Characterisation of the sensory properties of whey protein concentrates

Non-thermal processing has an impact on the digestibility of the muscle proteins

Muscle proteins undergo several processes before being ready in a final consumable form. All these processes affect the digestibility of muscle proteins and subsequent release of amino acids and peptides during digestion in the human gut. The present review examines the effects of different processing techniques, such as curing, drying, ripening, comminution, aging, and marination on the digestibility of muscle proteins. The review also examines how the source of muscle proteins alters the gastrointestinal protein digestion. Processing techniques affect the structural and functional properties of muscle proteins and can affect their digestibility negatively or positively depending on the processing conditions. Some of these techniques, such as aging and mincing, can induce favorable changes in muscle proteins, such as partial unfolding or exposure of cleavage sites, and increase susceptibility to hydrolysis by digestive enzymes whereas others, such as drying and marination, can induce unfavorable changes, such as severe cross-linking, protein aggregation, oxidation induced changes or increased disulfide (S-S) bond content, thereby decreasing proteolysis. The underlying mechanisms have been discussed in detail and the conclusions drawn in the light of existing knowledge provide information with potential industrial importance.

The amino acid composition and protein quality of various egg, poultry meal by-products, and vegetable proteins used in the production of dog and cat diets

New protein ingredients are used to support pet food market growth and the development of new products while maintaining animal dietary needs. However, novel protein sources (e.g., spray-dried chicken, and (or) rice, pea, and potato protein concentrates) have limited data available regarding their protein quality. The objective of this study was to evaluate protein ingredients used in the pet food industry by laboratory analysis and a chick growth assay as a model. Following analysis for proximate and amino acid composition, chicks (six birds per pen with four pens per treatment) were fed experimental diets for 10 d. Diets contained 10% crude protein from each of the experimental protein sources (spray-dried egg-SDEG; spray-dried egg white-SDEW, spray-dried inedible whole egg-SDIE, chicken by-product meal-CBPM, chicken meal-CKML, low-temperature fluid bed air-dried chicken-LTCK, low-temperature and pressure fluid bed dried chicken-LTPC, spray-dried chicken-SDCK, whey protein concentrate-WPCT, corn gluten meal-CGML, corn protein concentrate-CPCT, potato protein isolate-PPIS, rice protein concentrate-RPCT, pea protein isolate-PEPI, soy protein isolate-SPIS, and soybean meal-SBML) along with an N-free diet (negative control). Chicks fed SDEG, SDIE, and LTPC had the highest protein efficiency ratio (PER; P < 0.0001; 5.18, 5.37, and 5.33, respectively), LTCK and SDCK were intermediate (4.54 and 4.79), and the CBPM and CKML were the lowest among the poultry proteins for EAA:NEAA, PER, and Lys availability. Among the vegetable proteins, PPIS and SBML had the highest PER values (3.60 and 3.48, P < 0.0001). In general, the chick PER method ranked the quality of animal protein sources higher than vegetable proteins, and these results were consistent with the EAA:NEAA ratio and Lys availability.

Effects of ball milling treatment on physicochemical properties and digestibility of Pacific oyster (Crassostrea gigas) protein powder

The oyster protein was ball milling treated in this work, and the effects on particle size, conformation, physicochemical properties, and in vitro protein digestibility (IVPD) were investigated. After ball milling treatment, the particle size obviously decreased, and the protein powder became denser and more homogeneous. The ball milling treatment could not change the primary structure of oyster protein. However, it could affect the secondary structure and physicochemical properties. The disulfide bond increased from 8.18 to 9.14 μmol/g protein, while the protein surface hydrophobicity index increased from 0.088 to 0.176. The decreasing water-holding capacity from 390% to 226% and the increasing oil-binding capacity from 91.2% to 189.1% were related to the alterations of conformation and physicochemical properties. Ball milling could also improve the IVPD from 54.6% to 82.4%. These results provided theoretical basis for the application of ball milling treatment in the utilization of oyster protein in the food industry.