1
|
Kleinmann W, Zofkie A, McIntire D, Adhikari EH. A Prospective Study of Lactate Levels in Uncomplicated Spontaneous and Induced Labor. Am J Perinatol 2024; 41:1743-1747. [PMID: 38593986 DOI: 10.1055/a-2302-8828] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/11/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Maternal pushing can yield lactate levels that are above the normal range for nonpregnant individuals. Many hospitals require lactate levels as part of sepsis bundles, and this can confuse the clinicians when measured during labor. The objective of this study was to observe lactate levels in uncomplicated labor. STUDY DESIGN This was a prospective study of patients presenting to Labor and Delivery in early labor. Patients met inclusion criteria if they presented at 37 weeks' gestation or greater and were either 3 to 4 cm dilated, in early labor with rupture of membranes less than 12 hours, or were being induced for oligohydramnios or postdates gestation. A baseline maternal lactate level was collected at enrollment. Further levels were collected at complete cervical dilation and every 30 minutes during the second stage of labor up to 3 hours or until delivery. RESULTS From January 7, 2021, through December 30, 2021, a total of 148 screened patients met the inclusion criteria and 38 were enrolled. Eight (21%) patients withdrew after baseline lactate level was drawn. Twenty-three (61%) patients had a level drawn at complete dilation. Of the 12 (32%) patients with a lactate level drawn at complete and after 30 minutes of pushing, the mean change in lactate level was 2.0 ± 1.8 mmol/L or 0.07 ± 0.06 mmol/L/min (p < 0.01). This change is more pronounced in the second stage of labor for patients with chorioamnionitis (2.6 mmol/L), although this difference is not statistically significant (p = 0.41). CONCLUSION Lactate levels increase significantly once a patient reaches complete cervical dilation within 30 minutes of pushing. This increase is more pronounced, although significantly, in patients with chorioamnionitis. As sepsis is one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality, this pilot study is relevant for providers to see the natural course of lactate levels in labor. KEY POINTS · The change in lactate level during normal labor is unknown.. · We measured lactate levels in uncomplicated labor.. · Lactate levels can be elevated in uncomplicated labor..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Whitney Kleinmann
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
- Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Amanda Zofkie
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
- Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Donald McIntire
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
- Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas
| | - Emily H Adhikari
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas
- Parkland Health, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shields AD, Tse BC. Finding the Needle in the Haystack: Challenges and Future Directions in Maternal Sepsis Recognition. Obstet Gynecol 2024; 143:323-325. [PMID: 38359433 DOI: 10.1097/aog.0000000000005513] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 12/15/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2024]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrea D Shields
- Andrea D. Shields and Beverly C. Tse are from the Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Women's Health at the University of Connecticut Health Center, Farmington, Connecticut;
| | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Prabhu M, Wilkie G, MacEachern M, LaBuda D, Purtell J, Rao K, Riley LE, Fuller M, Rosser M, Habib AS, Bauer ME. Procalcitonin levels in pregnancy: A systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 2023; 163:484-494. [PMID: 37118923 DOI: 10.1002/ijgo.14813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2023] [Revised: 04/05/2023] [Accepted: 04/12/2023] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The utility of procalcitonin to identify obstetric sepsis is unknown. OBJECTIVE To calculate the mean (range) procalcitonin in pregnancy among healthy women not in labor (group 1), healthy women in labor (group 2), and women with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) without clinical chorioamnionitis (group 3). SEARCH STRATEGY NLM PubMed, Elsevier Embase, and Wiley Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials from inception to February 21, 2022. SELECTION CRITERIA Ten or more pregnant women with procalcitonin reported at more than 20 weeks of pregnancy, with information on labor, PPROM, and infection. Exclusions were major medical comorbidities. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS Each abstract and full-text review was independently reviewed by the same two authors. Quality was reviewed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. A meta-analysis was performed using a random effects model. MAIN RESULTS The systematic review included 25 studies: 10 (40%) of good quality and 15 (60%) of poor quality. The meta-analysis included 21 studies. Mean procalcitonin in group 1 was 0.092 ng/mL (range 0.036-0.049 ng/mL), in group 2 it was 0.130 ng/mL (range 0.049-0.259 ng/mL), and in group 3 it was 0.345 ng/mL (range 0.005-1.292 ng/mL). CONCLUSIONS Among healthy pregnant women not in labor, procalcitonin levels are comparable to those in non-pregnant adults and may be useful in identifying infection. Procalcitonin levels in other groups overlap abnormal values of procalcitonin in non-pregnant adults, and may not discriminate infection among women in labor or with obstetric comorbidities. PROSPERO CRD42020157376, registered 4/28/2020.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Malavika Prabhu
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Gianna Wilkie
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Massachusetts Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts, USA
| | | | - Dana LaBuda
- University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | | | - Krishna Rao
- Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Laura E Riley
- Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York, USA
| | - Matthew Fuller
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Morgan Rosser
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Ashraf S Habib
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melissa E Bauer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA
- Department of Anesthesiology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Shields AD, Plante LA, Pacheco LD, Louis JM. Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine Consult Series #67: Maternal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2023; 229:B2-B19. [PMID: 37236495 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2023.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/28/2023]
Abstract
Maternal sepsis is a significant cause of maternal morbidity and mortality, and is a potentially preventable cause of maternal death. This Consult aims to summarize what is known about sepsis and provide guidance for the management of sepsis during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Most studies cited are from the nonpregnant population, but where available, pregnancy data are included. The following are the Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine recommendations: (1) we recommend that clinicians consider the diagnosis of sepsis in pregnant or postpartum patients with otherwise unexplained end-organ damage in the presence of a suspected or confirmed infectious process, regardless of the presence of fever (GRADE 1C); (2) we recommend that sepsis and septic shock in pregnancy be considered medical emergencies and that treatment and resuscitation begin immediately (Best Practice); (3) we recommend that hospitals and health systems use a performance improvement program for sepsis in pregnancy with sepsis screening tools and metrics (GRADE 1B); (4) we recommend that institutions develop their own procedures and protocols for the detection of maternal sepsis, avoiding the use of a single screening tool alone (GRADE 1B); (5) we recommend obtaining tests to evaluate for infectious and noninfectious causes of life-threatening organ dysfunction in pregnant and postpartum patients with possible sepsis (Best Practice); (6) we recommend that an evaluation for infectious causes in pregnant or postpartum patients in whom sepsis is suspected or identified includes appropriate microbiologic cultures, including blood, before starting antimicrobial therapy, as long as there are no substantial delays in timely administration of antibiotics (Best Practice); (7) we recommend obtaining a serum lactate level in pregnant or postpartum patients in whom sepsis is suspected or identified (GRADE 1B); (8) in pregnant or postpartum patients with septic shock or a high likelihood of sepsis, we recommend administration of empiric broad-spectrum antimicrobial therapy, ideally within 1 hour of recognition (GRADE 1C); (9) after a diagnosis of sepsis in pregnancy is made, we recommend rapid identification or exclusion of an anatomic source of infection and emergency source control when indicated (Best Practice); (10) we recommend early intravenous administration (within the first 3 hours) of 1 to 2 L of balanced crystalloid solutions in sepsis complicated by hypotension or suspected organ hypoperfusion (GRADE 1C); (11) we recommend the use of a balanced crystalloid solution as a first-line fluid for resuscitation in pregnant and postpartum patients with sepsis or septic shock (GRADE 1B); (12) we recommend against the use of starches or gelatin for resuscitation in pregnant and postpartum patients with sepsis or septic shock (GRADE 1A); (13) we recommend ongoing, detailed evaluation of the patient's response to fluid resuscitation guided by dynamic measures of preload (GRADE 1B); (14) we recommend the use of norepinephrine as the first-line vasopressor during pregnancy and the postpartum period with septic shock (GRADE 1C); (15) we suggest using intravenous corticosteroids in pregnant or postpartum patients with septic shock who continue to require vasopressor therapy (GRADE 2B); (16) because of an increased risk of venous thromboembolism in sepsis and septic shock, we recommend the use of pharmacologic venous thromboembolism prophylaxis in pregnant and postpartum patients in septic shock (GRADE 1B); (17) we suggest initiating insulin therapy at a glucose level >180 mg/dL in critically ill pregnant patients with sepsis (GRADE 2C); (18) if a uterine source for sepsis is suspected or confirmed, we recommend prompt delivery or evacuation of uterine contents to achieve source control, regardless of gestational age (GRADE 1C); and (19) because of an increased risk of physical, cognitive, and emotional problems in survivors of sepsis and septic shock, we recommend ongoing comprehensive support for pregnant and postpartum sepsis survivors and their families (Best Practice).
Collapse
|
5
|
Kulikov AV, Shifman EM, Protsenko DN, Ovezov AM, Роненсон АМ, Raspopin YS, Artymuk NV, Belokrynitskaya TE, Zolotukhin KN, Shchegolev AV, Kovalev VV, Matkovsky AA, Osipchuk DO, Pylaeva NY, Ryazanova OV, Zabolotskikh IB. Septic shock in obstetrics: guidelines of the All-Russian public organization “Federation of Anesthesiologists and Reanimatologists”. ANNALS OF CRITICAL CARE 2023:7-44. [DOI: 10.21320/1818-474x-2023-2-7-44] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/05/2025]
Abstract
The article reflects the main provisions of the clinical guidelines on septic shock in obstetrics, approved by the All-Russian public organization “Federation of Anesthesiologists-Resuscitators” in 2022. The relevance of the problem is associated with high mortality and morbidity rates from sepsis and septic shock in obstetrics. The main issues of etiology, pathogenesis, clinical picture, methods of laboratory and instrumental diagnostics, features of using the qSOFA, SOFA, MOEWS, SOS, MEWC, IMEWS scales for sepsis verification are consistently presented. The article presents the starting intensive therapy (the first 6–12 hours) of the treatment of septic shock in obstetrics, taking into account the characteristics of the pregnant woman's body. The strategy of prescribing vasopressors (norepinephrine, phenylephrine, epinephrine), inotropic drugs (dobutamine) is described, antibiotics and optimal antibiotic therapy regimens, features of infusion and adjuvant therapy are presented. The issues of surgical treatment of the focus of infection and indications for hysterectomy, as well as the organization of medical care and rehabilitation of patients with sepsis and septic shock were discussed. The basic principles of prevention of sepsis and septic shock in obstetrics are described. The criteria for the quality of medical care for patients with septic shock and the algorithms of doctor's actions in the diagnosis and intensive care of patients with septic shock in obstetrics are presented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - E. M. Shifman
- Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - D. N. Protsenko
- Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (RNRMU), Moscow, Russia; Moscow’s Multidisciplinary Clinical Center “Kommunarka”, Moscow, Russia
| | - A. M. Ovezov
- Moscow Regional Research and Clinical Institute, Moscow, Russia
| | - А. М. Роненсон
- Tver State Medical University, Tver, Russia; E.M. Bakunina Tver Regional Clinical Perinatal Centre, Tver, Russia
| | - Yu. S. Raspopin
- Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University, Krasnoyarsk, Russia; Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Center for Maternal and Child Health, Krasnoyarsk, Russia
| | | | | | | | | | - V. V. Kovalev
- Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
| | - A. A. Matkovsky
- Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia; Ural State Medical University, Yekaterinburg, Russia
| | - D. O. Osipchuk
- Regional Children's Clinical Hospital. Yekaterinburg, Russia
| | - N. Yu. Pylaeva
- V.I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Simferopol, Russia
| | - O. V. Ryazanova
- D.O. Ott Research Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology RAMS, St. Petersburg, Russia
| | - I. B. Zabolotskikh
- Kuban State Medical University, Krasnodar, Russia; Federal Research and Clinical Center of Intensive Care Medicine and Rehabilitology, Moscow, Russia; Regional Clinical Hospital No 2, Krasnodar, Russia
| |
Collapse
|