1
|
Hou YB, Chang S, Chen S, Zhang WJ. Intravenous immunoglobulin in kidney transplantation: Mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and hyperimmune globulin. Clin Immunol 2023; 256:109782. [PMID: 37742791 DOI: 10.1016/j.clim.2023.109782] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/24/2023] [Revised: 09/11/2023] [Accepted: 09/20/2023] [Indexed: 09/26/2023]
Abstract
Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) has been developed for over 40 years. The mechanisms of action of IVIG are complex and diverse, and there may be multiple mechanisms that combine to influence it. IVIG has been used in kidney transplantation for desensitization, treatment of antibody-mediated rejection, and ABO-incompatible transplantation. and treatment or prevention of some infectious diseases. Hyperimmune globulins such as cytomegalovirus hyperimmune globulin (CMV-IG) and hepatitis B hyperimmune globulin (HBIG) have also been used to protect against cytomegalovirus and hepatitis B virus, respectively. However, IVIG is also associated with some rare but serious adverse effects and some application risks, and clinicians need to weigh the pros and cons and develop individualized treatment programs to benefit more patients. This review will provide an overview of the multiple mechanisms of action, clinical applications, adverse effects, and prophylactic measures of IVIG, and hyperimmune globulin will also be introduced in it.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Bo Hou
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Sheng Chang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Song Chen
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China
| | - Wei-Jie Zhang
- Institute of Organ Transplantation, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Ministry of Education; NHC Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation; Key Laboratory of Organ Transplantation, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Wuhan 430030, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Bouchet A, Muller B, Olagne J, Barba T, Joly M, Obrecht A, Rabeyrin M, Dijoud F, Picard C, Mezaache S, Sicard A, Koenig A, Parissiadis A, Dubois V, Morelon E, Caillard S, Thaunat O. Evolution of humoral lesions on follow-up biopsy stratifies the risk for renal graft loss after antibody-mediated rejection treatment. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2022; 37:2555-2568. [PMID: 35675302 DOI: 10.1093/ndt/gfac192] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/14/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The standard-of-care protocol, based on plasma exchanges, high-dose intravenous immunoglobulin and optimization of maintenance immunosuppression, can slow down the evolution of antibody-mediated rejection (AMR), but with high interindividual variability. Identification of a reliable predictive tool of the response to AMR treatment is a mandatory step for personalization of the follow-up strategy and to guide second-line therapies. METHODS Interrogation of the electronic databases of 2 French university hospitals (Lyon and Strasbourg) retrospectively identified 81 renal transplant recipients diagnosed with AMR without chronic lesions (cg score ≤1) at diagnosis and for whom a follow-up biopsy had been performed 3-6 months after initiation of therapy. RESULTS The evolution of humoral lesions on follow-up biopsy (disappearance versus persistence versus progression) correlated with the risk for allograft loss (logrank test, P = .001). Patients with disappearance of humoral lesions had ∼80% graft survival at 10 years. The hazard ratio for graft loss in multivariate analysis was 3.91 (P = .04) and 5.15 (P = .02) for patients with persistence and progression of lesions, respectively. The non-invasive parameters classically used to follow the intensity of humoral alloimmune response (evolution of immunodominant DSA mean fluorescence intensity) and the decline of renal graft function (estimated glomerular filtration rate decrease and persistent proteinuria) showed little clinical value to predict the histological response to AMR therapy. CONCLUSION We conclude that invasive monitoring of the evolution of humoral lesions by the mean of follow-up biopsy performed 3-6 months after the initiation of therapy is an interesting tool to predict long-term outcome after AMR treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonin Bouchet
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Unité de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Brieuc Muller
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Jerome Olagne
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Thomas Barba
- Unité de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1111, Lyon, France
| | - Mélanie Joly
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Augustin Obrecht
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Maud Rabeyrin
- Institut de Pathologie Multisite, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | - Frédérique Dijoud
- Institut de Pathologie Multisite, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | - Cécile Picard
- Institut de Pathologie Multisite, Groupement Hospitalier Est, Bron, France
| | - Sarah Mezaache
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Unité de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Antoine Sicard
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Unité de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France
| | - Alice Koenig
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Unité de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1111, Lyon, France
| | - Anne Parissiadis
- Laboratoire d'Histocompatibilité, Etablissement Français du Sang, Strasbourg, France
| | - Valérie Dubois
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1111, Lyon, France.,Laboratoire d'Histocompatibilité, Etablissement Français du Sang, Lyon, France
| | - Emmanuel Morelon
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Unité de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1111, Lyon, France
| | - Sophie Caillard
- Service de Néphrologie et Transplantation, Les Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - Olivier Thaunat
- Service de Transplantation, Néphrologie et Immunologie Clinique, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.,Unité de Formation et de Recherche de Médecine Lyon Est, Université Claude-Bernard Lyon I, Lyon, France.,Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1111, Lyon, France
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Večerić-Haler Ž, Sever M, Kojc N, Halloran PF, Boštjančič E, Mlinšek G, Oblak M, Poženel P, Švajger U, Hartman K, Kneževič M, Barlič A, Girandon L, Aleš Rigler A, Zver S, Buturović Ponikvar J, Arnol M. Autologous Mesenchymal Stem Cells for Treatment of Chronic Active Antibody-Mediated Kidney Graft Rejection: Report of the Phase I/II Clinical Trial Case Series. Transpl Int 2022; 35:10772. [PMID: 36484064 PMCID: PMC9722440 DOI: 10.3389/ti.2022.10772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 11/08/2022] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
Mesenchymal stem cell (MSCs) therapy has already been studied in kidney transplant recipients (KTRs), and the available data showed that it is safe and well tolerated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of autologous MSCs in combination with standard therapy in KTRs with biopsy-proven chronic active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR). Patients with biopsy-proven chronic active AMR received treatment with autologous bone marrow-derived MSCs (3 × 106 cells/kg iv) after completion of standard therapy and were followed for up to 12 months. The primary endpoints were safety by assessment of adverse events. Secondary endpoints included assessment of kidney graft function, immunological and histological changes related to AMR activity and chronicity assessed by conventional microscopy and molecular transcripts. A total of 3 patients were enrolled in the study before it was terminated prematurely because of adverse events. We found that AMR did not improve in any of the patients after treatment with MSCs. In addition, serious adverse events were observed in one case when autologous MSCs therapy was administered in the late phase after kidney transplantation, which requires further elucidation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Željka Večerić-Haler
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,*Correspondence: Željka Večerić-Haler,
| | - Matjaž Sever
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Department of Haematology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Nika Kojc
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Philip F. Halloran
- Division of Nephrology and Transplant Immunology, Alberta Transplant Applied Genomics Centre, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada
| | - Emanuela Boštjančič
- Institute of Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Gregor Mlinšek
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Manca Oblak
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Primož Poženel
- Division for Cells and Tissue, Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Urban Švajger
- Division for Cells and Tissue, Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Katrina Hartman
- Division for Cells and Tissue, Blood Transfusion Centre of Slovenia, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Ariana Barlič
- Educell d.o.o Cell Therapy Service, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | | | - Andreja Aleš Rigler
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Samo Zver
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Department of Haematology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Jadranka Buturović Ponikvar
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| | - Miha Arnol
- Department of Nephrology, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia,Faculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Therapeutic plasma exchange: single-center experience in children with kidney disorders. Pediatr Nephrol 2021; 36:621-629. [PMID: 32949283 DOI: 10.1007/s00467-020-04744-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2020] [Revised: 07/31/2020] [Accepted: 08/25/2020] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is used in kidney diseases as an adjunct treatment. Little has been described as to its effectiveness in kidney disorders in children. This study aimed to assess the safety, efficacy, and outcomes of patients who underwent TPE for kidney indications. METHODS Retrospective chart review of patients receiving TPE from 2010 to 2018 for kidney indications, such as antibody-mediated rejection, bone marrow transplant-associated thrombotic microangiopathy (TA-TMA), atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome, transplant recurrence of focal segmental glomerulosclerosis, and glomerulonephritis. Outcomes assessed were trends in kidney function, mortality, and progression to stage 5 chronic kidney disease (CKD 5). Significant hypocalcemia was defined as ionized calcium < 1 mmol/L. RESULTS A total of 641 TPE procedures were performed on 47 patients (25 male). Average age was 12.8 ± 5.9 years. Median glomerular filtration rate (GFR) improved from baseline to end of TPE treatments (pre 44.9 (19.8, 79), end 56.1 (23, 98) [p = 0.02]). Ten out of 47 children developed CKD 5. Seven out of 47 patients died; 5 had TA-TMA. Initial 7 consecutive sessions were reviewed for complications. Among 335 procedures, 41 episodes of significant hypocalcemia were noted (12.2%); only 1 was symptomatic. Of the 26 episodes (7.7%) of allergic reactions, all were associated with the use of FFP; 5 were anaphylactic. No TPE-associated mortality was noted. CONCLUSIONS TPE is a relatively well-tolerated useful adjunct therapy in children with kidney indications. The benefit of TPE has to be balanced with risks such as hypocalcemia and allergic reactions which can occur more frequently with FFP. Graphical abstract.
Collapse
|
5
|
Noppakun K, Kittipanyaworakun T, Ruengorn C, Vongsanim S, Saikam A, Khamlueang N. Plasma volume treated with double filtration plasmapheresis and outcomes of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients: A retrospective cohort study. Ther Apher Dial 2020; 25:341-349. [PMID: 32666667 DOI: 10.1111/1744-9987.13560] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2020] [Revised: 06/17/2020] [Accepted: 07/13/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
A retrospective cohort study was conducted to evaluate the association between the plasma volume treated by double filtration plasmapheresis and allograft outcomes for the treatment of acute antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplant recipients. Patients were divided into two groups: group 1, plasma volume treated between 1 and <1.3 total plasma volume and group 2, plasma volume treated ≥1.3 total plasma volume. Primary outcome was ≥50% reduction of serum creatinine rising from baseline value at 1 month. A total of 32 courses (146 sessions) of double filtration plasmapheresis were performed; 17 and 15 courses in group 1 and group 2, respectively. Primary outcome occurred in 41% of group 1 and 40% of group 2 (adjusted risk ratio 1.15 [95%CI, 0.48-2.76]). Graft loss at 1 year did not differ between the two groups (adjusted hazard ratio 0.65 [95%CI, 0.23-1.87]). Infection tendency seemed to be higher in group 2 (40% vs 18%, P = .243).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kajohnsak Noppakun
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Kidney Transplant and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Thanapat Kittipanyaworakun
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Chidchanok Ruengorn
- Pharmacoepidemiology and Statistics Research Center (PESRC), Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Department of Pharmaceutical Care, Faculty of Pharmacy, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Surachet Vongsanim
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand.,Kidney Transplant and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Anchalee Saikam
- Kidney Transplant and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| | - Nikhom Khamlueang
- Kidney Transplant and Research Center, Faculty of Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai, Thailand
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kolonko A, Słabiak-Błaż N, Karkoszka H, Więcek A, Piecha G. The Preliminary Results of Bortezomib Used as A Primary Treatment for An Early Acute Antibody-Mediated Rejection after Kidney Transplantation-A Single-Center Case Series. J Clin Med 2020; 9:jcm9020529. [PMID: 32075220 PMCID: PMC7074248 DOI: 10.3390/jcm9020529] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2019] [Revised: 02/06/2020] [Accepted: 02/12/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Proteasome inhibitor bortezomib has been used in the treatment of refractory cases of acute and chronic antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) in kidney transplant recipients. However, its efficacy and safety as a primary treatment for early AMR has been scarcely investigated. We herein present our preliminary experience with bortezomib- and plasmapheresis-based primary treatment for early AMR. Thirteen patients transplanted between October 2015 and September 2019 were treated (starting at median 19th post-transplant day) with bortezomib/plasmapheresis protocol for early biopsy-proven AMR. Twelve out of thirteen patients received 4 doses and one patient recieved 3 doses of bortezomib (1.3 mg/m2 per dose). In 11/13 patients, 4–7 concomitant plasmapheresis sessions were performed, with or without intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Of note, rituximab was not used in all study patients. The kidney graft and patient survival were 100%. The mean 3-month estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was 55.3 (95%CI: 44.9–65.8) mL/min/1.73m2, 8/13 patients completed 12-month follow-up with mean eGFR 60.4 (45.4–75.4) mL/min/1.73m2, and 6/13 patients completed a 24-month follow-up period with mean eGFR 73.9 (56.7–91.1) mL/min/1.73m2. Neutropenia < 1 G/L was observed in one patient, third or fourth grade thrombocytopenia in two patients, and eleven patients needed a blood transfusion (median: 2 units/patient). The mid-term results of a primary bortezomib-based treatment for kidney AMR showed its non-inferiority as compared to preceding regimens and acceptable safety. However, our data should be validated in a multicenter randomized trial.
Collapse
|
7
|
Tan EK, Bentall AJ, Dean PG, Shaheen MF, Stegall MD, Schinstock CA. Use of Eculizumab for Active Antibody-mediated Rejection That Occurs Early Post-kidney Transplantation: A Consecutive Series of 15 Cases. Transplantation 2019; 103:2397-2404. [PMID: 30801549 PMCID: PMC6699919 DOI: 10.1097/tp.0000000000002639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Active antibody-mediated rejection (AMR) that occurs during the amnestic response within the first month posttransplant is a rare but devastating cause of early allograft loss after kidney transplant. Prior reports of eculizumab treatment for AMR have been in heterogeneous patient groups needing salvage therapy or presenting at varied time points. We investigated the role of eculizumab as primary therapy for active AMR early posttransplant. METHODS We performed a retrospective observational study of a consecutive cohort of solitary kidney transplant recipients who were transplanted between January 1, 2014, and January 31, 2018, and had AMR within the first 30 days posttransplant and treated with eculizumab ± plasmapheresis. RESULTS Fifteen patients had early active AMR at a median (interquartile range [IQR]) of 10 (7-11) days posttransplant and were treated with eculizumab ± plasmapheresis. Thirteen cases were biopsy proven, and 2 cases were presumed on the basis of donor-specific antibody trends and allograft function. Within 1 week of treatment, the median estimated glomerular filtration rate increased from 21 to 34 mL/min (P = 0.001); and persistent active AMR was only found in 16.7% (2/12) of biopsied patients within 4-6 months. No graft losses occurred, and at last follow-up (median [IQR] of 13 [12-19] mo), the median IQR estimated glomerular filtration rate increased to 52 (46-60) mL/min. CONCLUSIONS Prompt eculizumab treatment as primary therapy is safe and effective for early active AMR after kidney transplant or abrupt increases in donor-specific antibodies when biopsy cannot be performed for diagnosis confirmation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ek Khoon Tan
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Andrew J. Bentall
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Patrick G. Dean
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | | | - Mark D. Stegall
- Division of Transplantation Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Carrie A. Schinstock
- Division of Nephrology and Hypertension, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
- Mayo Clinic William J. von Liebig Center for Transplantation and Clinical Regeneration, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Goutaudier V, Perrochia H, Mucha S, Bonnet M, Delmas S, Garo F, Garrigue V, Lepreux S, Pernin V, Serre JE, Szwarc I, Merville P, Ramounau-Pigot A, René C, Visentin J, Morgan BP, Frémeaux-Bacchi V, Mourad G, Couzi L, Le Quintrec M. C5b9 Deposition in Glomerular Capillaries Is Associated With Poor Kidney Allograft Survival in Antibody-Mediated Rejection. Front Immunol 2019; 10:235. [PMID: 30906289 PMCID: PMC6418012 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00235] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2018] [Accepted: 01/28/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
C4d deposition in peritubular capillaries (PTC) reflects complement activation in antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) of kidney allograft. However, its association with allograft survival is controversial. We hypothesized that capillary deposition of C5b9-indicative of complement-mediated injury-is a severity marker of ABMR. This pilot study aimed to determine the frequency, location and prognostic impact of these deposits in ABMR. We retrospectively selected patients diagnosed with ABMR in two French transplantation centers from January 2005 to December 2014 and performed C4d and C5b9 staining by immunohistochemistry. Fifty-four patients were included. Median follow-up was 52.5 (34.25-73.5) months. Thirteen patients (24%) had C5b9 deposits along glomerular capillaries (GC). Among these, seven (54%) had a global and diffuse staining pattern. Twelve of the C5b9+ patients also had deposition of C4d in GC and PTC. C4d deposits along GC and PTC were not associated with death-censored allograft survival (p = 0.42 and 0.69, respectively). However, death-censored allograft survival was significantly lower in patients with global and diffuse deposition of C5b9 in GC than those with a segmental pattern or no deposition (median survival after ABMR diagnosis, 6 months, 40.5 months and 44 months, respectively; p = 0.015). Double contour of glomerular basement membrane was diagnosed earlier after transplantation in C5b9+ ABMR than in C5b9- ABMR (median time after transplantation, 28 vs. 85 months; p = 0.058). In conclusion, we identified a new pattern of C5b9+ ABMR, associated with early onset of glomerular basement membrane duplication and poor allograft survival. Complement inhibitors might be a therapeutic option for this subgroup of patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Valentin Goutaudier
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Hélène Perrochia
- Department of Pathology, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Simon Mucha
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Marie Bonnet
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Sylvie Delmas
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Florian Garo
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Valérie Garrigue
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Sébastien Lepreux
- Department of Pathology, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Vincent Pernin
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.,INSERM U1183, Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Biotherapy, Saint-Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Jean-Emmanuel Serre
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Ilan Szwarc
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Pierre Merville
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.,UMR CNRS 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| | - Annie Ramounau-Pigot
- Department of Immunology, Saint Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Céline René
- Department of Immunology, Saint Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Jonathan Visentin
- UMR CNRS 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France.,Department of Immunology and Immunogenetics, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France
| | - Bryan Paul Morgan
- School of Medicine, Systems Immunity Research Institute, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | | - Georges Mourad
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| | - Lionel Couzi
- Department of Nephrology, Transplantation, Dialysis and Apheresis, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux University Hospital, Bordeaux, France.,UMR CNRS 5164, ImmunoConcEpT, Bordeaux University, Bordeaux, France
| | - Moglie Le Quintrec
- University of Montpellier, Department of Nephrology, Dialysis and Transplantation, Lapeyronie Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.,INSERM U1183, Institute for Regenerative Medicine and Biotherapy, Saint-Eloi Hospital, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Simmons SC, Adamski J, Berg M, Biller E, Fang DC, Ipe TS, Shunkwiler SM, Zhao Y, Baron BW, Pham HP. The apheresis management of patients undergoing transplantation: a concise review. Transfusion 2019; 59:1863-1869. [PMID: 30701552 DOI: 10.1111/trf.15153] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2018] [Revised: 01/01/2019] [Accepted: 01/01/2019] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Sierra C Simmons
- Department of Pathology, Michigan Pathology Specialists, PC, Spectrum Health Hospitals, Grand Rapids, Michigan
| | - Jill Adamski
- Department of Pathology, Mayo Clinic Hospital, Phoenix, Arizona
| | - Mary Berg
- Department of Pathology, University of Colorado Hospital, Aurora, Colorado
| | - Elizabeth Biller
- Department of Pathology, Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio
| | - Deanna C Fang
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Tina S Ipe
- Department of Pathology and Genomic Medicine, Houston Methodist Hospital, Houston, Texas
| | - Sara M Shunkwiler
- Department of Pathology and Microbiology, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska
| | - Yong Zhao
- Departments of Medicine and Pathology, UMass Memorial Medical Center, Worcester, Massachusetts
| | - Beverly W Baron
- Department of Pathology, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois
| | - Huy P Pham
- Department of Pathology, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mella A, Gallo E, Messina M, Caorsi C, Amoroso A, Gontero P, Verri A, Maletta F, Barreca A, Fop F, Biancone L. Treatment with plasmapheresis, immunoglobulins and rituximab for chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection in kidney transplantation: Clinical, immunological and pathological results. World J Transplant 2018; 8:178-187. [PMID: 30211026 PMCID: PMC6134268 DOI: 10.5500/wjt.v8.i5.178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/01/2018] [Revised: 06/14/2018] [Accepted: 06/28/2018] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
AIM To evaluate the role of a therapeutic regimen with plasma exchange, intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab in chronic-active antibody-mediated rejection (cAMR) settings.
METHODS We compared 21 kidney transplant recipients (KTRs) with a diagnosis of cAMR in a retrospective case-control analysis: nine KTRs treated with plasmapheresis, intravenous immunoglobulins and rituximab (PE-IVIG-RTX group) vs 12 patients (control group) not treated with antibody-targeted therapies. We examined kidney survival and functional outcomes 24 mo after diagnosis. Histological features and donor-specific antibody (DSA) characteristics (MFI and C1q-fixing ability) were also investigated.
RESULTS No difference in graft survival between the two groups was noted: three out of nine patients in the PE-IVIG-RTX group (33.3%) and 4/12 in the control group (33.3%) experienced loss of allograft function at a median time after diagnosis of 14 mo (min 12-max 18) and 15 mo (min 7-max 22), respectively. Kidney functional tests and proteinuria 24 mo after cAMR diagnosis were also similar in both groups. Only microvascular inflammation (glomerulitis + peritubular capillaritis score) was significantly reduced after PE-IVIG-RTX in seven out of eight patients (87.5%) in the PE-IVIG-RTX group (median score 3 in pre-treatment biopsy vs 1.5 in post-treatment biopsy; P = 0.047), without any impact on kidney survival and/or DSA characteristics. No functional or histological parameter at diagnosis was predictive of clinical outcome.
CONCLUSION Our data showed no difference in the two year post-treatment outcome of kidney grafts treated with PE-IVIG-RTX for cAMR diagnosis, however there were notable improvements in microvascular inflammation in post-therapy protocol biopsies. Further studies, especially involving innovative therapeutic approaches, are required to improve the management and long-term results of this severe condition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Mella
- Renal Transplantation Center “A. Vercellone”, Division of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital and University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Ester Gallo
- Renal Transplantation Center “A. Vercellone”, Division of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital and University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Maria Messina
- Renal Transplantation Center “A. Vercellone”, Division of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital and University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Cristiana Caorsi
- Immunogenetics and Transplant Biology Service, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Antonio Amoroso
- Immunogenetics and Transplant Biology Service, AOU Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino and Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Division of Urology, Department of Surgical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital and University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Aldo Verri
- Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Thoracic-Vascular Surgery, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Francesca Maletta
- Division of Pathology Transplantation, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Antonella Barreca
- Division of Pathology Transplantation, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Fop
- Renal Transplantation Center “A. Vercellone”, Division of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital and University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| | - Luigi Biancone
- Renal Transplantation Center “A. Vercellone”, Division of Nephrology Dialysis and Transplantation, Department of Medical Sciences, Città della Salute e della Scienza Hospital and University of Turin, Turin 10126, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Viglietti D, Loupy A, Aubert O, Bestard O, Duong Van Huyen JP, Taupin JL, Glotz D, Legendre C, Jouven X, Delahousse M, Kamar N, Lefaucheur C. Dynamic Prognostic Score to Predict Kidney Allograft Survival in Patients with Antibody-Mediated Rejection. J Am Soc Nephrol 2018; 29:606-619. [PMID: 29255058 PMCID: PMC5791064 DOI: 10.1681/asn.2017070749] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
No tool is available for the early assessment of response to antibody-mediated rejection (ABMR) therapies in kidney allograft recipients. This study was designed to define a dynamic composite prognostic ABMR score to predict kidney allograft survival, integrating the disease characteristics at diagnosis and the response to treatment. Among 1978 kidney recipients who underwent transplant between 2008 and 2014, we included 278 patients diagnosed with active ABMR and receiving standard treatment, including plasma exchange, intravenous Ig, and rituximab. Patients were prospectively assessed at diagnosis and after treatment for clinical data, histologic characteristics (allograft biopsy specimen), and donor-specific anti-HLA antibodies (DSA). The dynamic ABMR prediction model included GFR (P<0.001) and presence of interstitial fibrosis/tubular atrophy (P=0.003) at diagnosis and changes in GFR (P<0.001), peritubular capillaritis Banff score (P=0.002), and DSA mean fluorescence intensity (P<0.001) after treatment. Overall, this model showed good calibration and discrimination (C-statistic=0.84). The ABMR prognostic score derived from the prediction model identified three risk strata with 6-year kidney allograft survival rates of 6.0% (high-risk group, n=40), 44.9% (intermediate-risk group, n=36), and 84.4% (low-risk group, n=202), and it provided greater net clinical benefit to patients than did considering them all to have the same level of risk of allograft loss. The performance of the ABMR prognostic score was validated in an independent cohort of 202 kidney recipients with ABMR (C-statistic=0.79). The ABMR prognostic score could be used to inform therapeutic decisions in clinical practice and for the design of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Denis Viglietti
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970, Paris, France
- Departments of Kidney Transplant and
| | - Alexandre Loupy
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970, Paris, France;
- Departments of Kidney Transplant and
| | - Olivier Aubert
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970, Paris, France
| | - Oriol Bestard
- Department of Nephrology, Bellvitge University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Jean-Paul Duong Van Huyen
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970, Paris, France
- Pathology, Necker Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Jean-Luc Taupin
- Immunology and Histocompatibility, Saint-Louis Hospital, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris, Paris, France
| | - Denis Glotz
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970, Paris, France
- Departments of Kidney Transplant and
| | - Christophe Legendre
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970, Paris, France
- Departments of Kidney Transplant and
| | - Xavier Jouven
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970, Paris, France
| | - Michel Delahousse
- Department of Nephrology and Kidney Transplantation, Foch Hospital, Suresnes, France
| | - Nassim Kamar
- Department of Nephrology and Organ Transplantation, Centre Hospitalier Universtaire Rangueil, Toulouse; and
- Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U1043, IFR-BMT, Centre Hospitalier Universtaire Purpan, Toulouse, Université Paul Sabatier, Toulouse, France
| | - Carmen Lefaucheur
- Paris Translational Research Center for Organ Transplantation, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale, Unité Mixte de Recherche S970, Paris, France;
- Departments of Kidney Transplant and
| |
Collapse
|