Cumulative live birth rates and perinatal outcomes with the use of time-lapse imaging incubators for embryo culture: a retrospective cohort study of 1882 ART cycles

Do IVF culture conditions have an impact on neonatal outcomes? A systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Are embryo culture conditions, including type of incubator, oxygen tension, and culture media, associated with obstetric or neonatal complications following in vitro fertilization (IVF)?

METHODS

A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library was performed from January 01, 2008, until October 31, 2021. The studies reporting quantitative data on at least one of the primary outcomes (birthweight and preterm birth) for the exposure group and the control group were included. For oxygen tension, independent meta-analysis was performed using Review Manager, comparing hypoxia/normoxia. For culture media, a network meta-analysis was carried out using R software, allowing the inclusion of articles comparing two or more culture media.

RESULTS

After reviewing 182 records, 39 full-text articles were assessed for eligibility. A total of 28 studies were kept for review. Meta-analysis about the impact of incubator type on perinatal outcomes could not be carried out because of a limited number of studies. For oxygen tension, three studies were included. The pairwise meta-analysis comparing hypoxia/normoxia did not show any statistical difference for birthweight and gestational age at birth. For culture media, 18 studies were included. The network meta-analysis failed to reveal any significant impact of different culture media on birthweight or preterm birth.

CONCLUSION

No difference was observed for neonatal outcomes according to the embryo culture conditions evaluated in this review. Further research is needed about the safety of IVF culture conditions as far as future children's health is concerned.

Effects of different oocyte cytoplasmic granulation patterns on embryo development and euploidy: a sibling oocyte control study

PURPOSE

This study evaluated the relationship between cytoplasmic granulation patterns and the developmental potential of mature sibling oocytes.

METHODS

Data from 54 cycles of preimplantation genetic tests for structural rearrangement from July 2019 to June 2022 were analyzed. In total, 564 embryos were cultured using a time-lapse system. Sibling oocytes were divided into four groups based on cytoplasmic granulation patterns: fine granulation (FG) group (n = 177), central granulation (CG) group (n = 183), dispersed granulation (DG) group (n = 161), and uneven granulation (UG) group (n = 43). The CG group was further divided into three groups (grades I, II, and III) based on the tertile of the ratio of central granular distribution area to oocyte area. Fertilization rate, embryo morphokinetics, chromosomal ploidy, and clinical outcomes of the groups were compared.

RESULTS

No significant differences were observed in morphokinetic parameters, fertilization rate, embryo production, blastocyst formation, and aneuploidy rates among the different cytoplasmic-granulation pattern groups. However, embryos derived from CG oocytes showed significantly higher aneuploidy rates in grade III compared to grade I (86.21% vs 61.54%, P = 0.036) or grade II (86.21% vs 56.00%, P = 0.013). Thirty embryos were transferred to the uteri of female patients and the clinical pregnancy and live birth rates did not significantly differ among groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytoplasmic granulation patterns may not affect embryo fertilization, development speed, and aneuploidy rates. However, a higher grade of CG may be associated with increased aneuploidy rates. Larger sample sizes are required to explore the impact of oocyte cytoplasmic granulation patterns on embryo implantation potential.

Research progress of time-lapse imaging technology and embryonic development potential: A review

Cultivation and selection of high-quality human embryos are critical for the success of in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer. Time-lapse imaging technology (TLI) provides a stable culture environment for embryos, which can continuously observe and record the development process of early embryos, so that doctors can record embryo development time parameters more accurately. In this study, we review the current observation and research on the main embryo dynamics parameters in TLI and discusses their significance and development for embryo development potential. To analysis and summary, the application and research situation of TLI, we searched PubMed, Web of Science, and China National Knowledge Infrastructure, using TLI, embryo dynamics parameters, embryo development potential as Keywords, cited 50 out of the initial 89 selected literatures and summarized. With comparative analysis and research, we found that the embryo dynamic parameters provided by TLI has been intensively studied in clinical empirical and observational research, extensive experimental data verified its effectiveness and advantages in embryo development potential assessment. TLI provides technical support of embryo dynamic parameters, which may become the quantitative indicators for superior embryos and pregnancy prediction as well. Existing studies have shown that certain kinetic parameters provided by TLI culture can predict embryo implantation, but no parameter has been confirmed as the absolute correlation biological indicators yet. In this review we believe that further research is needed to verify these preliminary and sometimes contradictory results, and explore the predictive significance of various embryo kinetic parameters relying on TLI technology for embryo development potential.

Promising Perinatal Outcome after Using a Simplified Low-Cost IVF Culture System Specifically Designed for Resource-Poor Countries

Background: Assisted reproductive techniques services are often not accessible to the majority of infertile couples in Low and Middle Income Countries (LMIC) due to high costs. Lowering IVF laboratory costs is a crucial step to make IVF affordable for a larger part of the world population. We developed a simplified culture system (SCS) which has proven to be effective, and the next step is to prove its safety.Methods: Preterm birth (PTB) and low birthweight (LBW) of 176 singletons born after using the SCS, 105 after fresh embryo transfer (fresh ET), and 71 after frozen embryo transfer (frozen ET) were compared with all IVF/ICSI singletons born in Belgium between 2013 and 2018. When comparing our 105 SCS babies born after fresh ET with all Belgian babies born after conventional IVF only, we also adjusted for 7 risk factors known to influence perinatal outcome, namelythe mother’s age, day of transfer, pituitary inhibition protocol, rank of cycles, number of oocytes retrieved, number of embryos transferred, and gender of the baby.Findings: Before adjustment, we found a significantly higher PTB (10.2% vs. 3.8%, OR 2.852, 95% CI [1.042–7.803], p-value 0.0413) and LBW (9.8% vs. 2.9%, OR 3.692, 95% CI [1.163–11.721], p-value 0.0267) in the conventional IVF group versus SCS after fresh ET. After adjusting for seven risk parameters, these differences remained significant (PTB: OR 2.627, 95% CI [1.013–6.816], p-value 0.0471) and LBW: OR 3.267, 95% CI [1.118–9.549], p-value 0.0305). PTB and LBW between both groups was not significantly different for singletons born after frozen ET. Interpretation: Taking into account the small series, PTB and LBW rates in SCS singletons in FRET cycles are very reassuring and significantly lower compared to babies born after conventional IVF in Belgium. Being aware of its effectiveness, our results offer a good perspective for SCS to become an important tool to implement low-cost IVF in LMIC.

Can Time-Lapse Incubation and Monitoring Be Beneficial to Assisted Reproduction Technology Outcomes? A Randomized Controlled Trial Using Day 3 Double Embryo Transfer

Objective: To determine if the application of time-lapse incubation and monitoring can be beneficial to clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.

Methods: A total of 600 patients were equally randomized to three groups, namely, conventional embryo culture and standard morphological selection (CM group), time-lapse culture and standard morphological selection (TLM group), and time-lapse culture and morphokinetic selection (TLA group). Notably, 424 undergoing fresh autologous in vitro fertilization cycles were analyzed, 132 patients in the CM group, 158 in the TLM group, and 134 in the TLA group. Main outcomes included clinical outcomes, embryo development rates, and perinatal outcomes.

Results: Clinical pregnancy rates in the time-lapse groups were significantly higher than in the CM group (CM 65.2% vs. TLM 77.2% vs. TLA 81.3%). Implantation rates and live birth rates were significantly higher for the TLA group (59.7 and 70.9%) compared with the CM group (47.7 and 56.1%) but not compared with the TLM group (55.4 and 67.1%). There was no statistical difference in miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates among the three groups. Overall, birth weight was significantly higher in the time-lapse groups (CM 2,731.7 ± 644.8 g vs. TLM 3,066.5 ± 595.4 g vs. TLA 2,967.4 ± 590.0 g). The birth height of newborns in the TLM group was significantly longer than that of the CM group and TLA group (CM 48.3± 4.4 cm vs. TLM 49.8± 2.3 cm vs. TLA 48.5± 2.7 cm).

Conclusion: Time-lapse incubation and monitoring have a significant benefit on clinical pregnancy rates and on overall birth weights while morphokinetic analysis is not necessary.

Clinical Trial Registration: [www.ClinicalTrials.gov], identifier [NCT02974517].

Time-lapse technology improves total cumulative live birth rate and shortens time to live birth as compared to conventional incubation system in couples undergoing ICSI

PURPOSE

The improvement of clinical outcome provided by time-lapse technology (TLT) in IVF over conventional incubation (CI) still remains controversial. This study aimed at evaluating whether the exclusive use of time-lapse technology (TLT) during whole IVF care improves total cumulative live birth rate (TCLBR) and shortens time to live birth (TTLB) as compared to the use of CI in couples undergoing ICSI.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in couples with male infertility undergoing their first ICSI cycle in 2014-2015 and for whom embryo culture system remained the same during their whole IVF care, i.e., TLT or CI. Couples were followed up up to 2020, including all following frozen-embryo transfers and ICSI cycles (if any). Survival analysis was used to compare clinical outcome and time-related endpoints between both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 151 and 250 couples underwent their whole IVF care with the exclusive use of TLT and CI, respectively. Survival analysis showed that TCLBR after whole IVF care was significantly higher in TLT than in CI group (66.9 vs 56.4%, p=0.02, log-rank test). Median live birth time was significantly shorter in TLT than CI group (464 vs 596 days, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that TCLBR and TTLB were significantly improved with TLT over CI in couples undergoing ICSI for male factor. This study fuels the debate on the clinical benefit of using TLT. The use of time-related endpoints adds important information for both patients and practitioners.

Biomechanics of Early Life in the Female Reproductive Tract

Early human life that starts at the onset of fertilization and ends with implantation of the embryo in the uterine wall is the foundation for a successful pregnancy. The different stages during this period require biomechanical mechanisms, which are mostly unknown due to difficulties to conduct in vivo studies in humans.

Time-lapse technology improves total cumulative live birth rate and shortens time to live birth as compared to conventional incubation system in couples undergoing ICSI

PURPOSE

The improvement of clinical outcome provided by time-lapse technology (TLT) in IVF over conventional incubation (CI) still remains controversial. This study aimed at evaluating whether the exclusive use of time-lapse technology (TLT) during whole IVF care improves total cumulative live birth rate (TCLBR) and shortens time to live birth (TTLB) as compared to the use of CI in couples undergoing ICSI.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted in couples with male infertility undergoing their first ICSI cycle in 2014-2015 and for whom embryo culture system remained the same during their whole IVF care, i.e., TLT or CI. Couples were followed up up to 2020, including all following frozen-embryo transfers and ICSI cycles (if any). Survival analysis was used to compare clinical outcome and time-related endpoints between both groups.

RESULTS

A total of 151 and 250 couples underwent their whole IVF care with the exclusive use of TLT and CI, respectively. Survival analysis showed that TCLBR after whole IVF care was significantly higher in TLT than in CI group (66.9 vs 56.4%, p=0.02, log-rank test). Median live birth time was significantly shorter in TLT than CI group (464 vs 596 days, p=0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

We found that TCLBR and TTLB were significantly improved with TLT over CI in couples undergoing ICSI for male factor. This study fuels the debate on the clinical benefit of using TLT. The use of time-related endpoints adds important information for both patients and practitioners.

The clinical use of time-lapse in human-assisted reproduction

A major challenge in the assisted reproduction laboratory is to set up reproducible and efficient criteria to identify the embryo with the highest developmental potential. Over the years, several methods have been used worldwide with this purpose. Initially, standard morphology assessment was the only available strategy. It is now universally recognized that besides being a very subjective embryo selection strategy, morphology evaluation alone has a very poor prognostic value. More recently, the availability of time-lapse incubators allowed a continuous monitoring of human embryo development. This technology has spread quickly and many fertility clinics over the world produced a remarkable amount of data. To date, however, a general consensus on which variables, or combination of variables, should play a central role in embryo selection is still lacking. Many confounding factors, concerning both patient features and clinical and biological procedures, have been observed to influence embryo development. In addition, several studies have reported unexpected positive outcomes, even in the presence of abnormal developmental criteria. While it does not seem that time-lapse technology is ready to entirely replace the more invasive preimplantation genetic testing in identifying the embryo with the highest implantation potential, it is certainly true that its application is rapidly growing, becoming progressively more accurate. Studies involving artificial intelligence and deep-learning models as well as combining morphokinetic with other non-invasive markers of embryo development, are currently ongoing, raising hopes for its successful applicability for clinical purpose in the near future. The present review mainly focuses on data published starting from the first decade of 2000, when time-lapse technology was introduced as a routine clinical practice in the infertility centers.

Time-lapse imaging derived morphokinetic variables reveal association with implantation and live birth following in vitro fertilization: A retrospective study using data from transferred human embryos

The purpose of this retrospective time-lapse data analysis from transferred preimplantation human embryos was to identify early morphokinetic cleavage variables that are related to implantation and live birth following in vitro fertilization (IVF). All embryos were monitored from fertilization check until embryo transfer for a minimum of 44 hours. The study was designed to assess the association between day 2 embryo morphokinetic variables with implantation and live birth based on Known Implantation Data (KID). The kinetic variables were subjected to quartile-based analysis. The predictive ability for implantation and live birth was studied using receiver operator characteristic (ROC) curves. Three morphokinetic variables, time to 2-cells (t2), duration of second cell cycle (cc2) below one threshold and cc2 above another threshold had the highest predictive value with regards to implantation and live birth following IVF treatment. The predictive pre-transfer information has little divergence between fetal heartbeat and live birth data and therefore, at least for early morphokinetic variables up to the four-cell stage (t4), conclusions and models based on fetal heartbeat data can be expected to be valid for live birth datasets as well. The three above mentioned variables (t2, cc2 below one threshold and cc2 above another threshold) may supplement morphological evaluation in embryo selection and thereby improve the outcome of in vitro fertilization treatments.

Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of morphologically grade CC blastocysts: are they of clinical value?

PURPOSE

To study if the transfer of morphological grade-CC blastocyst is effective and safe.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 2585 frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles with grade-BB blastocysts and 102 FET cycles with grade-CC blastocysts during the period from January 2006 to December 2017. Pregnancy and neonatal outcomes of couples in two groups were analyzed before and after propensity score matching.

RESULTS

Pregnancy outcomes showed no significant difference in the rates of biochemical pregnancy, ectopic pregnancy, miscarriage, multiple gestation, gestational age (P > 0.05). However, the rates of intrauterine implantation, clinical pregnancy, and live birth were significantly lower in the grade-CC blastocyst transfer group than those in the grade-BB blastocyst transfer group (18.9% vs 46.0%, 21.6% vs 51.3%, 16.7% vs 41.4%, all P < 0.001, respectively) before and after propensity score matching. The assessment of neonatal outcomes showed no statistically significant differences in the birth weight, low birth weight, early-neonatal death, and birth defect, etc., similar results were also observed in the two matched cohorts.

CONCLUSION

Morphologically grade-CC blastocysts should be transferred rather than discarded, resulting in acceptable pregnancy and neonatal outcomes, which is beneficial to infertile patients suffering from repeated poor-quality embryos.

Effect of embryo selection based morphokinetics on IVF/ICSI outcomes: evidence from a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

PURPOSE

Debate exists for the optimal tool to select embryos for transfer in assisted reproductive technology (ART). Time-lapse monitoring (TLM) is a noninvasive tool suggested where each embryo can be captured every 5-20 min. Given the inconsistency in the existing studies, we conducted this meta-analysis of RCTs to summarize the evidence available concerning the predictive ability of morphokinetics compared with the routine assessment of embryo development in ART.

METHODS

The primary databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, NHS, WHO, and Other Non-Indexed Citations were consulted for RCTs that have been published until November 2018, with no language restriction.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Our review includes 6 RCTs (n = 2057 patients). The data showed an improvement (~ 9%) in live birth TLM (OR 1.43; 95% CI 1.10-1.85; P = 0.007), with low-quality evidence. There was no evidence of a significant difference between both groups concerning ongoing pregnancy, clinical pregnancy and implantation rates. The data further showed that morphokinetics is associated with decreased early pregnancy loss rate. These estimates must be interpreted with caution owing to the statistical and clinical heterogeneities and the consequent difficulty in drawing any meaningful conclusion.

Time-lapse imaging systems in IVF laboratories: a French national survey

PURPOSE

Although the clinical value of time-lapse imaging (TLI) systems in in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles is still debated, its prevalence worldwide seems to be expanding. The situation of TLI in the USA has been recently surveyed, but these results might not be transposable to other countries with different IVF regulation and funding such as France. This study evaluated the TLI situation in French IVF laboratories.

METHODS

An anonymous online cross-sectional survey was sent by email to 210 embryologists in September and October 2017. Laboratories, demographics, TLI clinical use, purchasing plan, and embryologists' opinions were analyzed using logistic regression to calculate odds ratio.

RESULTS

Of the 210 lab directors surveyed, 78 responded (37.1%), 43 (55%) working in private IVF laboratories and 35 (45%) in public hospitals. Thirty (38.5%) were TLI users. The odds of TLI possession were not statistically different according to laboratory sector or size. Most embryologists (n = 21, 70%) used TLI for unselected patients. Cost was the main reason given by non-users for not implementing TLI (n = 24, 50%). Most respondents were convinced that TLI is superior to standard morphology (n = 52, 73.2%) and that TLI improves culture conditions (n = 62, 84.9%). However, half (n = 39, 54.9%) indicated that evidence was still lacking to assert TLI clinical usefulness.

CONCLUSION

The prevalence of TLI systems and embryologists' opinion in France was slightly different from the American situation. The different regulation and funding policy might account for some differences in terms of TLI use and perception.