Second-trimester discordance and adverse perinatal outcome in twins: the STORK multiple pregnancy cohort

Intra-abdominal umbilical venous diameter and abdominal circumference discordance at 15-20 weeks' gestation: simple markers in transverse abdominal plane to predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in monochorionic diamniotic twins

PURPOSE

This study aimed to investigate the association between simple markers in fetal abdominal plane, intra-abdominal umbilical venous diameter (DIUV) and abdominal circumference (AC) discordance at 15-20 weeks' gestation, and adverse pregnancy outcomes in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twins.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective analysis of MCDA twins with two live fetuses examined at 15-20 weeks from Jun 2020 to Dec 2021 at Beijing Obstetrics and Gynecology Hospital. Measurement of fetal AC and DIUV was performed according to standard protocols. Twin pregnancies with major fetal structural anomalies, chromosomal abnormalities, miscarriage, and twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence were excluded. DIUV and AC discordance in MCDA twins with an adverse pregnancy outcome was compared with a normal pregnancy outcome. Furthermore, the performance of DIUV and AC discordance in predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes in MCDA twins was assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 105 women with MCDA twin pregnancies were enrolled, contributing 179 visits. Adverse pregnancy outcomes occurred in 33.3% (35/105) of cases in our study. The intra-observer and inter-observer intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of both AC and DIUV were very good or excellent. There was no statistical difference in AC and DIUV discordance (%) between 15-16, 17-18, and 19-20 weeks (χ2 = 3.928, P = 0.140; χ2 = 2.840, P = 0.242). Both AC and DIUV discordance were greater in twins with adverse pregnancy outcomes than that in twins with normal pregnancy outcome at each pregnancy periods. Both AC discordance (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.3) and DIUV discordance (OR 1.2, 95% CI 1.1-1.2) were associated with adverse pregnancy outcomes. The AUC for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes by AC discordance was 0.75 (95% CI 0.68-0.83), with a sensitivity of 58.7% (95% CI 51.9-64.5) and a specificity of 86.2% (95% CI 81.7-88.4). The AUC for predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes by DIUV was 0.78 (95% CI 0.70-0.86), with sensitivity and specificity of 65.1% (95% CI 58.1-70.3) and 86.2% (95% CI 81.7-88.4), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The AC discordance and DIUV discordance could predict adverse pregnancy outcomes in MCDA twins. When these simple markers occurred, intensive surveillance was recommended.

Accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation and prediction of birth-weight discordance in twin pregnancy: large single-center study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the accuracy of sonographic fetal weight estimation in predicting birth weight (BW) and BW discordance in twin gestations, and to evaluate maternal and fetal characteristics that may affect the accuracy of this assessment.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of all twins delivered at a single tertiary medical center between 2010 and 2021. Twin gestations for which sonographic estimation of fetal weight was performed within the week preceding delivery were included. Statistical analysis was performed to evaluate the strength of the correlation between sonographic estimated fetal weight (EFW) and BW, and to determine the impact of maternal and fetal factors on the accuracy of sonographic estimation.

RESULTS

The study included 2154 twin pregnancies. There was a strong correlation between sonographic EFW and corresponding BW for all twins (r = 0.922; P < 0.001). Strong correlations were observed for both the presenting and non-presenting cotwin (r = 0.921 and r = 0.922, respectively; both P < 0.001), as well as the larger and smaller cotwin (r = 0.928 and r = 0.934, respectively; both P < 0.001). The overall mean ± SD absolute error of sonographic EFW was 7.41 ± 6.81%. This error was greater for the non-presenting cotwin compared with the presenting cotwin (7.99 ± 6.12% vs 7.17 ± 5.64%; P < 0.001), and for the smaller cotwin compared with the larger cotwin (8.56 ± 7.50% vs 6.58 ± 5.47%; P < 0.001). Advanced gestational age at scanning was correlated inversely with the mean absolute error of sonographic EFW. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that an earlier gestational age at scanning, being the non-presenting cotwin and being the smaller cotwin were independent risk factors for sonographic EFW inaccuracy. Pregnancies in which the presenting twin was estimated to be the smaller cotwin had twice the rate of false-positive BW discordance compared with pregnancies in which the presenting twin was estimated to be the larger cotwin (36.0% vs 13.0% for BW discordance > 15%, 35.0% vs 17.0% for BW discordance > 20% and 37.7% vs 12.1% for BW discordance > 25%; all P < 0.001). The error in sonographic EFW discordance was not related to chorionicity, the position of the presenting fetus or gestational age at the time of fetal weight estimation.

CONCLUSIONS

Sonographic estimation of fetal weight within 7 days before delivery accurately predicts BW in twin pregnancy. Sonographic EFW accuracy is reduced for the non-presenting twin, the smaller cotwin and when delivery occurs at an earlier gestational age. Sonographic estimation of fetal weight discordance is less accurate when the presenting twin is the smaller cotwin. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Directive clinique no 440 : Prise en charge de la grossesse gémellaire monochoriale

OBJECTIF

Cette directive clinique passe en revue les données probantes sur la prise en charge de la grossesse gémellaire monochoriale normale et compliquée.

POPULATION CIBLE

Les femmes menant une grossesse gémellaire ou multiple de haut rang. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: L'application des recommandations de cette directive devrait améliorer la prise en charge des grossesses gémellaires (ou multiples de haut rang) monochoriales compliquées et non compliquées. Ces recommandations aideront les fournisseurs de soins à surveiller adéquatement les grossesses gémellaires monochoriales ainsi qu'à détecter et prendre en charge rapidement les complications associées de façon optimale afin de réduire les risques de morbidité et mortalité périnatales. Ces recommandations impliquent une surveillance échographique plus fréquente en cas de grossesse monochoriale qu'en cas de grossesse bichoriale. DONNéES PROBANTES: La littérature publiée a été colligée par des recherches dans les bases de données PubMed et Cochrane Library au moyen de termes MeSH pertinents (Twins, Monozygotic; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Placenta; Fetofetal Transfusion; Fetal Death; Fetal Growth Retardation). Les résultats ont été restreints aux revues systématiques, aux essais cliniques randomisés et aux études observationnelles. Aucune date limite n'a été appliquée, mais les résultats ont été limités aux contenus en anglais ou en français. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs principaux ont rédigé le contenu et les recommandations et ils se sont entendus sur ces derniers. Le conseil d'administration de la SOGC a approuvé la version définitive aux fins de publication. Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et conditionnelles [faibles]). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Spécialistes en médecine fœto-maternelle, obstétriciens, radiologues, échographistes, médecins de famille, infirmières, sages-femmes, résidents et autres fournisseurs de soins de santé qui s'occupent de femmes menant une grossesse gémellaire ou multiple de haut rang. RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: Directive canadienne (SOGC) pour le diagnostic, la surveillance échographique et la prise en charge des complications de la grossesse gémellaire monochoriale (p. ex., STT, TAPS, retard de croissance sélectif, cojumeau acardiaque, monoamnionicité et mort d'un jumeau). DÉCLARATIONS SOMMAIRES: RECOMMANDATIONS.

Guideline No. 440: Management of Monochorionic Twin Pregnancies

OBJECTIVE

This guideline reviews the evidence-based management of normal and complicated monochorionic twin pregnancies.

TARGET POPULATION

Women with monochorionic twin or higher order multiple pregnancies.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Implementation of these recommendations should improve the management of both complicated and uncomplicated monochorionic (and higher order multiple) twin pregnancies. They will help users monitor monochorionic twin pregnancies appropriately and identify and manage monochorionic twin complications optimally in a timely manner, thereby reducing perinatal morbidity and mortality. These recommendations entail more frequent ultrasound monitoring of monochorionic twins compared to dichorionic twins.

EVIDENCE

Published literature was retrieved through searches of PubMed and the Cochrane Library using appropriate MeSH headings (Twins, Monozygotic; Ultrasonography, Prenatal; Placenta; Fetofetal Transfusion; Fetal Death; Fetal Growth Retardation). Results were restricted to systematic reviews, randomized controlled clinical trials, and observational studies. There were no date limits, but results were limited to English or French language materials.

VALIDATION METHODS

The content and recommendations were drafted and agreed upon by the principal authors. The Board of the SOGC approved the final draft for publication. The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and conditional [weak] recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Maternal-fetal medicine specialists, obstetricians, radiologists, sonographers, family physicians, nurses, midwives, residents, and other health care providers who care for women with monochorionic twin or higher order multiple pregnancies.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Canadian (SOGC) guidelines for the diagnosis, ultrasound surveillance and management of monochorionic twin pregnancy complications, including TTTS, TAPS, sFGR (sIUGR), acardiac (TRAP), monoamniotic twins and intrauterine death of one MC twin.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Incidence of small-for-gestational-age infant birthweight following early intertwin fetal growth discordance in dichorionic and monochorionic twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Serial growth scans are routinely recommended for twin pregnancies to identify fetal growth restriction (defined as an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile), which can result in increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. However, the clinical significance of early intertwin growth discordance in the absence of fetal growth restriction remains unclear.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to compare the rates of small-for-gestational-age infants among twin pregnancies with intertwin growth discordance in the absence of fetal growth restriction with that among twin pregnancies with concordant, normal growth identified by ultrasound between 24 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of twin deliveries at a single hospital from 2010 to 2019. Pregnancies without fetal growth restriction were categorized as discordant or concordant using the earliest prenatal growth ultrasound between 24 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation. Discordance was defined as an estimated fetal weight difference of ≥18% between twins. Pregnancies with major fetal anomalies, no growth ultrasound between 24 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation, or twin-twin transfusion syndrome were excluded. The cohort was stratified by chorionicity. Our primary outcome was small-for-gestational-age defined as <10th percentile per the Fenton growth curve at delivery. Secondary outcomes included gestational age at delivery, mode of delivery, neonatal intensive care unit admission, length of stay, and neonatal complications and placental pathology.

RESULTS

Of the 707 twin pregnancies that met the inclusion criteria, 558 (79%) were dichorionic and 149 (21%) were monochorionic. Most pregnancies were concordant on ultrasound between 24 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation (dichorionic, 93%; monochorionic, 87%). Regardless of chorionicity, twin pregnancies with discordance at ultrasound, were more likely to have a small-for-gestational-age infant than concordant twin pregnancies (dichorionic: 51% vs 29%; P=.002; monochorionic: 65% vs 24%; P<.001). Furthermore, women with twin pregnancies with discordance were delivered at an earlier gestational age (dichorionic: 36 weeks [interquartile range, 33-36] vs 34 weeks [interquartile range, 34-38]; P<.001; monochorionic: 34 weeks [interquartile range, 32-34] vs 36 weeks [interquartile range, 34-37]; P=.003). Pregnancies with growth discordance were more likely to be delivered by cesarean delivery (dichorionic: 90% vs 72%; P=.01; monochorionic: 65% vs 60%; P=.70), although this was only statistically significant for dichorionic twin pregnancies. Neonates of pregnancies with growth discordance had a higher incidence of respiratory distress syndrome (dichorionic: 54% vs 37%; P=.04; monochorionic: 70% vs 45%; P=.04) and neonatal intensive care unit admission (dichorionic: 71% vs 50%; P=.01; monochorionic: 90% vs 65%; P=.03). Furthermore, dichorionic infants had longer neonatal intensive care unit stays (30 [interquartile range, 18-61] vs 18 [interquartile range, 10-35] days; P=.02).

CONCLUSION

Regardless of chorionicity, twin pregnancies with discordance without fetal growth restriction identified on growth ultrasound between 24 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation were nearly twice as likely to develop small-for-gestational-age neonates, deliver earlier in gestation, and experience greater neonatal morbidity than twin pregnancies without discordance. Patients with pregnancies complicated by isolated intertwin discordance between 24 0/7 and 31 6/7 weeks' gestation will need counseling regarding adverse perinatal outcomes.

The accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction with second trimester Doppler ultrasound in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND

Selective fetal restriction growth (sFGR) is one of the common diseases of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies, resulting in many adverse outcomes. At present, second trimester ultrasonography is widely used in the prenatal diagnosis of sFGR, but the diagnostic effectiveness is still uncertain. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of second trimester Doppler ultrasound measurements for sFGR.

METHODS

A retrospective study included 280 pregnant women (118 with and 162 without sFGR) with MCDA pregnancies was conducted in the fetal medicine center from Leiden University Medical Center from January 2008 to December 2013. The women participating had already undergone an ultrasound examination in the second trimester. The postnatal criteria of sFGR was a single birth weight (BW) < 3 rd percentile in a twin, or birth weight discordance (BWD)≥25% between two twins, while the BW of the smaller twin < 10th percentile. Early prenatal diagnosis of sFGR was defined as a single EFW < 3 rd percentile in a twin, or at least 2 of the following 4 parameters must be met (fetal weight of one fetus < 10th percentile, AC of one fetus <10th percentile, EFW discordance≥25%, UA pulsatility index (PI) of the smaller fetus > 95th percentile). According to the diagnosis of sFGR after birth, we evaluate diagnostic effectiveness of Doppler ultrasound in the second trimester for sFGR.

RESULTS

Of these 280 participants, the mean age was 32.06 ± 4.76 years. About 43.9% of pregnant women were primiparas. The ability of second trimester Doppler ultrasound to accurately diagnosed sFGR is 75.4%, missed diagnosis rate and the misdiagnosis rate were 24.6% and 10.5% respectively. The ROC curve indicated that the combination of AC discordance, EFW discordance, and small fetal UA blood flow was the best diagnostic indicator of sFGR in MCDA pregnancy with the AUC was 0.882 (95%CI, 0.839-0.926).

CONCLUSIONS

Second trimester Doppler and ultrasound measurements is an effective method for early prenatal diagnosis of sFGR. The combined indicator of AC discordance, EFW discordance, and the small fetal UA blood flow reaches highest diagnostic value.

Patterns of discordant growth and adverse neonatal outcomes in twins

BACKGROUND

Intertwin size discordance is an independent risk factor for adverse neonatal outcomes in twin pregnancies. However, size discordance at a given point in gestation fails to take into consideration information, such as the timing of onset and the rate of progression of discordance, that may be of prognostic value.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, we aimed to identify distinct patterns of discordant fetal growth in twin pregnancies and to determine whether these patterns are predictive of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective cohort study of women with twin pregnancies in a single tertiary referral center between January 2011 and April 2020, who had at least 3 ultrasound examinations during pregnancy that included assessment of fetal biometry. Size discordance was calculated at each ultrasound examination, and pregnancies were classified into 1 of 4 predetermined patterns based on the timing of onset and the progression of discordance: pattern 1, no significant discordance group (referent); pattern 2, early (<24 weeks' gestation) progressive discordance group; pattern 3, early discordance with plateau group; or pattern 4, late (≥24 weeks' gestation) discordance group. The associations of discordance pattern (using pattern 1 as referent) with preterm birth, preeclampsia, size discordance at birth, and birthweight<10th percentile were expressed as adjusted relative risk with 95% confidence intervals and were compared with those observed for a single measurement of size discordance at 32 weeks' gestation.

RESULTS

Of 2075 women with a twin gestation who were identified during the study period, 1059 met the study criteria. Of the 1059 women, 599 (57%) were classified as no significant discordance (pattern 1), 23 (2%) as early progressive discordance (pattern 2), 160 (15%) as early discordance with plateau (pattern 3), and 277 (26%) as late discordance (pattern 4). The associations of discordance pattern with preterm birth at <34 weeks' gestation and preeclampsia were strongest for pattern 2 (rates of 43% [adjusted relative risk, 3.43; 95% confidence interval, 2.10-5.62] and 17% [adjusted relative risk, 5.81; 95% confidence interval, 2.31-14.60], respectively), intermediate for pattern 3 (rates of 23% [adjusted relative risk, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.28-2.59] and 6% [adjusted relative risk, 2.08; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-4.43], respectively), and weakest for pattern 4 (rates of 12% [adjusted relative risk, 0.96; 95% confidence interval, 0.65-1.42] and 4% [adjusted relative risk, 1.41; 0.68-2.92], respectively). In contrast, a single measurement of size discordance at 32 weeks' gestation showed no association with preeclampsia and only a weak association with preterm birth at <34 weeks' gestation.

CONCLUSION

We identified 4 distinct discordance growth patterns among twins that demonstrated a dose-response relationship with adverse outcomes and seemed to be more informative than a single measurement of size discordance.

Screening, Management and Delivery in Twin Pregnancy

The following AWMF guideline (DGGG/AGG & DEGUM responsible) deals with the diagnosis, screening and management of twins as well as the timing and mode of birth.Twin pregnancies can be classified as dichorionic diamniotic (DC DA), monochorionic diamniotic (MC DA) and monochorionic monoamniotic (MC MA) which are always monochorionic.Twin pregnancies can be concordant (both twins are affected) or discordant (only one twin is affected) for chromosomal defects, malformations, growth restriction and hemodynamic disorders.Chorionicity is the prognostically most significant parameter. Monochorial twins have significantly higher risks of intrauterine morbidity and mortality compared to dichorial twins.In particular, general aspects of twin pregnancies such as dating, determination of chorionicity and amnionicity, the labeling of twin fetuses and the perinatal switch phenomenon are discussed.Routine monitoring of MC and DC twin pregnancies with ultrasound at 11-13^+ 6 weeks of gestation for chromosomal defects, invasive prenatal diagnosis, first-trimester NT or CRL discrepancies, early diagnosis of fetal anatomical defects, and management of twins with abnormalities, including selective fetocide, is described.Second trimester screening and management for preterm birth, intrauterine selective growth restriction (sFGR), classification of monochorial twins with sFGR, and management of the surviving twin after the death of the co-twin are described.Complications exclusively affecting MC twins include Twin to Twin Transfusion Syndrome (TTTS) with the important topics screening, prognosis, complications of laser therapy, timing of delivery, risks for brain abnormalities and delayed neurological development, Twin Anemia-Polycythemia Sequence (TAPS) and Twin Reversed Arterial Perfusion (TRAP) Sequence. This also includes MC MA twins as well as conjoined twins.Finally, the birth mode and time for DC and MC twin pregnancies are described.The information is summarized in 62 recommendations for action, 4 tables and 8 illustrations with comprehensive background texts.The guideline is an international guideline adaptation (ISUOG, NICE) as well as a systematic literature search and is up-to-date.

Second-trimester abdominal circumference discordance and adverse perinatal outcomes in monochorionic twins

OBJECTIVE

The perinatal outcomes in second-trimester abdominal circumference (AC) discordant twins are yet to be established. The aim of this study was to ascertain perinatal risks associated with second-trimester AC discordance in monochorionic (MC) twins.

METHOD

We conducted a retrospective study of all MC twin pregnancies over a 7-year period. Intertwin AC discordance at 14-26 gestational weeks was analyzed in relation to Doppler abnormalities, obstetric complications, and perinatal adverse outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 246 MC twin pregnancies were included in the analysis. The smaller twins of second-trimester AC discordant pairs were at increased prevalence of abnormal umbilical artery flow (50% versus 24%, p < .001) and low positive A wave of ductus venous flow (24% versus 9%, p = .002). The second-trimester AC discordant twins were at increased risk of oligohydramnios in smaller twin (OR = 2.44, 95% CI = 1.37-4.32, p < .01), cardiomegaly in larger twin (OR = 2.95, 95% CI = 1.01-8.60, p < .05), birth weight of either twin below the 10th percentile for gestational age (OR = 5.56, 95% CI = 2.67-11.59, p < .001), birth weight discordance > 25% (OR = 9.41, 95% CI = 4.46-19.87, p < .001), IUFD (OR = 3.26, 95% CI = 1.76-6.05, p < .001), and severe neonatal morbidity (OR = 1.83, 95% CI = 1.03-3.26, p < .05). The intact survival rate in discordant and concordant twin pairs was 70% and 89%, respectively (p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Early and increase fetal surveillance of the second-trimester AC discordant twins should be utilized to establish perinatal risks, thus allowing prenatal care to improve.

Fetal Growth in Multiple Gestations: Evaluation and Management

Multifetal gestation pregnancies present a clinical challenge due to unique complications including growth issues, prematurity, maternal risk, and pathologic processes, such as selective intrauterine growth restriction (sIUGR), twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS), and twin anemia-polycythemia sequence. If sIUGR is found, then management may involve some combination of increased surveillance, fetal procedures, and/or delivery. The combination of sIUGR with TTTS or other comorbidities increases the risk of pregnancy complications. Multifetal pregnancy reduction is an option when a problem is confined to a single fetus or when weighing the risks and benefits of a multifetal gestation in comparison to a singleton pregnancy.

Ultrasound for diagnosis of birth weight discordance in twin pregnancies

BACKGROUND

There is a need to standardize monitoring in obstetric research of twin pregnancies. Identification of birth weight discordance (BWD), defined as a difference in the birth weights of twins, is a well-documented phenomenon in twin pregnancies. Ultrasound for the diagnosis of BWD informs complex decision making including whether to intervene medically (via laser photo coagulation) or deliver the twins to avoid fetal morbidities or even death. The question is, how accurate is this measurement?

OBJECTIVES

To determine the diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of ultrasound estimated fetal weight discordance (EFWD) of 20% and 25% using different estimated biometric ultrasound measurements compared with the actual BWD as the reference standard in twin pregnancies.

SEARCH METHODS

The search for this review was performed on 15 March 2019. We searched CENTRAL, MEDLINE (Ovid), Embase (Ovid), seven other databases, conference proceedings, reference lists and contacted experts. There were no language or date restrictions applied to the electronic searches, and no methodological filters to maximize sensitivity.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected cohort-type studies with delayed verification that evaluated the accuracy of biometric measurements at ultrasound scanning of twin pregnancies that had been proposed for the diagnosis of estimated BWD, compared to BWD measurements after birth as a reference standard. In addition, we only selected studies that considered twin pregnancies and applied a reference standard for EFWD for the target condition of BWD.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We screened all titles generated by electronic database searches. Two review authors independently assessed the abstracts of all potentially relevant studies. We assessed the identified full papers for eligibility, and extracted data to create 2 × 2 tables. Two review authors independently performed quality assessment using the QUADAS-2 tool. We excluded studies that did not report data in sufficient detail to construct 2 × 2 tables, and where this information was not available from the primary investigators. We assessed the certainty of the evidence using the GRADE approach.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 39 eligible studies with a median study sample size of 140. In terms of risk of bias, there were many unclear statements regarding patient selection, index test and use of proper reference standard. Twenty-one studies (53%) were of methodological concern due to flow and timing. In terms of applicability, most studies were of low concern. Ultrasound for diagnosis of BWD in twin pregnancies at 20% cut-off Twenty-two studies provided data for a BWD of 20% and the summary estimate of sensitivity was 0.51 (95% CI 0.42 to 0.60), and the summary estimate of specificity was 0.91 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.93) (8005 twin pregnancies; very low-certainty evidence). Ultrasound for diagnosis of BWD in twin pregnancies at 25% cut-off Eighteen studies provided data using a BWD discordance of 25%. The summary estimate of sensitivity was 0.46 (95% CI 0.26 to 0.66), and the summary estimate of specificity was 0.93 (95% CI 0.89 to 0.96) (6471 twin pregnancies; very low-certainty evidence). Subgroup analyses were possible for both BWD of 20% and 25%. The diagnostic accuracy did not differ substantially between estimation by abdominal circumference and femur length but femur length had a trend towards higher sensitivity and specificity. Subgroup analyses were not possible by sex of twins, chorionicity or gestational age due to insufficient data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Very low-certainty evidence suggests that EFWD identified by ultrasound has low sensitivity but good specificity in detecting BWD in twin pregnancies. There is uncertain diagnostic value of EFWD; this review suggests there is insufficient evidence to support this index as the sole measure for clinical decision making to evaluate the prognosis of twins with growth discordance. The diagnostic accuracy of other measures including amniotic fluid index and umbilical artery Doppler resistive indices in combination with ultrasound for clinical intervention requires evaluation. Future well-designed studies could also evaluate the impact of chorionicity, sex and gestational age in the diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound for EFWD.

Outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy with selective fetal growth restriction at 16, 20 or 30 weeks according to new Delphi consensus definition

OBJECTIVES

To report the outcome of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) diagnosed according to the new Delphi consensus definition, and determine potential predictors of survival, in a cohort of unselected monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies followed from the first trimester onward, which were diagnosed with sFGR at 16, 20 or 30 weeks' gestation. sFGR was defined according to the new Delphi consensus criteria as presence of either an estimated fetal weight (EFW) < 3^rd centile in one twin or at least two of the following: EFW of one twin < 10^th centile, abdominal circumference of one twin < 10^th centile, EFW discordance ≥ 25% or umbilical artery pulsatility index of the smaller twin > 95^th centile. The primary outcomes were the overall survival rate (up to day 28 after birth) and risk of loss of one or both twins. We further determined possible predictors of survival using uni- and multivariate generalized estimated equation modeling.

RESULTS

We analyzed 675 pregnancies, of which 177 (26%) were diagnosed with sFGR at 16, 20 or 30 weeks. The overall survival rate was 313/354 (88%) with 146/177 (82%) pregnancies resulting in survival of both twins, 21/177 (12%) in survival of one twin and 10/177 (6%) in loss of both twins. Subsequent twin anemia-polycythemia sequence (TAPS) developed in 6/177 (3%) and twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) in 17/177 (10%) pregnancies. All TAPS fetuses survived. The survival rate in sFGR pregnancies that subsequently developed TTTS was 65% (22/34), compared with 91% (279/308) in those with isolated sFGR (no subsequent TAPS or TTTS) (P < 0.001). The majority of sFGR cases were Type I (110/177 (62%)) and had a survival rate of 96% (212/220), as compared with a survival of 55% (12/22) in those with Type-II (P < 0.001) and 83% (55/66) in those with Type-III (P = 0.006) sFGR. The majority of sFGR pregnancies (130/177 (73%)) were first diagnosed at 16 or 20 weeks (early onset), with a survival rate of 85% (221/260), as compared with a survival of 98% (92/94) in sFGR first diagnosed at 30 weeks (late onset) (P = 0.04). A major anomaly in at least one twin was present in 28/177 (16%) sFGR cases. In these pregnancies, survival was 39/56 (70%), compared with 274/298 (92%) in those without an anomaly (P < 0.001). Subsequent development of TTTS (odds ratio (OR), 0.18 (95% CI, 0.06-0.52)), Type-II sFGR (OR, 0.06 (95% CI, 0.02-0.24)) and Type-III sFGR (OR, 0.21 (95% CI, 0.07-0.60)) and presence of a major anomaly in at least one twin (OR, 0.12 (95% CI, 0.04-0.34)), but not gestational age at first diagnosis, were independently associated with decreased survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated sFGR is associated with a 90% survival rate in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. The subsequent development of TTTS, absent or reversed end-diastolic flow in the umbilical artery of the smaller twin and the presence of a major anomaly adversely affect survival in sFGR. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Predictive value of prenatal ultrasound parameters for dichorionic growth discordant twins

BACKGROUND

Twin growth discordance was demonstrated to be a risk factor for adverse perinatal outcomes, and prenatal ultrasonographic methods were utilized to predict twin growth discordance to improve outcomes. The results currently reported are not consistent due to the poor unified parameters and gestational durations.

METHODS

A total of 71 dichorionic twins with growth discordance and 346 dichorionic twins with normal growth were respectively included in the retrospective cohort study. The weight discordance of more than 25% was defined as a "growth discordant twin". The clinical baseline information, maternal outcomes, twin birth weights and fetal growth parameters (which were measured by ultrasound) were compared between the two groups from early gestation to late gestation. Multiple logistic regression and receiver operating characteristic curves were adopted to evaluate the predictive value of the growth parameters.

RESULTS

Compared with normal dichorionic twins, the clinical baseline conditions were similar in the twins those finally developed growth discordance. The fetal growth parameters and the deepest volume pocket of amniotic fluid in early and mid-pregnancy showed no obvious predictive values. The fetal growth parameters in late pregnancy showed predictive values, especially the discordance of estimated fetal weight (EFW) in the early third-trimester (P < 0.001, area under the curve, 0.822; the cut-off value, 20%; sensitivity, 66.67%; specificity, 91.30%; positive predictive value, 88.46%).

CONCLUSION

Two assessment approaches were suggested and adopted to predict twin growth discordance in the current study. Twin growth should be assessed longitudinally and dynamically. Normal twins may show growth imbalance in the early stage. The discordance of EFW in late pregnancy may be a useful indicator for a growth discordance of more than 25%, which is required further confirmation.

Associations between estimated foetal weight discordance and clinical characteristics within dichorionic twins: The NICHD Fetal Growth Studies

BACKGROUND

Birthweight discordance is well studied, with less known about longitudinal inter-twin differences in foetal growth.

OBJECTIVE

To examine inter-twin per cent differences in EFW (EFW_% ), head (HC_% ) and abdominal circumference (AC_% ), and femur length (FL_% ) across gestation in dichorionic twin gestations and explore associated characteristics.

METHODS

Foetal biometrics were assessed by ultrasound and EFW calculated at ≤6 study visits among women with dichorionic twin pregnancies enrolled in the NICHD Fetal Growth Studies cohort (US, 2012-2013). Inter-twin per cent difference was defined: ([Size_{larger twin}  - Size_{smaller twin} ]/Size_{larger twin}  × 100). Linear mixed models evaluated per cent differences in foetal biometrics at 15 weeks and their change per week overall and by maternal/neonatal characteristics in unadjusted and adjusted models.

RESULTS

In 140 pregnancies, inter-twin per cent differences increased across gestation for EFW (0.18%/week, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.10, 0.27), HC (0.03%/week, 95% CI 0.00, 0.06), and AC (0.03%/week, 95%CI -0.01, 0.08) but decreased for FL (-0.03%/week, 95% CI -0.09, 0.02). After adjustment, change in EFW_% difference across gestation differed by pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI [kg/m² ]; underweight [<18.5]; normal weight [18.5-24.9]; overweight [25.0-29.9]; obese [≥30.0]; P_interaction  = .022); and conception method (in vitro fertilisation [IVF], intrauterine insemination, ovulation induction medication, donor egg/embryo, none; P_interaction  = .060). While EFW_% difference increased with normal pre-pregnancy BMI (0.24%/week, 95% CI 0.12, 0.37), little change was noted with pre-pregnancy obesity (0.01%/week, 95% CI -0.15, 0.17). EFW_% difference increased in conceptions without fertility treatments (0.23%/week, 95% CI 0.11, 0.34) but not IVF conceptions (-0.00%/week, 95% CI -0.16, 0.16). Similar patterns of differences across gestation were noted for HC_% by conception method (P_interaction  = .026) and AC_% by pre-pregnancy BMI (P_interaction  = .071); changes in HC_% differed by parity (nulliparous, multiparous; P_interaction  = .004).

CONCLUSIONS

EFW_% difference increased across gestation in dichorionic twins, but remained stable with pre-pregnancy obesity or IVF conception, patterns mirrored for HC and AC. Research is needed to understand pathologic versus physiologic differential twin growth trajectories.

Placental T2* estimated by magnetic resonance imaging and fetal weight estimated by ultrasound in the prediction of birthweight differences in dichorionic twin pairs

INTRODUCTION

Intertwin birthweight (BW) difference is associated with an increased risk of adverse outcome. Ultrasound estimated fetal weight (EFW) is the current method to predict intertwin BW difference, however, the sensitivity is poor. Therefore, new methods are needed. Placental T2* estimated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) provides non-invasive information about the placental function. This study aimed to investigate placental T2* difference as a new predictor of BW difference, and to compare it to the EFW.

METHODS

We included 25 dichorionic twin pairs at 19-38 weeks' gestation. Placental T2* was obtained by MRI and EFW by ultrasound. Correlations between each predictor and BW difference were examined by simple linear regression, and the combined model was analyzed by multiple linear regression and likelihood ratio test.

RESULTS

Strong positive correlations were demonstrated between intertwin differences in placental T2* and BW (r = 0.80, p < 0.005), and EFW and BW (r = 0.64, p < 0.005). Placental T2* difference was a strong independent predictor of BW difference (p < 0.001), and the combined model performed better than each predictor alone (p < 0.0001).

DISCUSSION

This pilot study demonstrates that placental T2* difference may be a predictor of intertwin BW difference irrespectively of fetal size. The clinical potential of this method deserves further investigation in a larger clinical study.

The value of ultrasound in predicting isolated inter-twin discordance and adverse perinatal outcomes

PURPOSE

To investigate the value of ultrasound approaching delivery to predict isolated inter-twin discordance and adverse perinatal outcomes.

METHODS

We retrospectively included twin pregnancies with sonography approaching delivery in ten maternal-foetal medicine centres in China from 2013 to 2014. Estimated foetal weight (EFW) and inter-twin EFW disparity (EFWD) were calculated based on biometry parameters. Percentage errors between EFW and actual birthweight or between EFWD and actual inter-twin disparity were calculated. ROC curves and multiple logistic regression were applied to evaluate the ability of EFWD to predict inter-twin disparity ≥ 25%, stillbirth, asphyxia and admission to a neonatal intensive unit (NICU). Chorionicity-stratified analysis was further performed.

RESULTS

Two hundred sixty-six monochorionic and 760 dichorionic twin pregnancies were analysed. The percentage errors in foetal weight estimations were 7-13%, whereas percentage errors in the estimation of inter-twin disparity were nearly 100%. Among eight formulas, Hadlock1 performed best, with a detectable rate of 65% and a false positive rate of 5% when predicting inter-twin disparity ≥ 25%. EFWD ≥ 22% was strongly associated with stillbirth (OR = 4.17, 95% CI 1.40-12.40) and NICU admission (OR = 3.48, 95% CI 2.03-5.97) after adjustment for gestational age, parity and abnormal umbilical systolic/diastolic ratio. Ultrasound had better predictive ability in monochorionic twins.

CONCLUSION

The predictive value of ultrasound for isolated inter-twin discordance and adverse perinatal outcomes was limited, which was possibly due to the magnifying of systematic errors in the disparity estimation compared with weight estimation. Despite this, abnormal biometry was an independent contributor for the poor prognosis of neonates.

Ethical considerations in the care of complicated twin pregnancies

Twin gestations are increasing in prevalence worldwide, and are potentially subject to medical complications which present uniquely complex ethical and psychosocial challenges for the pregnant patient and obstetrician to navigate. In this article, we explore these issues as they relate to medical decision-making in cases of discordant growth and discordant anomalies in both monochorionic and dichorionic twin pregnancies, including those affected by twin-twin transfusion syndrome, with particular attention to scenarios in which the individual fetuses hold competing interests. For each of these scenarios, we consider how decisions may positively or negatively impact one or both fetuses, and how familiarity with population outcomes, as well as sensitivity to the complex psychosocial circumstances surrounding these pregnancies, can support and inform shared decision-making.

Diagnostic accuracy of ultrasound in predicting birth-weight discordance in twin pregnancy: systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the diagnostic performance of ultrasound in predicting birth-weight (BW) discordance in twin pregnancy.

METHODS

Electronic databases PubMed, EMBASE and CINAHL were searched using combinations of MeSH terms 'birth weight', 'discordance', 'twins' and 'ultrasound'. Summary estimates of sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios and diagnostic odds ratios for the predictive accuracy of sonographically estimated fetal-weight (EFW) discordance and abdominal-circumference (AC) discordance in predicting BW discordance were computed using hierarchical summary receiver-operating characteristics curves.

RESULTS

Twenty studies (including 5826 twin pregnancies) were included. EFW discordance ≥ 20% had a sensitivity of 65.4% and specificity of 90.8% in predicting BW discordance ≥ 20%. The predictive performance of ultrasound performed within 1 month, 2 weeks and 3 days before birth was 61.4%, 72.3% and 78.9%, respectively. EFW discordance ≥ 25% had a sensitivity of 57.7% and specificity of 95.2% in predicting BW discordance ≥ 25%. The sensitivity of EFW discordance ≥ 25% detected within 1 month, 2 weeks and 3 days before birth was 60.0%, 75.0% and 60.3%, respectively, while the corresponding values for specificity were 97.7%, 96.2% and 87.3%, respectively. In view of the different cut-offs reported among studies, it was not possible to perform comprehensive data synthesis for each AC discordance cut-off. The optimal diagnostic performance of AC discordance was for prediction of BW discordance ≥ 25%, with a sensitivity of 70.8% and specificity of 86.4%.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound EFW discordance has an overall moderate accuracy in predicting BW discordance in twin pregnancy. Copyright © 2016 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Prenatal prediction of significant intertwin birthweight discordance using standard second and third trimester sonographic parameters

INTRODUCTION

Our study aim was to evaluate standard ultrasound-derived fetal biometric parameters in the prediction of clinically significant intertwin birthweight discordance defined as ≥18%.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This was a secondary analysis of a prospective cohort study of 1028 unselected twin pairs recruited over a two-year period. Dichorionic twins underwent two-weekly ultrasonographic surveillance from 24 weeks' gestation, with surveillance of monochorionic twins two-weekly from 16 weeks. Ultrasonographic biometric data from 24 to 36 weeks were evaluated for the prediction of an intertwin birthweight discordance threshold ≥18%. Umbilical artery Doppler waveform data was also analyzed to evaluate whether it was predictive of birthweight discordance.

RESULTS

Of the 956 twin pairs analyzed for discordance, 208 pairs were found to have a clinically significant birthweight discordance ≥18%. All biometric parameters were predictive of significant inter-twin birthweight discordance at low cut-offs, with low discriminatory powers when ROC curves were analyzed. Discordance in estimated fetal weight was predictive of a significant birthweight discordance at all gestational categories with cut-offs between 8 and 11%. A low-discriminatory power and poor sensitivity and specificity were also observed. An abnormal umbilical artery Doppler was predictive of birthweight discordance ≥18% between 28 and 32 weeks' gestation, although with poor sensitivity and specificity.

CONCLUSIONS

Calculation of estimated fetal weight and birthweight discordance between twins allows minimal margin for error. These margins make it difficult to accurately predict those who are at or above the discordance threshold of 18%. These findings highlight that small intertwin discrepancies in weight and biometry should not be overlooked and merit further investigation.

Prediction of birth weight discordance from fetal weight estimations at 21-24 weeks' scans in monochorionic and dichorionic twins

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate if inter-twin estimated fetal weight (EFW) differences at 21-24 weeks' scans predict birth weight discordance in monochorionic and dichorionic twins born at three gestational age periods.

METHODS

We counted the number of pairs with discordant EFWs (EFWs greater than the mean + 1SD; i.e. a difference above 12% in dichorionic and 21% in monochorionic twins) derived during a 21-24 weeks' scan as compared to actual discordant birth weight (>25%) in monochorionic and dichorionic pairs born at ≤32, 33-36 and >36 weeks.

RESULTS

We studied 416 dichorionic and 244 monochorionic twins. The frequency of EFWs discordance at 21-24 weeks was the same for dichorionic and monochorionic twins but the total number of birth weight discordant pairs was significantly smaller among dichorionic twins (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.1, 0.6). Generally, the positive predictive values for birth weight discordance by using the EFWs difference were quite poor, but always better in monochorionic than in dichorionic twins. Whereas the negative predictive value and hence the sensitivity for monochorionic twins was 100% irrespective of gestational age at birth, it was much lower in the dichorionic pairs.

CONCLUSION

Concordant EFWs at 21-24 weeks exclude discordant birth weight in monochorionic twins whereas discordant EFWs are poor predictors of birth weight discordance especially in dichorionic twins irrespective when the twins were born.

Intertwin estimated fetal weight or crown rump length discordance and adverse perinatal outcome

AIM

In the current review study, we present recent data regarding the importance of intertwin estimated fetal weight (EFW) and crown rump length (CRL) discordance for the prediction of adverse perinatal outcome both in monochorionic and in dichorionic diamniotic gestations.

RESULTS

Twins with significant weight disparity are associated with higher rates of perinatal morbidity and mortality, regardless of gestational age at delivery. However, there is no agreement regarding as to the cut off value above which the perinatal outcome is unfavorably affected and the threshold range from 10 to 30%. On the other hand, CRL discrepancy has proved to be a weak predictor of adverse outcomes, such as fetal or neonatal death in fetuses without chromosomal and structural abnormalities. In clinical practice, decisions about obstetric surveillance of discordant twin gestations, frequency of fetal sonographic monitoring and time of delivery are usually based on amniotic fluid volume and Doppler assessments on a weekly basis.

CONCLUSION

Significant EFW discordance leads to adverse perinatal outcome, although the cut-off value has not yet been estimated. CRL discrepancy is not correlated well with adverse perinatal outcome. However, increased monitoring of women with EFW and CRL discrepancy is suggested.

Multiple gestations and preterm birth

Preterm birth is a major concern in modern obstetrics, and an important source of morbidity and mortality in newborns. Among twin pregnancies, especially, preterm birth is highly prevalent, and it accounts for almost 50% of the complications observed in this obstetrical population. In this article, we review the existing literature regarding the prediction and prevention of preterm birth in both symptomatic and asymptomatic twin pregnancies. In asymptomatic twin pregnancies, the best two predictive tests were cervical length (CL) measurement and cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin (fFN) testing. A single measurement of transvaginal CL at 20-24 weeks of gestation <20 mm or <25 mm is a good predictor of spontaneous preterm birth at <28, <32, and <34 weeks of gestation. A CL beyond 25 mm is associated with a 2% risk for birth before 28 weeks and with a 65% chance for a term pregnancy. Cervicovaginal fFN may be slightly less accurate than CL; however, it has a high negative predictive value in women presenting with threatened preterm labor, as <2% of these women will deliver within one week if the fFN is negative. In symptomatic twin pregnancies, no tests have proven accurate in predicting the risk of preterm birth. For the prevention of preterm birth in asymptomatic twins, regardless of CL, no treatment including bed rest, limitation of home activities, prophylactic tocolysis, progesterone, or cerclage has been shown to reduce the rate of preterm birth. Cervical pessaries might be of interest in cases where there is a short cervix (<25 mm and <38 mm, respectively) but these results need to confirmed in future trials.

Anomalies of the placenta and umbilical cord in twin gestations

The frequency of twin gestations has increased over the last few decades, mainly due to maternal age at childbearing, and the use of assisted reproductive technologies. Twins are at higher risk of aneuploidy, structural anomalies, and placental abnormalities. Some of the placental and umbilical cord abnormalities found in twin gestations are nonspecific and can be found in singleton gestations (ie, placenta previa, placental abruption, single umbilical artery, velamentous cord insertion, vasa previa, etc). However, other anomalies are unique to twin gestations, and are mainly associated with monochorionic twins-these include intraplacental anastomosis and cord entanglement. Most of these conditions can be diagnosed with ultrasound. An accurate and early diagnosis is important in the management of twin gestations. Determination of chorionicity, amnionicity, and the identification of placental anomalies are key issues for the adequate management of twin pregnancies. Pathologic placental examination after delivery can help in assessing the presence of placental and umbilical cord abnormalities, as well as providing information about chorionicity and gaining insight into the potential mechanisms of disease affecting twin gestations.

Fetal growth reference ranges in twin pregnancy: analysis of the Southwest Thames Obstetric Research Collaborative (STORK) multiple pregnancy cohort

OBJECTIVE

To generate reference charts for expected fetal growth in dichorionic diamniotic (DCDA) and monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies and to compare these with those from singleton pregnancies.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of biometric measurements from serial ultrasound examinations of twin pregnancies in the second and third trimesters, from 14 weeks' gestation to term, collected by nine hospitals over a 10-year period. The measurements obtained in each fetus at each examination included head circumference (HC), biparietal diameter (BPD), abdominal circumference (AC) and femur length (FL). Multilevel mixed effects statistical models were used to evaluate growth in each biometric variable in relation to gestational age, taking account of the serial examinations and the association between the two fetuses in each pregnancy, with separate models constructed for DCDA and MCDA pregnancies.

RESULTS

The final dataset for analysis included a total of 9866 second- and third-trimester ultrasound examinations in 1802 DCDA and 323 MCDA twin pregnancies, with a median of five (range, 1-14) scans per pregnancy. For each variable, the mean value for DCDA twins was close to the reported value in singletons at 20-30 weeks and showed a decrease relative to singletons beyond 30 weeks. The differences were greater for AC and HC, for which the mean in twins was approximately equivalent to the 30th percentile in singletons at 18 weeks, the 35th percentile at 25 weeks and the 30th percentile at 35 weeks. Fetuses in MCDA twin pregnancies displayed lower mean measurements than did those in DCDA pregnancies throughout the gestational age range considered.

CONCLUSIONS

Ultrasound biometry shows a small but statistically significant reduction in fetal growth in twin pregnancies relative to that in singletons, particularly in the third trimester, with a more marked difference for MCDA than for DCDA pregnancies.

Prediction of preterm birth in twin gestations using biophysical and biochemical tests

The objective of this study was to determine the performance of biophysical and biochemical tests for the prediction of preterm birth in both asymptomatic and symptomatic women with twin gestations. We identified a total of 19 tests proposed to predict preterm birth, mainly in asymptomatic women. In these women, a single measurement of cervical length with transvaginal ultrasound before 25 weeks of gestation appears to be a good test to predict preterm birth. Its clinical potential is enhanced by the evidence that vaginal progesterone administration in asymptomatic women with twin gestations and a short cervix reduces neonatal morbidity and mortality associated with spontaneous preterm delivery. Other tests proposed for the early identification of asymptomatic women at increased risk of preterm birth showed minimal to moderate predictive accuracy. None of the tests evaluated in this review meet the criteria to be considered clinically useful to predict preterm birth among patients with an episode of preterm labor. However, a negative cervicovaginal fetal fibronectin test could be useful in identifying women who are not at risk for delivering within the next week, which could avoid unnecessary hospitalization and treatment. This review underscores the need to develop accurate tests for predicting preterm birth in twin gestations. Moreover, the use of interventions in these patients based on test results should be associated with the improvement of perinatal outcomes.