can give some guidance for occupational therapists in selecting a suitable occupational therapy instrument for practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad Hibatullah Romli
- Department of Nursing and Rehabilitation, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia.,Malaysian Research Institute on Ageing (MyAgeing), Universiti Putra Malaysia, Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia
| | - Farahiyah Wan Yunus
- Occupational Therapy Programme, Faculty of Health Sciences, Centre for Rehabilitation and Special Needs, Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
| | - Lynette Mackenzie
- Discipline of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cumberland Campus, University of Sydney, Lidcombe, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|