Translating Research into Policy and Action

Research Priorities to Expand Virtual Care Access for Patients in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System

The rapid expansion of virtual care is driving demand for equitable, high-quality access to technologies that are required to utilize these services. While the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) is seen as a national leader in the implementation of telehealth, there remain gaps in evidence about the most promising strategies to expand access to virtual care. To address these gaps, in 2022, the VA's Health Services Research and Development service and Office of Connected Care held a "state-of-the-art" (SOTA) conference to develop research priorities for advancing the science, clinical practice, and implementation of virtual care. One workgroup within the SOTA focused on access to virtual care and addressed three questions: (1) Based on the existing evidence about barriers that impede virtual care access in digitally vulnerable populations, what additional research is needed to understand these factors? (2) Based on the existing evidence about digital inclusion strategies, what additional research is needed to identify the most promising strategies? and (3) What additional research beyond barriers and strategies is needed to address disparities in virtual care access? Here, we report on the workgroup's discussions and recommendations for future research to improve and optimize access to virtual care. Effective implementation of these recommendations will require collaboration among VA operational leadership, researchers, Human Factors Engineering experts and front-line clinicians as they develop, implement, and evaluate the spread of virtual care access strategies.

Implementing an integrated diabetic foot care programme in Ireland: podiatrists' experience

BACKGROUND

International evidence suggests that an integrated multidisciplinary approach to diabetic foot management is necessary to prevent ulceration and progression to amputation. Many health systems have introduced policies or models of care supporting the introduction of this evidence into practice, but little is known about the experiences of those involved in implementation. This study addresses this gap by examining the experiences of podiatrists providing integrated diabetic foot care.

METHODS

Between October 2017 and April 2018, an online survey comprising closed and open-ended questions on podiatrists' demographics, clinical activity, links with other services, continuous professional development activities and experiences of implementing the Model of Care was administered to podiatrists (n = 73) working for Ireland's Health Service Executive in the community and hospital setting. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics and qualitative content analysis.

RESULTS

The response rate was 68% (n = 50), with 46% (n = 23), 38% (n = 19) and 16% (n = 8) working across hospital, community and both settings, respectively. Most reported treating high-risk patients (66%), those with active foot disease (61%) and educating people about the risk of diabetes to the lower limb (80%). Reported challenges towards integrated diabetic foot care include a perceived lack of awareness of the role of podiatry amongst other healthcare professionals, poor integration between hospital and community podiatry services, especially where new services had been developed, and insufficient number of podiatrists to meet service demands.

CONCLUSION

Previous evidence has shown that there is often a gap between what is set out by a policy and what it looks like when delivered to service users. Results from the current study support this, highlighting that while most podiatrists work in line with national recommendations, there are specific gaps and challenges that need to be addressed to ensure successful policy implementation.

A Qualitative Study on the Implementation of the National Action Plan on Antimicrobial Resistance in Singapore

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a global public health threat that affects humans, animals, and the environment across the One Health spectrum. Singapore launched its own National Strategic Action Plan (NSAP) on AMR in 2017 with the aim of tackling the growing threat of AMR in Singapore through coordinated approaches. However, little is known about the implementation of the NSAP. In this study, we analysed the implementation of the NSAP with guidance from an AMR governance framework. We conducted in-depth interviews with 20 participants across the One Health spectrum. The interviews were transcribed verbatim and analysed thematically. Overall, the implementation of activities against AMR was more advanced with respect to human health compared to other sectors such as (1) AMR and antimicrobial use (AMU) surveillance systems in hospitals; (2) the hospital antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) service and legislation to optimise AMU; (3) the national children and adults vaccination programme for IPC; (4) multiple avenues for education and awareness for both professionals and public; and (5) extensive research and collaboration networks with many sources of funding. Areas that were lacking presented problems including (1) an incomplete surveillance system for AMR and AMU across all sectors; (2) the need for better AMS and legislation in some sectors; (3) insufficient innovation in education for sustained behavioural modification; and (4) the need for more open research collaborations and the translation of research into policy outcomes. Improvements in these areas will enhance the overall implementation of the NSAP through a more holistic One Health approach.