Are there missed opportunities for occupational therapy for people with dementia? An audit of practice in Australia

The Role of Rehabilitation for Early-Stage Alzheimer's Disease and Related Dementias: Practice and Priorities

The World Health Organization describes rehabilitation as interventions that focus on addressing disability through optimizing functional ability for individuals living with various health challenges in their unique daily life contexts. Rehabilitation services are typically seeking to enhance functional capacity and health, either in concert with, or in place of pharmacologic interventions. These services typically fall into 2 categories, restorative, where the client endeavors to return to a prior level of independent function, and compensatory, where s/he may not. In the latter case, clients might receive, and be trained to use, technology aids or other external supports to enable them to engage in a safe, healthy, and meaningful day-to-day life. For some populations, however, even enhanced functional capacity can present in the form of an insidious, albeit slower decline. So, what is, or should, rehabilitation's role be in progressive neurologic conditions? Specifically, what are the policy and practice implications of rehabilitation for (not in the presence of, but for) the care of persons living with neurodegenerative conditions such as Alzheimer's disease and Alzheimer's disease related dementias (AD/ADRD)?

Role of occupational therapy in person-centred dementia care: Exploring family member and clinician perceptions

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to explore the role of occupational therapy in dementia facilities using a person-centred model of care, from the perspective of family members, occupational therapists and multidisciplinary health professionals.

METHODS

A descriptive qualitative approach was adopted, and all data were evaluated using thematic analysis. Semi-structured interviews were completed with eight family members and five multidisciplinary health professionals. Four occupational therapists practising in dementia care also provided qualitative data via an online survey.

RESULTS

The analysis identified two key themes around perceptions of occupational therapy in person-centred dementia care. These themes were (1) the poorly defined scope of the occupational therapy role and (2) the perceived features of the occupational therapy role.

CONCLUSIONS

While the perceptions and experiences of participants varied, the scope of this role is currently poorly defined. Occupational therapists in this setting commonly facilitate positive social interaction and present-oriented occupational engagement with residents and are also recognised as building workforce capacity with multidisciplinary colleagues. Without a clearly defined scope of practice, the role of occupational therapy in enabling health and well-being for people with dementia cannot be coherently articulated. This could lead to underutilisation of occupational therapy services, and lost opportunities for residents to experience improved health and well-being.

Barriers and enablers to the delivery and implementation of the tailored activity programme in Australia: Perspectives of occupational therapists and their managers

BACKGROUND

Prior to implementing new programmes or practices, it is essential to understand the context, barriers and enablers to support successful use. The tailored activity programme (TAP) is an evidence-based intervention provided by occupational therapists to support community-dwelling people living with dementia and their carers. The programme was developed in the United States, and although it is not currently available for routine use in Australia, its implementation would address the needs of many Australians with dementia and their carers.

AIM

The aim of the study is to understand the perspectives of occupational therapists and their managers regarding barriers and enablers to the delivery and implementation of the TAP in Queensland, Australia.

METHODS

A qualitative descriptive methodology was employed. Semistructured interviews were undertaken with occupational therapists (n = 18) who work with community-dwelling people with dementia and their carers, and their managers (n = 10). Participants were recruited from a range of organisations across Queensland, and they were asked about potential barriers and enablers to implementing TAP. Interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were mapped using framework analysis whilst remaining open to other themes.

FINDINGS

Themes were identified, and facilitating factors included the close alignment of TAP with occupational therapists' scope of practice; their acceptance of, and optimism about the programme and its perceived benefits including improved client outcomes; and an opportunity for occupational therapists to further develop their skills. Managerial support and carers' readiness and willingness to participate were also identified as important factors for success, whereas barriers were cost to clients and the capacity of the occupational therapy workforce to provide TAP.

CONCLUSION

Occupational therapists and their managers expressed enthusiasm for TAP and awareness of its likely benefits, while also identifying barriers that will need to be addressed if implementation of the programme is to be successful in Australia.

Occupational Therapy Utilization in Veterans With Dementia: A Retrospective Review of Root Cause Analyses of Falls Leading to Adverse Events

INTRODUCTION

Falls in persons with dementia are associated with increased mortality. Occupational therapy (OT) is a rehabilitation discipline, which has, among its goals, the promotion of safety and fall prevention in older adults and those with dementia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate root cause analysis (RCA) data to identify causes of falls with adverse events in patients with dementia who were referred to or receiving OT services within the Veterans Health Administration (VHA).

METHODS

This study used retrospective review of RCAs within the National Center for Patient Safety database for the VHA. The RCA database was searched using these terms: falls with adverse events, dementia, and OT. Descriptive statistical analysis of demographic information, location, occurrence of orthopedic fracture, and mortality was used. All root causes were qualitatively categorized using thematic analysis of determined causes.

RESULTS

Eighty RCAs were included in analysis. Mean age of veterans included was 80 years; 96% were male; 76% resulted in hip fracture; and 20% died as a result of the fall. Occupational therapy evaluations occurred within 7 days of admission to VHA and falls most frequently occurred within 4 days of OT evaluation. Most common causes included inappropriate or lack of equipment (21%), need for falls/rehabilitation assessment (20%), compliance/training to fall protocol of all staff (19%), and behavior/medical status (17%).

CONCLUSIONS

Earlier identification for OT evaluation need may improve access to services, and use of proper equipment to decrease frequency of falls may improve patient safety for older adults with dementia.

Use of Services by People Living Alone With Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Formal supports and social services are essential to people living alone with cognitive impairment (PLACI) because they are at risk of negative health outcomes and lack cohabitants who may support them with cognitively demanding tasks. To further our understanding of this critical and worldwide issue, we conducted a systematic review to understand whether, and how, PLACI access and use essential formal supports and services.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

We searched 6 databases (PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, and Sociological Abstracts) to identify quantitative and mixed-method literature on formal service use among PLACI. The initial search was conducted in 2018 and updated in 2020.

RESULTS

We identified 32 studies published between 1992 and 2019, representing 13 countries, that met our criteria: 16 reported on health services and 26 on social services. Most studies compared PLACI with people with cognitive impairment living with others. Health service use was lower or similar among PLACI, as opposed to counterparts living with others. Most studies reported a higher use of social services (e.g., home services) among PLACI than those living with others. Overall use of essential home service among PLACI was higher in Europe than in the United States, a country where large portions of PLACI were reported receiving no formal services.

DISCUSSION AND IMPLICATIONS

We identified wide variability among countries and major gaps in service use. Results for use of health services were mixed, although our findings suggest that PLACI may have fewer physician visits than counterparts living with others. Our findings suggest that varying policies and budgets for these services among countries may have affected our findings. We encourage researchers to evaluate and compare the influence of social policies in the well-being of PLACI. We also encourage policy makers to prioritize the needs of PLACI in national dementia strategies.

Feasibility and potential effects of interdisciplinary home-based reablement program (I-HARP) for people with cognitive and functional decline: a pilot trial

Objectives: To test feasibility and potential effects of the interdisciplinary Home-bAsed Reablement Program (I-HARP) that integrates evidence-based strategies and cognitive rehabilitation techniques into a dementia-specific, bio-behavioural-environmental intervention.Methods: A parallel-group randomised controlled pilot trial was conducted in Sydney, Australia, targeting community-dwelling people with amnestic mild cognitive impairment or mild/moderate stages of dementia and their carer (n = 18 dyads). I-HARP comprised: up to 12 home visits by registered nurse, occupational therapist, and psychologist, tailored to the individual client's needs; <A$1000 for home modification/assistive devices; and individual carer support, all provided over four months. Additional allied health services were recommended when necessary. Clients' daily activities, mobility, mood, caregiver burden, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, four months and 12 months. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with I-HARP participants post intervention.Results: Of 51 dyads who expressed interest in participation, 25 were eligible, with 76% consent rate (19/25 eligible dyads consented), and high adherence to the program (all nine intervention group participants completed and complied). Challenges included: need for better carer and allied health support, with more targeted recruitment points to speed up the process. The I-HARP group showed favourable effects across most outcomes at short-term (4 months) and longer-term (12 months) assessments. However, wide Confidence Intervals (CIs) point to the degree of uncertainty around interpretation of these results.Conclusion: The delivery of I-HARP, a dementia-specific reablement program and the trial design concerning randomisation, screening and consent procedures, were deemed feasible, acceptable and appropriate for the target population group. Building on the success and lessons from the pilot, a larger trial is currently underway.

Implementing an evidence-based dementia care program in the Australian health context: A cost-benefit analysis

The World Health Organisation has called for the implementation of evidence-based interventions that enhance function and capability in people with dementia. In response, the Boosting Dementia Research Initiative in Australia has funded a number of projects aimed at improving such outcomes for people with dementia and their caregivers. What is not known is the economic and societal outcomes of these projects and of program implementation to the Australian healthcare system. The purpose of this study was to identify the costs and benefits of implementing an evidence-based reablement program within Australian health context. A well-used methodology familiar to governments and decision-makers was used to calculate the costs and benefits of implementing the program in Australia. Four different perspectives: market, private, efficiency (social) and referent group (key stakeholders) were considered in the cost-benefit evaluation. Almost A$6.2 million societal gain is presented through a social cost-benefit analysis. The referent (stakeholder) group analysis is used to demonstrate that people with dementia and their caregivers are the bearers of the costs and the Australian health and social care system gains the most from the program implementation. The results of this cost-benefit analysis suggest that there is a need to plan and provide subsidies or other financial incentives to assist people with dementia and their caregivers to engage in reablement programs in Australia; thus the whole society can be advantaged. Funding bodies and decision-makers are urged to recognise the potential societal benefits that can be achieved from participating in such reablement programs.

Implementing a Reablement Intervention, “Care of People With Dementia in Their Environments (COPE)”: A Hybrid Implementation-Effectiveness Study

Background and Objectives

The translation of reablement programs into practice is lagging despite strong evidence for interventions that maintain function for the person living with dementia as well as improve carer well-being. The aim was to evaluate the implementation of an evidence-based program, Care of People with Dementia in Their Environments (COPE), into health services.

Research Design and Methods

An implementation-effectiveness hybrid design was used to evaluate implementation outcomes while simultaneously involving a pragmatic pre–post evaluation of outcomes for people with dementia. We report uptake, fidelity to intervention, outcomes for people living with dementia and carers, and beliefs and behaviors of interventionists contributing to successful implementation.

Results

Seventeen organizations in Australia across 3 health contexts, 38 occupational therapists, and 17 nurses participated in training and implementation. While there were challenges and delays in implementation, most organizations were able to offer the program and utilized different models of funding. Overall, we found there was moderate fidelity to components of the program. Pre–post outcomes for carer well-being and coping (Perceived Change Index, p &lt; .001) and activity engagement of the person living with dementia (p = .002) were significantly increased, replicating previous trial results. What contributed most to therapists implementing the program (Determinants of Implementation Behaviour Questionnaire) was a stronger intent to deliver (p &lt; .001), higher confidence (p &lt; .001), a sense of control in delivery (p = .004), and a belief the program was very useful to their clients (p = .002).

Discussion and Implications

This study demonstrated that implementation is possible in multiple health systems and beneficial to individuals and their families.

A second chance: Experiences and outcomes of people with dementia and their families participating in a dementia reablement program

Rationale:

Evidence-based reablement programs for people with dementia and their caregivers are not routinely implemented in practice. These programs have been shown to be effective in delaying functional decline and improving caregiver wellbeing. Yet, little is known about the experiences of those participating in such programs.

Aim:

To describe experiences and outcomes of participating in a dementia reablement program, the Care of Persons with dementia in their Environments (COPE), in Australia.

Methods:

Purposeful sampling was used and semi-structured interviews were completed with people with dementia and their caregivers who received the COPE program in two different states in Australia. The interviews explored the participants’ experiences with the program as well as how they are managing after program completion. Thematic analysis was used to identify themes from the interviews. A Likert scale was used to rate the value of the program.

Results:

Ten dyads (person with dementia and/or their caregiver) were interviewed. Participation in the program was rated (mostly) very valuable. The ongoing collaboration between the therapist and caregiver was considered empowering. The program promoted participation in everyday activities for the person with dementia and appeared to give a ‘second chance’ to remain in their own homes and communities.

Conclusion:

Participation in reablement programs (such as the COPE program) has the potential to re-engage people with dementia in meaningful roles and activities in their chosen environments. A therapeutic relationship and individualized intervention approaches tailored to the participants’ needs and readiness foster positive experiences and confidence.