Therapeutic plasma exchange in pediatric intensive care: Indications, results and complications

Therapeutic apheresis: is it safe in children with kidney disease?

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is already used to treat various diseases in the field of nephrology. The aim of this study was to evaluate the frequency and types of complications that occur during TA in children with kidney disease.

METHODS

Records of children (≤ 18 years) who underwent TA between 2007 and 2022 were retrospectively reviewed. Children with missing data and those with a diagnosis of nonnephrological disease were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 1214 TA sessions, including 1147 therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) sessions and 67 immunoadsorption (IA) sessions, were performed on the 108 patients enrolled in the study. Forty-seven percent of the patients were male, and the mean age was 12.22 ± 4.47 years. Posttransplant antibody-mediated rejection (64.8%) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (14.8%) were the most common diagnoses indicating TA. Overall, 17 different complications occurred in 58 sessions (4.8%), and 53 sessions (4.6%) were not completed because of these complications. The distribution of complications among the patients was as follows: 41.4% had technical complications, 25.9% had allergic complications, and 32.7% had others. The most common technical complication was insufficient flow (37.5%). The incidence of complications was greater in patients aged 3-6 years than in patients in the other age groups (p = 0.031). The primary disease, type of vascular access, and rate of fresh frozen plasma/albumin use were similar between patients with and without complications (p values of 0.359 and 0.125 and 0.118, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study showed that complications occurred in only 4.8% of TA sessions. The most common complication was technical problems.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in critically ill children: 18-year experience of a tertiary care paediatric intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) has been used as a primary or supportive treatment in critical paediatric patients during the clinical course of many diseases.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to characterise the indications, complications, and outcomes of critically ill children who received TPE in a tertiary referral paediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

METHODS

This retrospective observational study was conducted in a tertiary referral 13-bed PICU of a university hospital. Critically ill children, who received at least one TPE procedure, were retrospectively included in the study. TPE was utilised by the same paediatric intensivist in accordance with the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) guideline between January 2005 and December 2022. The procedures were analysed in terms of technical aspects and complications. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent risk factors for mortality.

RESULTS

In total, 1528 TPE sessions were performed on a total of 328 children. The overall TPE utility rate was 25 per 1000 PICU admissions. Primary indications for TPE were sepsis, neurological autoimmune, haematological diseases, acute liver failure, drug overdose, and autoimmune rheumatological disorders in 109 (33.2%), 90 (27.4%), 49 (14.9%), 43 (13.1%), 12 (3.7%), and 10 (3%) of patients, respectively. The distribution of TPE indications according to ASFA categories was as follows: 37 patients (11.3%) were in category I, 44 patients (13.4%) were in category II, and 211 (64.3%) were in category III. Complications were observed in 18.7% of sessions, and the most common complications were haemodynamic (10.8%) and circuit-/catheter-related (7.6%) complications. The mortality rate was 28.4% in the study. Moreover, both Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 score and number of organ failures were found as independent risk factors for mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results revealed that TPE may be an effective procedure even in critically ill children in accordance with ASFA recommendations. We also showed that mortality rate increased with Pediatric Index of Mortality 3 score at admission and number of organ failures.

Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Neurology Patients: A Single-Center Experience

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a procedure involving the filtration of a patient's plasma to eliminate pathogenic components or address deficiencies. This technique finds varied indications in the pediatric age group, particularly in neuroinflammatory diseases.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study is to delve into our local experience with TPE, focusing on indications, outcomes, and complications among children with neurological diseases at King Abdulaziz University Hospital (KAUH) in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.

RESULTS

Conducted at the pediatric department of KAUH in Jeddah from November 2008 to July 2023, this retrospective cohort study examined 15 patients, revealing a notable male predominance with 12 male patients (80%) and three female patients (20%). About two-thirds of patients exhibited an average illness severity, with a Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score of 10.7 and an Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) score of 4.8. The median length of hospital stay was 23 days, and in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU), it was 8.5 days. Presenting symptoms included limb weakness (n = 6), loss of consciousness (n = 3), dysphagia (n = 3), photophobia (n = 1), and ascending paralysis (n = 1). The TPE was performed for Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS) (n = 7), myasthenia gravis (MG) (n = 3), transverse myelitis (TM) (n = 2), neuromyelitis optica (NMO) (n = 2), and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) cerebritis (n = 1). Twelve patients were admitted to the PICU, and mechanical ventilation was required for 10 patients. In magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, abnormalities were observed in 10 cases, while the remaining five either had normal results or did not undergo MRI. Most patients required five sessions of TPE (n = 7). The median age at the initiation of TPE was 13 years. Twelve patients improved with TPE treatment, while three did not. Complications observed during and following TPE included fever (n = 5), electrolyte disturbance (n = 5), hypotension (n = 3), hypocalcemia (n = 2), bradycardia (n = 2), vomiting (n = 1), tachycardia (n = 1), eye rash (n = 1), infection (n = 1), and bleeding originating from the TPE procedure site (n = 1).

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, our study underscores the significance of TPE as a therapeutic modality, emphasizing the imperative for ongoing research to fully exploit its potential across diverse medical contexts for enhancing patient care. Our findings, consistent with prior research, reveal plasma exchange's (PLEX's) wide-ranging applications and complications in neurological disorders.

Scope, Safety, and Feasibility of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Experience

Background

Indications for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) are expanding. We aimed to study the demographics, clinical indications, and outcomes of patients who have undergone TPE in our PICU.

Materials and methods

This is a retrospective study performed among children aged from 1 month to 16 years of age. Demographics, indications, therapeutic response, serious adverse events (SAE), PICU length of stay (LOS), and death during hospitalization were studied as outcome variables.

Results

Therapeutic plasma exchange was performed in 115 sessions on 24 patients for 12 different indications falling under various American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) categories. Therapeutic plasma exchange was performed on ten, four, and ten children for ASFA category I, II, and III indications, respectively. The most common indications were thrombotic microangiopathy (TMA) (8/24) and acute liver failure (ALF) (6/24). During those 115 sessions, a total of five serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred, accounting for 4.3% of the cases. Minor adverse events occurred in 12 sessions (10.4%). Therapeutic response was good in 17 patients (71%) including 5 patients who underwent standard volume TPE (SV-TPE) for ALF. Median PICU LOS was 9 (range 2-120) days. The mortality rate was 12.5% (3/24).

Conclusion

Therapeutic plasma exchange is effective in various clinical conditions involving various organ systems. It is an excellent therapeutic modality in children with ALF, irrespective of the exchange volume and TMA. However, SAEs do occur in the minority.

How to cite this article

Balasubramanian KK, Venkatachalapathy P, Margabandhu S, Natraj R, Sridaran VK, Lakshmanan C, et al. Scope, Safety, and Feasibility of Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(10):766-770.

[Therapeutic plasma exchange in the pediatric intensive care unit: a single-center retrospective study]

OBJECTIVES

To study the indication for therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) and related complications in children admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical records of the children who received TPE in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, Hunan Children's Hospital, from March 2015 to March 2021. The indication for TPE and related complications were analyzed and compared with the American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) indication categories.

RESULTS

A total of 405 TPE treatment sessions were performed for 196 children, among whom 76 children (38.8%) also received continuous renal replacement therapy and 147 children (75.0%) survived. The children with neurological diseases had the highest survival rate of 93.1% (27/29). The top three indications for TPE were hematologic diseases (61/196, 31.1%), sepsis with multiple organ dysfunction (41/196, 20.9%), and liver diseases (36/196, 18.4%). The children with hematologic diseases received the highest number of 129 TPE treatment sessions. The subjects with ASFA category Ⅲ indications accounted for the highest proportion of 76.5% (150/196), followed by those with ASFA category Ⅰ indications (11.2%, 22/196), ASFA category Ⅱ indications (7.1%, 14/196), and unknown category (5.1%, 10/196), and no ASFA category Ⅳ indications were observed. The incidence rate of TPE complications was 12.3% (50/405), and the most common complications were pipeline coagulation (4.2%, 17/405) and hypotension (3.7%, 15/405). No serious adverse events were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

TPE can be safely used for the treatment of critically ill children with indications in an experienced pediatric intensive care unit.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the intensive care unit and with the critically ill, a focus on clinical nursing considerations

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is a blood purification technique removing antibodies and plasma proteins to modulate disease and promote recovery. The procedure has different methods, using a membrane or plasma separator with many elements similar to continuous renal replacement therapy (CCRT) in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU). These nursing knowledge and skill sets apply where ICU nurses are providing TPE with increasing need. However, different care models are also in place where TPE is the responsibility of apheresis and nephrology teams visiting the ICU. The plasma replacement volume and prescribing is aligned with published guidelines but is variable when critical illness overlays the primary indication for TPE. There are some important considerations for TPE with respect to anticoagulation, machine settings, prescribing, and associated nursing management. TPE can be performed concurrent with CRRT in acute situations using Y‐piece and valve connectors and is a new and recent advanced blood purification for the ICU.

Role of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of pediatric kidney diseases

Therapeutic apheresis utilizes apheresis procedures in the treatment of a variety of conditions including kidney disease. Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is the most common modality employed with the rationale of rapid reduction of a pathogenic substance distributed primarily in the intravascular compartment; however other techniques which adsorb such pathogenic substances or alter the immune profile have been utilized in diseases affecting native and transplanted kidneys. This article discusses the modalities and technical details of therapeutic apheresis and summarizes its role in individual diseases affecting the kidney. Complications related to pediatric apheresis procedures and specifically related to apheresis in kidney disease are also discussed. Though therapeutic apheresis modalities are employed frequently in children with kidney disease, most experiences are extrapolated from adult studies. International and national registries need to be established to elucidate the role of apheresis modalities in children with kidney disease.

Safety of Therapeutic Apheresis in Children and Adolescents

BACKGROUND

Therapeutic apheresis (TA) is based on the principles of either removing dissolved pathogenic substances (e.g., antibodies) from the blood plasma or replacing plasma factors. It expands the therapeutic scope for a variety of diseases. Safety analysis in the pediatric field are scant. The aim of this analysis was to analyze specific complications of TA modalities - plasma exchange (PE) and immunoadsorption (IA) - in children and adolescents.

METHODS

Children and adolescents (n = 298) who had received TA from 2008 to 2018 in five pediatric nephrology centers were analyzed retrospectively. In total, 4.004 treatments (2.287 PE and 1.717 IA) were evaluated.

RESULTS

Indications for TA were mainly nephrological and neurological diseases. The three main indications were antibody-mediated graft rejection (13.4%), hemolytic uremic syndrome mainly with neurological involvement (12.8%), and AB0-incompatible transplantation (11.7%). Complications developed in 440 of the 4004 sessions (11%), of which one third were non-specific (nausea, headache). IA was better tolerated than PE. Complications were reported in 9.5% (n = 163) of the IA versus 12.1% (277) of the PE sessions (p < 0.001). When considering different types of complications, significantly more non-specific/non-allergic events (p = 0.02) and allergic reactions occurred in PE sessions (p < 0.001). More complications occurred with PE, when using fresh frozen plasma (16.2%; n = 145) in comparison to human albumin (14.5%; n = 115) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Therapeutic apheresis in childhood and adolescence is a safe treatment procedure. IA showed a lower complication rate than PE. Therefore, IA may be preferably provided if the underlying disease pathomechanisms do not require PE.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Experience

Aim and objective

To examine the clinical characteristics, indications, and complications of patients undergoing therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in our pediatric intensive care unit (PICU).

Materials and methods

Patients who underwent therapeutic plasma exchange between January 2018 and January 2020 in the PICU were included in the study. Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data of patients were obtained retrospectively from medical records. A venous catheter was placed into subclavian, femoral, or jugular veins. The number of plasmapheresis sessions for each patient was determined by observing the course of the disease and clinical improvement. Patients were monitored for vital signs during the plasmapheresis process. Complications directly associated with TPE were recorded.

Results

During the 2-year study period, 105 TPE sessions were performed in 25 patients (15 males/10 females). The median age was 84 months (6–204), and the median body weight was 32 kg (8–75). Renal disorders and sepsis were the most common group, and about 48% of patients were in these groups. The most common diagnoses were sepsis with multi-organ dysfunction syndrome in seven patients and followed by hemolytic uremic syndrome (five patients) and Guillain–Barre syndrome (three patients). Nausea (6.7%) and hypocalcemia (6.7%) were the most common complications of patients associated with the procedure. Premature discontinuation of the procedure were not seen due to complications. Complications were treated with symptomatic therapy.

Conclusion

TPE is an effective treatment that can be safely used for pediatric patients with developments in PICUs. Nevertheless, TPE should be performed by experienced staff at a specialized center to minimize the risk of complications.

How to cite this article

Özsoylu S, Dursun A, Çelik B. Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Pediatric Intensive Care Unit: A Single-center Experience. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(10):1189–1192.

Therapeutic plasma exchange for life-threatening pediatric disorders

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is acknowledged to be an effective treatment in life-threatening pediatric disorders. Apheresis for pediatric diseases has been poorly investigated, and most studies to date featured small numbers of patients and lacked control groups. The objective of the present study was to evaluate the tolerance of TPE in pediatric patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective cohort study via a web-based electronic case report form including pediatric patients referred for TPE between January 2005 and December 2014.

RESULTS

A total of 78 patients (median [range] age: 9.8 [0.53-17.93]) and 731 TPE procedures were analyzed. The indications were antibody-mediated rejection (n = 33; 42%) and desensitization therapy (n = 5; 6%) after solid organ or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, thrombotic microangiopathy (n = 17; 22%), pediatric inflammatory diseases (n = 16; 21%), kidney diseases (n = 6; 8%), and hyperviscosity syndrome (n = 1; 1%). On average, each patient underwent six procedures during the first session [range: 1-19]. In the 2 weeks following the start of a session, 72 patients (92%) presented a total of 311 adverse events (AEs) potentially related to TPE. The risk of AEs was not related to the indication for TPE, the intensity of care, venous access, plasma substitute use, or body weight. None of the deaths was related to the TPE.

CONCLUSION

We studied one of the largest retrospective pediatric cohorts described to date. Our experience of TPE children's TPE feasibility concerned specific, life-threatening conditions and otherwise treatment-refractory diseases.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in critically ill children: experience of the pediatric intensive care unit of two centers in Chile

INTRODUCTION

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) is an extracorporeal blood purification technique used in a wide spectrum of diseases. We aim to review the indications, complications, and outcomes of critically ill children who received TPE and to compare a membrane versus centrifugal method in this cohort.

METHODS

A retrospective observational study in two pediatric intensive care units in Chile during eight years (2011-2019) Results: A total of 36 patients underwent 167 TPE sessions (20 centrifugation and 16 membrane-based). The more frequent indications for TPE were autoimmune neurological diseases in 14 cases, renal diseases (9), and rheumatological disorders (5). 58 % of children received other immunomodulatory therapy. According to ASFA, 45 % of cases were I-II category, 50 % to III, and 5% not classified. Response to treatment was complete in 64 % (23/36) and partial in 33 % (12/36). Complications occurred in 17.4 % of sessions, and the most frequent was transient hypotension during the procedure. Overall survival at discharge from the PICU was 92 %. Patients who received TPE as a single therapy (n = 26) survived 96 %. The clinical outcomes between the two apheresis methods were similar. Survivors had a significantly lower PELOD score on admission (14.5 vs. 6.5, p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

TPE is mainly indicated as a rescue treatment in neurological autoimmune diseases refractory to conventional immunomodulatory treatment. Complications in critically ill children are mild and low. The outcome in children requiring TPE as a single therapy is good, and no differences were observed with centrifugation or membrane method.

Therapeutic plasma exchange in the pediatric intensive care unit: A single-center 5-Year experience

The objective of this study is to characterize clinical indications, safety and outcome with the use of TPE in critically ill children. All TPE procedures performed in a tertiary pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) during a 5-year period were retrospectively evaluated. A total of 75 patients underwent 249 sessions of TPE. Sepsis-induced multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS) was the most common indication with 29.3 %. American Society for Apheresis classifications were as follows: Category I: 24 %, Category II: 16 %, Category III: 45.3 % and Category IV: 4%, while 10.7 % of the patients could not be classified. TPE was performed without any adjunct procedures in 188 sessions (75.5 %), while it was combined with continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) in 49 sessions (19.7 %) and with CRRT and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) in 12 (4.8 %) sessions. Overall survival rate was 73.3 %. The survival rate in patients requiring only TPE was 86.5 %, while the survival rates of patients who had CRRT and ECMO were 45 % and 33.3 %, respectively. Complications associated with the procedure occurred in 48 (19.2 %) TPE sessions. The lowest survival rate (31.9 %) was in patients with sepsis-induced MODS. Finally, we also found significantly higher organ failure rate, mechanical ventilation requirement, and PRISM III score at PICU admission in non-survivors. Our experience indicates that TPE can be performed relatively safely in critically ill children with appropriate treatment indications. Survival rate may vary depending on the underlying disease; however, it must be noted that survival rate is very high in children requiring TPE only.