1
|
Alsabri M, Hafez AH, Singer E, Elhady MM, Waqar M, Gill P. Efficacy and Safety of Intranasal Fentanyl in Pediatric Emergencies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Pediatr Emerg Care 2024:00006565-990000000-00435. [PMID: 38713846 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000003187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/09/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Intranasal fentanyl (INF) has gained popularity in pediatric emergency departments (EDs) as an effective alternative to intravenous morphine for treating acute moderate to severe pain. Intranasal fentanyl eliminates the need for invasive access, making it advantageous for patients with minor injuries. Our study aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the available evidence regarding the effectiveness and safety of INF administration in pediatric emergency wards, particularly compared with other treatment options described in the literature. METHODS A thorough search strategy identified randomized controlled trials assessing INF in the pediatric emergency ward. Eligible studies were independently screened, and relevant data were extracted. The analysis used pooled risk ratio (RR) for dichotomous outcomes and the standardized mean difference (SMD) for continuous ones. Randomized controlled trials' quality was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Assessment Tool 2. RESULTS In our study, 8 randomized controlled trials involving 806 patients, INF demonstrated superior effectiveness in reducing pain compared with other comparators at the 15- to 20-minute mark (SMD, -0.23; 95% confidence interval, -0.37 to -0.08; P = 0.002). However, no significant differences were found at the 30- and 60-minute time points (SMDs, -0.16; 95% CI, -0.50, 0.19; P = 0.37; and -0.16; 95% CI, -0.50 to 0.19; P = 0.78) except when excluding one study to resolve heterogeneity at the 30-minute mark (RR, -0.02; 95% CI, -0.24 to 0.20; P = 0.87). Intranasal fentanyl also exhibited a better adverse outcome profile, with a lower risk of total adverse events and nausea/vomiting (RR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.48-0.91; P = 0.01; and RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63; P > 0.001) compared with other analgesics. However, no significant differences were observed for dizziness and hallucination (RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63; P = 0.68; and RR, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.30-0.63; P = 0.35). CONCLUSIONS Our study assessed the effectiveness of INF compared with other analgesics in pain reduction. Intranasal fentanyl demonstrated superior pain reduction at the 15- to 20-minute point but showed no significant differences at 30 and 60 minutes. Intranasal fentanyl also had a more favorable adverse event profile, with a lower risk of nausea and vomiting than other analgesics. However, no significant differences were observed in dizziness and hallucination between the groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mohammed Alsabri
- From the Pediatric Emergency Department, Woodhull Hospital, New York, NY
| | | | - Emad Singer
- The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Corwell BN, Motov SM, Davis N, Kim HK. Novel uses of ketamine in the emergency department. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2022; 21:1009-1025. [PMID: 35822534 DOI: 10.1080/14740338.2022.2100883] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION : Ketamine is gaining renewed interest among healthcare providers due to its novel clinical applications in the emergency department (ED) setting. AREAS COVERED : This article provides a comprehensive discussion of ketamine's pharmacological properties, including safety profile and adverse effects, in addition to an overview of current evidence for ketamine (racemic formulation) in the management of ED patients with acute agitation, pain, and depression/suicide ideation. EXPERT OPINION : Ketamine is an effective adjunct to opioids, providing greater pain relief than morphine alone. As an analgesic agent, administration of ketamine (0.1-0.3 mg/kg IV) alone can provide analgesia similar to that of morphine in patients with acute visceral and musculoskeletal pain. Moreover, ketamine provides equal analgesic efficacy to morphine in a variety of chronic painful conditions including pain associated with cancer, vaso-occlusive pain crisis associated with sickle cell disease, and in patients with high opioid tolerance and/or opioid dependency. Available literature shows that ketamine (1-2mg/kg IV or 4-5 mg/kg IM) is a safe, rapid (<5 minutes) and effective tranquilization agent for ED patients with acute agitation. Finally, there is growing evidence that suggests ketamine may have a potential utility in the management of patients with self-harm ideation or acute depressive episodes. Intravenous infusion of ketamine (0.5 mg/kg over 40 mins) has been shown to produce an antidepressant effect and decrease in suicidal ideation within 4 hours with effects lasting up to one week.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brian N Corwell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Sergey M Motov
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | - Natalie Davis
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| | - Hong K Kim
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Shokoohi O, Nasr Isfahani M, Golshani K. Intranasal ketamine versus intranasal fentanyl on pain management in isolated traumatic patients. JOURNAL OF RESEARCH IN MEDICAL SCIENCES 2022; 27:1. [PMID: 35342440 PMCID: PMC8943598 DOI: 10.4103/jrms.jrms_505_20] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2020] [Revised: 06/16/2021] [Accepted: 08/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/09/2022]
Abstract
Background: Given the inadequate control of pain in patients with the trauma that refer to the emergency departments, the rapid onset of action of intranasal administration in pain management, and the avoidance of administering opioid medications, the present study aimed at evaluating the effect of intranasal ketamine versus intranasal fentanyl on pain management in isolated traumatic patients. Materials and Methods: The current study was performed on 125 patients that were divided into the following three groups: control group (n = 41), 1 mg/kg intranasal ketamine group (n = 40), and 1 μg/kg intranasal fentanyl group (n = 44). Then pain scores, heart rate, respiratory rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation were recorded at baseline, 5, 10, 15, 30, and 40 min after the intervention. Results: Visual analog scale (VAS) scores of patients in the intranasal ketamine group 5 and 10 min after the intervention were 61.50 ± 20.45 and 55.00 ± 21.96, respectively. The mentioned scores were significantly lower than the VAS scores of patients in the control group with the mean of 72.44 ± 22.11 and 66.59 ± 24.25 and the VAS scores of patients in the intranasal fentanyl group with the mean of 71.59 ± 22.09 and 65.00 ± 22.87 at 5 and 10 min after the intervention, respectively (P < 0.05). Conclusion: Given the onset of action in < 10 min, intranasal ketamine can be proposed as an appropriate analgesic medication in pain reduction of patients with isolated limb injuries. Moreover, the incidence rate and severity of adverse effects were insignificantly higher in the intranasal ketamine group as compared with the intranasal fentanyl group.
Collapse
|
4
|
Qiu J, Xie M. Influence of ketamine versus fentanyl on pain relief for pediatric orthopedic emergencies: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2021; 100:e27409. [PMID: 34678869 PMCID: PMC8542162 DOI: 10.1097/md.0000000000027409] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/26/2021] [Accepted: 09/16/2021] [Indexed: 01/05/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The comparison of ketamine with fentanyl for pain control of pediatric orthopedic emergencies remains controversial. We conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to explore the influence of ketamine versus fentanyl on pain management among pediatric orthopedic emergencies. METHODS We have searched PubMed, EMbase, Web of science, EBSCO, and Cochrane library databases through September 2020 for randomized controlled trials assessing the effect of ketamine versus fentanyl on pain management for pediatric orthopedic emergencies. RESULTS Five randomized controlled trials are included in the meta-analysis. Overall, compared with fentanyl for pediatric orthopedic emergencies, ketamine led to similar change in pain scores at 15 to 20 minutes (standard mean difference = -0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] = -0.38 to 0.28; P = .77) and 30 minutes (standard mean difference = 0.11; 95% CI = -0.20 to 0.42; P = .49), as well as rescue analgesia (RR = 0.90; 95% CI = 0.54 to 1.51; P = .69), but revealed the increase in nausea/vomiting (RR = 2.65; 95% CI = 1.13 to 6.18; P = .02) and dizziness (RR = 3.83; 95% CI = 1.38 to 10.60; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS Ketamine may be similar to fentanyl in terms of the analgesic efficacy for pediatric orthopedic emergencies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Rhodes AJ, Fagan MJ, Motov SM, Zerzan J. Nebulized ketamine for managing acute pain in the pediatric emergency department: A case series. Turk J Emerg Med 2021; 21:75-78. [PMID: 33969243 PMCID: PMC8091994 DOI: 10.4103/2452-2473.313334] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/20/2020] [Revised: 07/13/2020] [Accepted: 09/14/2020] [Indexed: 11/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Administration of sub-dissociative doses of ketamine is used via intranasal (IN) and intravenous routes in the pediatric emergency department for managing acute pain. Due to difficulties in both obtaining intravenous access and compliance with IN medications in children, administration of ketamine via breath-actuated nebulizer can serve as a valuable modality for timely analgesia in children where dosing titration is patient controlled. We describe five pediatric patients who received ketamine via breath-actuated nebulizer at 0.75 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg, and 1.5 mg/kg, with all patients experiencing a decrease in pain score. This case series introduces ketamine inhalation as a modality for managing pain in children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adam James Rhodes
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, 4802 10th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Michele Joy Fagan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, 4802 10th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Sergey M Motov
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, 4802 10th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Jessica Zerzan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, 4802 10th Avenue, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Quinn K, Kriss S, Drapkin J, Likourezos A, Pushkar I, Brady J, Yasavolian M, Chitnis SS, Motov S, Fromm C. Analgesic Efficacy of Intranasal Ketamine Versus Intranasal Fentanyl for Moderate to Severe Pain in Children: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Study. Pediatr Emerg Care 2021; 37:250-254. [PMID: 30045355 DOI: 10.1097/pec.0000000000001556] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to compare analgesic efficacy of intranasal (IN) ketamine to IN fentanyl for moderate to severe pain in children in a pediatric emergency department. METHODS A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, noninferiority study evaluating children aged 3 to 17 years in a pediatric emergency department with acute moderate to severe pain was conducted. Patients received either 1 mg/kg of IN ketamine or 1.5 μg/kg of IN fentanyl and were evaluated after 10, 20, 30, and 60 minutes. The primary outcome was the degree of pain reduction after 20 minutes. RESULTS Twenty-two patients were enrolled (11 in each group). Underlying pain conditions represented were musculoskeletal injury (73%) and abdominal pain (27%). At 20 minutes after analgesia, there was no significant difference in pain scores between the fentanyl (median, 2; range, 0-8) and ketamine groups (median, 4; range, 0-7; P = 0.20). The ketamine group showed a significantly greater rate of adverse effects, 73% versus 9% (P = 0.002), and throughout the course of the study period, 7 patients in the ketamine group (64%) group showed some degree of sedation versus no one in the fentanyl group (P = 0.004). CONCLUSIONS There was insufficient power to support the analgesic noninferiority of IN ketamine at a dose of 1 mg/kg compared with IN fentanyl at a dose of 1.5 μg/kg in children experiencing painful conditions at 20 minutes after administration. Intranasal ketamine was found to be inferior to IN fentanyl in relieving pain at 10 minutes and was found to have significantly greater rates of sedation and dizziness.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | - Jason Brady
- Pharmacy, Maimonides Medical Center, Brooklyn, NY
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Rocchio RJ, Ward KE. Intranasal Ketamine for Acute Pain. Clin J Pain 2021; 37:295-300. [PMID: 33555694 DOI: 10.1097/ajp.0000000000000918] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/05/2019] [Accepted: 01/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The aim was to review current evidence regarding the off-label use of intranasal ketamine for acute pain presenting in the setting of the emergency department, and secondary to pediatric limb injuries, renal colic, digital nerve block, and migraines. RESULTS In all 5 indications reviewed, ketamine demonstrated efficacy in reducing pain. However, when compared with other agents, ketamine did not demonstrate superiority over opioids in pediatric limb injuries or renal colic and was not as efficacious as standard therapy for migraine relief. Ketamine was also associated with a greater incidence of transient adverse reactions, such as dizziness, bitter aftertaste, fatigue, and vomiting than opioid therapies. DISCUSSION The current body of evidence is insufficient to support the use of intranasal ketamine over other standard therapies for acute pain. However, current evidence can be used when developing dosing strategies, preparing for adverse reactions, and generating hypotheses for future, more robust research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Robert J Rocchio
- Department of Pharmacy Practice, University of Rhode Island, Kingston, RI
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Intranasal ketamine has not been well studied in acute pain treatment and does not have a recognized place in therapy in current practice guidelines for pediatric patients. Ketamine has a unique mechanism of action with a favorable side effect profile that may provide benefit to the pediatric population for acute pain. The purpose of this review is to summarize the evidence evaluating intranasal ketamine versus any other comparator for children who require acute pain treatment. METHODS A systematic review was performed to include clinical studies of intranasal ketamine for acute pain that reported any pain-related outcome and adverse events in children 0 to 17 years old. Trials were identified through PubMed, Google Scholar, clinical trial registries, research registries, and key journals through April 2018. The Jadad scoring system was used to assess the methodological quality of the included randomized controlled trials. RESULTS Six studies consisting of 261 patients were reviewed. Intranasal ketamine demonstrated pain relief in all included clinical studies; however, there was inconsistency in dosing, comparators, scales, and indications. Two of the randomized controlled trials were rated as high quality, and 1 randomized controlled trial was rated as poor quality on the Jadad scale. CONCLUSIONS Intranasal ketamine was safe and effective in the 6 clinical studies included in this systematic review.
Collapse
|
9
|
Turner AL, Shandley S, Miller E, Perry MS, Ryals B. Intranasal Ketamine for Abortive Migraine Therapy in Pediatric Patients: A Single-Center Review. Pediatr Neurol 2020; 104:46-53. [PMID: 31902550 DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2019.10.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/04/2019] [Revised: 10/16/2019] [Accepted: 10/27/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ketamine has recently emerged as a promising therapeutic alternative for abortive migraine therapy, likely secondary to N-methyl-d-aspartate antagonism. Most reports examine adults and the intravenous route. Fewer utilize intranasal administration or pediatric populations. Given the limited evidence for intranasal ketamine in pediatric migraine populations, we retrospectively reviewed our experience to further characterize safety and efficacy of intranasal ketamine in this population. METHODS A retrospective review in a free-standing, pediatric medical center was performed examining the utilization of intranasal ketamine at 0.1 to 0.2 mg/kg/dose up to five doses in pediatric migraineurs. Pain scores (scale = 0 to 10) were recorded at baseline and after each dose. Response was characterized as pain score reduction to 0 to -3 and/or reduction of at least 50%. RESULTS Twenty-five encounters (25 of 34; 73.5%) were responders (mean pain score reduction of -7.2 from admission to treatment completion). Overall pain reduction from admission to discharge in the entire study population was 66.1%. Side effects were mild and transient. CONCLUSIONS Our experience with intranasal ketamine has promising outcomes in both pain relief and side effect minimization. When other therapeutic options are unavailable, practitioners should consider intranasal ketamine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adrian L Turner
- Department of Pharmacy, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas; Jane and John Justin Neurosciences Center, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas.
| | - Sabrina Shandley
- Jane and John Justin Neurosciences Center, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas; Research Administration Office, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Ean Miller
- Department of Pharmacy, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - M Scott Perry
- Jane and John Justin Neurosciences Center, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas
| | - Brian Ryals
- Jane and John Justin Neurosciences Center, Cook Children's Medical Center, Fort Worth, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Intranasal ketamine reduces pain of digital nerve block; a double blind randomized clinical trial. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37:1622-1626. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2018.11.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2018] [Revised: 11/12/2018] [Accepted: 11/17/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
|
11
|
Lumanauw DD, Youn S, Horeczko T, Yadav K, Tanen DA. Subdissociative-dose Ketamine Is Effective for Treating Acute Exacerbations of Chronic Pain. Acad Emerg Med 2019; 26:1044-1051. [PMID: 30901130 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13755] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/18/2018] [Revised: 02/22/2019] [Accepted: 03/09/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Subdissociative-dose ketamine (SDDK) is used to treat acute pain. We sought to determine if SDDK is effective in relieving acute exacerbations of chronic pain. METHODS This study was a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled trial conducted May 2017 to June 2018 at a public teaching hospital (ClinicalTrials.gov #NCT02920528). The primary endpoint was a 20-mm decrease on a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) at 60 minutes. Power analysis using three groups (0.5 mg/kg ketamine, 0.25 mg/kg ketamine, or placebo infused over 20 minutes) estimated that 96 subjects were needed for 90% power. Inclusion criteria included age > 18 years, chronic pain > 3 months, and acute exacerbation (VAS ≥ 70 mm). Pain, agitation, and sedation were assessed by VAS at baseline and 20, 40, and 60 minutes after initiation of study drug. Telephone follow-up at 24 to 48 hours used a 10-point numeric rating scale for pain. RESULTS A total of 106 subjects were recruited, with three excluded for baseline pain < 70 mm. After randomization, 35 received 0.5 mg/kg ketamine, 36 received 0.25 mg/kg ketamine, and 35 received placebo. Three subjects receiving 0.5 mg/kg withdrew during the infusion due to adverse effects, and one subject in each group had incomplete data, leaving 97 for analysis. Initial pain scores (91.9 ± 8.9 mm), age (46.5 ± 12.6 years), sex distribution, and types of pain reported were similar. Primary endpoint analysis found that 25 of 30 (83%) improved with 0.5 mg/kg ketamine, 28 of 35 (80%) with 0.25 mg/kg ketamine, and 13 of 32 (41%) with placebo (p = 0.001). More adverse effects occurred in the ketamine groups with one subject in the 0.25 mg/kg group requiring a restraint code for agitation. A total of 89% of subjects were contacted at 24 to 48 hours, and no difference in pain level was detected between groups. CONCLUSION Ketamine infusions at both 0.5 and 0.25 mg/kg over 20 minutes were effective in treating acute exacerbations of chronic pain but resulted in more adverse effects compared to placebo. Ketamine did not demonstrate longer-term pain control over the next 24 to 48 hours.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Debryna D. Lumanauw
- LABioMed and Harbor–University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center Los Angeles CA
| | - Sylvia Youn
- LABioMed and Harbor–University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center Los Angeles CA
| | - Timothy Horeczko
- LABioMed and Harbor–University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center Los Angeles CA
| | - Kabir Yadav
- LABioMed and Harbor–University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center Los Angeles CA
| | - David A. Tanen
- LABioMed and Harbor–University of California at Los Angeles Medical Center Los Angeles CA
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Abstract
Patients frequently come to the emergency department for pain. For decades, ketamine has been used in the emergency department for procedural sedation but is now receiving attention as a potential alternative to opioids because of its unique analgesic effects. Additionally, ketamine's dissociative properties have made it a popular choice for sedating profoundly agitated patients. In this narrative review, these new roles for ketamine in the emergency department are discussed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sophia Sheikh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA.
| | - Phyllis Hendry
- Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Florida College of Medicine-Jacksonville, 655 West 8th Street, Jacksonville, FL, 32209, USA
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Tsze DS, Pan SS, DePeter KC, Wagh AM, Gordon SL, Dayan PS. Intranasal hydromorphone for treatment of acute pain in children: A pilot study. Am J Emerg Med 2019; 37:1128-1132. [PMID: 30902361 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2019.03.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2019] [Revised: 03/07/2019] [Accepted: 03/08/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We aimed to describe the analgesic efficacy, duration of analgesia, and adverse event profile associated with intranasal hydromorphone in children with acute pain presenting to an emergency department. METHODS Prospective dose titration pilot study of otherwise healthy children 4 to 17-years-old with moderate to severe pain who required a parenteral opioid. All patients received an initial intranasal hydromorophone dose of 0.03 mg/kg. The need for additional analgesia was assessed at 15 and 30 min; an additional 0.015 mg/kg was given at each assessment, if required. Need for rescue analgesic, pain intensity and adverse events were assessed until 6 h after hydromorphone administration or until patients were discharged, underwent a procedure to treat their painful condition, or received a rescue analgesic. RESULTS We enrolled 35 children. Fifteen, 11, and 9 children required a total dose of 0.03, 0.045, and 0.06 mg/kg, respectively. Patients in each dose group experienced an absolute decrease in pain score of ≥3/10 and percent reduction >40% within 5-15 min of completing dose-titration administration of hydromorphone. Duration of analgesia (i.e. time until rescue analgesic administered) >1 h was observed in 85.7% of patients. Patients not requiring rescue analgesics had mild or no pain until discharged or their painful conditions were treated. Three (8.6%) patients required a rescue analgesic <1 h after hydromorphone administration. There were no major adverse events. CONCLUSIONS Intranasal hydromorphone led to rapid, clinically significant and frequently sustained decreases in pain intensity in children. No major adverse events were observed in this preliminary sample. Clinical Trials Registration Number: NCT02437669.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel S Tsze
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA.
| | - Sharon S Pan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Kerrin C DePeter
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Anju M Wagh
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Stephen L Gordon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| | - Peter S Dayan
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Benish T, Villalobos D, Love S, Casmaer M, Hunter CJ, Summers SM, April MD. The THINK (Treatment of Headache with Intranasal Ketamine) Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intranasal Ketamine with Intravenous Metoclopramide. J Emerg Med 2019; 56:248-257.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2018.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2018] [Revised: 11/26/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
15
|
Frey TM, Florin TA, Caruso M, Zhang N, Zhang Y, Mittiga MR. Effect of Intranasal Ketamine vs Fentanyl on Pain Reduction for Extremity Injuries in Children: The PRIME Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Pediatr 2019; 173:140-146. [PMID: 30592476 PMCID: PMC6439599 DOI: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2018.4582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 43] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022]
Abstract
IMPORTANCE Timely analgesia is critical for children with injuries presenting to the emergency department, yet pain control efforts are often inadequate. Intranasal administration of pain medications provides rapid analgesia with minimal discomfort. Opioids are historically used for significant pain from traumatic injuries but have concerning adverse effects. Intranasal ketamine may provide an effective alternative. OBJECTIVE To determine whether intranasal ketamine is noninferior to intranasal fentanyl for pain reduction in children presenting with acute extremity injuries. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS The Pain Reduction With Intranasal Medications for Extremity Injuries (PRIME) trial was a double-blind, randomized, active-control, noninferiority trial in a pediatric, tertiary, level 1 trauma center. Participants were children aged 8 to 17 years presenting to the emergency department with moderate to severe pain due to traumatic limb injuries between March 2016 and February 2017. Analyses were intention to treat and began in May 2017. INTERVENTIONS Intranasal ketamine (1.5 mg/kg) or intranasal fentanyl (2 µg/kg). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES The primary outcome was reduction in visual analog scale pain score 30 minutes after intervention. The noninferiority margin for this outcome was 10. RESULTS Of 90 children enrolled, 45 (50%) were allocated to ketamine (mean [SD] age, 11.8 [2.6] years; 26 boys [59%]) and 45 (50%) to fentanyl (mean [SD] age, 12.2 [2.3] years; 31 boys [74%]). Thirty minutes after medication, the mean visual analog scale reduction was 30.6 mm (95% CI, 25.4-35.8) for ketamine and 31.9 mm (95% CI, 26.6-37.2) for fentanyl. Ketamine was noninferior to fentanyl for pain reduction based on a 1-sided test of group difference less than the noninferiority margin, as the CIs crossed 0 but did not cross the prespecified noninferiority margin (difference in mean pain reduction between groups, 1.3; 90% CI, -6.2 to 8.7). The risk of adverse events was higher in the ketamine group (relative risk, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.5-4.0), but all events were minor and transient. Rescue analgesia was similar between groups (relative risk, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.5-1.6). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE Ketamine provides effective analgesia that is noninferior to fentanyl, although participants who received ketamine had an increase in adverse events that were minor and transient. Intranasal ketamine may be an appropriate alternative to intranasal fentanyl for pain associated with acute extremity injuries. Ketamine should be considered for pediatric pain management in the emergency setting, especially when opioids are associated with increased risk. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02778880.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theresa M. Frey
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio,Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Todd A. Florin
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio,Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio,Now with the Department of Pediatrics, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, Illinois,Division of Emergency Medicine, Ann and Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Michelle Caruso
- Emergency Medicine, Division of Pharmacy, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Nanhua Zhang
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio,Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Yin Zhang
- Division of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Matthew R. Mittiga
- Department of Pediatrics, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio,Division of Emergency Medicine, Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati, Ohio
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Porter KM, Dayan AD, Dickerson S, Middleton PM. The role of inhaled methoxyflurane in acute pain management. Open Access Emerg Med 2018; 10:149-164. [PMID: 30410414 PMCID: PMC6200081 DOI: 10.2147/oaem.s181222] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Methoxyflurane is an inhaled analgesic administered via a disposable inhaler which has been used in Australia for over 40 years for the management of pain associated with trauma and for medical procedures in children and adults. Now available in 16 countries worldwide, it is licensed in Europe for moderate to severe pain associated with trauma in conscious adults, although additional applications are being made to widen the range of approved indications. Considering these ongoing developments, we reviewed the available evidence on clinical usage and safety of inhaled analgesic methoxyflurane in trauma pain and in medical procedures in both adults and children. Published data on methoxyflurane in trauma and procedural pain show it to be effective, well tolerated, and highly rated by patients, providing rapid onset of analgesia. Methoxyflurane has a well-established safety profile; adverse events are usually brief and self-limiting, and no clinically significant effects on vital signs or consciousness levels have been reported. Nephrotoxicity previously associated with methoxyflurane at high anesthetic doses is not reported with low analgesic doses. Although two large retrospective comparative studies in the prehospital setting showed inhaled analgesic methoxyflurane to be less effective than intravenous morphine and intranasal fentanyl, this should be balanced against the administration, supervision times, and safety profile of these agents. Given the limitations of currently available analgesic agents in the prehospital and emergency department settings, the ease of use and portability of methoxyflurane combined with its rapid onset of effective pain relief and favorable safety profile make it a useful nonopioid option for pain management. Except for the STOP! study, which formed the basis for approval in trauma pain in Europe, and a few smaller randomized controlled trials (RCTs), much of the available data are observational or retrospective, and further RCTs are currently underway to provide more robust data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Keith M Porter
- Trauma Department, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | - Sara Dickerson
- Medical Affairs, Mundipharma International Limited, Cambridge, UK,
| | - Paul M Middleton
- Emergency Medicine Research Unit, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, NSW, Australia
- Distributed Research in Emergency and Acute Medicine (DREAM) Collaboration, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Karlow N, Schlaepfer CH, Stoll CRT, Doering M, Carpenter CR, Colditz GA, Motov S, Miller J, Schwarz ES. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Ketamine as an Alternative to Opioids for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med 2018; 25:1086-1097. [PMID: 30019434 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13502] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2018] [Revised: 05/30/2018] [Accepted: 06/08/2018] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Opioids are commonly prescribed in the emergency department (ED) for the treatment of acute pain. Analgesic alternatives are being explored in response to an epidemic of opioid misuse. Low-dose ketamine (LDK) is one opioid alternative for the treatment of acute pain in the ED. OBJECTIVES This systematic review and meta-analysis sought to quantify whether LDK is an effective and safe opioid alternative for acute pain reduction in adults in the ED setting. (PROSPERO Registration Number CRD42017065303). METHODS This was a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing intravenous opioids to LDK for relief of acute pain in the ED. Studies where the control group initially received opioids prior to ketamine were excluded. A research librarian designed the electronic search strategy. Changes in visual analog scale or numeric rating scale pain scales were analyzed to determine the relative effects of LDK and opioids in the treatment of acute pain. RESULTS Three studies met the criteria for inclusion in this meta-analysis. Compared to pain scale reduction with morphine, ketamine was not inferior (relative reduction = 0.42, 95% confidence interval = -0.70 to 1.54). No severe adverse events were reported in any study, but higher rates of nonsevere adverse events were observed with ketamine. CONCLUSIONS Ketamine is noninferior to morphine for the control of acute pain, indicating that ketamine can be considered as an alternative to opioids for ED short-term pain control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Carolyn R. T. Stoll
- Division of Public Health Sciences Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO
| | | | | | - Graham A. Colditz
- Division of Public Health Sciences Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO
| | | | - Joshua Miller
- Department of Emergency Medicine Bergan Mercy Medical Center Omaha NE
| | - Evan S. Schwarz
- Division of Emergency Medicine Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis MO
| |
Collapse
|
18
|
Hartshorn S, Middleton PM. Efficacy and safety of inhaled low-dose methoxyflurane for acute paediatric pain: A systematic review. TRAUMA-ENGLAND 2018. [DOI: 10.1177/1460408618798391] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022]
Abstract
Introduction Undertreatment of acute, moderate-to-severe pain in children is common, due in part to barriers to the use of opioids. Low-dose methoxyflurane is an inhaled, non-opioid analgesic widely used in Australia and recently approved in Europe for the emergency relief of acute moderate-to-severe trauma pain in adults. Methods Using an integrative review framework, we conducted a literature analysis to examine the potential utility of methoxyflurane in children with acute pain. EMBASE®, MEDLINE® and PubMed were searched (criteria included ‘methoxyflurane’ ‘child*’ or ‘adolescent’ or ‘pediatr*’ or ‘paediatr*’) from January 2000 to October 2017, along with internet-based sources to identify relevant grey literature (no predefined search criteria). A series of investigative questions were developed regarding the safety and efficacy of methoxyflurane in this setting and addressed using evidence collated from the identified studies. Results Of 366 results from the literature searches, 6 clinical trials and observational studies were identified which explored the safety and/or efficacy of inhaled methoxyflurane in individuals < 18 years in either a clinical trial or observational study. All six studies concluded that methoxyflurane provides effective and rapid analgesia for paediatric acute moderate-to-severe pain. Methoxyflurane was well tolerated and associated with good levels of patient/healthcare provider satisfaction in this setting. Conclusions While large-scale studies are needed to better inform treatment approaches for paediatric use, inhaled methoxyflurane has potential to provide easy to administer, needle-free analgesia with a rapid onset and good safety profile.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stuart Hartshorn
- Emergency Department, Birmingham Children's Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Paul M Middleton
- South Western Emergency Research Institute/Department, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, Australia
- South Western Sydney Clinical School, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Abdolrazaghnejad A, Banaie M, Tavakoli N, Safdari M, Rajabpour-Sanati A. Pain Management in the Emergency Department: a Review Article on Options and Methods. ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2018; 2:e45. [PMID: 31172108 PMCID: PMC6548151 DOI: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.93] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
CONTEXT The aim of this review is to recognizing different methods of analgesia for emergency medicine physicians (EMPs) allows them to have various pain relief methods to reduce pain and to be able to use it according to the patient's condition and to improve the quality of their services. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION In this review article, the search engines and scientific databases of Google Scholar, Science Direct, PubMed, Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane for emergency pain management methods were reviewed. Among the findings, high quality articles were eventually selected from 2000 to 2018, and after reviewing them, we have conducted a comprehensive comparison of the usual methods of pain control in the emergency department (ED). RESULTS For better understanding, the results are reported in to separate subheadings including "Parenteral agents" and "Regional blocks". Non-opioids analgesics such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen are commonly used in the treatment of acute pain. However, the relief of acute moderate to severe pain usually requires opioid agents. Considering the side effects of systemic drugs and the restrictions on the use of analgesics, especially opioids, regional blocks of pain as part of a multimodal analgesic strategy can be helpful. CONCLUSION This study was designed to investigate and identify the disadvantages and advantages of using each drug to be able to make the right choices in different clinical situations for patients while paying attention to the limitations of the use of these analgesic drugs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ali Abdolrazaghnejad
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohsen Banaie
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Sina Hospital, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Nader Tavakoli
- Trauma and Injury research center, Iran university of medical sciences, Tehran, Iran
| | - Mohammad Safdari
- Department of Neurosurgery, Khatam-Al-Anbia Hospital, Zahedan University of Medical Sciences, Zahedan, Iran
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
NMDA-receptor Antagonism in Pediatric Pancreatitis: Use of Ketamine and Methadone in a Teenager With Refractory Pain. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2018; 66:e134-e136. [PMID: 29394214 DOI: 10.1097/mpg.0000000000001907] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/10/2022]
|
21
|
Intranasal Ketamine Administration for Narcotic Dose Decrement in Patients Suffering from Acute Limb Trauma in Emergency Department: a Double-Blind Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial. ADVANCED JOURNAL OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2018; 2:e30. [PMID: 31172093 PMCID: PMC6549208 DOI: 10.22114/ajem.v0i0.75] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/03/2023]
Abstract
Introduction: pain management is an important and challenging issue in emergency medicine. Despite the conduct of several studies on this topic, pain is still handled improperly in many cases. Objective: This study investigated the effectiveness of low-dose IN ketamine administration in reducing the need for opiates in patients in acute pain resulting from limb injury. Method: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the possible effect of low-dose intranasal (IN) ketamine administration in decreasing patients' narcotic need. Patients in emergency department suffering from acute isolated limb trauma were included. One group of patients received 0.5 mg/kg intravenous morphine sulfate and 0.02 ml/kg IN ketamine. The other group received the same dose of morphine sulfate and 0.02 ml/kg IN distilled water. Pain severity was measured using the 11 points numerical rating scale at 0, 10, 30, 60, 120, and 180 minutes. Results: Ninety-one patients with mean age of 31.59 ± 11.33 years were enrolled (38.8% female). The number of requests for supplemental medication was significantly lower in patients who received ketamine (12 patients (30%)) than those who received placebo (27 patients (67.5%)) (p = 0.001). Conclusion: It is likely that low-dose IN ketamine is effective in reducing the narcotic need of patients suffering from acute limb trauma.
Collapse
|
22
|
Yenigun A, Yilmaz S, Dogan R, Goktas SS, Calim M, Ozturan O. Demonstration of analgesic effect of intranasal ketamine and intranasal fentanyl for postoperative pain after pediatric tonsillectomy. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2018; 104:182-185. [PMID: 29287863 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijporl.2017.11.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/17/2017] [Revised: 11/16/2017] [Accepted: 11/18/2017] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Tonsillectomy is one of the oldest and most commonly performed surgical procedure in otolaryngology. Postoperative pain management is still an unsolved problem. In this study, our aim is to demonstrate the efficacy of intranasal ketamine and intranasal fentanyl for postoperative pain relief after tonsillectomy in children. MATERIAL AND METHOD This randomized-controlled study was conducted to evaluate the effects of intranasal ketamine and intranasal fentanyl in children undergoing tonsillectomy. Tonsillectomy performed in 63 children were randomized into three groups. Group I received: Intravenous paracetamol (10 mg/kg), Group II received intranasal ketamine (1.5 mg/kg ketamine), Group III received intranasal fentanyl (1.5 mcg/kg). The Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and Wilson sedation scale scores were recorded at 15, 30, 60 min, 2 h, 6hr, 12 h and 24 h postoperatively. Patients were interviewed on the day after surgery to assess the postoperative pain, nightmares, hallucinations, nausea, vomiting and bleeding. RESULTS Intranasal ketamine and intranasal fentanyl provided significantly stronger analgesic affects compared to intravenous paracetamol administration at postoperative 15, 30, 60 min and at 2, 6, 12 and 24 h in CHEOPS (p < 0.05). Sedative effects were observed in three patients in the intranasal ketamine administration group. No such sedative effect was seen in the groups that received intranasal fentanyl and intravenous paracetamol in Wilson Sedation Scale (p < 0.05). Cognitive impairment, constipation, nausea, vomiting and bleeding were not observed in any of the groups. CONCLUSION This study showed that either intranasal ketamine and intranasal fentanyl were more effective than paracetamol for postoperative analgesia after pediatric tonsillectomy. Sedative effects were observed in three patients with the group of intranasal ketamine. There was no significant difference in the efficacy of IN Ketamine and IN Fentanyl for post-tonsillectomy pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alper Yenigun
- Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey.
| | - Sinan Yilmaz
- Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Remzi Dogan
- Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Seda Sezen Goktas
- Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Muhittin Calim
- Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Anesthesiology, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Orhan Ozturan
- Bezmialem Vakif University, Faculty of Medicine, Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fatih, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
23
|
Drendel AL, Ali S. Ten Practical Ways to Make Your ED Practice Less Painful and More Child-Friendly. CLINICAL PEDIATRIC EMERGENCY MEDICINE 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpem.2017.09.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
|
24
|
Reynolds SL, Bryant KK, Studnek JR, Hogg M, Dunn C, Templin MA, Moore CG, Young JR, Walker KR, Runyon MS. Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial of Intranasal Ketamine Compared to Intranasal Fentanyl for Analgesia in Children with Suspected Extremity Fractures. Acad Emerg Med 2017; 24:1430-1440. [PMID: 28926159 DOI: 10.1111/acem.13313] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/16/2017] [Revised: 08/12/2017] [Accepted: 09/10/2017] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES We compared the tolerability and efficacy of intranasal subdissociative ketamine to intranasal fentanyl for analgesia of children with acute traumatic pain and investigated the feasibility of a larger noninferiority trial that could investigate the potential opioid-sparing effects of intranasal ketamine. METHODS This randomized controlled trial compared 1 mg/kg intranasal ketamine to 1.5 μg/kg intranasal fentanyl in children 4 to 17 years old with acute pain from suspected isolated extremity fractures presenting to an urban Level II pediatric trauma center from December 2015 to November 2016. Patients, parents, treating physicians, and outcome assessors were blinded to group allocation. The primary outcome, a tolerability measure, was the frequency of cumulative side effects and adverse events within 60 minutes of drug administration. The secondary outcomes included the difference in mean pain score reduction at 20 minutes, the proportion of patients achieving a clinically significant reduction in pain in 20 minutes, total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour (excluding study drug) required during the emergency department (ED) stay, and the feasibility of enrolling children presenting to the ED in acute pain into a randomized trial conducted under U.S. regulations. All patients were monitored until 6 hours after their last dose of study drug or until admission to the hospital ward or operating room. RESULTS Of 629 patients screened, 87 received the study drug and 82 had complete data for the primary outcome (41 patients in each group). The median (interquartile range) age was 8 (6-11) years and 62% were male. Baseline pain scores were similar among patients randomized to receive ketamine (73 ± 26) and fentanyl (69 ± 26; mean difference [95% CI] = 4 [-7 to 15]). The cumulative number of side effects was 2.2 times higher in the ketamine group, but there were no serious adverse events and no patients in either group required intervention. The most common side effects of ketamine were bad taste in the mouth (37; 90.2%), dizziness (30; 73.2%), and sleepiness (19; 46.3%). The most common side effects of fentanyl were sleepiness (15; 36.6%), bad taste in the mouth (9; 22%), and itchy nose (9; 22%). No patients experienced respiratory side effects. At 20 minutes, the mean pain scale score reduction was 44 ± 36 for ketamine and 35 ± 29 for fentanyl (mean difference = 9 [95% CI = -4 to 23]). Procedural sedation with ketamine occurred in 28 ketamine patients (65%) and 25 fentanyl patients (57%) prior to completing the study. CONCLUSIONS Intranasal ketamine was associated with more minor side effects than intranasal fentanyl. Pain relief at 20 minutes was similar between groups. Our data support the feasibility of a larger, noninferiority trial to more rigorously evaluate the safety, efficacy, and potential opioid-sparing benefits of intranasal ketamine analgesia for children with acute pain.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy L. Reynolds
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Carolinas Medical Center
- Levine Children's Hospital Emergency Department
| | - Kathleen K. Bryant
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Carolinas Medical Center
- Levine Children's Hospital Emergency Department
| | | | - Melanie Hogg
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Carolinas Medical Center
| | - Connell Dunn
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Carolinas Medical Center
| | - Megan A. Templin
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation; Carolinas HealthCare System; Charlotte NC
| | - Charity G. Moore
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation; Carolinas HealthCare System; Charlotte NC
| | - James R. Young
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Carolinas Medical Center
- Levine Children's Hospital Emergency Department
| | | | - Michael S. Runyon
- Department of Emergency Medicine; Carolinas Medical Center
- Levine Children's Hospital Emergency Department
| |
Collapse
|
25
|
|
26
|
Häske D, W. Böttiger B, Bouillon B, Fischer M, Gaier G, Gliwitzky B, Helm M, Hilbert-Carius P, Hossfeld B, Meisner C, Schempf B, Wafaisade A, Bernhard M. Analgesia in Patients with Trauma in Emergency Medicine. DEUTSCHES ARZTEBLATT INTERNATIONAL 2017; 114:785-792. [PMID: 29229039 PMCID: PMC5730701 DOI: 10.3238/arztebl.2017.0785] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2016] [Revised: 11/29/2016] [Accepted: 07/03/2017] [Indexed: 01/05/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Suitable analgesic drugs and techniques are needed for the acute care of the approximately 18 200-18 400 seriously injured patients in Germany each year. METHODS This systematic review and meta-analysis of analgesia in trauma patients was carried out on the basis of randomized, controlled trials and observational studies. A systematic search of the literature over the 10-year period ending in February 2016 was carried out in the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Springer Link Library databases. Some of the considered trials and studies were included in a meta-analysis. Mean differences (MD) of pain reduction or pain outcome as measured on the Numeric Rating Scale were taken as a summarizing measure of treatment efficacy. RESULTS Out of 685 studies, 41 studies were considered and 10 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Among the drugs and drug combinations studied, none was clearly superior to another with respect to pain relief. Neither fentanyl versus morphine (MD -0.10 with a 95% confidence interval of [-0.58; 0.39], p = 0.70) nor ketamine versus morphine (MD -1.27 [-3.71; 1.16], p = 0.31), or the combination of ketamine and morphine versus morphine alone (MD -1.23 [-2.29; -0.18], p = 0.02) showed clear superiority regarding analgesia. CONCLUSION Ketamine, fentanyl, and morphine are suitable for analgesia in spontaneously breathing trauma patients. Fentanyl and ketamine have a rapid onset of action and a strong analgesic effect. Our quantitative meta-analysis revealed no evidence for the superiority of any of the three substances over the others. Suitable monitoring equipment, and expertise in emergency procedures are prerequisites for safe and effective analgesia by healthcare professionals..
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Bernd W. Böttiger
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospital of Cologne
| | - Bertil Bouillon
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, and Sports Injuries, Cologne Hospitals, University of Witten/Herdecke
| | - Matthias Fischer
- Department of Anesthesiology, Surgical Intensive Care, Emergency Medicine, and Pain Therapy, Hospital am Eichert, ALB FILS Hospitals, Göppingen
| | - Gernot Gaier
- Department of Anesthesiology and Surgical Intensive Care, Hospital am Steinenberg, Reutlingen
| | | | - Matthias Helm
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Section Emergency Medicine, Federal Armed Forces Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Peter Hilbert-Carius
- Department of Anesthesiology, Intensive Care, and Emergency Medicine, Bergmannstrost BG Hospital, Halle
| | - Björn Hossfeld
- Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Section Emergency Medicine, Federal Armed Forces Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Christoph Meisner
- Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Applied Biometrics, University of Tübingen
| | - Benjamin Schempf
- Department of Medicine II – Cardiology, Angiology, Intensive Care, Hospital am Steinenberg, Reutlingen
| | - Arasch Wafaisade
- Department of Orthopedics, Trauma Surgery, and Sports Injuries, Cologne Hospitals, University of Witten/Herdecke
| | | |
Collapse
|
27
|
Young JR, Sawe HR, Mfinanga JA, Nshom E, Helm E, Moore CG, Runyon MS, Reynolds SL. Subdissociative intranasal ketamine plus standard pain therapy versus standard pain therapy in the treatment of paediatric sickle cell disease vaso-occlusive crises in resource-limited settings: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open 2017; 7:e017190. [PMID: 28698351 PMCID: PMC5541700 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Pediatric sickle cell disease, highly prevalent in sub-Saharan Africa, carries great morbidity and mortality risk. Limited resources and monitoring make management of acute vaso-occlusive crises challenging. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of subdissociative intranasal ketamine as a cheap, readily available and easily administered adjunct to standard pain therapy. We hypothesise that subdissociative, intranasal ketamine may significantly augment current approaches to pain management in resource-limited settings in a safe and cost-effective manner. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This is a multicentred, randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial enrolling children 4-16 years of age with sickle cell disease and painful vaso-occlusive pain crises. Study sites include two sub-Saharan teaching and referral hospitals with acute intake areas. All patients receive standard analgesic therapy during evaluation. Patients randomised to the treatment arm receive 1 mg/kg intranasal ketamine at onset of therapy, while placebo arm participants receive volume-matched intranasal normal saline. All participants and clinical staff are blinded to the treatment allocation. Data will be analysed on an intention-to-treat basis. Primary endpoints are changes in self-report pain scales (Faces Pain Scale-Revised) at 30, 60 and 120 minutes and rates of adverse events. Secondary endpoints include hospital length of stay, total analgesia use and quality of life assessment 2-3 weeks postintervention. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION The research methods for this study have been approved by the Cameroon Baptist Convention Health Board Institutional Review Board (IRB2015-07), the Tanzanian National Institute for Medical Research (NIMR/HQ/R.8a/Vol. IX/2299), Muhimbili National Hospital IRB (MNH/IRB/I/2015/14) and the Tanzanian Food and Drugs Authority (TFDA0015/CTR/0015/9). Data reports will be provided to the Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) periodically throughout the study as well as all reports of adverse events. All protocol amendments will also be reviewed by the DSMB. Study results, regardless of direction or amplitude, will be submitted for publication in relevant peer-reviewed journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.Gov, NCT02573714. Date of registration: 8 October 2015. Pre-results.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James R Young
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Hendry Robert Sawe
- Deparment of Emergency Medicine, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Juma A Mfinanga
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Muhimbili National Hospital, Dar es Salaam, United Republic of Tanzania
| | - Ernest Nshom
- Department of Internal Medicine, CIMS, Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Cameroon Baptist Convention, Mbingo, Cameroon
| | - Ethan Helm
- Department of Pediatrics, Mbingo Baptist Hospital, Cameroon Baptist Convention, Mbingo, Cameroon
| | - Charity G Moore
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Carolinas HealthCare System, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael S Runyon
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Stacy L Reynolds
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Parvizrad R, Pakniyat A, Malekianzadeh B, Almasi-Hashiani A. Comparing the analgesic effect of intranasal with intravenous ketamine in isolated orthopedic trauma: A randomized clinical trial. Turk J Emerg Med 2017; 17:99-103. [PMID: 28971157 PMCID: PMC5608614 DOI: 10.1016/j.tjem.2017.05.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2017] [Revised: 05/09/2017] [Accepted: 05/23/2017] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Objectives Ketamine is commonly used in anesthetic and sedation before surgical procedures and acts as an analgesic in smaller doses. The aim of this study was to assess the effects of intranasal (IN) ketamine in patients with moderate to severe limb trauma (visual analog scale (VAS) > 60 mm). Methods In a triple-blind randomized controlled clinical trial; 154 patients with isolated orthopedic trauma and visual analog scale (VAS) ≥60 mm were included on the basis of inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were divided into two groups of ketamine-IN (0.4 mg/kg IN ketamine and an equal volume of placebo saline intravenously (IV)) and ketamine-IV (0.2 mg/kg ketamine IV with 0.5 ml saline IN) on the basis of balanced block randomization method. At 5, 10, 20, and 30 min, patients were assessed for VAS measurement and adverse events. Repeated measure ANOVA, independent t-test and chi square test were employed. The level of statistical significance was considered to be less than 0.05. Results Mean VAS in IN ketamine and IV group at minute 30 was 31.50 ± 13.40 and 29.35 ± 11.73, respectively. At minute 30, 31 patients (20.39%) required a low-dose of morphine as rescue analgesia (P = 0.427). The results showed that mean change score of VAS (difference of time 0 and time 30) in IN ketamine and IV ketamine VAS were 43.8 (95% confidence interval: 41.1–46.5) and 46.4 (95% confidence interval: 42.8–50.1) and there is no difference between two groups in case of score change of VAS (P = 0.245). Adverse events in nasal and intravenous ketamine in both groups were mild and transient. Conclusion IN ketamine is associated with few side effects and appropriate analgesic effects in isolated orthopedic trauma patients, and it may be used in cases where there is no need for venipuncture of peripheral vessels, especially in crowded EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ramin Parvizrad
- Department of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | - Abdolghader Pakniyat
- Student Research Committee, Emergency Medicine Department, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran
| | | | - Amir Almasi-Hashiani
- Department of Epidemiology and Reproductive Health, Reproductive Epidemiology Research Center, Royan Institute for Reproductive Biomedicine, ACECR, Tehran, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
29
|
Rech MA, Barbas B, Chaney W, Greenhalgh E, Turck C. When to Pick the Nose: Out-of-Hospital and Emergency Department Intranasal Administration of Medications. Ann Emerg Med 2017; 70:203-211. [PMID: 28366351 DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2017.02.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 46] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/04/2016] [Revised: 02/10/2017] [Accepted: 02/15/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
The intranasal route for medication administration is increasingly popular in the emergency department and out-of-hospital setting because such administration is simple and fast, and can be used for patients without intravenous access and in situations in which obtaining an intravenous line is difficult or time intensive (eg, for patients who are seizing or combative). Several small studies (mostly pediatric) have shown midazolam to be effective for procedural sedation, anxiolysis, and seizures. Intranasal fentanyl demonstrates both safety and efficacy for the management of acute pain. The intranasal route appears to be an effective alternative for naloxone in opioid overdose. The literature is less clear on roles for intranasal ketamine and dexmedetomidine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Megan A Rech
- Department of Pharmacy, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL; Department of Emergency Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL.
| | - Brian Barbas
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | - Whitney Chaney
- Department of Pharmacy, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
30
|
Reynolds SL, Studnek JR, Bryant K, VanderHave K, Grossman E, Moore CG, Young J, Hogg M, Runyon MS. Study protocol of a randomised controlled trial of intranasal ketamine compared with intranasal fentanyl for analgesia in children with suspected, isolated extremity fractures in the paediatric emergency department. BMJ Open 2016; 6:e012190. [PMID: 27609854 PMCID: PMC5020878 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-012190] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/04/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Fentanyl is the most widely studied intranasal (IN) analgesic in children. IN subdissociative (INSD) ketamine may offer a safe and efficacious alternative to IN fentanyl and may decrease overall opioid use during the emergency department (ED) stay. This study examines the feasibility of a larger, multicentre clinical trial comparing the safety and efficacy of INSD ketamine to IN fentanyl and the potential role for INSD ketamine in reducing total opioid medication usage. METHODS AND ANALYSIS This double-blind, randomised controlled, pilot trial will compare INSD ketamine (1 mg/kg) to IN fentanyl (1.5 μg/kg) for analgesia in 80 children aged 4-17 years with acute pain from a suspected, single extremity fracture. The primary safety outcome for this pilot trial will be the frequency of cumulative side effects and adverse events at 60 min after drug administration. The primary efficacy outcome will be exploratory and will be the mean reduction of pain scale scores at 20 min. The study is not powered to examine efficacy. Secondary outcome measures will include the total dose of opioid pain medication in morphine equivalents/kg/hour (excluding study drug) required during the ED stay, number and reason for screen failures, time to consent, and the number and type of protocol deviations. Patients may receive up to 2 doses of study drug. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION This study was approved by the US Food and Drug Administration, the local institutional review board and the study data safety monitoring board. This study data will be submitted for publication regardless of results and will be used to establish feasibility for a multicentre, non-inferiority trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER NCT02521415.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stacy L Reynolds
- Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | | | - Kathleen Bryant
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Kelly VanderHave
- Department of Orthopedics, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Eric Grossman
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Levine Children's Hospital, Concord, North Carolina, USA
| | - Charity G Moore
- Dickson Advanced Analytics, Carolinas Healthcare System, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - James Young
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Melanie Hogg
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| | - Michael S Runyon
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Carolinas Medical Center, Charlotte, North Carolina, USA
| |
Collapse
|
31
|
Abstract
Far more attention is now given to pain management in children in the emergency department (ED). When a child arrives, pain must be recognized and evaluated using a pain scale that is appropriate to the child's development and regularly assessed to determine whether the pain intervention was effective. At triage, both analgesics and non-pharmacological strategies, such as distraction, immobilization, and dressing should be started. For mild pain, oral ibuprofen can be administered if the child has not received it at home, whereas ibuprofen and paracetamol are suitable for moderate pain. For patients who still require pain relief, oral opioids could be considered; however, many EDs have now replaced this with intranasal fentanyl, which allows faster onset of pain relief and can be administered on arrival pending either intravenous access or definitive care. Intravenous opioids are often required for severe pain, and paracetamol or ibuprofen can still be considered for their likely opioid-sparing effects. Specific treatment should be used for patients with migraine. In children requiring intravenous access or venipuncture, non-pharmacological and pharmacological strategies to decrease pain and anxiety associated with needle punctures are mandatory. These strategies can also be used for laceration repairs and other painful procedures. Despite the gaps in knowledge, pain should be treated with the most up-to-date evidence in children seen in EDs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Benoit Bailey
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada.
| | - Evelyne D Trottier
- Division of Emergency Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, CHU Sainte-Justine, 3175 Chemin de la Côte-Sainte-Catherine, Montréal, QC, H3T 1C5, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Gao M, Rejaei D, Liu H. Ketamine use in current clinical practice. Acta Pharmacol Sin 2016; 37:865-72. [PMID: 27018176 DOI: 10.1038/aps.2016.5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 147] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/04/2015] [Accepted: 01/19/2016] [Indexed: 12/14/2022] Open
Abstract
After nearly half a century on the market, ketamine still occupies a unique corner in the medical armamentarium of anesthesiologists or clinicians treating pain. Over the last two decades, much research has been conducted highlighting the drug's mechanisms of action, specifically those of its enantiomers. Nowadays, ketamine is also being utilized for pediatric pain control in emergency department, with its anti-hyperalgesic and anti-inflammatory effects being revealed in acute and chronic pain management. Recently, new insights have been gained on ketamine's potential anti-depressive and antisuicidal effects. This article provides an overview of the drug's pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics while also discussing the potential benefits and risks of ketamine administration in various clinical settings.
Collapse
|
33
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This article provides a summary of recommendations for the multimodal and multidisciplinary approach to acute pediatric pain management and highlights recent research on this topic. RECENT FINDINGS Recent literature has focused on updating recommendations for the use of various analgesics in the pediatric population. While codeine is no longer recommended due to increasing evidence of adverse effects, the more liberal use of intranasal fentanyl is now encouraged because of the ease of administration and rapid delivery. The evidence base for the use of ultrasound-guided regional nerve blocks by qualified providers in the acute pediatric pain setting continues to grow. SUMMARY The pediatric emergency medicine provider should be able to assess pain and develop individualized pain plans by utilizing a range of nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic strategies. Knowledge of the most recent literature and changes in recommendations for various pain medications is essential.
Collapse
|
34
|
Abstract
Pain is the most common complaint for which patients come to the emergency department (ED). Emergency physicians are responsible for pain relief in a timely, efficient, and safe manner in the ED. The improvement in our understanding of the neurobiology of pain has balanced the utilization of nonopioid and opioid analgesia, and simultaneously has led to more rational and safer opioid prescribing practices. This article reviews advances in pain management in the ED for patients with acute and chronic pain as well as describes several newer strategies and controversies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sergey M Motov
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Maimonides Medical Center, 4802 Tenth Avenue, Brooklyn, NY 11219, USA.
| | - Lewis S Nelson
- New York University School of Medicine, 455 First Avenue, New York, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Shrestha R, Pant S, Shrestha A, Batajoo KH, Thapa R, Vaidya S. Intranasal ketamine for the treatment of patients with acute pain in the emergency department. World J Emerg Med 2016; 7:19-24. [PMID: 27006733 DOI: 10.5847/wjem.j.1920-8642.2016.01.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Pain in the emergency department (ED) is common but undertreated. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of intranasal (IN) ketamine used as an analgesic for patients with acute injury with moderate to severe pain. METHODS This study was a cross sectional, observational study of patients more than 8 years old experiencing moderate to severe pain [visual analog score (VAS) >50 mm]. The initial dose of IN ketamine was 0.7 mg/kg with an additional dose of 0.3 mg/kg if VAS was more than 50 mm after 15 minutes. Pain scores and vital signs were recorded at 0, 15, 30 and 60 minutes. Side-effects, sedation level and patient's satisfaction were also recorded. The primary outcome was the number of patients achieving ≥ 20 mm reductions in VAS at 15 minutes. Other secondary outcome measures were median reduction in VAS at 15, 30 and 60 minutes, changes of vital signs, adverse events, satisfaction of patients, and need for additional ketamine. RESULTS Thirty-four patients with a median age of 29.5 years (IQR 17.5-38) were enrolled, and they had an initial median VAS of 80 mm (IQR 67-90). The VAS decreased more than 20 mm at 15 minutes in 27 (80%) patients. The reduction of VAS from baseline to 40 mm (IQR 20-40), 20 mm (IQR 14-20) and 20 mm (IQR 10-20) respectively at 15, 30 and 60 minutes (P<0.001). No critical changes of vital signs were noted and adverse effects were mild and transient. CONCLUSION This study showed that IN ketamine is an analgesic choice for patients with acute injury in moderate to severe pain in an overcrowded and resource limited ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roshana Shrestha
- Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Manmohan Medical College and Teaching Hospital, Swoyambhu, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Samita Pant
- Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, PAHS, Patan, Nepal
| | - Ashis Shrestha
- Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, PAHS, Patan, Nepal
| | - Kabita Hada Batajoo
- Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, KIST Medical College Hospital, Patan, Nepal
| | - Rashmi Thapa
- Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, KMC Medical College Hospital, Kathmandu, Nepal
| | - Sumana Vaidya
- Department of General Practice and Emergency Medicine, Patan Academy of Health Sciences, PAHS, Patan, Nepal
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Palmer GM. Pain management in the acute care setting: Update and debates. J Paediatr Child Health 2016; 52:213-20. [PMID: 27062626 DOI: 10.1111/jpc.13134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/29/2015] [Revised: 11/26/2015] [Accepted: 11/26/2015] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Pain management in the paediatric acute care setting is underutilised and can be improved. An awareness of the analgesic options available and their limitations is an important starting point. This article describes the evolving understanding of relevant pharmacogenomics and safety data of the various analgesic agents with a focus on agents available in Australia and New Zealand. It highlights the concerns with the use of codeine in children and discusses alternative oral opioids. Key features of oral, parenteral, inhaled and intranasal analgesic agents are discussed, as well as evidence supported use of sweet tasting solutions and non-pharmacological interventions. One of the biggest changes in acute care pain management has been the advent of intranasal fentanyl providing reliable potent analgesia without the need for intravenous access. The article will also address the issue of multimodal analgesia where a single agent is insufficient.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greta M Palmer
- Department of Anaesthesia and Pain Management, Royal Children's Hospital.,Murdoch Children's Research Institute.,Department of Paediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences, University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
37
|
Tagg A, Goldstein H, Davis T, Lawton B. Sticks and stones may break some bones. Emerg Med Australas 2016; 28:4-6. [DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12531] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Andrew Tagg
- Emergency Department, Footscray Hospital; Melbourne Victoria Australia
| | - Henry Goldstein
- Emergency Department, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital; Brisbane Queensland Australia
- School of Medicine; University of Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
| | - Tessa Davis
- Emergency Department, Sydney Children's Hospital; Sydney New South Wales Australia
| | - Ben Lawton
- Emergency Department, Lady Cilento Children's Hospital; Brisbane Queensland Australia
- School of Medicine; University of Queensland; Brisbane Queensland Australia
- Emergency Department, Logan Hospital; Logan City Queensland Australia
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Liversidge XL, Taylor DM, Liu B, Ling SLY, Taylor SE. Variables associated with parent satisfaction with their child's pain management. Emerg Med Australas 2015; 28:39-43. [PMID: 26685807 DOI: 10.1111/1742-6723.12519] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Revised: 10/05/2015] [Accepted: 10/11/2015] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The provision of 'adequate analgesia' (which reduces the pain score by ≥2 and to <4 [0-10 scale]) is significantly associated with high levels of satisfaction with pain management among adult patients. We aimed to determine the variables (including 'adequate analgesia') associated with parent satisfaction with their child's pain management. METHODS We undertook an observational, pilot study in a mixed, metropolitan ED. Patients aged 4-16 years with a triage pain score of ≥4 were enrolled. Data included demographics, presenting complaint, pain scores every 30 min, analgesia administered, time to first analgesia, provision of nurse-initiated analgesia (NIA), and 'adequate analgesia', and parent satisfaction 48-h post-discharge (6 point scale: very unsatisfied - very satisfied). RESULTS Complete data were collected on 185 patients: mean (SD) age 10.4 (3.6) years, weight 41.9 (17.8) kg; 93 (50.3%) were male. One hundred and ten (59.4%) parents were very satisfied with their child's pain management. Children of very satisfied parents had shorter times to analgesia than those who did not (median [interquartile range] 14 (33) vs 33 (46) min, respectively, P = 0.003). Parents whose children received NIA or 'adequate analgesia' were more often very satisfied than those whose children did not. However, the differences were not significant (difference in proportions: 13.2% [95% CI -1.9, 28.3], P = 0.07 and 10.2% [95% CI -5.02, 25.34], P = 0.16, respectively). CONCLUSION Short times to analgesia are associated with parent satisfaction. There were non-significant trends towards high levels of satisfaction following the provision of NIA and 'adequate analgesia'. These findings will inform a well-powered study to confirm this association.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - David McD Taylor
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Emergency Department, Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Bonnia Liu
- Austin Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
39
|
|
40
|
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel Quibell
- Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals Foundation Trust, Newcastle, United Kingdom
| | - Marie Fallon
- University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, United Kingdom
| | - Mary Mihalyo
- Mylan School of Pharmacy, Duquesne University, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
41
|
Murphy A, McCoy S, O'Reilly K, Fogarty E, Dietz J, Crispino G, Wakai A, O'Sullivan R. A Prevalence and Management Study of Acute Pain in Children Attending Emergency Departments by Ambulance. PREHOSP EMERG CARE 2015; 20:52-8. [DOI: 10.3109/10903127.2015.1037478] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022]
|
42
|
[Burns and scalds in children]. Med Klin Intensivmed Notfmed 2015; 110:346-53. [PMID: 25971367 DOI: 10.1007/s00063-015-0032-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Since pediatric emergencies and burn injuries are rare in prehospital emergency medicine, emergency teams can hardly develop routine in emergency care. OBJECTIVES How to effectively treat burn injuries and avoid common errors? MATERIALS AND METHODS A simple and severity-based therapy concept based on the current literature using the example of a case report is presented. RESULTS About 80% of burns and scalds in children are not severe cases-in these patients an effective analgesia by intranasal administration is important and further invasive treatments are generally not necessary. The emergency care of children with severe burn injuries should start with intranasally administered analgesia and/or sedation. After an intravenous or intraosseous access is gained, moderate fluid therapy is started, which should be complemented by a fluid bolus only if signs of a shock are present. Additional administration of analgesia and/or sedation may be necessary. Estimation of the burned body surface area is best determined with the palm rule; the severity of the burn appears after a latency period. Induction of anesthesia and intubation are not required in the majority of cases. CONCLUSIONS By applying a modified ABCDE scheme, all emergency teams can provide effective emergency care in children with burn injuries.
Collapse
|
43
|
Abstract
Procedural sedation options in the emergency department now allow for more effective and safer care and facilitate the delivery of orthopaedic care that would otherwise require operating room anesthesia. Traditional sedation agents, such as nitrous oxide, midazolam, fentanyl, and ketamine, have a persistent role. Etomidate and propofol are relatively recent additions that are highly effective. Combination regimens, such as ketamine-midazolam and ketamine-propofol, may be superior because they benefit from synergistic traits. Despite these sedation regimens, use of local blocks in adults continues to be effective, and intranasal delivery in children has emerged as a viable option. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of the appropriateness of different sedation regimens and other options for specific clinical scenarios.
Collapse
|
44
|
Graudins A, Meek R, Egerton-Warburton D, Oakley E, Seith R. The PICHFORK (Pain in Children Fentanyl or Ketamine) Trial: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Intranasal Ketamine and Fentanyl for the Relief of Moderate to Severe Pain in Children With Limb Injuries. Ann Emerg Med 2015; 65:248-254.e1. [DOI: 10.1016/j.annemergmed.2014.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 85] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2014] [Revised: 09/08/2014] [Accepted: 09/26/2014] [Indexed: 12/01/2022]
|
45
|
Sin B, Ternas T, Motov SM. The use of subdissociative-dose ketamine for acute pain in the emergency department. Acad Emerg Med 2015; 22:251-7. [PMID: 25716117 DOI: 10.1111/acem.12604] [Citation(s) in RCA: 34] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2014] [Revised: 10/15/2014] [Accepted: 10/19/2014] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Ketamine is a well-known anesthetic with its use trailing back to the 1960s. It has antagonistic effects at the N-methyl-d-aspartate receptor. There is emerging literature to suggest the use of subdissociative-dose ketamine (SDDK) for pain reduction. This evidence-based review evaluates the evidence regarding the use of SDDK for acute pain control in the emergency department (ED). METHODS The MEDLINE and EMBASE databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that described or evaluated the use of SDDK for acute pain in the ED were included. Literature was excluded if it was not published in English. Duplicate articles, unpublished reports, abstracts, and review articles were also excluded. Quality assessment and evaluation of literature were evaluated based on the GRADE criteria. The primary outcome of interest in this review was the difference in pain score from baseline to cutoff time as specified in the studies. Secondary outcome measures were the incidence of adverse events and reduction in the amount of adjuvant opioids consumed by patients who received SDDK. RESULTS Four RCTs met the inclusion criteria, which enrolled a total of 428 patients. Three adult trials and one pediatric trial were identified. The level of evidence for the individual trials ranged from low to moderate. A significant reduction in pain scores was only found in two of the four trials. One trial found a significant reduction in mean pain scores when ketamine was compared to morphine (p < 0.05). Another trial reported a significant decrease in mean distress scores, favoring SDDK over fentanyl (1.0 vs. 2.7, p < 0.05). One trial found a significant reduction in the amount of morphine consumed, favoring ketamine over placebo (0.14 mg/kg, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13 to 0.16 mg/kg vs. 0.2 mg/kg, 95% CI = 0.18 to 0.22 mg/kg; p < 0.001). An emergence phenomenon was reported in one trial. CONCLUSIONS Four RCTs with methodologic limitations failed to provide convincing evidence to either support or refute the use of SDDK for acute pain control in the ED.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Billy Sin
- The Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy; Long Island University; Brooklyn NY
- The Department of Pharmacy; Division of Pharmacotherapy Services; The Brooklyn Hospital Center; Brooklyn NY
| | - Theologia Ternas
- The Arnold & Marie Schwartz College of Pharmacy; Long Island University; Brooklyn NY
| | - Sergey M. Motov
- The Department of Emergency Medicine; Maimonides Medical Center, and SUNY Downstate Medical Center; Brooklyn NY
| |
Collapse
|
46
|
Buonsenso D, Barone G, Valentini P, Pierri F, Riccardi R, Chiaretti A. Utility of intranasal Ketamine and Midazolam to perform gastric aspirates in children: a double-blind, placebo controlled, randomized study. BMC Pediatr 2014; 14:67. [PMID: 24598046 PMCID: PMC3974003 DOI: 10.1186/1471-2431-14-67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/21/2013] [Accepted: 02/18/2014] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background We performed a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a sedation protocol based on intranasal Ketamine and Midazolam (INKM) administered by a mucosal atomizer device in uncooperative children undergoing gastric aspirates for suspected tuberculosis. Primary outcome: evaluation of Modified Objective Pain Score (MOPS) reduction in children undergoing INKM compared to the placebo group. Secondary outcomes: evaluation of safety of INKM protocol, start time sedation effect, duration of sedation and evaluation of parents and doctors’ satisfaction about the procedure. Methods In the sedation group, 19 children, mean age 41.5 months, received intranasal Midazolam (0.5 mg/kg) and Ketamine (2 mg/kg). In the placebo group, 17 children received normal saline solution twice in each nostril. The child’s degree of sedation was scored using the MOPS. A questionnaire was designed to evaluate the parents’ and doctors’ opinions on the procedures of both groups. Results Fifty-seven gastric washings were performed in the sedation-group, while in the placebo-group we performed 51 gastric aspirates. The degree of sedation achieved by INMK enabled all procedures to be completed without additional drugs. The mean duration of sedation was 71.5 min. Mean MOPS was 3.5 (range 1-8) in the sedation-group, 7.2 (range 4-9) in the placebo-group (p <0.0001). The questionnaire revealed high levels of satisfaction by both doctors and parents in the sedation-group compared to the placebo-group. The only side effect registered was post-sedation agitation in 6 procedures in the sedation group (10.5%). Conclusions Our experience suggests that atomized INKM makes gastric aspirates more acceptable and easy to perform in children. Trial registration Unique trial Number: UMIN000010623; Receipt Number: R000012422.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danilo Buonsenso
- Department of Pediatric Sciences, Catholic University of Rome, Largo A, Gemelli, 1, 00168 Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
47
|
|
48
|
Graudins A, Meek R, Egerton-Warburton D, Seith R, Furness T, Chapman R. The PICHFORK (Pain InCHildren Fentanyl OR Ketamine) trial comparing the efficacy of intranasal ketamine and fentanyl in the relief of moderate to severe pain in children with limb injuries: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials 2013; 14:208. [PMID: 23842536 PMCID: PMC3716920 DOI: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-208] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2013] [Accepted: 07/04/2013] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The effectiveness of intranasal (IN) fentanyl as an analgesic for painful pediatric limb injuries in the Emergency Department (ED) has been reported previously. However, efficacy of IN ketamine in sub-dissociative doses is not well studied in the ED setting. A non-blinded pilot study undertaken by this study group suggested that IN ketamine showed similar analgesic effectiveness to that reported with IN fentanyl in similar non-blinded studies. The aim of this randomized, controlled, equivalence trial is to compare the analgesic effect of sub-dissociative dose IN ketamine with IN fentanyl for children with isolated musculoskeletal limb injuries. Methods/Design This is a prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind equivalence trial of children agedthree to thirteen years and less than 50 kg body weight, with isolated musculoskeletal limb injury, presenting to the ED with moderate to severe pain, defined as a verbal response of at least six to a standard 11-point scale (0 = none, 10 = worst pain imaginable). Pain score, sedation, satisfaction with analgesic intervention, and adverse effects will be assessed over a 60 minute interval for each participant. Intranasal ketamine (1 mg/kg) or fentanyl (1.5 microgram/kg) will be administered via blinded syringe and mucosal atomization device in a standardized volume at 0.03 ml/kg, with a maximum volume of 1.5 ml divided equally to both nares. Participants will also receive 10 mg/kg ibuprofen orally. The primary outcome measure will be median change in pain score from pre-administration to 30 minutes post-administration. Non-parametric Mann–Whitney U tests will be computed to compare median change in the primary outcome measure for IN ketamine and fentanyl. A sample size of 36 participants per group is needed to detect the expected 40 mm reduction in pain rating with a 95% confidence interval (CI) no greater than ± 10 mm at 30 minutes. Rescue analgesia will be given as IN fentanyl or intravenous morphine. Discussion This is the first randomized-controlled trial comparing the efficacy of these two analgesic agents via the intranasal route. If IN ketamine is found to be equally effective to IN fentanyl for this indication, it will provide another analgesic agent that may be considered for the relief of acute pain in children in the ED. Trial registration Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry
ACTRN12612000795897.
Collapse
|