Lu S, Wang P, Zhang XQ, Feng G, He HL, Chen Y, Huang XB, Pan C, Luo JC. The superiority of veno-arterial over veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for operative support of lung transplantation.
BMC Pulm Med 2025;
25:30. [PMID:
39833774 PMCID:
PMC11748553 DOI:
10.1186/s12890-025-03483-6]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/14/2024] [Accepted: 01/06/2025] [Indexed: 01/22/2025] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
Veno-arterial (V-A) and veno-venous (V-V) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) are crucial support modalities during lung transplantation, yet their comparative effectiveness remains unclear.
METHODS
We conducted an 8-year retrospective analysis of 62 lung transplant recipients who received intraoperative ECMO (29 V-A, 33 V-V). Baseline characteristics, surgical parameters, and clinical outcomes were compared. To address potential selection bias, we employed entropy weighted inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW-EW).
RESULTS
After IPTW-EW adjustment, V-A ECMO was associated with superior hemodynamic and respiratory parameters, including lower systolic pulmonary artery pressure (30 vs. 37 mmHg, p = 0.007), higher arterial oxygen partial pressure (119 vs. 78 mmHg, p = 0.002), and less severe pulmonary edema (Grade 1: 50% vs. 3%, Grade 2: 45% vs. 38%, Grade 3: 5% vs. 59%, p < 0.001). Notably, V-A ECMO demonstrated significantly lower 28-day (5% vs. 29%, p = 0.017) and hospital mortalities (21% vs. 69%, p = 0.035).
CONCLUSIONS
V-A ECMO provides superior pulmonary circulation unloading and is associated with improved survival outcomes compared to V-V ECMO in lung transplantation, suggesting its preferential use when clinically appropriate.
Collapse