1
|
Voulgaris T, Alexopoulos T, Vlachogiannakos J, Kamberoglou D, Koutsoumbas A, Papaxoinis K, Fytily P, Papatheodoridis G, Karamanolis GP. Patients with cardinal symptoms of eosinophilic esophagitis. Prejudice affects clinical practice…. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 2024; 36:1298-1304. [PMID: 39083053 DOI: 10.1097/meg.0000000000002833] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/27/2024]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Dysphagia and bolus impaction are the cardinal manifestations of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Esophageal biopsy sampling is mandatory for EoE diagnosis, data though suggest that clinician do not always obtain biopsies from patients with cardinal EoE symptoms during upper gastrointestinal endoscopy even if no other entity than EoE can explain patients symptoms. We aimed to search for the esophageal biopsy procurement rate as also for factors that drive clinicians to obtain esophageal biopsies among patients with cardinal EoE symptoms. METHODS We retrospectively searched for patients with cardinal EoE symptoms submitted to upper gastrointestinal endoscopy between 1/2018 and 12/2023 in our department. Epidemiologic, clinical, endoscopic, and histological data were analyzed. RESULTS In total 163 patients with cardinal EoE symptoms (dysphagia: 63 and bolus impaction: 100) were included in the study (M/F: 100/63, mean age: 54 ± 22 years). Biopsy sampling was obtained in 77/163 (47.2%) patients and sampling rates did not differ between patients with bolus impaction or dysphagia (47/100, 47% vs 30/63, 47.6%, P = 0.553). Higher rates of sampling were observed in males ( P = 0.045), those younger than 65 years old ( P < 0.001) and patients with endoscopic EoE signs ( P = 0.004). Age and endoscopic findings compatible to EoE were independently correlated to biopsy sampling. EoE was diagnosed in 35/74 patients (47.3%); the majority of patients were male, with a bolus impaction episode, compatible endoscopic findings and all were younger than 65 years old. CONCLUSION Clinicians take esophageal biopsies in half of patients with cardinal EoE. Age and supportive endoscopic evidence drive clinicians' decision to obtain esophageal biopsies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros Voulgaris
- Academic Department of Gastroenterology, Medical School of National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, General Hospital of Athens 'Laiko', Athens, Greece
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Terkelsen JH, Hollænder M, Bredal K, Nielsen SM, Thomsen KVK, Baggerman A, Ofverlind E, Koc AM, Pakes H, Mahdi MB, Larsen SØ, Gonzalez VP, Riis J, Frandsen LT, Melgaard D, Krarup AL. A retrospective cohort study on oesophageal food bolus obstruction in the North Denmark region in 2021-two thirds were never diagnosed with a cause. BMC Gastroenterol 2024; 24:3. [PMID: 38166672 PMCID: PMC10759704 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-023-03077-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/19/2023] [Accepted: 12/06/2023] [Indexed: 01/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Food bolus obstruction (FBO) leading to hospital treatment is often associated with eosinophilic oesophagitis (EoE), stenosis, or oesophageal cancer (1). Danish national guidelines recommend that patients with FBO undergo a diagnostic upper endoscopy within two weeks of presentation to exclude possible malignancy, and histological evaluation of eight biopsies (2, 3). AIMS The aims of this study were to (1) report the incidence and describe the causes and treatment of FBO in the North Denmark Region (NDR), (2) determine the proportion of patients who underwent upper endoscopy and biopsy according to regional and national guidelines, and (3) identify International Classification of Diseases 10th Revision (ICD-10) diagnosis and procedure codes applied to the hospital visits due to FBO in the NDR. METHODS Among all acute hospital visits in the NDR in 2021, all visits with ICD-10 codes possibly reflecting FBO, as well as a random sample of 14,400 visits with unspecific ICD-10 codes (R and Z codes), were screened manually for possible FBO. Diagnosis, follow-up, and treatment of all patients with FBO were recorded. RESULTS The median patient age was 66.0 (Q1-Q3: 49.8-81.0) years, and half of the patients had experienced FBO before. Two thirds of patients (66.0%) were never diagnosed with a cause of FBO, followed by 17.3% with EoE. 30% of patients did not undergo upper endoscopy within two weeks of the hospital visit, and 50.7% were never biopsied in the oesophagus. Of 1886 hospital visits with registry ICD-10 codes that possibly reflected FBO, 8.4% were due to FBO, while FBO was present in 0.028% of the random sample of unspecific ICD-10 codes. CONCLUSIONS Most hospitalized FBO patients in the NDR in 2021 were never diagnosed with a cause. In these patients there is a high risk of overlooked EoE or upper gastrointestinal cancers. The area needs immediate focus and changed routines to improve treatment and prevent new FBO.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Martin Hollænder
- School of Medicine and Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Kasper Bredal
- School of Medicine and Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | | | - Kristoffer Vittrup Koed Thomsen
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- School of Medicine and Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Amanda Baggerman
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Emilia Ofverlind
- School of Medicine and Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Alptug Mertcan Koc
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Hannah Pakes
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Marco Bassam Mahdi
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- School of Medicine and Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Sanne Ørnfeldt Larsen
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Vanessa Parra Gonzalez
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- School of Medicine and Health, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Johannes Riis
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Line Tegtmeier Frandsen
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark
- Department of Gastroenterology, North Denmark Regional Hospital, Hjørring, Denmark
| | - Dorte Melgaard
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark
- Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Anne Lund Krarup
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Trauma Center, Aalborg University Hospital, Hobrovej 18-22, DK-9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.
- Faculty of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark.
| |
Collapse
|