Immobilization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae on Perlite Beads for the Decontamination of Aflatoxin M1 in Milk

Immobilization of rough morphotype Mycolicibacterium neoaurum R for androstadienedione production

OBJECTIVES

Enhance the androstadienedione (Androst-1,4-diene-3,17-dione, ADD) production of rough morphotype Mycolicibacterium neoaurum R by repeated-batch fermentation of immobilized cells.

RESULTS

M. neoaurum R was a rough colony morphotype variant, obtained from the routine plating of smooth M. neoaurum strain CICC 21097. M. neoaurum R showed rougher cell surface and aggregated in broth. The ADD production of M. neoaurum R was notably lower than that of M. neoaurum CICC 21097 during the free cell fermentation, but the yield gap could be erased after proper cell immobilization. Subsequently, repeated-batch fermentation of immobilized M. neoaurum R was performed to shorten the production cycle and enhance the bio-production efficiency of ADD. Through the optimization of the immobilization carriers and the co-solvents for phytosterols, the ADD productivity of M. neoaurum R immobilized by semi-expanded perlite reached 0.075 g/L/h during the repeated-batch fermentation for 40 days.

CONCLUSIONS

The ADD production of the rough-type M. neoaurum R was notably enhanced by the immobilization onto semi-expanded perlite. Moreover, the ADD batch yields of M. neoaurum R immobilized by semi-expanded perlite were maintained at high levels during the repeated-batch fermentation.

Detoxification approaches of mycotoxins: by microorganisms, biofilms and enzymes

Mycotoxins are generally found in food, feed, dairy products, and beverages, subsequently presenting serious human and animal health problems. Not surprisingly, mycotoxin contamination has been a worldwide concern for many research studies. In this regard, many biological, chemical, and physical approaches were investigated to reduce and/or remove contamination from food and feed products. Biological detoxification processes seem to be the most promising approaches for mycotoxins removal from food. The current review details the newest progress in biological detoxification (adsorption and metabolization) through microorganisms, their biofilms, and enzymatic degradation, finally describing the detoxification mechanism of many mycotoxins by some microorganisms. This review also reports the possible usage of microorganisms as mycotoxins’ binders in various food commodities, which may help produce mycotoxins-free food and feed.

Biological Control and Mitigation of Aflatoxin Contamination in Commodities

Aflatoxins (AFs) are toxic secondary metabolites produced mostly by Aspergillus species. AF contamination entering the feed and food chain has been a crucial long-term issue for veterinarians, medicals, agroindustry experts, and researchers working in this field. Although different (physical, chemical, and biological) technologies have been developed, tested, and employed to mitigate the detrimental effects of mycotoxins, including AFs, universal methods are still not available to reduce AF levels in feed and food in the last decades. Possible biological control by bacteria, yeasts, and fungi, their excretes, the role of the ruminal degradation, pre-harvest biocontrol by competitive exclusion or biofungicides, and post-harvest technologies and practices based on biological agents currently used to alleviate the toxic effects of AFs are collected in this review. Pre-harvest biocontrol technologies can give us the greatest opportunity to reduce AF production on the spot. Together with post-harvest applications of bacteria or fungal cultures, these technologies can help us strictly reduce AF contamination without synthetic chemicals.

Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus rhamnosus cell walls immobilized on nano-silica entrapped in alginate as aflatoxin M1 binders

Aflatoxins are common fungal toxins in foods that cause health problems for humans. The aim of this study was to use Saccharomyces cerevisiae and Lactobacillus rhamnosus cell walls immobilized on nano-silica entrapped in alginate as aflatoxin M₁ (AFM₁) binders. In this study, microbial walls were disrupted using a three-step mechanical technique including autoclave, thermal shock, and ultrasound. Dynamic light scattering (DLS) results proved size reduction in microbial walls ranging 75.8-91.4 nm. Disrupted walls were immobilized on nano-silica to enhance the efficiency of AFM₁ adsorption. Then, to prevent the release of the nano-silica or cell walls into the reaction medium, they were entrapped into alginate gel beads. Fourier transform infrared spectrometer (FT-IR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micrographs confirmed the immobilization and entrapment process. Individual and mixtures of free cell walls, immobilized-entrapped walls, alginate bead and nano-silica were contacted with AFM₁ for 15 min and 24 h. AFM₁ reduction ability was evaluated using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The results showed an AFM₁ reduction ranging 53-87% for free cell walls mixture at 15 min and alginate bead respectively. Also, it was possible to reuse immobilized-entrapped walls as binders with an efficiency of about 85%.

In vitro and in vivo capacity of yeast-based products to bind to aflatoxins B1 and M1 in media and foodstuffs: A systematic review and meta-analysis

The aflatoxins are hepatotoxic and carcinogenic metabolites produced by Aspergillus species during growth on crop products. In this regard, a systematic review to collect the quantitative data regarding the in vitro capacity of yeasts-based products to bind to aflatoxin B₁ (AFB₁) and/or aflatoxin M₁ (AFM₁) was performed. After screening, 31 articles which met the inclusion criteria was included and then the pooled decontamination of aflatoxins in the defined subgroups (the type of foods, pH, contact time, temperature, yeast species, and aflatoxin type) was calculated by the random effect model (REM). The overall binding capacity (BC) of aflatoxins by yeast was 52.05% (95%CI: 49.01-55.10), while the lowest and highest aflatoxins' BC were associated with Yeast Extract Peptone (2.79%) and ruminal fluid + artificial saliva (96.21%), respectively. Regarding the contact time, temperature, pH and type of aflatoxins subgroups, the binding percentages varied from 50.83% (>300 min) to 52.66% (1-300 min), 50.71% (0-40 °C) to 88.39% (>40 °C), 43.03% (pH: 3.1-6) to 44.56% (pH: 1-3) and 59.35% (pH > 6), and 48.47% (AFB₁) to 69.03% AFM₁, respectively. The lowest and highest aflatoxins' BC was related to C. fabianii (18.45%) and Z. rouxii (86.40%), respectively. The results of this study showed that variables such as temperature, yeast, pH and aflatoxin type can be considered as the effective factors in aflatoxin decontamination.

Aflatoxin M1-Binding Ability of Selected Lactic Acid Bacteria Strains and Saccharomyces boulardii in the Experimentally Contaminated Milk Treated with Some Biophysical Factors

There is a growing concern regarding the recurrent observation of aflatoxins (AFs) in the milk of lactating animals. Regarding this, the present study was conducted to assess the aflatoxin M1 (AFM1)-binding ability of three species, namely Lactobacillus rhamnosus, L. plantarum, and Saccharomyces boulardii, inAFM1-contaminatedmilk. The mentioned species were administeredatthe concentrations of107 and 109 CFU/mLto skimmed milk contaminated with 0.5 and 0.75 ng/mL AFM1 within the incubation times of 30 and 90 min at 4°C and 37°C. Lactobacillus rhamnosus was found to have the best binding ability at the concentrations of 107 and 109 (CFU/ml), rendering 82% and 90% removal in the milk samples with 0.5 and 0.75 ng/ml AFM1, respectively. Accordingly, this value at 107 and 109 CFU/ml of L. plantarum was obtained 89% and 82% with 0.75 ng/ml of AFM1, respectively. For S. boulardii at 107 and 109 CFU/ml, the rates were respectively estimated at 75% and 90% with 0.75 ng/ml of AFM1. The best AFM1-binding levels for L. rhamnosus, L. plantarum, and S. boulardii were 91.82±10.9%, 89.33±0.58%, and 93.20±10.9, respectively, at the concentrations of 1×109, 1×107, and 1×107 CFU/ml at 37, 4, and 37°C, respectively. In this study, the maximum AFM1 binding (100.0±0.58) occurred while a combination of the aforementioned probiotics was employed at a concentration of 1×107 CFU/ml at 37°C with 0.5 ng/ml AFM1, followed by the combination of L. rhamnosus and L. plantarum (95.86±10.9) at a concentration of 1×109 CFU/ml at the same temperature with 0.75 ng/ml AFM1. It was concluded that the use of S. boulardii in combination with Lactobacillus rhamnosus and L. plantarum, which bind AFM1 in milk, can decrease the risk of AFM1 in dairy products.

Control of aflatoxin M1 in milk by novel methods: A review

Aflatoxin M₁ (AFM₁) in milk and milk products has been recognised as an issue for over 30 years. Controlling AFM₁ in milk is important to protect human health and trade. Preventing contamination by avoiding fungal contamination of cattle feed is the best method of control, however this is hard to avoid in some countries. Treating milk containing AFM₁ is an alternative control measure, however, there is no single approved method. The challenge is to select a treatment method that is effective but does not affect the organoleptic quality of milk. This study reviews the strategies for degrading AFM₁ in milk including yeast, lactic acid bacteria, enzyme, peroxide, ozone, UV light and cold plasma. This review compares the efficacy, influencing factors, (possible) mechanisms of activity, advantages, limitations and potential future trends of these methods and provides some recommendations for the treatment of milk to reduce the risk of AFM₁ contamination.

Assorted Methods for Decontamination of Aflatoxin M1 in Milk Using Microbial Adsorbents

Aflatoxins (AF) are carcinogenic metabolites produced by different species of Aspergillus which readily colonize crops. AFM1 is secreted in the milk of lactating mammals through the ingestion of feedstuffs contaminated by aflatoxin B1 (AFB1). Therefore, its presence in milk, even in small amounts, presents a real concern for dairy industries and consumers of dairy products. Different strategies can lead to the reduction of AFM1 contamination levels in milk. They include adopting good agricultural practices, decreasing the AFB1 contamination of animal feeds, or using diverse types of adsorbent materials. One of the most effective types of adsorbents used for AFM1 decontamination are those of microbial origin. This review discusses current issues about AFM1 decontamination methods. These methods are based on the use of different bio-adsorbent agents such as bacteria and yeasts to complex AFM1 in milk. Moreover, this review answers some of the raised concerns about the binding stability of the formed AFM1-microbial complex. Thus, the efficiency of the decontamination methods was addressed, and plausible experimental variants were discussed.