Fetal and maternal outcomes after maternal biologic use during conception and pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

TNF-α inhibitor use during pregnancy and the risk of preeclampsia: population-based cohort study

BACKGROUND

Although the clinical importance of preeclampsia is widely recognized, few treatment options are available for prevention. TNF-α inhibitors have been hypothesized to potentially prevent the disease. We aimed to examine whether exposure to TNF-α inhibitors during pregnancy reduces the risk of preeclampsia.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based pregnancy cohort study using nationwide samples of publicly (Medicaid data, 2000-2018) and commercially (MarketScan Research Database, 2003-2020) insured pregnant women linked to their liveborn infants. Exposure was ascertained based on a filled prescription or administration code for TNF-α inhibitors during the first and second trimester of pregnancy. The outcomes included early-onset preeclampsia, late-onset preeclampsia, and small-for-gestational age. For baseline confounding adjustment, we leveraged propensity score overlap weights to estimate risk ratios (RR).

RESULTS

Among 4 315 658 pregnancies in the Medicaid and the MarketScan cohort, 2736 (0.063%) were exposed to TNF-α inhibitors during the first trimester and 1712 (0.040%) during the second trimester. After adjustment, the risk of early-onset preeclampsia was not decreased among mothers exposed during the first trimester compared with unexposed women with treatment indications [RR pooled : 1.25, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-1.67]. Similarly, the risk of late-onset preeclampsia was not decreased among mothers exposed during the second trimester compared with unexposed women (RR pooled : 0.99, 95% CI 0.81-1.22).

CONCLUSION

Contrary to the hypothesis, exposure to TNF-α inhibitors during pregnancy did not appear to be associated with a reduced risk of early-onset or late-onset preeclampsia. These findings do not support consideration of the use of TNF-α inhibitors for the prevention of preeclampsia.

The time of equipoise on the use of biological DMARDs in for inflammatory arthritis during pregnancy is finally over: a reappraisal of evidence to optimise pregnancy management

Active inflammatory arthritis in pregnancy is associated with an increased risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes. Treatment of active inflammation and maintenance of low disease activity with medication reduces these risks. Therapeutic decisions on disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) in pregnancy are complicated by safety concerns, which have led to inappropriate withdrawal of treatment and consequential harm to mother and fetus. Studies of inflammatory arthritis in pregnancy have consistently shown minimal safety concerns with the use of biological DMARDs and an increased risk of disease flare with discontinuation of biological DMARDs. It is our opinion that during pregnancy, the benefits of disease control with biological DMARDs, when required in addition to conventional synthetic DMARDs, outweigh the risks. In this Series paper, we review the reasons for reconsideration of equipoise and propose an agenda for future research to optimise the use of biological DMARDs in inflammatory arthritis during pregnancy.

A Benefit-Risk Conceptual Framework for Biologic Use During Pregnancy: A Mini-Review

Recent reports related to in utero exposure of marketed immunosuppressive biologics led to clinical recommendations to delay live vaccinations for infants due to the concern of reduced vaccine effectiveness and/or increased risk of vaccine-related disease. These delays can increase the risk of children contracting vaccine preventable diseases, yet the alternative cessation of biologics during pregnancy may result in increased autoimmune disease activity for the pregnant person, raising complex benefit-risk (B-R) considerations and trade-offs. Our goal is to develop a conceptual framework for B-R assessment based on the key benefits and risks pregnant people would consider for themselves and their children when continuing (vs. discontinuing) a biologic during pregnancy. The proposed framework defines the decision contexts, key domains and attributes for potential benefits, and risks of biologic use during pregnancy, informed by a literature review of indications for biologics and refined with key clinical stakeholders. The framework includes both the pregnant person taking the biologic and the infant potentially exposed to the biologic in utero, with potential benefit and risk domains and attributes for each participant. To advance this conceptual framework, there are considerations of potential biases and uncertainty of available data that will be imperative to address when quantifying the B-R framework. For these reasons, we recommend the formation of a consortium to ensure development of a robust, validated framework that can be adopted in the healthcare setting.

Effect of Anti-TNF Biologic Exposure During Pregnancy on Villitis of Unknown Etiology Diagnoses in Patients with Autoimmune Disease

Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) antagonists are highly effective in controlling autoimmune diseases. This has led to speculation that they might also be useful in treating inflammatory placental conditions, such as chronic villitis of unknown etiology (VUE). VUE affects 10-15% of term placentas and is associated with recurrent fetal growth restriction (FGR) and pregnancy loss. We aimed to evaluate outcomes in patients with autoimmune diseases with and without anti-TNF-α biologic exposure during gestation. This retrospective cohort study compared pregnant women with autoimmune disease taking anti-TNF-α biologics (n = 89) to pregnant women with autoimmune disease but not taking a biologic (n = 53). We extracted data on all patients meeting our inclusion criteria over a 20-year period. Our primary outcome was the diagnosis of VUE by histology. Our secondary outcomes were maternal and neonatal complications such as preeclampsia, FGR, and neonatal intensive care admission. Kruskal-Wallis and chi-squared tests were performed as appropriate for statistical analysis. Maternal characteristics were comparable between groups, and there was no increase in adverse pregnancy outcomes based on anti-TNF-α treatment. Exposure to anti-TNF-α therapy had no significant effect on the incidence of VUE or other obstetric complications. Within the cohort exposed to anti-TNF-α biologics during pregnancy, the rate of VUE was 9.3%, which is comparable to the reported general population risk. Our data support the safety profile of biologic use in pregnancy.

Reproductive Safety Issues of Novel Small Molecules for the Treatment of Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Systematic Review

Maintenance of remission during pregnancy is vital for women with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The antenatal safety of novel small molecules for IBD is yet to be ascertained. We aimed to describe the current evidence on reproductive data regarding small-molecule drugs. We performed a systematic review searching Embase Classic + Embase and Ovid MEDLINE for reproductive outcomes for tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitininb, and ozanimod. Additionally, we asked the manufacturers for available data on file regarding reproduction. We analysed data from 10 sources; six studies and four manufacturer reports were identified from our search. Significant malformation risks were reported for tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitininb, and ozanimod in animal studies. In 126 tofacitinib-exposed pregnancies, there were 55 live births with 2 congenital malformations and 1 serious infant infection, 14 terminations, 15 miscarriages, and 42 outcomes unknown. In 50 filgotinib-exposed pregnancies, there were 20 healthy babies, 1 congenital malformation, 9 terminations, 10 miscarriages, and 10 outcomes unknown. In 78 upadacitinib-exposed pregnancies, there were 30 healthy babies, 15 terminations, 15 miscarriages, and 18 outcomes unknown. In 60 ozanimod-exposed pregnancies, there were 31 live births with 1 congenital malformation, 1 case of intra-uterine growth restriction, 1 case of neonatal icterus, 13 terminations, 9 miscarriages, and 8 unknown outcomes. Animal data suggest significant risks of malformations for tofacitinib, filgotinib, upadacitininb, and ozanimod. Human data from clinical trials and real-world observations do not show concerning data so far, but these are very limited. Currently, alternative treatments should be used for IBD during pregnancy.

Pregnancy Outcomes Associated With Biologic Agent Exposure in Patients With Several Rheumatic Diseases and Inflammatory Bowel Diseases

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to analyze pregnancy outcomes based on biologic agents use in women using the nationwide population-based database.

METHODS

The study used the claims database to identify women of childbearing age with several rheumatic (rheumatoid arthritis, juvenile idiopathic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis) and inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis) who had pregnancy-related codes between January 2010 and December 2019. We analyzed live births and adverse pregnancy outcomes based on the previous use of biologics. We also stratified the patients according to duration of biologic agent exposure before pregnancy and the use of biologics during pregnancy to analyze the pregnancy outcomes by subgroups.

RESULTS

We identified 4,787 patients with pregnancy events. Among them, 1,034 (21.6%) used biologics before pregnancy. Live birth rate was not different between the biologics group and biologics naïve group (75.0% vs. 75.2%). Multivariate analyses showed that biologics use was associated with higher risk of intrauterine growth retardation (odds ratio [OR], 1.780) and lower risk of gestational diabetes mellitus (OR, 0.776) compared with biologics naïve. Biologics use during pregnancy was associated with higher risk of preterm delivery (OR, 1.859), preeclampsia/eclampsia (OR, 1.762), intrauterine growth retardation (OR, 3.487), and cesarean section (OR, 1.831), but lower risk of fetal loss (OR, 0.274) compared with biologics naïve.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there was no difference in live birth rate between the biologics group and biologics naïve group, biologics use seems to be associated with several adverse pregnancy outcomes, especially in patients with biologics during pregnancy. Therefore, patients with biologics during pregnancy need to be carefully observed for adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Pregnancy Considerations for Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease

Advances in our understanding of interstitial lung disease (ILD) pathophysiology and natural history have led to the development of guidelines for the diagnosis and management of several of these complex diseases. The demographics of patients with ILD indicate the disease is not restricted to older adults. Connective tissue disease-associated ILD, familial pulmonary fibrosis, and post-COVID-19 fibrosis may affect women of child-bearing age. Recent trials have excluded pregnant women, thereby limiting the applicability of contemporary therapeutic advances to these patients. This review synthesizes the current knowledge of pregnancy outcomes in those with ILD, with a focus on connective tissue disease-associated ILD, and potential treatment implications for patients with ILD who are pregnant or considering pregnancy. Pregnancy considerations for patients with ILD include the need for preconception counseling and planning to ensure disease stability, medication and vaccination optimization, and multidisciplinary involvement of a patient's pulmonologist, obstetrician, and, when indicated, rheumatologist and genetic counselor. Evidence to date suggests that women with ILD can have safe and healthy pregnancies but that complications may occur in those with severe ILD.

Case Report: TNF-Alpha Inhibitors to Rescue Pregnancy in Women With Potential Pregnancy Loss: A Report of Ten Cases

Miscarriage poses a significant threat to pregnant women globally. Recurrent miscarriages or potential poor embryonic development indicated by early drops in serum human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) are even more catastrophic for pregnant women. However, these patients receive either individualized medical intervention supported by limited evidence or no treatment at all. In this study, we report ten patients who shared at least one episode of an early decline of hCG in the first trimester and were treated with compassionate use of tumor necrosis factor-alpha inhibitor (TNFi). They were then followed up regularly with caution. Their hCG trajectory all resumed a normal pattern within one week and the obstetric outcomes were promising. No adverse fetal, neonatal, or maternal health issues have been observed. This case series supports current safety evidence of TNFi and provides new insight into its use in pregnancy when the embryo is in danger. Further well-designed clinical trials should be carried out to consolidate the evidence.