De novo hepatitis B virus infection from anti-HBc-positive donors in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

A quick algorithmic review on management of viral infectious diseases in pediatric solid organ transplant recipients

Pediatric solid organ transplant is a life-saving procedure for children with end-stage organ failure. Viral infections are a common complication following pediatric solid organ transplantation (SOT), which can lead to increased morbidity and mortality. Pediatric solid organ transplant recipients are at an increased risk of viral infections due to their immunosuppressed state. The most commonly encountered viruses include cytomegalovirus (CMV), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV), herpes simplex virus (HSV), varicella-zoster virus (VZV), adenoviruses, and BK polyomavirus. Prevention strategies include vaccination prior to transplantation, post-transplant prophylaxis with antiviral agents, and preemptive therapy. Treatment options vary depending on the virus and may include antiviral therapy and sometimes immunosuppression modification. This review provides a Quick Algorithmic overview of prevention and treatment strategies for viral infectious diseases in pediatric solid organ transplant recipient.

Vaccination in pediatric solid organ transplant: A primer for the immunizing clinician

Pediatric solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients are at a uniquely elevated risk for vaccine preventable illness (VPI) secondary to a multitude of factors including incomplete immunization at the time of transplant, inadequate response to vaccines with immunosuppression, waning antibody titers observed post-SOT, and uncertainty among providers on the correct immunization schedule to utilize post-SOT. Multiple guidelines are in existence from the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Society of Transplantation, which require use in adjunct with additional published references. We summarize the present state of SOT vaccine recommendations from relevant resources in tandem with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices guidance utilizing both routine and rapid catch-up schedules. The purpose of this all-inclusive review is to provide improved clarity on the most optimal pre- and post-transplant vaccine management within a one-stop-shop for the immunizing clinician. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Prevention and treatment of new hepatitis B after living donor liver transplantation in children

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to explore the prevention and treatment of new hepatitis B in children after liver transplantation with livers positive for HBcAg and to examine the treatment of new hepatitis B.

METHODS

A total of 22 children who received livers positive for HBcAg between January 2013 and December 2015 were retrospectively analyzed. After their operations, the children were given lamivudine for anti-hepatitis B virus (HBV) treatment, a hepatitis B vaccine or intermittent supplements of hepatitis B immunoglobulins to prevent recurrence of the infection, and entecavir for anti-hepatitis B treatment. The children were categorized into two groups: one group of children stopped taking lamivudine one year after operation (n=7) by themselves, while the other group did not (n=15).

RESULTS

Of the seven children who stopped lamivudine anti-HBV treatment, six developed hepatitis B at 24.33±13.95 months after operation. Of these children, five were treated with entecavir, resulting in their HBV DNA decreasing to undetectable levels (<50 IU/mL). HBsAg turned negative in four of these patients, but in one patient it did not. The other patient with new hepatitis B continued to use lamivudine, resulting in their HBV DNA decreasing to normal levels (<50 IU/mL) but without their HBsAg turning negative. No new cases of hepatitis B were found in the 15 children who did not stop anti-HBV treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

The long-term prophylactic therapy of nucleoside analogues combined with hepatitis B immunoglobulins should be used for a long time after liver transplantation with a liver positive for HBcAg. Discontinuation of nucleoside analogues is associated with a higher risk of the new onset of hepatitis B. Entecavir has a significant effect on the treatment of postoperative new hepatitis B in children.

Prophylactic Strategy Against De Novo Hepatitis B Virus Infection for Pediatric Recipients Who Receive Hepatitis B Core Antibody-Positive Liver Grafts

The goal of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of a perioperative prophylactic strategy against de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in pediatric liver transplantation (LT) recipients with hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive grafts. A total of 482 pediatric recipients transplanted between 2013 and 2017 were enrolled, and 170 recipients received HBcAb-positive liver grafts. The overall graft and recipient survival rates in HBcAb-positive and HBcAb-negative graft recipients were 91.8% versus 91.3% and 95.3% versus 94.2% at the end of follow-up. Preoperative hepatitis B surface antibody (HBsAb) titer ≥ 1000 IU/L and postoperative HBsAb titer ≥200 IU/L were our prophylactic targets for recipients receiving HBcAb-positive grafts. While 11 recipients developed de novo HBV infection, 10 received HBcAb-positive grafts. Both the preoperative and postoperative HBsAb targets were achieved in 78 recipients, the infection rate of de novo HBV was 1.3%; 24 recipients met the preoperative target, the infection rate was 4.2%; 52 recipients met the postoperative target, the infection rate was 1.9%; and 16 recipients met neither the preoperative nor postoperative HBsAb target, 43.8% of the recipients were infected with de novo HBV, which was significantly higher than the recipients who met both or either of the preoperative and postoperative targets. Split-liver grafts positive for HBcAb showed higher risk of de novo HBV infection. Postoperative application of lamivudine to recipients whose preoperative HBsAb titer < 1000 IU/L did not show preventive effect. Out of 11 infected recipients, 3 showed seroconversion under entecavir treatment. In conclusion, the graft and recipient survival rates were similar in pediatric LT recipients receiving HBcAb-positive or HBcAb-negative grafts. Our prophylactic strategy was effective for preventing de novo HBV infection in HBcAb-positive liver graft recipients.

Review article: preventing hepatitis B graft infection in hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation: immunoglobulin vs anti-virals

BACKGROUND

A critical aspect of liver transplantation in hepatitis B patients is to prevent graft reinfection with hepatitis B virus. The use of hepatitis B immune globulin after transplant was a significant milestone, which allowed prolonged graft and patient survival by controlling hepatitis B reinfection in liver grafts. The development of anti-viral treatments with oral nucleos(t)ide analogues, led to a further reduction in graft reinfection and improvement in patient survival. The combination of the aforementioned two therapies has been widely used in hepatitis B-associated liver transplants.

AIMS

To address the post-transplant management of hepatitis B and provide updates on preventing graft reinfection.

METHODS

We performed a literature search on Ovid and PubMed for randomised controlled trials or cohort studies in English, which investigated the effectiveness of hepatitis B immune globulin and anti-viral therapy on hepatitis B-associated transplants (1/2000-1/2020). Studies that met pre-established criteria were reviewed.

RESULTS

Based on currently available evidence, an algorithm for post-transplant management with anti-viral therapy is proposed. Also, the management of recipients who received grafts from hepatitis B core antibody-positive donors is discussed.

CONCLUSIONS

The development of hepatitis B immune globulin and anti-viral treatments led to substantial improvement in graft and patient survival. The prevention of hepatitis B graft reinfection is complex and involves a broad interdisciplinary team.

Risk factors of de novo hepatitis B virus infection in pediatric hepatitis B core antibody positive liver graft recipients under prophylactic therapy

BACKGROUND AND AIM

We aim to investigate the risk factors of de novo hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in pediatric liver transplantation recipients receiving hepatitis B core antibody positive grafts and to evaluate the efficacy of our prophylactic strategies.

METHODS

One hundred thirty-nine pediatric recipients receiving hepatitis B core antibody positive grafts operated from September 2016 to September 2018 were retrospectively enrolled, and all the patients received prophylactic treatment to prevent de novo HBV infection. Donor and recipient features, operative information along with graft, and recipient outcomes were compared between recipients with or without de novo HBV infection. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to identify the risk factors of de novo HBV infection.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up time was 23.5 ± 15.7 months, and the overall incidence of de novo HBV infection was 3.6%. Recipients with de novo HBV infection showed equal graft and recipient outcome compared with the recipients without de novo HBV infection during the follow-up time. Recipient preoperative hepatitis B surface antibody titer of < 1000 IU/L (odds ratio [OR] = 9.652, P = 0.024), graft HBV DNA of > 1000 copies (OR = 9.050, P = 0.032), and intraoperative fresh-frozen plasma transfusion of > 400 mL (OR = 10.462, P = 0.023) were identified as independent risk factors for de novo HBV infection.

CONCLUSION

Hepatitis B core antibody positive grafts can safely be used in pediatric liver transplantation under rational prophylactic therapy.

Management of Hepatitis B Virus Infection and Prevention of Hepatitis B Virus Reactivation in Children With Acquired Immunodeficiencies or Undergoing Immune Suppressive, Cytotoxic, or Biological Modifier Therapies

Reactivation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is a known complication of immune-suppressive, cytotoxic, and biological modifier therapies in patients currently infected with HBV or who have had past exposure to HBV. Nowadays, newer and emerging forms of targeted biologic therapies are available for the management of rheumatologic conditions, malignancies, inflammatory bowel disease, dermatologic conditions and solid-organ, bone marrow, or haematologic stem cell transplant but there is currently a lack of a systematic approach to the care of patients with or at risk of HBV reactivation. The Hepatology Committee of the European Society of Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) together with a working group of ESPGHAN members with clinical and research expertise in viral hepatitis developed an evidence-based position paper on reactivation of HBV infection in children identifying pertinent issues addressing the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of this condition. Relevant clinical questions were formulated and agreed upon by all the members of the working group. Questions were answered and positions were based on evidence resulting from a systematic literature search on PubMed and Embase from their inception to July 1, 2019. A document was produced and the working group and ESPGHAN Hepatology Committee members voted on each recommendation, using a formal voting technique. A recommendation was accepted provided upon agreement by at least 75% of the working group members. This position paper provides a comprehensive update on the diagnosis, prevention and treatment of HBV reactivation in children.

A single-center, single-blind study to evaluate the clinical sensitivity, specificity, and agreement between Elecsys Anti-HBc II and Elecsys Anti-HBc in a Korean population

BACKGROUND

Anti-HBc IgG is almost always detected in hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected individuals and persists in resolved infections. In certain cases, anti-HBc IgG is the only serological marker and anti-HBc-positive result generally means anti-HBc total positivity.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the clinical sensitivity and specificity of an investigational medical device, Elecsys Anti-HBc II, using samples from the Korean population. Agreement between Elecsys Anti-HBc II and its widely utilized predecessor Elecsys Anti-HBc was also evaluated.

STUDY DESIGN

Residual serum or plasma samples stored at below -20 °C without individual identifiers were used in this study. This study had 106 randomly selected HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA)-positive samples used for evaluating clinical sensitivity. For clinical specificity, a total of 239 both HBV DNA and hepatitis B surface antigen-negative samples, which were anti-HBc-negative by Elecsys Anti-HBc, were used. Agreement between Elecsys Anti-HBc and Elecsys Anti-HBc II was evaluated in total 345 samples. The Architect Anti-HBc II was used as a confirmatory test regarding discrepancies between Elecsys Anti-HBc and Elecsys Anti-HBc II results.

RESULTS

The clinical sensitivity and specificity of Elecsys Anti-HBc II were found to be 99.06% and 100%, respectively. In total, 345 samples showed 100% agreement. Both positive and negative agreements were also 100%.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical performance of Elecsys Anti-HBc II was confirmed as sufficient in Korean samples. Elecsys Anti-HBc II demonstrated an exceptional performance, exceeding the requirements of the Ministry of Food and Drug Safety and confirming its reliability as an in vitro diagnostic device for HBV diagnosis in Korea.

Feasibility of using marginal liver grafts in living donor liver transplantation

Liver transplantation (LT) is one of the most effective treatments for end-stage liver disease caused by related risk factors when liver resection is contraindicated. Additionally, despite the decrease in the prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) over the past two decades, the absolute number of HBsAg-positive people has increased, leading to an increase in HBV-related liver cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma. Consequently, a large demand exists for LT. While the wait time for patients on the donor list is, to some degree, shorter due to the development of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), there is still a shortage of liver grafts. Furthermore, recipients often suffer from emergent conditions, such as liver dysfunction or even hepatic encephalopathy, which can lead to a limited choice in grafts. To expand the pool of available liver grafts, one option is the use of organs that were previously considered “unusable” by many, which are often labeled “marginal” organs. Many previous studies have reported on the possibilities of using marginal grafts in orthotopic LT; however, there is still a lack of discussion on this topic, especially regarding the feasibility of using marginal grafts in LDLT. Therefore, the present review aimed to summarize the feasibility of using marginal liver grafts for LDLT and discuss the possibility of expanding the application of these grafts.

Risks and treatment strategies for de novo hepatitis B virus infection from anti-HBc-positive donors in pediatric living donor liver transplantation

The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence and risk factors of de novo HBV infection in pediatric patients receiving living donor liver transplants (LDLT) from HBcAb-positive donors, and to explore its treatment strategies. The data of 101 pediatric recipients receiving LDLT in Tianjin First Central Hospital between September 2006 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed. The HBV markers were regularly tested before and after the surgery, including HBsAb, HBsAg, HBeAg, HBeAb, and HBcAb. The median follow-up period was 25.6 months, during which eight cases (7.92%) were diagnosed with de novo HBV infection. Forty-four (43.6%) of the children received HBcAb-positive allografts. The rate of de novo HBV in the children that received HBcAb+ livers vs those received HBcAb- livers was 15.9% (7/44) vs 1.7% (1/57) (P=.037). The rates of de novo HBV in the children who received HBcAb-positive allografts were significantly less than in those that received preventative therapy with HBIG and lamivudine treatment (2/31, 6.4%) vs those that did not (5/13, 38.5%) (P<.01). HBcAb-positive liver donors are strongly associated with de novo HBV in HBsAg-negative pediatric patients receiving LDLT. However, the incidence of de novo HBV infection is significantly less with the use of prophylactic treatment strategies.

Influence of graft size matching on outcomes of infantile living donor liver transplantation

We aimed to assess the impact of size mismatching between grafts and recipients on outcomes of infants or small children after LDLT. Between October 2006 and December 2014, 129 LDLT recipients weighing no more than 8 kg were retrospectively analyzed. The entire cohort was categorized into three groups by GRWR: GRWR < 3.0% (group A, n = 38), 3.0% ≤ GRWR < 4.0% (group B, n = 61), and GRWR ≥ 4.0% (group C, n = 30). Baseline characteristics were similar among groups A, B, and C. Compared with groups A and B, post-transplant alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase within seven days were significantly higher in group C; however, differences between total bilirubin and albumin after transplantation were not prominent. Moreover, incidences of surgical complications, perioperative deaths, infections, and acute rejections were all comparable among the three groups. Five-yr patient survival rates for groups A, B, and C were 89.5%, 88.9%, and 81.6%, respectively (p = 0.872), and the graft survival rates were 89.5%, 86.6%, and 81.6%, respectively (p = 0.846). In conclusion, GRWR between 1.9% and 5.8% would not cause noticeable adverse events for infantile LDLT recipients ≤ 8 kg. However, there is still a role for considering reduction in the graft mass as an applicable strategy in selected cases.

Application of nucleoside analogues to liver transplant recipients with hepatitis B

Hepatitis B is a common yet serious infectious disease of the liver, affecting millions of people worldwide. Liver transplantation is the only possible treatment for those who advance to end-stage liver disease. Donors positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) core antibody (HBcAb) have previously been considered unsuitable for transplants. However, those who test negative for the more serious hepatitis B surface antigen can now be used as liver donors, thereby reducing organ shortages. Remarkable improvements have been made in the treatment against HBV, most notably with the development of nucleoside analogues (NAs), which markedly lessen cirrhosis and reduce post-transplantation HBV recurrence. However, HBV recurrence still occurs in many patients following liver transplantation due to the development of drug resistance and poor compliance with therapy. Optimized prophylactic treatment with appropriate NA usage is crucial prior to liver transplantation, and undetectable HBV DNA at the time of transplantation should be achieved. NA-based and hepatitis B immune globulin-based treatment regimens can differ between patients depending on the patients' condition, virus status, and presence of drug resistance. This review focuses on the current progress in applying NAs during the perioperative period of liver transplantation and the prophylactic strategies using NAs to prevent de novo HBV infection in recipients of HBcAb-positive liver grafts.

Liver transplantation for biliary atresia: A single-center study from mainland China

AIM: To summarize our single-center experience with liver transplantation (LT) for biliary atresia (BA).

METHODS: From October 2006 to December 2012, 188 children with BA were analyzed retrospectively. The stage I group (from October 2006 to December 2010) comprised the first 74 patients, and the stage II group (from January 2011 to December 2012) comprised the remaining 114 patients. Finally, 123 liver transplants were performed in 122 (64.9%) patients, whereas 66 patients did not undergo LT due to denial by their parents or lack of suitable liver grafts. The selection of graft types depended on the patients’ clinical status and whether a suitable living donor was available. The characteristics of patients in stages I and II were described, and the surgical outcomes of LT recipients were compared between the two stages. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the cumulative patient and graft survival rates, and the equality of survival distributions was evaluated using the log-rank test.

RESULTS: The 188 children consisted of 102 boys and 86 girls. Their ages ranged from 3 to 144 mo with a median of 8 mo. One hundred and fifteen (61.2%) patients were born in rural areas. Comparing stage I and stage II patients, the proportion of patients referred by pediatricians (43.2% vs 71.1%, respectively; P < 0.001) and the proportion of patients who previously received a Kasai procedure (KP) (32.4% vs 44.7%, respectively; P = 0.092) obviously increased, and significantly more parents were willing to treat their children with LT (73% vs 86%, respectively; P = 0.027). Grafts from living donors (102/122, 83.6%) were the most commonly used graft type. Surgical complications (16/25, 64.0%) were the main reason for posttransplant mortality. Among the living donor liver transplantation recipients (n = 102), the incidence of surgical complications was significantly reduced (34.1% vs 15.5%, respectively; P = 0.029) and survival rates of patients and grafts were greatly improved (81.8% vs 89.7%, respectively, at 1 year; 75.0% vs 87.8%, respectively, at 3 years; P = 0.107) from stage I to stage II.

CONCLUSION: The status of surgical treatments for BA has been changing in mainland China. Favorable midterm outcomes after LT were achieved as centers gained greater technical experience.

Solid organ transplantation from hepatitis B virus-positive donors: consensus guidelines for recipient management

Use of organs from donors testing positive for hepatitis B virus (HBV) may safely expand the donor pool. The American Society of Transplantation convened a multidisciplinary expert panel that reviewed the existing literature and developed consensus recommendations for recipient management following the use of organs from HBV positive donors. Transmission risk is highest with liver donors and significantly lower with non-liver (kidney and thoracic) donors. Antiviral prophylaxis significantly reduces the rate of transmission to liver recipients from isolated HBV core antibody positive (anti-HBc+) donors. Organs from anti-HBc+ donors should be considered for all adult transplant candidates after an individualized assessment of the risks and benefits and appropriate patient consent. Indefinite antiviral prophylaxis is recommended in liver recipients with no immunity or vaccine immunity but not in liver recipients with natural immunity. Antiviral prophylaxis may be considered for up to 1 year in susceptible non-liver recipients but is not recommended in immune non-liver recipients. Although no longer the treatment of choice in patients with chronic HBV, lamivudine remains the most cost-effective choice for prophylaxis in this setting. Hepatitis B immunoglobulin is not recommended.