Injury-associated levator ani muscle and anal sphincter ooedema following vaginal birth: a secondary analysis of the EMRLD study

A model to predict delivery time following induction of labor at term with a dinoprostone vaginal insert: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

Dinoprostone vaginal insert is the most common pharmacological method for induction of labor (IOL); however, studies on assessing the time to vaginal delivery (DT) following dinoprostone administration are limited.

AIMS

We sought to identify the primary factors influencing DT in women from central China, at or beyond term, who underwent IOL with dinoprostone vaginal inserts.

METHODS

In this retrospective observational study, we analyzed the data of 1562 women at 37 weeks 0 days to 41 weeks 6 days of gestation who underwent dinoprostone-induced labor between January 1st, 2019, and December 31st, 2021. The outcomes of interest were vaginal or cesarean delivery and factors influencing DT, including maternal complications and neonatal characteristics.

RESULTS

Among the enrolled women, 71% (1109/1562) delivered vaginally, with median DT of 740.50 min (interquartile range 443.25 to 1264.50 min). Of the remaining 29% (453/1562), who delivered by cesarean section, 11.9% (54/453) were multiparous. Multiple linear regression analysis showed that multiparity, advanced maternal age, fetal macrosomia, premature rupture of membranes (PROM), and daytime insertion of dinoprostone were the factors that significantly influenced DT. Time to vaginal delivery increased with advanced maternal age and fetal macrosomia and decreased with multiparity, PROM, and daytime insertion of dinoprostone. A mathematical model was developed to integrate these factors for predicting DT: Y = 804.478 - 125.284 × multiparity + 765.637 × advanced maternal age + 411.511 × fetal macrosomia-593.358 × daytime insertion of dinoprostone - 125.284 × PROM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings may help obstetricians estimate the DT before placing a dinoprostone insert, which may improve patient management in busy maternity wards and minimize potential risks.

Pelvic floor injury during vaginal birth is life-altering and preventable: what can we do about it?

Pelvic floor disorders after childbirth have distressing lifelong consequences for women, requiring more than 300,000 women to have surgery annually. This represents approximately 10% of the 3 million women who give birth vaginally each year. Vaginal birth is the largest modifiable risk factor for prolapse, the pelvic floor disorder most strongly associated with birth, and is an important contributor to stress incontinence. These disorders require 10 times as many operations as anal sphincter injuries. Imaging shows that injuries of the levator ani muscle, perineal body, and membrane occur in up to 19% of primiparous women. During birth, the levator muscle and birth canal tissues must stretch to more than 3 times their original length; it is this overstretching that is responsible for the muscle tear visible on imaging rather than compression or neuropathy. The injury is present in 55% of women with prolapse later in life, with an odds ratio of 7.3, compared with women with normal support. In addition, levator damage can affect other aspects of hiatal closure, such as the perineal body and membrane. These injuries are associated with an enlarged urogenital hiatus, now known as antedate prolapse, and with prolapse surgery failure. Risk factors for levator injury are multifactorial and include forceps delivery, occiput posterior birth, older maternal age, long second stage of labor, and birthweight of >4000 g. Delivery with a vacuum device is associated with reduced levator damage. Other steps that might logically reduce injuries include manual rotation from occiput posterior to occiput anterior, slow gradual delivery, perineal massage or compresses, and early induction of labor, but these require study to document protection. In addition, teaching women to avoid pushing against a contracted levator muscle would likely decrease injury risk by decreasing tension on the vulnerable muscle origin. Providing care for women who have experienced difficult deliveries can be enhanced with early recognition, physical therapy, and attention to recovery. It is only right that women be made aware of these risks during pregnancy. Educating women on the long-term pelvic floor sequelae of childbirth should be performed antenatally so that they can be empowered to make informed decisions about management decisions during labor.

The predicting value of the ratio of levator hiatus diameter to fetal head circumference in pregnant women at 37 weeks of gestation in the progression of the second stage of labor and levator ani injury 6 weeks postpartum

Objective

This study investigated the predicting value of the ratio of levator hiatus diameter (LHS) to fetal head circumference (HC) in pregnant women at 37 weeks of gestation in the progression of the second stage of labor and levator ani injury 6 weeks postpartum.

Methods

A total of 120 first-time women who gave vaginal delivery at 37 weeks of pregnancy were selected as the subjects in our hospital during March 2021 to March 2022. The subjects were divided into the second stage of labor > 1 h group and the second stage of labor ≤ 1 h group, according to the delivery time of the second stage of labor. According to the 6-week postpartum follow-up ultrasound examination with or without levator ani injury, they were divided into levator ani injury group and no injury group. All primipara women underwent three-dimensional ultrasonography at 37 weeks of gestation, and the resting LHS, Valsalva LHS, fetal HC and the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC were compared. The correlation between these factors and the length of the second labor stage was analyzed using Pearson correlation analysis. The value of these factors in predicting labor progression and postpartum levator ani injury was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The resting LHS, Valsalva LHS and the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC in the levator ani injury group were lower than these in the no injury group, while fetal HC in the levator ani injury group was higher than that in the no injury group (P < 0.05). The resting LHS, Valsalva LHS and the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC in the second stage of labor > 1 h group were lower than these in the second stage of labor ≤ 1 h group, while fetal HC in the second stage of labor > 1 h group was higher than that in the second stage of labor ≤ 1 h group (P < 0.05). A significant negative correlation was observed between resting LHS/HC and total labor process (=-0.333, P < 0.01). ROC curve analysis showed that the AUCs of resting LHS, Valsalva LHS, HC, and resting LHS/HC ratio in predicting prolongation of the second stage of labor were 0.741, 0.740, 0.702, and 0.843 respectively. Besides, the AUCs of resting LHS, Valsalva LHS, HC, and resting LHS/HC ratio in predicting the total labor process were 0.657, 0.684, 0.768, and 0.836 respectively. The AUCs of resting LHS, Valsalva LHS, HC, and resting LHS/HC ratio in predicting postpartum levator ani muscle injury were 0.769, 0.773, 0.747, and 0.885 respectively.These results suggested that the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC may have certain clinical value in predicting levator ani injury in pregnant women.

Conclusion

LHS, fetal HC and the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC are significantly correlated with labor progression and postpartum levator ani injury, which have certain value in predicting labor progress and postpartum levator ani injury. Therein, the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC has the highest predictive value, and early detection of the ratio of resting LHS and fetal HC is helpful to guide the selection of appropriate delivery mode.

Evaluating changes in the strength of the levator ani muscle after vaginal delivery using T2-parameter mapping

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate pelvic floor muscle injury in patients with levator ani muscle (LAM) weakness after vaginal delivery using T2-parameter mapping.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

40 parturients (patient group) and 25 nonparturients (healthy control group) were enrolled in the study. The LAM weakness group had a Modified Oxford Grading System (MOGS) grade of less than 3 after vaginal delivery. All participants underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans, including T2 and T2* mapping, on which the main branches of the LAM, the puborectalis and iliococcygeus, were evaluated. The differences in T2 and T2* values in the puborectalis and iliococcygeus between patients with LAM weakness and controls were analyzed using an independent samples t test or a Mann-Whitney U test.

RESULTS

For both the right and left iliococcygeus, the T2* values of the patient group were lower than those of the control group (P = 0.002 and 0.008, respectively), while no significant difference was observed in the T2 values between the groups (P = 0.45 and 0.69, respectively). For both the right and left puborectalis, no significant differences in the T2* (P = 0.25 and P = 0.25, respectively) or T2 values (P = 0.38 and 0.43, respectively) were observed between the patient and control groups.

CONCLUSION

T2* mapping as a quantitative measurement is an effective imaging tool to assess LAM injury in women after vaginal delivery. The iliococcygeus was more susceptible to vaginal delivery damage than the puborectalis, and pelvic floor dysfunction may be mainly driven by iliococcygeus injury.

Association between infant birthweight and pelvic floor muscle strength: a population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

To assess the relationship between infant birthweight and pelvic floor muscle (PFM) strength in China.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective, single-center cohort study of 1575 women delivering vaginally between January 2017 and May 2020. All participants completed pelvic floor examinations within 5-10 weeks after delivery and were evaluated for PFM strength, which was estimated by vaginal pressure. Data were collected from electronic records. We evaluated the association between infant birthweight and vaginal pressure through multivariable-adjusted linear regression analysis. We also performed subgroup analyses stratified by potential confounders.

RESULTS

Vaginal pressure decreased as the quartile of birthweight increased (P for trend < 0.001). Beta coefficients were -5.04 (95%CI -7.98 to -2.1), -5.53 (95%CI -8.5 to -2.57), -6.07 (95%CI -9.08 to -3.07) for birthweight quartile 2-4, respectively (P for trend < 0.001), independent of age, postpartum hemorrhage, and the number of vaginal deliveries. In addition, the results of subgroup analyses showed the same patterns across strata.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that infant birthweight was associated with decreased vaginal pressure in women after vaginal delivery and could be considered a risk factor for decreased PFM strength in the population with vaginal delivery. This association may provide an extra basis for appropriate fetal weight control during pregnancy, and for earlier pelvic floor rehabilitation of postpartum women delivering babies with larger birthweight.