1
|
Bedoya K, Buetas L, Rozès N, Mas A, Portillo MC. Influence of different stress factors during the elaboration of grape must's pieddecuve on the dynamics of yeast populations during alcoholic fermentation. Food Microbiol 2024; 123:104571. [PMID: 39038885 DOI: 10.1016/j.fm.2024.104571] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/31/2024] [Revised: 05/24/2024] [Accepted: 05/28/2024] [Indexed: 07/24/2024]
Abstract
The pieddecuve (PdC) technique involves using a portion of grape must to undergo spontaneous fermentation, which is then used to inoculate a larger volume of must. This allows for promoting autochthonous yeasts present in the must, which can respect the typicality of the resulting wine. However, the real impact of this practice on the yeast population has not been properly evaluated. In this study, we examined the effects of sulphur dioxide (SO2), temperature, ethanol supplementation, and time on the dynamics and selection of yeasts during spontaneous fermentation to be used as PdC. The experimentation was conducted in a synthetic medium and sterile must using a multi-species yeast consortium and in un-inoculated natural grape must. Saccharomyces cerevisiae dominated both the PdC and fermentations inoculated with commercial wine yeast, displaying similar population growth regardless of the tested conditions. However, using 40 mg/L of SO2 and 1% (v/v) ethanol during spontaneous fermentation of Muscat of Alexandria must allowed the non-Saccharomyces to be dominant during the first stages, regardless of the temperature tested. These findings suggest that it is possible to apply the studied parameters to modulate the yeast population during spontaneous fermentation while confirming the effectiveness of the PdC methodology in controlling alcoholic fermentation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katherine Bedoya
- Biotecnología Enològica, Dept. Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d'Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/ Marcel·lí Domingo 1, 43007, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Luis Buetas
- Biotecnología Enològica, Dept. Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d'Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/ Marcel·lí Domingo 1, 43007, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Nicolas Rozès
- Biotecnologia Microbiana dels Aliments, Dept. Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d'Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/ Marcel·lí Domingo 1, 43007, Tarragona, Spain
| | - Albert Mas
- Biotecnología Enològica, Dept. Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d'Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/ Marcel·lí Domingo 1, 43007, Tarragona, Spain
| | - M Carmen Portillo
- Biotecnología Enològica, Dept. Bioquímica i Biotecnologia, Facultat d'Enologia, Universitat Rovira i Virgili, C/ Marcel·lí Domingo 1, 43007, Tarragona, Spain.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
The effect of preparing the commercial yeast prise de mousse S. cerevisiae IOC 18-2007 on the second fermentation kinetics of a Macabeo white base wine was evaluated. The influence of yeast preparation on the final “Cava” sparkling wines was determined. The medium glucose, peptone, yeast extract (GPY medium), and the characteristic classic pied de cuve procedure were used to prepare the inoculum, which was placed besides a tirage liqueur inside bottles in which a second fermentation took place by the “traditional method”. The fermentation kinetics were similar for the first 60 days regardless of the employed yeast inoculum preparation. In both cases, glucose was exhausted and a few grams of fructose remained on day 30. The ethanol concentration after 60 days was the same in all of the wines. The sparkling wines inoculated with the GPY-grown yeasts showed higher titratable acidity, lower total polysaccharide and protein contents, and greater foamability (HM) and foam stability (HS). Regarding volatile compounds, these wines contained higher esters, fatty acids, higher alcohols, and γ-butyrolactone. Differences in the wine’s visual and flavor attributes were not significant no matter what inoculum was used. However, the aroma score was significantly higher in the wines inoculated with the pied de cuve-prepared yeasts.
Collapse
|
3
|
Does the Temperature of the prise de mousse Affect the Effervescence and the Foam of Sparkling Wines? Molecules 2021; 26:molecules26154434. [PMID: 34361583 PMCID: PMC8347939 DOI: 10.3390/molecules26154434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/08/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
The persistence of effervescence and foam collar during a Champagne or sparkling wine tasting constitute one, among others, specific consumer preference for these products. Many different factors related to the product or to the tasting conditions might influence their behavior in the glass. However, the underlying factor behind the fizziness of these wines involves a second in-bottle alcoholic fermentation, also well known as the prise de mousse. The aim of this study was to assess whether a low temperature (13 °C) or a high temperature (20 °C) during the in-bottle fermentation might have an impact on the effervescence and the foaming properties (i.e., collar height and bubble size) of three French sparkling wines (a Crémant de Loire and two Champagne wines), under standard tasting conditions. Our results showed that sparkling wines elaborated at 13 °C and served in standard tasting conditions (i.e., 100 mL, 18 °C) had better ability to keep the dissolved CO2 (between 0.09 and 0.30 g/L) in the liquid phase than those elaborated at 20 °C (with P < 0.05). Most interestingly, we also observed, for the Crémant de Loire and for one Champagne wine, that the lower the temperature of the prise de mousse, the smaller (with P < 0.05) the bubbles in the foam collar throughout the wine tasting.
Collapse
|
4
|
Nutrient Addition to Low pH Base Wines (L. cv. Riesling) during Yeast Acclimatization for Sparkling Wine: Its Influence on Yeast Cell Growth, Sugar Consumption and Nitrogen Usage. BEVERAGES 2020. [DOI: 10.3390/beverages6010010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
In traditional method sparkling wine production, to carry out a successful second alcoholic fermentation, yeast are acclimatized to stressful base wine conditions. Base wines typically have low pH, low nutrient concentrations, high acid concentrations, contain sulfur dioxide (SO2), and high ethanol concentrations. Supplementing yeast during the acclimatization stages prior to second alcoholic fermentation with different nutrient sources was assessed to determine the impact on yeast growth, sugar consumption and nitrogen usage. Four treatments were tested with Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain EC1118: the control (T1) with no additives; addition of diammonium phosphate (DAP) during acclimatization, (T2); Go-Ferm® inclusion during yeast rehydration (GF), (T3); and DAP + GF (T4). Results (n = 4) indicated that supplementing with DAP, GF or DAP + GF increased both the rate of sugar consumption and the concentration of viable cells during the yeast acclimatization phase in comparison to the control. Treatments supplemented with DAP + GF or DAP alone resulted in yeast consuming 228 and 220 mg N/L during the acclimatization phase, respectively. Yeast treated only with GF consumed 94 mg N/L in comparison to the control, which consumed 23 mg N/L. The time required to reach the target specific gravity (1.010) during acclimatization was significantly reduced to 57 h for yeast treated with DAP and GF, 69 h for yeast treated with DAP only and 81 h for yeast rehydrated with GF in comparison to 105 h for the control. Our results suggest that nutrients used during yeast acclimatization could have an important impact on the kinetics of second alcoholic fermentation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Benucci I. Impact of post-bottling storage conditions on colour and sensory profile of a rosé sparkling wine. Lebensm Wiss Technol 2020. [DOI: 10.1016/j.lwt.2019.108732] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
6
|
Yeast cells in double layer calcium alginate–chitosan microcapsules for sparkling wine production. Food Chem 2019; 300:125174. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125174] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/28/2019] [Revised: 07/11/2019] [Accepted: 07/12/2019] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
|
7
|
Morgan SC, McCarthy GC, Watters BS, Tantikachornkiat M, Zigg I, Cliff MA, Durall DM. Effect of sulfite addition and pied de cuve inoculation on the microbial communities and sensory profiles of Chardonnay wines: dominance of indigenous Saccharomyces uvarum at a commercial winery. FEMS Yeast Res 2019; 19:foz049. [PMID: 31344230 PMCID: PMC6666381 DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/foz049] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2019] [Accepted: 07/19/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
The microbial consortium of wine fermentations is highly dependent upon winemaking decisions made at crush, including the decision to inoculate and the decision to add sulfur dioxide (SO2) to the must. To investigate this, Chardonnay grape juice was subjected to two inoculation treatments (uninoculated and pied de cuve inoculation) as well as two SO2 addition concentrations (0 and 40 mg/L). The bacterial communities, fungal communities and Saccharomyces populations were monitored throughout fermentation using culture-dependent and culture-independent techniques. After fermentation, the wines were evaluated by a panel of experts. When no SO2 was added, the wines underwent alcoholic fermentation and malolactic fermentation simultaneously. Tatumella bacteria were present in significant numbers, but only in the fermentations to which no SO2 was added, and were likely responsible for the malolactic fermentation observed in these treatments. All fermentations were dominated by a genetically diverse indigenous population of Saccharomyces uvarum, the highest diversity of S. uvarum strains to be identified to date; 150 unique strains were identified, with differences in strain composition as a result of SO2 addition. This is the first report of indigenous S. uvarum strains dominating and completing fermentations at a commercial winery in North America.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sydney C Morgan
- Department of Biology, Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1V 1V7
| | - Garrett C McCarthy
- Department of Biology, Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1V 1V7
| | - Brittany S Watters
- Department of Biology, Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1V 1V7
| | - Mansak Tantikachornkiat
- Department of Biology, Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1V 1V7
| | - Ieva Zigg
- Department of Biology, Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1V 1V7
| | - Margaret A Cliff
- Summerland Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Summerland, British Columbia, Canada, V0H 1Z0
| | - Daniel M Durall
- Department of Biology, Irving K. Barber School of Arts and Sciences, The University of British Columbia, Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada, V1V 1V7
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Nguyen HV, Boekhout T. Characterization of Saccharomyces uvarum (Beijerinck, 1898) and related hybrids: assessment of molecular markers that predict the parent and hybrid genomes and a proposal to name yeast hybrids. FEMS Yeast Res 2018; 17:3061370. [PMID: 28334169 DOI: 10.1093/femsyr/fox014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2016] [Accepted: 03/01/2017] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
The use of the nuclear DNA reassociation technique has led taxonomists to consider Saccharomyces uvarum a synonym of S. bayanus. The latter, however, is not a species but a hybrid harbouring S. eubayanus (Seu) and S. uvarum (Su) subgenomes with a minor DNA contribution from S. cerevisiae (Sc). To recognize genetically pure lines of S. uvarum and putative interspecies hybrids among so-called S. bayanus strains present in public culture collections, we propose the use of four markers that were defined from the S. bayanus CBS 380T composite genome, namely SeuNTS2 (rDNA), ScMAL31, MTY1 and SuMEL1. Saccharomyces carlsbergensis CBS 1513 was found to be similar to S. bayanus except that it carries the SeuMEL1 allele. Different marker combinations revealed that among 33 strains examined only a few were similar to CBS 380T, but many pure S. uvarum lines and putative Su/Seu-related hybrids occurred. Our results demonstrated that these hybrids were erroneously considered authentic S. bayanus and therefore the varietal state 'Saccharomyces bayanus var. uvarum comb. nov. Naumov' is not valid. Our markers constitute a tool to get insights into the genomic makeup of Saccharomyces interspecies hybrids. We also make a proposal to name those hybrids that may also be applicable to other fungal hybrids.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Huu-Vang Nguyen
- Micalis Institute, INRA, AgroParisTech, Université Paris-Saclay, 78350 Jouy-en-Josas, France
| | - Teun Boekhout
- CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, PO Box 85167, 3508 AD Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Di Gianvito P, Perpetuini G, Tittarelli F, Schirone M, Arfelli G, Piva A, Patrignani F, Lanciotti R, Olivastri L, Suzzi G, Tofalo R. Impact of Saccharomyces cerevisiae strains on traditional sparkling wines production. Food Res Int 2018; 109:552-560. [DOI: 10.1016/j.foodres.2018.04.070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/24/2018] [Revised: 04/16/2018] [Accepted: 04/30/2018] [Indexed: 10/17/2022]
|
10
|
|