1
|
Ward EC, Caird E, Khanal S, Kularatna S, Byrnes J, Penman A, Mcallister S, Baldac S, Cardell E, Davenport R, Davidson B, Hewat S, Howells S, Mccabe P, Purcell A, Walters J, Hill AE. A cost analysis of a 5-day simulation-based learning program for speech-language pathology student training. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY 2023; 25:688-696. [PMID: 36062806 DOI: 10.1080/17549507.2022.2115138] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/15/2023]
Abstract
Purpose: There is poor reporting of the cost of simulation and greater transparency is needed. The primary study aim was to conduct a financial analysis of the university/training institution costs associated with a 5-day simulation-based learning program for speech-language pathology students. The secondary aim was to consider the economic costs of the model.Method: Costs associated with the delivery of a 5-day simulation-based learning program for speech-language pathology students from six Australian universities were collected regarding: (a) pre-program training, (b) personnel, (c) room hire, (d) equipment, and (e) consumables. Both financial costs and economic costs (Australian dollar, at June 2017) were calculated per university site, and per student.Result: The simulation program was run 21 times involving 176 students. Average total financial cost per program ranged from $4717 to $11 425, with cost variation primarily attributed to local labour costs and various use of in-kind support. Average financial cost per student was $859 (range $683-$1087), however this was almost double ($1461 per student, range $857-$2019) in the economic cost calculation. Personnel was the largest contributing cost component accounting for 76.6% of financial costs. Personnel was also the highest contributing cost in the economic analysis, followed by room hire.Conclusion: This study provides clarity regarding financial and economic costing for a 5-day simulation-based learning program. These data can help universities consider potential up-front financial costs, and well as strategies for financial cost minimisation, when implementing simulation-based learning within the university context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Elizabeth C Ward
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
- Centre for Functioning and Health Research, Metro South Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Emma Caird
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Saval Khanal
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sanjeewa Kularatna
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Joshua Byrnes
- Centre for Applied Health Economics, School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Adriana Penman
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sue Mcallister
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
- College of Nursing and Health Sciences, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | | | - Elizabeth Cardell
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Rachel Davenport
- School of Allied Health, Human Services and Sport, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Bronwyn Davidson
- Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Sally Hewat
- School of Health Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia, and
| | - Simone Howells
- School of Health Sciences and Social Work, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Australia
| | - Patricia Mccabe
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Alison Purcell
- Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
| | - Joanne Walters
- School of Health Science, The University of Newcastle, Callaghan, Australia, and
| | - Anne E Hill
- School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Baumann-Birkbeck L, Anoopkumar-Dukie S, Khan SA, O'Donoghue M, Grant GD. Learner attitudes towards a virtual microbiology simulation for pharmacy student education. CURRENTS IN PHARMACY TEACHING & LEARNING 2022; 14:13-22. [PMID: 35125190 DOI: 10.1016/j.cptl.2021.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2020] [Revised: 07/14/2021] [Accepted: 11/28/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Simulation for education has become popular, but much literature on this modality fails to critically examine the learner's experience, focusing instead on learning outcomes. Learner attitudes should be scrutinised and monitored to appraise a technology-enhanced learning experience as student perceived educational benefits of technology-enhanced learning is reported to be more important than the intrinsic characteristics of any particular medium or tool. This study sought to evaluate pharmacy students' attitudes toward a virtual microbiology simulation. METHODS The virtual microbiology simulation (VUMIE) was compared with a traditional wet laboratory (lab) in a second-year integrated pharmacotherapeutics course for bachelor of pharmacy students. Data were collected using surveys deployed at baseline (pre-intervention), post-intervention (VUMIE or wet lab), and endpoint (post-interventions). Statistical and qualitative thematic analyses were performed. RESULTS Learners found the simulation valuable, and outcomes suggest that it is possible for technology-enhanced learning activities to replace face-to-face instruction to some extent, which may be useful given the current challenges with in-person education resulting from COVID-19. More students reported a specific preference for the wet lab rather than VUMIE. CONCLUSIONS: Although technology-enhanced simulation can produce a similar learning experience to a traditional wet lab, this evidence is not sufficient to completely replace the traditional lab experience for clinical courses of study. Technology-enhanced simulation could be considered for just-in-time training before exposure to traditional lab activities, for specific skill acquisition using deliberate practice, and perhaps for standardised assessment for clinical microbiology education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lyndsee Baumann-Birkbeck
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia; Menzies Health Institute, G40 Griffith Health Centre, Level 8.86, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
| | - Shailendra Anoopkumar-Dukie
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia; Quality Use of Medicines Network, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
| | - Sohil A Khan
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia; Mater Research Institute-The University of Queensland, Raymond Terrace, Level 3 Aubigny Place, South Brisbane QLD 4101, Australia; Menzies Health Institute, G40 Griffith Health Centre, Level 8.86, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
| | - Margaret O'Donoghue
- Squina International Centre for Infection Control, School of Nursing, Room FJ502, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong, SAR, China.
| | - Gary D Grant
- School of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia; Quality Use of Medicines Network, Griffith University, 1 Parklands Dr, Southport, QLD 4215, Australia.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Beveridge J, Pentland D. A mapping review of models of practice education in allied health and social care professions. Br J Occup Ther 2020. [DOI: 10.1177/0308022620904325] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Practice education is fundamental to pre-registration learning for many health and social care professions, yet finding sufficient opportunities for students is challenging. One-to-one student–educator pairings are common, and while different models could increase placement opportunities, the associated terminology is inconsistent and an overview of advantages, challenges and available evidence is missing. This mapping review identifies, categorises and critically considers the evidence for different models of practice education used by health and social care professions. Method Papers from 2008 onwards reporting on practice education approaches in allied health or social care profession courses were identified in three databases. Data was extracted, methodological quality categorised and a typology of practice education models developed. Findings Fifty-three papers were reviewed and developed into a typology of 14 models. Mapping indicated issues with a lack of high-quality research and limitations in available outcome indicators. Pre-requisites for the effective operation of different models include preparation, communication and allowing sufficient time for new ways of working. Conclusions Practice education discourse is characterised by varied terminology and practices. Various models for structuring practice education exist, though the evidence for their effectiveness and impact on capacity is limited. Using consistent language and considering wider impacts and outcomes is recommended in future study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joanna Beveridge
- Division of Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| | - Duncan Pentland
- Division of Occupational Therapy and Arts Therapies, Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh, UK
| |
Collapse
|