Googling preterm prelabour rupture of the membranes: A systematic review of patient information available on the internet

Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM): a study of patient experiences and support needs

BACKGROUND

Preterm prelabour rupture of membranes (PPROM) is a common obstetric condition but outcomes can vary depending on gestation. Significant maternal and foetal complications occur including preterm birth, infection, abruption, cord prolapse, pulmonary hypoplasia and even death. Although the need for psychological support is recognised it is unclear how much is actually offered to women and their families. This study aimed to survey the views of women and their families who have undergone PPROM in order to understand the care and psychological burden these families face.

METHODS

An online survey was conducted, recruiting women via social media with collaboration from the patient advocacy support group Little Heartbeats. Responses were collated where fields were binary or mean and standard deviations calculated. Framework analysis was used to identify and analyse themes in free text responses.

RESULTS

180PPROM pregnancies were described from 177 respondents. Although carewas variable and respondents were from across the world there werecommon themes. Five themes were highlighted which were: a lack ofbalanced information regarding the condition, support in decisionmaking and support with the process, specific psychological supportand ongoing psychological consequences of PPROM.

CONCLUSION

This survey highlights areas in which care needs to be improved for women with PPROM. Previous studies have shown that providing good care during the antenatal period reduces long-term psychological morbidity for the whole family. The need for support, with regard both to information provided to women and their families and their psychological support needs to be addressed urgently.

Fetal growth restriction: How reliable is information available to patients on Google? A systematic review

OBJECTIVES

To review systematically the quality, readability and credibility of English language webpages offering patient information on fetal growth restriction.

STUDY DESIGN

A systematic review of patient information was undertaken on Google with location services and browser history disabled. Websites from the first page were included providing they gave at least 300 words of health information on fetal growth restriction aimed at patients. Validated assessment of readability, credibility and quality were undertaken. An accuracy assessment was performed based on international guidance. Characteristics were tabulated.

RESULTS

Thirty-one websites including 30 different texts were included. No pages had a reading age of 11 years or less, none were credible, and only one was of high quality. Median accuracy rating was 9/24.

CONCLUSION

Patients cannot rely on Google as a source of information on fetal growth restriction. As well as being difficult to read, information tends to be low quality, low accuracy and not credible. Healthcare professionals must consider how to enable access to high-quality patient information and give time for discussion of information patients have found: failure to do so may disenfranchise patients.