Implications of Albumin Leakage for Survival in Maintenance Hemodialysis Patients: A 7-year Observational Study

The Medium Cut-Off Membrane Does Not Lower Protein-Bound Uremic Toxins

The accumulation of protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUT) is associated with increased cardiovascular outcomes in patients on dialysis. However, the efficacy of PBUT removal for a medium-cutoff (MCO) membrane has not been clarified. This study was designed to assess the efficacy of PBUT clearance according to dialysis modalities. In this prospective and cross-over study, we enrolled 22 patients who received maintenance hemodiafiltration (HDF) thrice weekly from three dialysis centers. The dialysis removal of uremic toxins, including urea, beta 2-microglobulin (B2MG), lambda free light chain (λ-FLC), indoxyl sulfate (IS), and p-cresyl sulfate (pCS), was measured in the 22 patients on high-flux HD (HF-HD), post-dilution online HDF (post-OL-HDF), and MCO-HD over 3 weeks. The average convection volume in post-OL-HDF was 21.4 ± 1.8 L per session. The reduction rate (RR) of B2MG was higher in post-OL-HDF than in MCO-HD and HF-HD. The RR of λ-FLC was the highest in MCO-HD, followed by post-OL-HDF and HF-HD. The dialysate albumin was highest in MCO-HD, followed by post-OL-HDF and HF-HD. Post-dialysis plasma levels of IS and pCS were not statistically different across dialysis modalities. The total solute removal and dialytic clearance of IS and pCS were not significantly different. The clearance of IS and pCS did not differ between the HF-HD, post-OL-HDF, and MCO-HD groups.

Effects of high albumin leakage on survival between online hemodiafiltration and super high-flux hemodialysis: the HISTORY study

Background

All-cause mortality is lower with a high substitution volume in predilution (pre) and postdilution (post) online hemodiafiltration (OHDF) than with hemodialysis (HD), and mortality does not significantly differ between pre- and post-OHDF groups. Despite the improved survival with a high substitution volume, there may be limitations. On the other hand, either normoalbuminemia or high albumin leakage in HD can reduce mortality, and super high-flux (SHF) membrane dialyzers can reduce mortality compared with low-flux and high-flux membrane dialyzers. Here, we investigated the associations of serum albumin concentration (s-Alb), albumin leakage, and substitution volume with all-cause mortality in OHDF and SHF-HD.

Methods

In a 3-year retrospective observational study of patients receiving dialysis from April 1 to July 1, 2017, we developed a propensity score-matched model using 783 stable patients (SHF-HD, 355; OHDF, 428). We used the log-rank test to compare Kaplan–Meier survival curves and Cox regression analysis to calculate hazard ratio (HR). Cox regression analysis was also used to compare the effect of estimated albumin leakage (EAL) and substitution volume on 3-year all-cause mortality.

Results

All-cause mortality was significantly lower with high EAL than with low EAL (SHF-HD: P = 0.012, log-rank test; HR, 0.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.23–0.85; OHDF: P = 0.027, log-rank test; HR, 0.41; 95% CI 0.18–0.93). The mortality of high EAL was not significantly different between high and low s-Alb in SHF-HD (3.5 ± 0.1 and 3.2 ± 0.2 g/dL) and OHDF (3.6 ± 0.2 and 3.2 ± 0.1 g/dL), despite significant differences in s-Alb. Mortality did not significantly differ between SHF-HD and OHDF with higher EAL ranges or a lower difference in EAL. Mortality in pre-OHDF was significantly correlated with EAL (P = 0.007, beta − 0.32) rather than substitution volume, and mortality in post-OHDF was not analyzed because of fewer deaths.

Conclusions

The results suggest that survival is improved more with high EAL than with low EAL in both OHDF and SHF-HD patients, that high EAL with mild-to-moderate hypoalbuminemia does not necessarily worsen survival in OHDF and SHF-HD patients, and that survival is equivalent between OHDF and SHF-HD patients with a similar level of EAL.

Peritoneal Protein Loss Is Not Associated With Sarcopenia in Peritoneal Dialysis Patients

Introduction: Maintenance of a peritoneal membrane is essential for maintaining long-term peritoneal dialysis (PD). Peritoneal protein loss (PPL) is basically the loss of an essential nutrient, which may lead to malnutrition. We aimed to evaluate the association between PPL and sarcopenia in PD patients.

Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study from September 2017 to November 2020 on all PD patients (n = 199). Finally, the patients were divided into tertiles based on the PPL level as follows: low, middle, and high. PPL (mg/day), appendicular lean mass (ALM) using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, and handgrip strength (HGS) were evaluated. Sarcopenia was defined using cut-off values from the Asian Working Group for Sarcopenia.

Results: The median PPL (interquartile range, interval) in the low, middle, and high tertiles were 4,229 (904, 1,706–5,111), 6,160 (760, 5,118–7,119), and 8,543 (2,284, 7,145–24,406) mg/day, respectively. HGS in the low, middle, and high tertiles was 23.4 ± 9.2, 23.8 ± 8.9, and 23.6 ± 8.3 kg, respectively (P = 0.967). The ALM index in the low, middle, and high tertiles was 6.0 ± 1.3, 6.0 ± 1.2, and 6.5 ± 1.1 kg/m², respectively (P = 0.061). Multivariate analyses did not reveal significant differences in HGS and ALM index in among tertiles. The proportions of patients with sarcopenia in the low, middle, and high tertiles was 24 (36.4%), 19 (28.4%), and 21 (31.8%), respectively (P = 0.612).

Conclusion: The present study showed that PPL is not independently associated with muscle mass, strength, and sarcopenia in PD patients.

Hypoalbuminemia: a price worth paying for improved dialytic removal of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins?

Hemodiafiltration (HDF) increases the removal of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins and may improve outcomes in patients with end-stage kidney disease (ESKD), but it requires complex equipment and comes with risks associated with infusion of large volumes of substitution solution. New high-flux hemodialysis membranes with improved diffusive permeability profiles do not have these limitations and offer an attractive alternative to HDF. However, both strategies are associated with increased albumin loss into the dialysate, raising concerns about the potential for decreased serum albumin concentrations that have been associated with poor outcomes in ESKD. Many factors can contribute to hypoalbuminemia in ESKD, including protein energy wasting, inflammation, volume expansion, renal loss and loss into the dialysate; of these factors, loss into the dialysate is not necessarily the most important. Furthermore, recent studies suggest that mild hypoalbuminemia per se is not an independent predictor of increased mortality in dialysis patients, but in combination with inflammation it is a poor prognostic sign. Thus, whether hypoalbuminemia predisposes to increased morbidity and mortality may depend on the presence or absence of inflammation. In this review we summarize recent findings on the role of dialysate losses in hypoalbuminemia and the importance of concomitant inflammation on outcomes in patients with ESKD. Based on these findings, we discuss whether hypoalbuminemia may be a price worth paying for increased dialytic removal of middle-molecular-weight uremic toxins.

Prescribing Hemodialysis or Hemodiafiltration: When One Size Does Not Fit All the Proposal of a Personalized Approach Based on Comorbidity and Nutritional Status

There is no simple way to prescribe hemodialysis. Changes in the dialysis population, improvements in dialysis techniques, and different attitudes towards the initiation of dialysis have influenced treatment goals and, consequently, dialysis prescription. However, in clinical practice prescription of dialysis still often follows a "one size fits all" rule, and there is no agreed distinction between treatment goals for the younger, lower-risk population, and for older, high comorbidity patients. In the younger dialysis population, efficiency is our main goal, as assessed by the demonstrated close relationship between depuration (tested by kinetic adequacy) and survival. In the ageing dialysis population, tolerance is probably a better objective: "good dialysis" should allow the patient to attain a stable metabolic balance with minimal dialysis-related morbidity. We would like therefore to open the discussion on a personalized approach to dialysis prescription, focused on efficiency in younger patients and on tolerance in older ones, based on life expectancy, comorbidity, residual kidney function, and nutritional status, with particular attention placed on elderly, high-comorbidity populations, such as the ones presently treated in most European centers. Prescription of dialysis includes reaching decisions on the following elements: dialysis modality (hemodialysis (HD) or hemodiafiltration (HDF)); type of membrane (permeability, surface); and the frequency and duration of sessions. Blood and dialysate flow, anticoagulation, and reinfusion (in HDF) are also briefly discussed. The approach described in this concept paper was developed considering the following items: nutritional markers and integrated scores (albumin, pre-albumin, cholesterol; body size, Body Mass Index (BMI), Malnutrition Inflammation Score (MIS), and Subjective Global Assessment (SGA)); life expectancy (age, comorbidity (Charlson Index), and dialysis vintage); kinetic goals (Kt/V, normalized protein catabolic rate (n-PCR), calcium phosphate, parathyroid hormone (PTH), beta-2 microglobulin); technical aspects including vascular access (fistula versus catheter, degree of functionality); residual kidney function and weight gain; and dialysis tolerance (intradialytic hypotension, post-dialysis fatigue, and subjective evaluation of the effect of dialysis on quality of life). In the era of personalized medicine, we hope the approach described in this concept paper, which requires validation but has the merit of providing innovation, may be a first step towards raising attention on this issue and will be of help in guiding dialysis choices that exploit the extraordinary potential of the present dialysis "menu".

Current approaches to middle molecule removal: room for innovation

Aggressive removal of middle molecules or larger low-molecular-weight proteins (LMWPs) has been a growing concern following studies on their harmful effects on the mortality and morbidity of chronic dialysis patients. To remove larger LMWPs and some protein-bound uremic toxins (PBUTs), high- and medium-cutoff (HCOs and MCOs, respectively) membranes, convective therapy and protein adsorptive membranes are available. When we use HCO or MCO membranes for convective therapy, we have to take care to avoid massive albumin leakage during a dialysis session. Convection volume is an important element to increase middle molecule removal; however, a larger convection volume has a risk of larger leakage of albumin. Predilution hemodiafiltration is a useful measurement to increase larger LMWPs without massive albumin leakage. β2-microglobulin (B2M), α1-microglobulin (A1M) and albumin leakage during a dialysis session are useful parameters for assessing middle-molecule removal. Reduction ratios of B2M >80% and of A1M >35% are favorable to improve severe dialysis-related symptoms. The efficacy of middle molecule removal should be evaluated in comparison with clinical outcomes, mortality, morbidity and the improvement of dialysis-related symptoms. Recently some dialysis-related symptoms such as sleep disturbance, skin itchiness and dialysis hypotension have been recognized as good surrogate makers for mortality. Further studies to evaluate the relationship between middle molecule or PBUTs removal and the improvement of patient symptoms should be performed in well-designed randomized controlled trials.