1
|
Stahnke DN, Nied C, Oliveira MLGD, Costa JSDD. Trends in hospital admissions and mortality from diabetes mellitus in Rio Grande do Sul: historical series 2000-2020. Rev Gaucha Enferm 2023; 44:e20230103. [PMID: 37971111 DOI: 10.1590/1983-1447.2023.20230103.en] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2023] [Accepted: 06/28/2023] [Indexed: 11/19/2023] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To analyze the trends of hospital admissions and deaths from diabetes mellitus in the 18 host municipalities of the 19 regional health coordination offices and in Rio Grande do Sul, 2000-2020. METHOD Ecological study with secondary data collected in the Hospital Information System, the Mortality Information System, and the Brazilian Institute of Geography and Statistics, from 2000-2020. Coefficients were standardized using the direct method and Prais-Winsten regression analysis. RESULTS A downward trend wasfound in the coefficients of hospitalizations for diabetes mellitus in most cities and states. In 2020, for both areas, hospitalizations for diabetes mellitus were below the average of the period. The mortality trend remained stationary in almost all municipalities and in the state. CONCLUSION There was evidence of a decrease in hospitalizations and stationary mortality by DM in most municipalities analyzed, possibly due to the policies and actions implemented in the period, despite the aging of the population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Douglas Nunes Stahnke
- Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
| | - Camila Nied
- Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
| | | | - Juvenal Soares Dias da Costa
- Universidade do Vale do Rio dos Sinos (Unisinos). Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Coletiva. São Leopoldo, Rio Grande do Sul, Brasil
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Kara P, Valentin JB, Mainz J, Johnsen SP. Composite measures of quality of health care: Evidence mapping of methodology and reporting. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0268320. [PMID: 35552561 PMCID: PMC9098058 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0268320] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/24/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2022] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Quality indicators are used to quantify the quality of care. A large number of quality indicators makes assessment of overall quality difficult, time consuming and impractical. There is consequently an increasing interest for composite measures based on a combination of multiple indicators. Objective To examine the use of different approaches to construct composite measures of quality of care and to assess the use of methodological considerations and justifications. Methods We conducted a literature search on PubMed and EMBASE databases (latest update 1 December 2020). For each publication, we extracted information on the weighting and aggregation methodology that had been used to construct composite indicator(s). Results A total of 2711 publications were identified of which 145 were included after a screening process. Opportunity scoring with equal weights was the most used approach (86/145, 59%) followed by all-or-none scoring (48/145, 33%). Other approaches regarding aggregation or weighting of individual indicators were used in 32 publications (22%). The rationale for selecting a specific type of composite measure was reported in 36 publications (25%), whereas 22 papers (15%) addressed limitations regarding the composite measure. Conclusion Opportunity scoring and all-or-none scoring are the most frequently used approaches when constructing composite measures of quality of care. The attention towards the rationale and limitations of the composite measures appears low. Discussion Considering the widespread use and the potential implications for decision-making of composite measures, a high level of transparency regarding the construction process of the composite and the functionality of the measures is crucial.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pinar Kara
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research (DACS), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- * E-mail:
| | - Jan Brink Valentin
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research (DACS), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Jan Mainz
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research (DACS), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
- Psychiatry, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department for Community Mental Health, University of Haifa, Haifa, Israel
- Department of Health Economics, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Søren Paaske Johnsen
- Danish Center for Clinical Health Services Research (DACS), Department of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Howard I, Cameron P, Castrén M, Wallis L, Lindström V. Multi-method versus single method appraisal of clinical quality indicators for the emergency medical services. Int J Qual Health Care 2021; 33:6047025. [PMID: 33367636 DOI: 10.1093/intqhc/mzaa171] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/31/2020] [Revised: 11/30/2020] [Accepted: 12/24/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Quality Indicator (QI) appraisal protocol is a novel methodology that combines multiple appraisal methods to comprehensively assess the 'appropriateness' of QIs for a particular healthcare setting. However, they remain inadequately explored compared to the single appraisal method approach. OBJECTIVES To describe and test a multi-method QI appraisal protocol versus the single method approach, against a series of QIs previously identified as potentially relevant to the prehospital emergency care setting. METHODS An appraisal protocol was developed consisting of two categorical-based appraisal methods, combined with the qualitative analysis of the discussion generated during the consensus application of each method. The output of the protocol was assessed and compared with the application and output of each method. Inter-rater reliability (IRR) of each particular method was evaluated prior to group consensus rating. Variation in the number of non-valid QIs and the proportion of non-valid QIs identified between each method and the protocol were compared and assessed. RESULTS There was mixed IRR of the individual methods. There was similarly low-to-moderate correlation of the results obtained between the particular methods (Spearman's rank correlation = 0.42, P < 0.001). From a series of 104 QIs, 11 non-valid QIs were identified that were shared between the individual methods. A further 19 non-valid QIs were identified and not shared by each method, highlighting the benefits of a multi-method approach. The outcomes were additionally evident in the group discussion analysis, which in and of itself added further input that would not have otherwise been captured by the individual methods alone. CONCLUSION The utilization of a multi-method appraisal protocol offers multiple benefits, when compared to the single appraisal approach, and can provide the confidence that the outcomes of the appraisal will ensure a strong foundation on which the QI framework can be successfully implemented.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ian Howard
- Department of Clinical Science and Education, Sjukhusbacken 10, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden.,Division of Emergency Medicine, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape 7602, South Africa
| | - Peter Cameron
- School of Public Health and Preventative Medicine, 553 St Kilda Road, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia
| | - Maaret Castrén
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Services, Topeliuksenkatu 5, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki 00280, Finland
| | - Lee Wallis
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Private Bag X1, Matieland, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, Western Cape 7602, South Africa.,Division of Emergency Medicine, Private Bag X3, Rondebosch, University of Cape Town, Cape Town 7700, South Africa
| | - Veronica Lindström
- Department of Neurobiology, Care Sciences and Society, Section of Nursing, Nobels väg 5, Solna, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden.,Academic EMS, Sjukhusbacken 10, Södersjukhuset, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm 171 77, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Variation in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation between English clinical commissioning groups: an observational study. Br J Gen Pract 2018; 68:e551-e558. [PMID: 29970397 DOI: 10.3399/bjgp18x697913] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2017] [Accepted: 02/05/2018] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Despite improvement in anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF), substantial variation in anticoagulation persists between clinical commissioning groups (CCGs) and regions in England. AIM To identify reasons for variation between English CCGs in anticoagulation for AF. DESIGN AND SETTING A 4-year observational study from 2012/2013 to 2015/2016, of the national Quality and Outcomes Framework. METHOD Multiple regression and Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to analyse anticoagulation for AF in relation to older age, Index of Multiple Deprivation, prescription of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and exception reporting, as well as stroke hospital admission and mortality. RESULTS The proportion of eligible patients in England prescribed anticoagulants for AF without exceptions for clinical complexity or patient dissent increased from 65.1% in 2012/2013 to 77.9% in 2015/2016. In 2015, 290 920 additional eligible people were anticoagulated in association with use of the CHA2DS2VASc rather than CHADS2 score. From 2012 to 2015, exception reporting almost halved from 20% to 10.2%. Variation in CCG anticoagulation was not associated with deprivation or NOAC use. There was a strong negative association between exception reporting representing patient complexity and anticoagulation performance, accounting for 57% of the variation in anticoagulation without exceptions (multiple regression coefficient = -0.81; 95% confidence intervals = -0.92 to -0.71; P<0.001). CONCLUSION Anticoagulation for AF has improved substantially in England in association with considerable increases in the eligible population as a result of decreased exception reporting and the use of the CHA2DS2VASc score. There is still substantial room for improvement in most CCGs because, even allowing for exceptions, nine out of 10 CCGs failed to achieve 90% anticoagulation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cookson R, Asaria M, Ali S, Ferguson B, Fleetcroft R, Goddard M, Goldblatt P, Laudicella M, Raine R. Health Equity Indicators for the English NHS: a longitudinal whole-population study at the small-area level. HEALTH SERVICES AND DELIVERY RESEARCH 2016. [DOI: 10.3310/hsdr04260] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/22/2022] Open
Abstract
BackgroundInequalities in health-care access and outcomes raise concerns about quality of care and justice, and the NHS has a statutory duty to consider reducing them.ObjectivesThe objectives were to (1) develop indicators of socioeconomic inequality in health-care access and outcomes at different stages of the patient pathway; (2) develop methods for monitoring local NHS equity performance in tackling socioeconomic health-care inequalities; (3) track the evolution of socioeconomic health-care inequalities in the 2000s; and (4) develop ‘equity dashboards’ for communicating equity findings to decision-makers in a clear and concise format.DesignLongitudinal whole-population study at the small-area level.SettingEngland from 2001/2 to 2011/12.ParticipantsA total of 32,482 small-area neighbourhoods (lower-layer super output areas) of approximately 1500 people.Main outcome measuresSlope index of inequality gaps between the most and least deprived neighbourhoods in England, adjusted for need or risk, for (1) patients per family doctor, (2) primary care quality, (3) inpatient hospital waiting time, (4) emergency hospitalisation for chronic ambulatory care-sensitive conditions, (5) repeat emergency hospitalisation in the same year, (6) dying in hospital, (7) mortality amenable to health care and (8) overall mortality.Data sourcesPractice-level workforce data from the general practice census (indicator 1), practice-level Quality and Outcomes Framework data (indicator 2), inpatient hospital data from Hospital Episode Statistics (indicators 3–6) and mortality data from the Office for National Statistics (indicators 6–8).ResultsBetween 2004/5 and 2011/12, more deprived neighbourhoods gained larger absolute improvements on all indicators except waiting time, repeat hospitalisation and dying in hospital. In 2011/12, there was little measurable inequality in primary care supply and quality, but inequality was associated with 171,119 preventable hospitalisations and 41,123 deaths amenable to health care. In 2011/12, > 20% of Clinical Commissioning Groups performed statistically significantly better or worse than the England equity benchmark.LimitationsGeneral practitioner supply is a limited measure of primary care access, need in deprived neighbourhoods may be underestimated because of a lack of data on multimorbidity, and the quality and outcomes indicators capture only one aspect of primary care quality. Health-care outcomes are adjusted for age and sex but not for other risk factors that contribute to unequal health-care outcomes and may be outside the control of the NHS, so they overestimate the extent of inequality for which the NHS can reasonably be held responsible.ConclusionsNHS actions can have a measurable impact on socioeconomic inequality in both health-care access and outcomes. Reducing inequality in health-care outcomes is more challenging than reducing inequality of access to health care. Local health-care equity monitoring against a national benchmark can be performed using any administrative geography comprising ≥ 100,000 people.Future workExploration of quality improvement lessons from local areas performing well and badly on health-care equity, improved methods including better measures of need and risk and measures of health-care inequality over the life-course, and monitoring of other dimensions of equity. These indicators can also be used to evaluate the health-care equity impacts of interventions and make international health-care equity comparisons.FundingThe National Institute for Health Research Health Services and Delivery Research programme.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Miqdad Asaria
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Shehzad Ali
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Brian Ferguson
- Knowledge and Intelligence, Public Health England, York, UK
| | | | - Maria Goddard
- Centre for Health Economics, University of York, York, UK
| | - Peter Goldblatt
- Institute of Health Equity, University College London, London, UK
| | | | - Rosalind Raine
- Department of Applied Health Research, University College London, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kontopantelis E, Olier I, Planner C, Reeves D, Ashcroft DM, Gask L, Doran T, Reilly S. Primary care consultation rates among people with and without severe mental illness: a UK cohort study using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink. BMJ Open 2015; 5:e008650. [PMID: 26674496 PMCID: PMC4691766 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-008650] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/03/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Little is known about service utilisation by patients with severe mental illness (SMI) in UK primary care. We examined their consultation rate patterns and whether they were impacted by the introduction of the Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF), in 2004. DESIGN Retrospective cohort study using individual patient data collected from 2000 to 2012. SETTING 627 general practices contributing to the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, a large UK primary care database. PARTICIPANTS SMI cases (346,551) matched to 5 individuals without SMI (1,732,755) on age, gender and general practice. OUTCOME MEASURES Consultation rates were calculated for both groups, across 3 types: face-to-face (primary outcome), telephone and other (not only consultations but including administrative tasks). Poisson regression analyses were used to identify predictors of consultation rates and calculate adjusted consultation rates. Interrupted time-series analysis was used to quantify the effect of the QOF. RESULTS Over the study period, face-to-face consultations in primary care remained relatively stable in the matched control group (between 4.5 and 4.9 per annum) but increased for people with SMI (8.8-10.9). Women and older patients consulted more frequently in the SMI and the matched control groups, across all 3 consultation types. Following the introduction of the QOF, there was an increase in the annual trend of face-to-face consultation for people with SMI (average increase of 0.19 consultations per patient per year, 95% CI 0.02 to 0.36), which was not observed for the control group (estimates across groups statistically different, p=0.022). CONCLUSIONS The introduction of the QOF was associated with increases in the frequency of monitoring and in the average number of reported comorbidities for patients with SMI. This suggests that the QOF scheme successfully incentivised practices to improve their monitoring of the mental and physical health of this group of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Evangelos Kontopantelis
- Centre for Health Informatics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ivan Olier
- Manchester Institute of Biotechnology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Claire Planner
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - David Reeves
- Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Darren M Ashcroft
- Centre for Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety, Manchester Pharmacy School, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Linda Gask
- NIHR School for Primary Care Research, Centre for Primary Care, Institute of Population Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Tim Doran
- Department of Health Sciences, University of York, York, UK
| | - Siobhan Reilly
- Division of Health Research, University of Lancaster, Lancaster, UK
| |
Collapse
|