The impact of a universal late third-trimester scan for fetal growth restriction on perinatal outcomes in term singleton births: A prospective cohort study

Routine third-trimester ultrasound assessment for intrauterine growth restriction

Intrauterine growth restriction significantly impacts perinatal outcomes. Undetected IUGR escalates the risk of adverse outcomes. Serial symphysis-fundal height measurement, a recommended strategy, is insufficient in detecting abnormal fetal growth. Routine third-trimester ultrasounds significantly improve detection rates compared with this approach, but direct high-quality evidence supporting enhanced perinatal outcomes from routine scanning is lacking. In assessing fetal growth, abdominal circumference alone performs comparably to estimated fetal weight. Hadlock formulas demonstrate accurate fetal weight estimation across diverse gestational ages and settings. When choosing growth charts, prescriptive standards (encompassing healthy pregnancies) should be prioritized over descriptive ones. Customized fetal standards may enhance antenatal IUGR detection, but conclusive high-quality evidence is elusive. Emerging observational data suggest that longitudinal fetal growth assessment could predict adverse outcomes better. However, direct randomized trial evidence supporting this remains insufficient.

Maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio distinguishes growth-restricted from non-growth-restricted small-for-gestational-age fetuses

BACKGROUND

Fetal growth restriction secondary to chronic placental insufficiency is a major cause of perinatal morbidity and mortality. A significant proportion of fetuses with fetal growth restriction are small for gestational age, defined as a birthweight of ≤10th percentile. However, not all small-for-gestational-age fetuses are growth restricted. Some are constitutionally small and otherwise healthy. It is important to distinguish between small-for-gestational-age fetuses with and without fetal growth restriction to ensure appropriate interventions in small-for-gestational-age fetuses with fetal growth restriction and to minimize unnecessary interventions in healthy small-for-gestational-age fetuses. The maternal serum ratio of soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and placental growth factor is an indicator of placental insufficiency in the latter half of pregnancy. As such, the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio may be a clinically useful tool to distinguish between small-for-gestational-age fetuses with and without fetal growth restriction.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine whether the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio can distinguish between small-for-gestational-age fetuses with and without fetal growth restriction with a birthweight of ≤10th percentile.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective audit of 233 singleton pregnancies delivering an infant with a birthweight of ≤10th percentile corrected for gestational age with an antenatal maternal serum soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor result was performed. Fetal growth restriction was defined as a birthweight of ≤10th percentile with an umbilical artery pulsatility index of >95th percentile, fetal middle cerebral artery pulsatility index of <5th percentile, amniotic fluid index of <6 cm, and/or cerebroplacental ratio of <1st percentile. The soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratios before delivery between fetuses with and without fetal growth restriction (121 [fetal growth restriction] vs 112 [no fetal growth restriction]) were compared. The Student t test and Fisher exact test were used to compare cases and controls. The Mann-Whitney U test, linear regression analysis, and Spearman correlation coefficient (Rho) were used to examine associations between the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio and fetal outcomes to determine whether the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio served as a prognostic marker of fetal growth restriction severity.

RESULTS

The mean soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio was increased in fetal growth restriction cases compared with non-fetal growth restriction controls (234.3±25.0 vs 67.4±7.7, respectively; P<.0001). When controlling for preeclampsia, which is associated with placental insufficiency, fetal growth restriction cases still demonstrated an independent increase in the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio (effect size, 0.865; 95% confidence interval, 0.509-1.220; P<.001). The soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio was negatively correlated with birthweight percentiles in pregnancies delivering an infant with a birthweight of ≤10th percentile (r=-0.3565; P<.0001). This association was maintained for fetuses with fetal growth restriction (r=-0.2309; P<.05), whereas fetuses without fetal growth restriction had no significant correlation between the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio and neonatal birthweight percentiles.

CONCLUSION

The soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio was significantly higher in small-for-gestational-age fetuses with fetal growth restriction than small-for-gestational-age fetuses without fetal growth restriction, independent of preeclampsia. Furthermore, the soluble fms-like tyrosine kinase-1-to-placental growth factor ratio was negatively correlated with fetal growth restriction birthweight percentiles, suggesting that it may be a clinical measure of fetal growth restriction severity. Therefore, the ratio may usefully delineate fetal growth restriction from constitutionally small but otherwise healthy fetuses antenatally, allowing for timely interventions in small-for-gestational-age cases with fetal growth restriction and unnecessary interventions to be minimized in small-for-gestational-age cases without fetal growth restriction.

Perinatal outcome of fetuses predicted to be large-for-gestational age on universal third-trimester ultrasound in non-diabetic pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the perinatal outcome of fetuses predicted to be large-for-gestational age (LGA) on universal third-trimester ultrasound in non-diabetic pregnancies of women attempting vaginal delivery.

METHODS

This was a prospective population-based cohort study of patients from a single tertiary maternity unit in the UK offering universal third-trimester ultrasound and practicing expectant management of suspected LGA until 41-42 weeks. All women with a singleton pregnancy and an estimated due date between January 2014 and September 2019 were included. Women delivering before 37 weeks, those having a planned Cesarean delivery, those with pre-existing or gestational diabetes, those with fetal abnormalities and those who did not undergo a third-trimester scan were excluded from the assessment of perinatal outcome of cases with LGA predicted on ultrasound after implementation of the universal scan period. Association of LGA on universal third-trimester ultrasound screening and perinatal adverse outcome was assessed, with the exposures of interest being estimated fetal weight (EFW) at the 90th -95th , > 95th and > 99th percentile. The reference group was composed of fetuses with EFW at the 30th -70th percentile. Analysis was performed using multivariate logistic regression. The evaluated adverse perinatal outcomes included a composite outcome of admission to neonatal intensive care unit, Apgar score < 7 at 5 min and arterial cord pH < 7.1 (CAO1) and a composite outcome of stillbirth, neonatal death and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy (CAO2). Secondary maternal outcomes were induction of labor, mode of delivery, postpartum hemorrhage, shoulder dystocia and obstetric anal sphincter injury.

RESULTS

Cases with EFW > 95th percentile on universal third-trimester scan were at increased risk of CAO1 (adjusted odds ratio (aOR), 2.18 (95% CI, 1.69-2.80)) and CAO2 (aOR, 2.58 (95% CI, 1.05-6.34)). Cases with EFW at the 90th -95th percentile had a less pronounced increase in the risk of CAO1 (aOR, 1.35 (95% CI, 1.02-1.78)) and were not at increased risk of CAO2. All pregnancies with a fetus predicted to be LGA were at increased risk of all of the evaluated secondary maternal outcomes except for obstetric anal sphincter injury. The risk of adverse maternal outcome was typically higher with increasing EFW. Post-hoc exploration of data suggested that shoulder dystocia had a limited contribution to composite adverse perinatal outcomes in LGA cases (population attributable fraction of 10.8% for CAO1 and 29.1% for CAO2).

CONCLUSIONS

Cases with EFW > 95th percentile are at increased risk of severe adverse perinatal outcome, such as death and hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy. These findings should aid antenatal counseling regarding the associated risk and delivery options. © 2023 International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.