Bloodstain pattern analysis: Does experience equate to expertise?

Bloodstain classification methods: A critical review and a look to the future

Classifying bloodstains is an essential part of Bloodstain Pattern Analysis. Various experts have developed methods. Each method considers the same basic bloodstain pattern types. These use either terminology based on the observable characteristics or the mechanistic cause of the bloodstain patterns as part of the classification process. This review paper considers ten classification methods from fourteen sources, which are used to classify bloodstain patterns. There are fundamental differences in how the patterns are classified, how differentiated the classification is, and whether the classification process uses clear, unambiguous criteria, and is susceptible to contextual bias. Experts have also reported issues with classifying bloodstains that have indistinguishable features. These differences expose key limitations with current classification methods: mechanistic terminology is too heavily relied on, and the classification process is susceptible to contextual bias. The development of an unambiguous classification method, based on directly observable characteristics within bloodstain patterns is recommended for future work.

Quantifying forensic investigations involving bloodstain pattern analysis within the UK

Research informed by practice is more likely to have a greater impact on society. However, forensic cases are confidential and thus, real-life data regarding the details of violent crime is usually withheld from the public and academia. Through a partnership between the authors institution and a UK police service, casefiles from 78 criminal investigations from 2012 to 2020 involving Bloodstain Pattern Analysis (BPA) were examined and quantified. The most common methods of assault and weapons used were identified as well as the frequency of different bloodstain pattern classifications. The results of this study will help inform researchers and supply forensic training providers with data derived from forensic practice. Despite a significant body of literature exploring impact patterns and software for calculating the Area of Origin (AO), impact pattern was classified at only 22% of scenes, with sharp-force trauma being the most prevalent form of assault. This paper recommends a review of the BPA terminology, to include additional commonly encountered patterns that are not defined by the current standard.

Software for the trajectory analysis of blood-drops: A systematic review

Blood-drop trajectory analysis can provide investigators with retrospective information regarding the spatial positioning of an injured person. To assist with bloodstain pattern analysis, various commercially available software have been developed and deployed. A systematic review was conducted to understand the extent of experimental validation and applications of blood-drop trajectory analysis software to case work. Ninety-two sources between 1987 and 2020 were identified including peer-reviewed studies and commercial websites. Thirty-four of these were validation studies, of which, only two involved impact patterns generated from greater than 1 m from the main target surface. Fifteen software were identified during this review with six documented to have been applied in casework. The reviewed software do not appear to fully satisfy relevant forensic validation criteria, based on publicly available literature. In some cases, software underwent limited experimental validation prior to real-world application with subsequent references to this in later literature. This review provides forensic investigators and bloodstain pattern analysts with a comprehensive overview of all available software options, knowledge of the extent of research into validating these techniques and highlights documented applications of these software in criminal cases.