Prophylactic antibiotics for preventing genital tract infection in women undergoing surgical procedures for incomplete abortion: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Failure to reduce the risk of postoperative lower genital tract infection with perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis during induced abortion: a real-world study

Objective

This study aimed to evaluate perioperative antibiotic use for induced abortion and its association with lower genital tract infections (LGTI) two weeks post-surgery in China.

Methods

We conducted a prospective cohort study of women seeking induced abortion. We interviewed participants on the day of surgery and two weeks after, and evaluated preoperative tests, gynecological exams, perioperative antibiotic usage, postoperative vaginal microbiota, and LGTI diagnosis. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess the association between the perioperative antibiotic use and LGTI risk.

Results

We recruited 8,190 women undergoing induced abortion at 27 participating hospitals. Of these, 95% had gynecological exams, but over 80% lacked tests for vaginal microbiota, chlamydia, and gonorrhea. Approximately 20% of those examined had increased vaginal discharge and abnormal vaginal cleanliness. The positive rates for gram-positive rods, fungi, and trichomonas were 38.6, 2.4, and 0.3%, respectively. More than three-quarters (78.5%) of participants received antibiotics, mainly second-gen cephalosporins (36.8%) and nitroimidazoles (12.3%). LGTI rates two weeks post-surgery were 2.7% for antibiotic recipients and 3.1% for non-recipients, with no statistically significant difference (p > 0.05). Logistic regression showed no association between perioperative antibiotic use and LGTI risk (OR = 1.01, 95% CI 0.59-1.74). However, this risk increased with abnormal preoperative discharge tests (OR = 1.39, 95% CI 1.04-1.86).

Conclusion

Most Chinese women undergoing induced abortion used perioperative antibiotics, but this did not significantly reduce LGTI risk. Instead, this risk was related to abnormal preoperative discharge tests. Standardization of perioperative antibiotic use for induced abortion is recommended, and prophylactic treatment in Chinese abortion services warrants further investigation.

Is antibiotic prophylaxis generally safe and effective in surgical and nonsurgical scenarios? Evidence from an umbrella review of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

The authors aimed to comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of antibiotic prophylaxis through surgical and nonsurgical scenarios and assess the strength of evidence.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The authors performed an umbrella review of meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials (RCTs). An evidence map was created to summarize the absolute benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis in each scenario and certainty of evidence.

RESULTS

Seventy-five meta-analyses proved eligible with 725 RCTs and 78 clinical scenarios in surgical and medical prophylaxis. Of 119 health outcomes, 67 (56.3%) showed statistically significant benefits, 34 of which were supported by convincing or highly suggestive evidence from RCTs. For surgeries, antibiotic prophylaxis may minimize infection occurrences in most surgeries except Mohs surgery, simple hand surgery, herniorrhaphy surgery, hepatectomy, thyroid surgery, rhinoplasty, stented distal hypospadias repair, midurethral sling placement, endoscopic sinus surgery, and transurethral resection of bladder tumors with only low to very low certainty evidence. For nonsurgery invasive procedures, only low to very low certainty evidence showed benefits of antibiotic prophylaxis for cystoscopy, postoperative urinary catheterization, and urodynamic study. For medical prophylaxis, antibiotic prophylaxis showed greater benefits in nonemergency scenarios, in which patients were mainly with weakened immune systems, or at risk of recurrent chronic infections. Antibiotics prophylaxis may increase antibiotic resistance or other adverse events in most scenarios and reached significance in cystoscopy, afebrile neutropenia following chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.

CONCLUSIONS

Antibiotic prophylaxis in surgical and nonsurgical scenarios is generally effective and seems independent of surgical cleanliness and urgency of diseases. Its safety is not well determined due to lack of available data. Nevertheless, the low quality of current evidence limits the external validity of these findings, necessitating clinicians to judiciously assess indications, balancing low infection rates with antibiotic-related side effects.

The efficacy and influence factors analysis of Mifepristone combined with estrogen-progesterone in the treatment of incomplete abortion

To analyze the efficacy and influencing factors of Mifepristone combined with estrogen-progesterone sequential therapy (Femoston) in the treatment of incomplete abortion. This retrospective cohort study included 93 patients with incomplete abortion. All patients took 50 mg of Mifepristone 2 times a day for 5 days and then took Femoston once a day (starting with estradiol tablets/2 mg) for 28 days. Without any indication of intrauterine residue by ultrasonic examination was judged to be effective. According to statistical analysis, this study calculated the effective rate and analyzed its influencing factors. A 2-sided value of P < .05 was considered statistically significant. The total response rate of the treatment regimen was 86.67%. body mass index was a significant influencing factor for treatment outcome (OR 0.818, 95% confidence interval 0.668-0.991, P = .041). For patients with incomplete abortion, Mifepristone combined with estrogen-progesterone sequential therapy has a remarkable therapeutic effect. Patients with a lower body mass index may respond much more significantly to this treatment regimen.

GRADE Use in Evidence Syntheses Published in High-Impact-Factor Gynecology and Obstetrics Journals: A Methodological Survey

Objective: To identify and describe the certainty of evidence of gynecology and obstetrics systematic reviews (SRs) using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. Method: Database searches of SRs using GRADE, published between 1 January 2016 to 31 December 2020, in the 10 "gynecology and obstetrics" journals with the highest impact factor, according to the Journal Citation Report 2019. Selected studies included those SRs using the GRADE approach, used to determine the certainty of evidence. Results: Out of 952 SRs, ninety-six SRs of randomized control trials (RCTs) and/or nonrandomized studies (NRSs) used GRADE. Sixty-seven SRs (7.04%) rated the certainty of evidence for specific outcomes. In total, we identified 946 certainty of evidence outcome ratings (n = 614 RCT ratings), ranging from very-low (42.28%) to low (28.44%), moderate (17.65%), and high (11.63%). High and very low certainty of evidence ratings accounted for 2.16% and 71.60% in the SRs of NRSs, respectively, compared with 16.78% and 26.55% in the SRs of RCTs. In the SRs of RCTs and NRSs, certainty of evidence was mainly downgraded due to imprecision and bias risks. Conclusions: More attention needs to be paid to strengthening GRADE acceptance and building knowledge of GRADE methods in gynecology and obstetrics evidence synthesis.

Current Resources for Evidence-Based Practice, November 2021

An extensive review of new resources to support the provision of evidence-based care for women and infants. The current column includes a discussion of autonomy and respect in maternity care and commentaries on reviews focused on whether to induce women who present with mild preeclampsia in the late preterm period and the extent to which urinary incontinence symptoms prevent women from participating in exercise. It also includes a brief update about the USPSTF guidelines on screening for gestational diabetes.