1
|
Baker BC, Lui S, Lorne I, Heazell AEP, Forbes K, Jones RL. Sexually dimorphic patterns in maternal circulating microRNAs in pregnancies complicated by fetal growth restriction. Biol Sex Differ 2021; 12:61. [PMID: 34789323 PMCID: PMC8597318 DOI: 10.1186/s13293-021-00405-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Accepted: 10/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Current methods fail to accurately predict women at greatest risk of developing fetal growth restriction (FGR) or related adverse outcomes, including stillbirth. Sexual dimorphism in these adverse pregnancy outcomes is well documented as are sex-specific differences in gene and protein expression in the placenta. Circulating maternal serum microRNAs (miRNAs) offer potential as biomarkers that may also be informative of underlying pathology. We hypothesised that FGR would be associated with an altered miRNA profile and would differ depending on fetal sex. Methods miRNA expression profiles were assessed in maternal serum (> 36 weeks’ gestation) from women delivering a severely FGR infant (defined as an individualised birthweight centile (IBC) < 3rd) and matched control participants (AGA; IBC = 20–80th), using miRNA arrays. qPCR was performed using specific miRNA primers in an expanded cohort of patients with IBC < 5th (n = 15 males, n = 16 females/group). Maternal serum human placental lactogen (hPL) was used as a proxy to determine if serum miRNAs were related to placental dysfunction. In silico analyses were performed to predict the potential functions of altered miRNAs. Results Initial analyses revealed 11 miRNAs were altered in maternal serum from FGR pregnancies. In silico analyses revealed all 11 altered miRNAs were located in a network of genes that regulate placental function. Subsequent analysis demonstrated four miRNAs showed sexually dimorphic patterns. miR-28-5p was reduced in FGR pregnancies (p < 0.01) only when there was a female offspring and miR-301a-3p was only reduced in FGR pregnancies with a male fetus (p < 0.05). miR-454-3p was decreased in FGR pregnancies (p < 0.05) regardless of fetal sex but was only positively correlated to hPL when the fetus was female. Conversely, miR-29c-3p was correlated to maternal hPL only when the fetus was male. Target genes for sexually dimorphic miRNAs reveal potential functional roles in the placenta including angiogenesis, placental growth, nutrient transport and apoptosis. Conclusions These studies have identified sexually dimorphic patterns for miRNAs in maternal serum in FGR. These miRNAs may have potential as non-invasive biomarkers for FGR and associated placental dysfunction. Further studies to determine if these miRNAs have potential functional roles in the placenta may provide greater understanding of the pathogenesis of placental dysfunction and the differing susceptibility of male and female fetuses to adverse in utero conditions. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s13293-021-00405-z. Detection and treatment of pregnancies at high risk of fetal growth restriction (FGR) and stillbirth remains a major obstetric challenge; circulating maternal serum microRNAs (miRNAs) offer potential as novel biomarkers. Unbiased analysis of serum miRNAs in women in late pregnancy identified a specific profile of circulating miRNAs in women with a growth-restricted infant. Some altered miRNAs (miR-28-5p, miR-301a-3p) showed sexually dimorphic expression in FGR pregnancies and others a fetal-sex dependent association to a hormonal marker of placental dysfunction (miR-454-3p, miR-29c-3p). miR-301a-3p and miR-28-5p could potentially be used to predict FGR specifically in pregnancies with a male or female baby, respectively, however larger cohort studies are required. Further investigations of these miRNAs and their relationship to placental dysfunction will lead to a better understanding of the pathophysiology of FGR and why there is differing susceptibility of male and female fetuses to FGR and stillbirth.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bernadette C Baker
- Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - Sylvia Lui
- Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,Division of Inflammation and Repair, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Isabel Lorne
- Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Alexander E P Heazell
- Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,St Mary's Hospital, Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester Academic Health Science Centre, Manchester, M13 9WL, UK
| | - Karen Forbes
- Discovery and Translational Science Department, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
| | - Rebecca L Jones
- Division of Developmental Biology and Medicine, Maternal and Fetal Health Research Centre, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McLaughlin K, Snelgrove JW, Audette MC, Syed A, Hobson SR, Windrim RC, Melamed N, Carmona S, Kingdom JC. PlGF (Placental Growth Factor) Testing in Clinical Practice: Evidence From a Canadian Tertiary Maternity Referral Center. Hypertension 2021; 77:2057-2065. [PMID: 33840202 DOI: 10.1161/hypertensionaha.121.17047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/23/2022]
Abstract
[Figure: see text].
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelsey McLaughlin
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (K.M., J.W.S., M.C.A., S.R.H., R.C.W., S.C., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.,The Research Centre for Women's and Infants' Health, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (K.M., M.C.A., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.,Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine (K.M.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - John W Snelgrove
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (K.M., J.W.S., M.C.A., S.R.H., R.C.W., S.C., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Melanie C Audette
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (K.M., J.W.S., M.C.A., S.R.H., R.C.W., S.C., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.,The Research Centre for Women's and Infants' Health, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (K.M., M.C.A., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Atif Syed
- Information Services (A.D., S.C.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Sebastian R Hobson
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (K.M., J.W.S., M.C.A., S.R.H., R.C.W., S.C., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Rory C Windrim
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (K.M., J.W.S., M.C.A., S.R.H., R.C.W., S.C., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - Nir Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, Canada (N.M.)
| | - Sergio Carmona
- Information Services (A.D., S.C.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| | - John C Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine (K.M., J.W.S., M.C.A., S.R.H., R.C.W., S.C., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada.,The Research Centre for Women's and Infants' Health, Lunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research Institute (K.M., M.C.A., J.C.K.), Sinai Health System, Toronto, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kingdom JC, Smith GCS. Authors' reply re: Next steps to prevent stillbirth associated with growth restriction. BJOG 2021; 128:940-941. [PMID: 33599376 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16641] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/29/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- John C Kingdom
- Departments of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Dornan JC, Feucht U, Dornan SS, Mulol H, Vannevel V, Hlongwane T, Pattinson R. Re: Next steps to prevent stillbirth associated with growth restriction: Continuous-wave Doppler, fetal growth restriction and small-for-gestational-age babies. BJOG 2021; 128:940. [PMID: 33524242 DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.16643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/07/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- James C Dornan
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology School Medicine, Royal College Surgeons Institute, Manama, Bahrain
| | - Ute Feucht
- South African Medical Research Council/University of Pretoria Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Samina S Dornan
- Maternal Fetal Medicine, King's College Hospital London, Dubai, UAE
| | - Helen Mulol
- South African Medical Research Council/University of Pretoria Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Valerie Vannevel
- South African Medical Research Council/University of Pretoria Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Tsakane Hlongwane
- South African Medical Research Council/University of Pretoria Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
| | - Robert Pattinson
- South African Medical Research Council/University of Pretoria Maternal and Infant Health Care Strategies Unit, Pretoria, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Melamed N, Hiersch L, Aviram A, Mei-Dan E, Keating S, Kingdom JC. Diagnostic accuracy of fetal growth charts for placenta-related fetal growth restriction. Placenta 2021; 105:70-77. [PMID: 33556716 DOI: 10.1016/j.placenta.2021.01.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/31/2020] [Revised: 01/09/2021] [Accepted: 01/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The choice of fetal growth chart to be used in antenatal screening for fetal growth restriction (FGR) has an important impact on the proportion of fetuses diagnosed as small for gestational age (SGA), and on the detection rate for FGR. We aimed to compare diagnostic accuracy of SGA diagnosed using four different common fetal growth charts [Hadlock, Intergrowth-21st (IG21), World Health Organization (WHO), and National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)], for abnormal placental pathology. METHODS A secondary analysis of data from a prospective cohort study in low-risk nulliparous women. The exposure was SGA (birthweight <10th centile for gestational age) using each of the four charts. The outcomes were one of three types of abnormal placental pathology associated with fetal growth restriction: maternal vascular malperfusion (MVM), chronic villitis, and fetal vascular malperfusion. RESULTS A total of 742 nulliparous women met the study criteria. The proportion of SGA was closest to the expected rate of 10% using the Hadlock chart (12.7%). The detection rates (DR) and false positive rates (FPR) for MVM pathology were similar for the Hadlock (DR = 53.1%, FPR = 10.8%), WHO (DR = 59.4%, FPR = 14.2%), and NICHD (DR = 53.1%, FPR = 12.3%) charts, and each was superior when compared to the IG21 chart (DR = 34.4%, FPR = 3.8%, p < 0.001). The diagnosis of SGA was associated with increased risks of preeclampsia and preterm birth for all four charts. DISCUSSION The selection of fetal growth chart to be used in screening programs for FGR has important implications with regard to the false positive and detection rate for FGR.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nir Melamed
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Liran Hiersch
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Amir Aviram
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M4N3M5, Canada
| | - Elad Mei-Dan
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, North York General Hospital, 4001 Leslie St, Toronto, Ontario, M2K 1E1, Canada
| | - Sarah Keating
- Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathobiology, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada
| | - John C Kingdom
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X8, Canada; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mount Sinai Hospital, 600 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 1X5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|