1
|
McMahon R, Pain T, Dick F, Tench S. Development of a team-specific research strategy using a modified Delphi method in a regional public hospital dietetics department. Aust J Rural Health 2024. [PMID: 38822645 DOI: 10.1111/ajr.13145] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2023] [Revised: 05/02/2024] [Accepted: 05/19/2024] [Indexed: 06/03/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Evaluate research capacity and culture among regional hospital dietitians, develop a team specific research strategy, and build research skills of novice researchers. METHODS The Research Capacity in Context Tool was used to assess current research capacity and culture at organisational, team and individual levels. Results were analysed using descriptive statistics and content analysis of free text responses. A modified Delphi method gained consensus regarding research capacity building. DESIGN Mixed method study. SETTING Dietetics department of a regional tertiary hospital (Modified Monash Category 2). PARTICIPANTS All clinical dietitians currently employed within the hospital (n = 20) regardless of employment duration. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES Self-rated response to research capacity and culture to produce a dietetics-specific research strategy. RESULTS Fifteen dietitians (75%) completed the Research Capacity in Context Tool. The overall mean score was highest at an organisational level at 7.9 (IQR 2), and lowest at team and individual levels at 4.3 (IQR 2.7) and 4.9 (IQR 3.3) respectively. Common barriers to research included time, lack of skills, knowledge and support. Using the modified Delphi method 39 statements relating to research capacity building met consensus and informed the creation of a research strategy. CONCLUSION The results of the Research Capacity in Context Tool from this regional study reflect those reported in the literature at metropolitan sites. A dietetic-specific research strategy was developed to assist with increasing research capacity at a team and individual level in a regional setting. Evaluation of long-term outcomes post implementation will be the subject of further research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel McMahon
- The Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Douglas, Queensland, Australia
| | - Tilley Pain
- The Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Douglas, Queensland, Australia
- James Cook University, Douglas, Queensland, Australia
| | - Felicity Dick
- The Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Douglas, Queensland, Australia
| | - Susan Tench
- The Townsville Hospital and Health Service, Douglas, Queensland, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang C, Yu W, Yang F, Peng F, Zhang L, Li M. Cognition of nursing translational medical research among nursing practitioners in China. J Pediatr Nurs 2024; 75:180-186. [PMID: 38163421 DOI: 10.1016/j.pedn.2023.12.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2023] [Revised: 11/30/2023] [Accepted: 12/20/2023] [Indexed: 01/03/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nursing translational research (TR) begins with clinical discovery and medical research and leads to clinical application in patients. TR is key to improving nursing quality and developing the nursing profession. However, its development in China remains limited, and the reasons for this are unclear. We aim to enhance the recognition of nursing TR among nursing practitioners in China by exploring their cognition about nursing TR and associated influences. METHODS We distributed an internet-based questionnaire to 683 nursing practitioners between February 13 and March 15, 2023. We analyzed the characteristics and cognition of nursing TR using descriptive statistics, the chi-squared test, Fisher's exact test, the Wilcoxon rank-sum test, Kruskal-Wallis H test, and stepwise logistic regression analysis. The majority (79.65%) of nursing practitioners who responded to the questionnaire were willing to participate in nursing TR. FINDINGS Nursing practitioners with a higher educational level, stronger recognition of the importance of nursing TR, and stronger recognition of transdisciplinary nursing TR were more willing to participate in nursing TR. DISCUSSION The results of this study can accelerate nursing practitioners' willingness to participate in nursing TR. APPLICATION TO PRACTICE We identified strategies to promote TR: provide further education, optimize courses in higher education, disseminate information, provide guidance on the importance of nursing TR, and establish a nursing TR platform with appropriate potential collaborators.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chunya Wang
- Coronary Heart Disease Center, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100029, China
| | - Wenya Yu
- School of Public Health, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai 200025, China
| | - Fang Yang
- Department of Spine Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200433, China
| | - Fei Peng
- Nursing Department, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University, Shanghai 200003, China.
| | - Lulu Zhang
- Department of Military Medical Service, Faculty of Military Health Service, Naval Medical University, PLA Navy, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China.
| | - Meina Li
- Department of Military Medical Service, Faculty of Military Health Service, Naval Medical University, PLA Navy, 800 Xiangyin Road, Yangpu District, Shanghai 200433, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
King O, West E, Alston L, Beks H, Callisaya M, Huggins CE, Murray M, Mc Namara K, Pang M, Payne W, Peeters A, Pithie M, Sayner AM, Wong Shee A. Models and approaches for building knowledge translation capacity and capability in health services: a scoping review. Implement Sci 2024; 19:7. [PMID: 38287351 PMCID: PMC10823722 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-024-01336-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/27/2023] [Accepted: 01/05/2024] [Indexed: 01/31/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Building healthcare service and health professionals' capacity and capability to rapidly translate research evidence into health practice is critical to the effectiveness and sustainability of healthcare systems. This review scoped the literature describing programmes to build knowledge translation capacity and capability in health professionals and healthcare services, and the evidence supporting these. METHODS This scoping review was undertaken using the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping review methodology. Four research databases (Ovid MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, and PsycInfo) were searched using a pre-determined strategy. Eligible studies described a programme implemented in healthcare settings to build health professional or healthcare service knowledge translation capacity and capability. Abstracts and full texts considered for inclusion were screened by two researchers. Data from included papers were extracted using a bespoke tool informed by the scoping review questions. RESULTS Database searches yielded 10,509 unique citations, of which 136 full texts were reviewed. Thirty-four papers were included, with three additional papers identified on citation searching, resulting in 37 papers describing 34 knowledge translation capability building programmes. Programmes were often multifaceted, comprising a combination of two or more strategies including education, dedicated implementation support roles, strategic research-practice partnerships and collaborations, co-designed knowledge translation capability building programmes, and dedicated funding for knowledge translation. Many programmes utilised experiential and collaborative learning, and targeted either individual, team, organisational, or system levels of impact. Twenty-seven programmes were evaluated formally using one or more data collection methods. Outcomes measured varied significantly and included participant self-reported outcomes, perceived barriers and enablers of knowledge translation, milestone achievement and behaviour change. All papers reported that programme objectives were achieved to varying degrees. CONCLUSIONS Knowledge translation capacity and capability building programmes in healthcare settings are multifaceted, often include education to facilitate experiential and collaborative learning, and target individual, team, organisational, or supra-organisational levels of impact. Although measured differently across the programmes, the outcomes were positive. The sustainability of programmes and outcomes may be undermined by the lack of long-term funding and inconsistent evaluation. Future research is required to develop evidence-informed frameworks to guide methods and outcome measures for short-, medium- and longer-term programme evaluation at the different structural levels.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Olivia King
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
- Barwon Health, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia.
- Monash University, Monash Centre for Scholarship in Health Education, Clayton, VIC, Australia.
| | - Emma West
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Institute for Mental and Physical Health and Clinical Translation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Laura Alston
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Research Unit, Colac Area Health, Colac, VIC, Australia
| | - Hannah Beks
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Michele Callisaya
- Peninsula Clinical School, Central Clinical School, Frankston, VIC, Australia
- National Centre for Healthy Ageing, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Catherine E Huggins
- Global Centre for Preventive Health and Nutrition, Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Margaret Murray
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | - Kevin Mc Namara
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
| | | | | | - Anna Peeters
- Western Alliance, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Deakin University, Institute for Health Transformation, Geelong, VIC, Australia
| | - Mia Pithie
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Alesha M Sayner
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| | - Anna Wong Shee
- Deakin University, Deakin Rural Health, PO Box 281, Geelong, Warrnambool, VIC, Australia
- Grampians Health, Ballarat, VIC, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Reszel J, Daub O, Leese J, Augustsson H, Bellows DM, Cassidy CE, Crowner BE, Dunn SI, Goodwin LB, Hoens AM, Hunter SC, Lynch EA, Moore JL, Rafferty MR, Romney W, Stacey D, Graham ID. Essential content for teaching implementation practice in healthcare: a mixed-methods study of teams offering capacity-building initiatives. Implement Sci Commun 2023; 4:151. [PMID: 38012798 PMCID: PMC10680357 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-023-00525-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Accepted: 11/02/2023] [Indexed: 11/29/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Applying the knowledge gained through implementation science can support the uptake of research evidence into practice; however, those doing and supporting implementation (implementation practitioners) may face barriers to applying implementation science in their work. One strategy to enhance individuals' and teams' ability to apply implementation science in practice is through training and professional development opportunities (capacity-building initiatives). Although there is an increasing demand for and offerings of implementation practice capacity-building initiatives, there is no universal agreement on what content should be included. In this study we aimed to explore what capacity-building developers and deliverers identify as essential training content for teaching implementation practice. METHODS We conducted a convergent mixed-methods study with participants who had developed and/or delivered a capacity-building initiative focused on teaching implementation practice. Participants completed an online questionnaire to provide details on their capacity-building initiatives; took part in an interview or focus group to explore their questionnaire responses in depth; and offered course materials for review. We analyzed a subset of data that focused on the capacity-building initiatives' content and curriculum. We used descriptive statistics for quantitative data and conventional content analysis for qualitative data, with the data sets merged during the analytic phase. We presented frequency counts for each category to highlight commonalities and differences across capacity-building initiatives. RESULTS Thirty-three individuals representing 20 capacity-building initiatives participated. Study participants identified several core content areas included in their capacity-building initiatives: (1) taking a process approach to implementation; (2) identifying and applying implementation theories, models, frameworks, and approaches; (3) learning implementation steps and skills; (4) developing relational skills. In addition, study participants described offering applied and pragmatic content (e.g., tools and resources), and tailoring and evolving the capacity-building initiative content to address emerging trends in implementation science. Study participants highlighted some challenges learners face when acquiring and applying implementation practice knowledge and skills. CONCLUSIONS This study synthesized what experienced capacity-building initiative developers and deliverers identify as essential content for teaching implementation practice. These findings can inform the development, refinement, and delivery of capacity-building initiatives, as well as future research directions, to enhance the translation of implementation science into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica Reszel
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada.
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Canada.
| | - Olivia Daub
- School of Communication Sciences and Disorders, Western University, London, Canada
| | - Jenny Leese
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Hanna Augustsson
- Procome Research Group, Department of Learning, Informatics, Management and Ethics, Medical Management Centre, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden
- Unit for Implementation and Evaluation, Center for Epidemiology and Community Medicine (CES), Stockholm, Sweden
| | - Danielle Moeske Bellows
- School of Physical Therapy, Massachusetts College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Worcester, USA
| | - Christine E Cassidy
- School of Nursing, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Canada
- IWK Health Centre, Halifax, Canada
| | | | - Sandra I Dunn
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- Better Outcomes Registry & Network (BORN) Ontario, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Lisa B Goodwin
- Inpatient Rehabilitation, University of Vermont Medical Center, Colchester, USA
| | - Alison M Hoens
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Sarah C Hunter
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Elizabeth A Lynch
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Caring Futures Institute, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jennifer L Moore
- Regional Rehabilitation Knowledge Center, Sunnaas Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute for Knowledge Translation, Carmel, Indiana, USA
| | - Miriam R Rafferty
- Shirley Ryan AbilityLab and Department of Physical Medicine & Rehabilitation, Northwestern University, Chicago, USA
| | - Wendy Romney
- Physical Therapy, Sacred Heart University, Fairfield, USA
| | - Dawn Stacey
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
| | - Ian D Graham
- School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, 200 Lees Avenue, Ottawa, ON, K1N 6N5, Canada
- Centre for Implementation Research, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada
- School of Epidemiology and Public Health, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Black AT, Steinberg M, Chisholm AE, Coldwell K, Hoens AM, Koh JC, LeBlanc A, Mackay M, Salmon A, Snow ME. Building capacity for implementation-the KT Challenge. Implement Sci Commun 2021; 2:84. [PMID: 34321107 PMCID: PMC8316705 DOI: 10.1186/s43058-021-00186-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2021] [Accepted: 07/08/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The KT Challenge program supports health care professionals to effectively implement evidence-based practices. Unlike other knowledge translation (KT) programs, this program is grounded in capacity building, focuses on health care professionals (HCPs), and uses a multi-component intervention. This study presents the evaluation of the KT Challenge program to assess the impact on uptake, KT capacity, and practice change. METHODS The evaluation used a mixed-methods retrospective pre-post design involving surveys and review of documents such as teams' final reports. Online surveys collecting both quantitative and qualitative data were deployed at four time points (after both workshops, 6 months into implementation, and at the end of the 2-year funded projects) to measure KT capacity (knowledge, skills, and confidence) and impact on practice change. Qualitative data was analyzed using a general inductive approach and quantitative data was analyzed using non-parametric statistics. RESULTS Participants reported statistically significant increases in knowledge and confidence across both workshops, at the 6-month mark of their projects, and at the end of their projects. In addition, at the 6-month check-in, practitioners reported statistically significant improvements in their ability to implement practice changes. In the first cohort of the program, of the teams who were able to complete their projects, half were able to show demonstrable practice changes. CONCLUSIONS The KT Challenge was successful in improving the capacity of HCPs to implement evidence-based practice changes and has begun to show demonstrable improvements in a number of practice areas. The program is relevant to a variety of HCPs working in diverse practice settings and is relatively inexpensive to implement. Like all practice improvement programs in health care settings, a number of challenges emerged stemming from the high turnover of staff and the limited capacity of some practitioners to take on anything beyond direct patient care. Efforts to address these challenges have been added to subsequent cohorts of the program and ongoing evaluation will examine if they are successful. The KT Challenge program has continued to garner great interest among practitioners, even in the midst of dealing with the COVID-19 pandemic, and shows promise for organizations looking for better ways to mobilize knowledge to improve patient care and empower staff. This study contributes to the implementation science literature by providing a description and evaluation of a new model for embedding KT practice skills in health care settings.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Agnes T Black
- Providence Health Care, 1190 Hornby St, Suite 409G, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 2K5, Canada.
| | - Marla Steinberg
- Evaluation & KT Consultant and Educator, 3037 West 13th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V6K 2V1, Canada
| | - Amanda E Chisholm
- Vancouver Coastal Health Research Institute, 6/F, 2635 Laurel St, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Kristi Coldwell
- Transplant Research Foundation of BC, 555 W 12th Ave 3rd floor, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 3X7, Canada
| | - Alison M Hoens
- Providence Health Care and University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Jiak Chin Koh
- Providence Health Care, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Allana LeBlanc
- Vancouver Coastal Health, 899 W 12th Ave, Vancouver, BC, V5Z 1M9, Canada
| | - Martha Mackay
- Providence Health Care and University of British Columbia, 1081 Burrard St, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - Amy Salmon
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, 588 - 1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| | - M Elizabeth Snow
- Centre for Health Evaluation & Outcome Sciences, 588 - 1081 Burrard Street, St. Paul's Hospital, Vancouver, BC, V6Z 1Y6, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Provvidenza C, Townley A, Wincentak J, Peacocke S, Kingsnorth S. Building knowledge translation competency in a community-based hospital: a practice-informed curriculum for healthcare providers, researchers, and leadership. Implement Sci 2020; 15:54. [PMID: 32620129 PMCID: PMC7333339 DOI: 10.1186/s13012-020-01013-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Enacting knowledge translation (KT) in healthcare settings is a complex process that requires organizational facilitation. In addition to addressing organizational-level barriers, targeting individual-level factors such as KT competencies are a necessary component of this aim. While literature on KT competency training is rapidly growing, there has been little exploration of the potential benefits of training initiatives delivered from an intra-organizational perspective. Addressing this gap, we developed the Knowledge Translation Facilitator Network (KTFN) to meet the KT needs of individuals expected to use and produce knowledge (e.g., healthcare providers, research staff, managers, family advisors) within an academic health sciences center. The aim of this study is to describe the development, implementation, and evaluation of the KTFN curriculum. METHODS An educational framework was used to guide creation of the KTFN curriculum. Stakeholder interviews, a literature review of KT competency, and environmental scan of capacity building initiatives plus adult learning principles were combined with in-house experience of KT practitioners to inform content and delivery. An evaluation strategy consisting of pre/post-test curriculum and post-session satisfaction surveys, as well as post-curriculum interviews assessed impact on participant knowledge and skills and captured perceived value of KFTN. RESULTS The curriculum has been delivered three times over 3 years, with 30 individuals trained, representing healthcare providers, graduate level research trainees, managers, and family advisors. Using the New World Kirkpatrick Model as an analysis framework, we found that the KTFN curriculum was highly valued and shifted learners' perceptions of KT. Participants identified enhanced knowledge and skills that could be applied to different facets of their work; increased confidence in their ability to execute KT tasks; and intention to use the content in future projects. Barriers to future use included time to plan and conduct KT activities. CONCLUSION KTFN was developed to enhance KT competency among organizational members. This initiative shows promise as a highly valued training program that meets both individual and organizational KT needs and speaks to the importance of investing in tailored KT competency initiatives as an essential building block to support moving evidence into practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christine Provvidenza
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| | - Ashleigh Townley
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| | - Joanne Wincentak
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| | - Sean Peacocke
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| | - Shauna Kingsnorth
- Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
- Bloorview Research Institute, Holland Bloorview Kids Rehabilitation Hospital, Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation Sciences Institute, University of Toronto, 150 Kilgour Road, Toronto, ON M4G 1R8 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Kim BJ, Rousseau DM, Tomprou M. Training and Diffusion of Change: The Impact of Training and Proactivity on Change-Related Advice Giving. JOURNAL OF APPLIED BEHAVIORAL SCIENCE 2019. [DOI: 10.1177/0021886319865323] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
This study investigates the effects of organizational change–related training on the diffusion of change through the employee advice network. It also examines the contribution of employee proactivity to the effects of that training. We compare trainees ( N = 46) and nontrained peers ( N = 47) doing similar work at pre- and posttest to examine how training and individual proactivity contribute to the change process. Results indicate that training is associated with increased change-related knowledge and skills and greater change-related advice giving (i.e., in-degree centrality). Additionally, proactivity is positively related to change-related advice giving and seeking (i.e., in- and out-degree centrality). Our findings also show that the effect of training on change-related advice giving is stronger for more proactive trainees than less proactive ones. We discuss our study’s theoretical and practical implications for both organizational change and employee proactivity.
Collapse
|