Pharmacological characterization of linzagolix, a novel, orally active, non-peptide antagonist of gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptors

Linzagolix therapy versus a placebo in patients with endometriosis-associated pain: a prospective, randomized, double-blind, Phase 3 study (EDELWEISS 3)

STUDY QUESTION

Does linzagolix administered orally once daily for up to 3 months at a dose of 75 mg alone or 200 mg in combination with add-back therapy (ABT) (1.0 mg estradiol; 0.5 mg norethindrone acetate, also known as norethisterone acetate [NETA]) demonstrate better efficacy than placebo in the management of endometriosis-related dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Combining 200 mg linzagolix with ABT was found to significantly reduce dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain at 3 months of therapy, while a daily dose of 75 mg linzagolix yielded a significant decrease only in dysmenorrhea at 3 months.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY?

A previously published Phase 2, dose-finding study reported that at a dose of 200 mg daily, linzagolix promotes full suppression of estradiol secretion to serum levels below 20 pg/ml and noted that the addition of ABT may be needed to manage hypoestrogenic side effects. At lower doses (75 mg and 100 mg/day), linzagolix maintains estradiol values within the target range of 20-60 pg/ml, which could be ideal to alleviate symptoms linked to endometriosis.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

EDELWEISS 3 was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind, double-dummy Phase 3 study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of linzagolix for the treatment of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. Treatment was administered orally once daily for up to 6 months.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

In the EDELWEISS 3 trial, 486 subjects with moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain were randomized at a 1:1:1 ratio to one of the three study groups: placebo, 75 mg linzagolix alone or 200 mg linzagolix in association with ABT. Pain was measured daily on a verbal rating scale and recorded in an electronic diary.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

At 3 months, the daily 200 mg linzagolix dose with ABT met the primary efficacy objective, showing clinically meaningful and statistically significant reductions in dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain, with stable or decreased use of analgesics. The proportion of responders for dysmenorrhea in the 200 mg linzagolix with ABT group was 72.9% compared with 23.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.001), while the rates of responders for non-menstrual pelvic pain were 47.3% and 30.9% (P = 0.007), respectively. The 75 mg linzagolix daily dose demonstrated a clinically meaningful and statistically significant reduction in dysmenorrhea versus placebo at 3 months. The proportion of responders for dysmenorrhea in the 75 mg linzagolix group was 44.0% compared with 23.5% in the placebo group (P < 0.001). Although the 75 mg dose showed a trend toward reduction in non-menstrual pelvic pain at 3 months relative to the placebo, it was not statistically significant (P = 0.279). Significant improvements in dyschezia and overall pelvic pain were observed in both linzagolix groups when compared to placebo. Small improvements in dyspareunia scores were observed in both linzagolix groups but they were not significant. In both groups, hypoestrogenic effects were mild, with low rates of hot flushes and bone density loss of <1%. A daily dose of 200 mg linzagolix with ABT or 75 mg linzagolix alone was found to significantly reduce dysmenorrhea and non-menstrual pelvic pain also at 6 months of therapy.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

Efficacy was compared between linzagolix groups and placebo; however, it would be useful to have results from comparative studies with estro-progestogens or progestogens. It will be important to ascertain whether gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonists have significant benefits over traditional first-line medications.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Linzagolix administered orally once daily at a dose of 200 mg in combination with add-back therapy (ABT) demonstrated better efficacy and safety than placebo in the management of moderate-to-severe endometriosis-associated pain. The quality of life was improved and the risks of bone loss and vasomotor symptoms were minimized due to the ABT. The 75 mg dose alone could be suitable for chronic treatment of endometriosis-associated pain without the need for concomitant hormonal ABT, but further research is needed to confirm this. If confirmed, it would offer a viable option for women who do not want to wish to have ABT or for whom it is contraindicated.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Funding for the EDELWEISS 3 study was provided by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland). Analysis of data and manuscript writing were partially supported by ObsEva (Geneva, Switzerland), Theramex (London, UK) and Kissei (Japan) and grant 5/4/150/5 was awarded to M.-M.D. by FNRS. J.D. was a member of the scientific advisory board of ObsEva until August 2022, a member of the scientific advisory board of PregLem, and received personal fees from Gedeon Richter, ObsEva and Theramex. J.D. received consulting fees, speakers' fees, and travel support from Gedeon Richter, Obseva and Theramex, which was paid to their institution. C.B. has received fees from Theramex, Gedeon Richter, and Myovant, and travel support from Gedeon Richter-all funds went to the University of Oxford. He was a member of the data monitoring board supervising the current study, and served at an advisory board for endometriosis studies of Myovant. H.T. has received grants from Abbvie and was past president of ASRM. F.C.H. has received fees from Gedeon Richter and Theramex. O.D. received fees for lectures from Gedeon Richter and ObsEva and research grants for clinical studies from Preglem and ObsEva independent from the current study. A.H. has received grants from NIHR, UKRI, CSO, Wellbeing of Women, and Roche Diagnostics; he has received fees from Theramex. A.H.'s institution has received honoraria for consultancy from Roche Diagnostics, Gesynta, and Joii. M.P. has nothing to declare. F.P. has received fees from Theramex. S.P.R. has been a member of the scientific advisory board of Gedeon Richter and received fees from Gedeon Richter. A.P. and M.B. are employees of Theramex. E.B. was an employee of ObsEva, sponsor chair of the data monitoring board supervising the current study, and has been working as a consultant for Theramex since December 2022; she owns stock options in ObsEva. M.-M.D. has received fees and travel support from Gedeon Richter and Theramex.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03992846.

TRIAL REGISTRATION DATE

20 June 2019.

DATE OF FIRST PATIENT’S ENROLLMENT

13 June 2019.

Physiological and Pharmacological overview of the Gonadotropin Releasing Hormone

Gonadotropin-releasing Hormone (GnRH) is a decapeptide responsible for the control of the reproductive functions. It shows C- and N-terminal aminoacid modifications and two other distinct isoforms have been so far identified. The biological effects of GnRH are mediated by binding to high-affinity G-protein couple receptors (GnRHR), showing characteristic very short C tail. In mammals, including humans, GnRH-producing neurons originate in the embryonic nasal compartment and during early embryogenesis they undergo rapid migration towards the hypothalamus; the increasing knowledge of such mechanisms improved diagnostic and therapeutic approaches to infertility. The pharmacological use of GnRH, or its synthetic peptide and non-peptide agonists or antagonists, provides a valid tool for reproductive disorders and assisted reproduction technology (ART). The presence of GnRHR in several organs and tissues indicates additional functions of the peptide. The identification of a GnRH/GnRHR system in the human endometrium, ovary, and prostate has extended the functions of the peptide to the physiology and tumor transformation of such tissues. Likely, the activity of a GnRH/GnRHR system at the level of the hippocampus, as well as its decreased expression in mice brain aging, raised interest in its possible involvement in neurogenesis and neuronal functions. In conclusion, GnRH/GnRHR appears to be a fascinating biological system that exerts several possibly integrated pleiotropic actions in the complex control of reproductive functions, tumor growth, neurogenesis, and neuroprotection. This review aims to provide an overview of the physiology of GnRH and the pharmacological applications of its synthetic analogs in the management of reproductive and non-reproductive diseases.

Profile of Linzagolix in the Management of Endometriosis, Including Design, Development and Potential Place in Therapy: A Narrative Review

Estrogens play a critical role in the pathogenesis of endometriosis and it is logical to assume that lowering estradiol levels with oral gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists may prove effective, especially in women who fail to respond to progestogens. Indeed, due to progesterone resistance, oral contraceptives and progestogens work well in two-thirds of women suffering from endometriosis, but are ineffective in 33% of women. Oral GnRH antagonists have therefore been evaluated for management of premenopausal women with endometriosis-associated pelvic pain. The first publication on these drugs reported the efficacy of elagolix. The present paper is a narrative review of linzagolix, which is an orally administered GnRH receptor antagonist with low pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic variability. It binds to and blocks the GnRH receptor in the pituitary gland, resulting in a dose-dependent drop in luteinizing hormone (LH) and follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) production. This reduction in LH and FSH levels in turn leads to a dose-dependent decline in estrogen. Phase 2 and 3 trials are reviewed and discussed here. There is a place for GnRH antagonists in the management of symptomatic endometriosis, and linzagolix with or without add-back therapy (ABT) is one option that can be used at low doses, avoiding the need for ABT, which is contraindicated in some patients.

Linzagolix: First Approval

Linzagolix (Yselty^®) is an orally administered, selective, non-peptide small molecule gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) receptor antagonist that is being developed by Kissei Pharmaceutical for the treatment of uterine fibroids and endometriosis in women of reproductive age. Linzagolix binds to and blocks the GnRH receptor in the pituitary gland, modulating the hypothalamic pituitary-gonadal axis and dose-dependently reducing serum luteinising hormone and follicle-stimulating hormone production and serum estradiol levels. In June 2022, linzagolix was approved for the treatment of moderate to severe symptoms of uterine fibroids in adult women of reproductive age in the EU. Linzagolix is under regulatory review the USA for this indication and is in phase 3 clinical development in the treatment of pain associated with endometriosis. This article summarizes the milestones in the development of linzagolix leading to this first approval for the treatment of moderate to severe symptoms of uterine fibroids in adult women of reproductive age.

Non-clinical studies indicating lack of interactions between iron/calcium ions and linzagolix, an orally available GnRH antagonist

Linzagolix is an orally available gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist used to treat sex-hormone-dependent diseases in women. This study aimed to investigate drug-drug interactions between linzagolix and iron/calcium ions in the intended clinical setting by conducting pharmacokinetic studies in vitro and in rats.Insoluble precipitate formation with metal ions was evaluated by measuring linzagolix concentrations in four types of bio-relevant dissolution media (fasted/fed state simulated gastric fluid and fasted/fed state simulated gastric fluid version 2), and chelate complex formation with metal ions was evaluated by release of linzagolix from a cellulose membrane sac. In these in vitro studies, linzagolix showed no potential for insoluble precipitate formation under fasted/fed conditions and no chelate complex formation in the presence of metal ions.In rats, the plasma concentration-time profiles of linzagolix and iron ion were similar regardless of whether they were administered with or without ferrous sulfate and linzagolix choline at clinically relevant doses. Thus, linzagolix and iron ion had no effect on each other's absorption in vivo.In conclusion, linzagolix is unlikely to cause clinically relevant drug-drug interactions by chelating metal ions according to the results of in vitro and in vivo studies.