Potential missed opportunities for antenatal corticosteroid exposure and outcomes among periviable births: observational cohort study

Antenatal corticosteroids: an updated assessment of anticipated benefits and potential risks

Antenatal steroid therapy is increasingly central to the obstetrical management of women at imminent risk of preterm birth. For women likely to deliver between 24 and 34 weeks' gestation, antenatal steroid therapy is the standard of care, conferring sizable benefits and few risks in high-resource environments when appropriately targeted. Recent studies have focused on antenatal steroid use in periviable and late preterm populations, and in term cesarean deliveries. As a result, antenatal steroid therapy has now been applied from 22 to 39+6 weeks of estimated gestational age. There is also an increased appreciation that the vast majority of randomized control data informing the use of antenatal steroids are derived from predominantly high-resource, White populations. Accordingly, a sizable amount of work has recently been undertaken to test how to safely use antenatal steroids in low- and middle-resource environments, wherein the often high rates of preterm birth make these low-cost, easily administered interventions an attractive proposition. It is likely underappreciated by the obstetrical and neonatal communities that the overall efficacy of antenatal steroid therapy is highly variable (including when preterm risk is accurately assessed), the treatment regimens used are largely arbitrary, dosing is suprapharmacologic for effect, and the benefit-risk balance is significantly and differentially modified by gestation. It is also very likely that the patients consenting to receive these treatments are similarly unaware of the complex balance of potential benefits and harms. Although a small number of follow-up studies present a generally benign picture of long-term antenatal steroid risk, several large, population-based retrospective studies have identified associations between antenatal steroid use, childhood mental disease, and newborn infections that warrant urgent attention. Of particular contemporary importance are emergent efforts to optimize antenatal steroid regimens on the basis of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the agents themselves, the need for better targeting of these potent drugs, and clear articulation of the potential benefits and harms of antenatal steroid use at differing stages of pregnancy and in different delivery contexts.

Extreme prematurity: Factors associated with perinatal management and morbi-mortality in western Normandy, France

BACKGROUND

Extreme prematurity (birth before 26 weeks of gestation), presents complex challenges and can lead to various complications. Survival rates of extremely preterm infants are lower in France than in other countries. The choice between active and palliative care is decisive in managing these births.

OBJECTIVE

To conduct an observational study focused on factors associated with perinatal management, mortality, and morbidity outcomes among extremely preterm births in a regional perinatal network.

METHODS

We undertook a retrospective, multicenter study within the western Normandy perinatal network, encompassing live births between 230/6 and 256/6 weeks from 2015 to 2019. Data were extracted from the perinatal network database and medical records.

RESULTS

One hundred and seven infants born from 94 women were included. In the antenatal period, 79 were exposed to corticosteroids, 66 to magnesium sulfate, and 67 to antibiotics. Active care at birth was provided to 84 neonates of whom 42 survived. In total, 65 infants died. Among the 42 surviving neonates, 9 experienced no severe morbidity, 29 displayed one and 4 exhibited two criteria of severe morbidity. Active care was associated with gestational age. Neonatal survival was correlated with antenatal exposure to antibiotics and magnesium sulfate as well as with postnatal corticosteroids. We found no significant association between mortality and gestational age at birth.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic factors must be weighed to discuss active antenatal care which is crucial for survival of extremely preterm neonates. Cooperation between obstetricians and neonatal caregivers is a cornerstone on a regional perinatal network scale.

Antenatal Corticosteroids at 21-23 Weeks of Gestation

Neonates born at the cusp of viability are at particularly high risk of severe morbidity and mortality. With advances in medicine and technology, the ability to resuscitate smaller, more premature neonates has become possible, and survival as early as 21 weeks of gestation has been reported. Although administration of antenatal corticosteroids has been shown to reduce the risk of morbidity and mortality at later gestational ages, neonates born before 24 weeks of gestation have not been included in randomized clinical trials. Changing clinical practices surrounding neonatal resuscitation with intervention offered after birth at earlier gestational ages has prompted re-evaluation of the use of antenatal corticosteroids at these very early gestational ages. Recent observational data demonstrate that antenatal corticosteroids administered before deliveries at or after 22 weeks of gestation are associated with lower risks of neonatal mortality, although survival with severe morbidity remains high. Future research is needed to determine the efficacy of antenatal corticosteroids for deliveries before 22 weeks of gestation and should evaluate the timing of corticosteroid administration. Furthermore, efforts should be made to include diverse populations and clinically meaningful long-term outcomes. At this time, the decision surrounding antenatal corticosteroids for threatened periviable deliveries should incorporate multidisciplinary counseling with the goal of achieving concordant prenatal and postnatal management aligned with the patient's desires.