Celiac disease diagnosis: impact of guidelines on medical prescription in France

Paediatricians provide higher quality care to children and adolescents in primary care: A systematic review

AIM

The number of primary care paediatricians is decreasing in Europe without a justifiable reason. We aimed to compare the clinical practice of paediatricians and family doctors attending children and adolescents in primary care.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, TRIP and Google Scholar were searched from December 2008 to February 2018. No language or study design restrictions were applied. Three reviewers assessed eligibility of the studies. Seven pairs of reviewers performed the data extraction and assessed the methodological quality independently. Discrepancies were resolved by consensus.

RESULTS

Fifty-four, out of 1150 studies preselected, were included. We found that paediatricians show more appropriate pharmacology prescription patterns for the illness being treated; they achieve higher vaccination rates and have better knowledge of vaccines and fewer doubts about vaccine safety; their knowledge and implementation of different screening tests are better; they prescribe psychoactive drugs more cautiously and more in line with current practice guidelines; their evaluation and treatment of obesity and lipid disorders follow criteria more consistently with current clinical practice guidelines; and they perform fewer diagnostic test, show a more suitable use of the test and request fewer referrals to specialists.

CONCLUSION

According to published data, in developed countries, paediatricians provide higher quality care to children than family doctors.

High rates of serology testing for coeliac disease, and low rates of endoscopy in serologically positive children and adults in Israel: lessons from a large real-world database

BACKGROUND

Although coeliac disease is common worldwide, little is known regarding screening patterns in unselected populations, and on real-life adherence to professional guidelines for coeliac disease diagnosis and management.

OBJECTIVE

To explore current practices in the diagnosis and management of coeliac disease, using data from a large Health Maintenance Organization in Israel that covers 54% of the population.

METHODS

A population-based electronic database of about 4.5 million individuals was reviewed during the period of 1 January 2008 to 31 December 2015. Rates and results of coeliac disease serology testing and endoscopy procedures were examined. Subgroup analysis was performed by age, sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic status.

RESULTS

Coeliac disease serology cumulative testing rate was 17.1% and 8.9% in the paediatric and adult population, respectively. The cumulative incidence of positive coeliac disease serology was 0.45% in children and 0.17% in adults, and was associated with age, sex, ethnicity and socioeconomic status sub-groups (P-value < 0.01). Gastrointestinal endoscopies were not subsequently performed in 44.1% of children and 47.1% of adults with positive coeliac disease serology. Within the study period, 36% of children and 56% of adults never achieved coeliac disease serology normalization.

CONCLUSION

In a large real-life database, screening for coeliac disease was common. However, confirmatory intestinal biopsies were under-utilized, and coeliac disease serology often remained positive over a long period time in both children and adults.

Misuse of serological screening tests for celiac disease in children: A prospective study in Italy

BACKGROUND

Despite a well-established diagnostic algorithm for celiac disease, it remains unclear whether prescriptions for celiac serological tests comply with the current pediatric guidelines.

AIM

To analyze the appropriateness of test prescription in children investigated for celiac disease in Italy, compared to the current European pediatric guidelines.

METHODS

All children who had performed a first evaluation for celiac disease were prospectively enrolled. Prescribed tests and related indications for testing were recorded, and compared to the European pediatric guidelines.

RESULTS

Overall, 202 children were enrolled (females 59%, mean age 7.1 years ±4.1) in two centers. The reasons for celiac disease testing were typical, atypical symptoms or celiac disease-associated conditions in 46.5%, 49%, and 4.5% of cases, respectively. First-line tests were IgA and IgG anti-transglutaminase antibodies in 88.1% and 29.7% of children, IgA and IgG anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies in 43% and 47%, IgA and IgG anti native gliadin in 15.8%, IgA anti-endomysium antibodies in 44.5%, HLA predisposing genes in 10% of patients. Test redundancy was very common, and the current diagnostic guidelines were correctly followed only in 23/202 patients (11.4%).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic European guidelines for celiac disease screening are often disregarded in Italy. Intervention to implement adherence to these guidelines is needed, with the aim of improving resource utilization, and quality of patient care.

Diagnosis of Celiac Disease: Taking a Bite Out of the Controversy

Celiac disease is a common autoimmune disorder of the small intestine, triggered by an immunological response to the gluten present in wheat, barley, and rye in individuals who are genetically at risk. A key to reducing the complications of this disease is early diagnosis, preferably in childhood, and consuming a lifelong gluten-free diet once diagnosis is confirmed. Yet, the diagnosis of celiac disease is often considerably delayed, exposing patients to needless suffering and morbidity. It is also difficult to confirm histologically if dietary gluten has been restricted prior to obtaining a diagnostic biopsy, a significant problem given the current growing popularity of gluten-free diets. Furthermore, failure to understand or follow current guidelines means physicians may recommend patients commence the gluten-free diet before initiating referral to a gastroenterologist. Finally, adding further confusion, pediatric guidelines in Europe support a diagnosis based on serology rather than on histology, whereas those based in North America do not. The purpose of this review is to discuss these issues and other controversies in the diagnosis of celiac disease and to consider ways to optimize diagnosis across the lifespan.

Trends in Drug Prescription Rates for Dementia: An Observational Population-Based Study in France, 2006-2014

BACKGROUND

Since the 2011 French guidance updates, cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine are considered optional in the management of dementia and leave physicians free to prescribe based on their clinical expertise.

OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to analyze the influence of these recent guidance updates on the prescription rates of these drugs and to quantify the impact of potential changes on healthcare expenditures.

METHODS

Patients over 65 years old from a representative sample of a national administrative claims database, the French national health insurance database, were retrospectively included from 2006 to 2014. Trends of annual prescription rates were tested using adjusted segmented regression analysis. Drug costs with and without prescribers' behavioral changes were estimated.

RESULTS

A total of 119,731 individuals were included and followed during the study period. Among them, 5514 individuals were treated for dementia. According to the unadjusted segmented regression model, there was a significant increase in prescription rates between 2006 and 2010, from 2.23% (95% confidence interval 2.13-2.34) to 2.73% (95% confidence interval 2.62-2.84) of the study population. Since 2011, the trend has reversed with a significant decrease until 2014, from 2.64% (95% confidence interval 2.54-2.75) to 1.92% (95% confidence interval 1.84-2.01). In the multivariate analysis, we also found a gradual decline since 2011, particularly for patients aged 65-69 years and with one or more other chronic diseases. Cost savings associated with prescribers' behavioral changes were estimated at €108 million.

CONCLUSION

Drugs prescribed for dementia are on a declining trend with important cost savings, and this was concomitant with guidance updates that left physicians to rely on their clinical expertise while managing dementia.

Interpretation of serological tests in the diagnosis of celiac disease: Anti-deamidated gliadin peptide antibodies revisited

Algorithms for celiac disease diagnosis provided by guidelines are based primarily on anti-tissue transglutaminase 2 (TG2) antibodies and/or anti-endomysium antibodies. The place of anti-deamidated gliadin peptide (DGP) antibodies is less well established. This study was designed to assess the clinical relevance of anti-DGP antibodies. Two thousand and twenty-six consecutive unselected patients systematically tested for anti-TG2, endomysium, gliadin, DGP antibodies and IgA dosage were investigated. The serological interpretation was assessed by analyzing the medical records of patients. From the 1984 newly investigated patients suspected of celiac disease, 10% had at least one celiac marker. Anti-TG2, anti-endomysium, anti-gliadin and anti-DGP antibodies were found in 1.1%, 0.6%, 6.8% and 4.1% of cases respectively, with different combinations. The diagnosis of celiac disease was retained in 0.45% of patients. When using the duodenal biopsies as a gold standard, analysis of the anti-DGP diagnosis performance showed that the specificity and the predictive positive value (PPV) were lower than that of the anti-TG2 assay. The combined detection of anti-TG2 and anti-DGP antibodies had a lower PPV than that of anti-TG2 and anti-endomysium antibodies (p = 0.04). When analyzing the contribution of anti-DGP antibodies as an additional marker to both anti-TG2 and anti-endomysium antibodies, the PPV of the three associated antibodies was shown to be significantly lower than the PPV of the both anti-TG2 and anti-endomysium antibodies (p = 0.04). As a conclusion, anti-DGP antibodies may not have the diagnosis value required as an additional screening test to anti-TG2 antibodies for identifying celiac disease patients in medical centers where anti-endomysium detection is available.

The Perceived Social Burden in Celiac Disease

In the present paper, we discuss the change in celiac disease (CD) awareness and perception through patients' concerns and the most recent literature. Nowadays CD has moved in the public awareness (both doctors and population) from a rare disease to a common one and the gluten free diet (GFD) is no longer the exclusive therapy for CD patients but is becoming a popular health choice for everybody. Gluten-free food, once hard to find and requiring home preparation, is now available at restaurants and grocery stores. However, the quality of life of those affected by CD seems to be still compromised and this is particularly true for those who find it difficult to adhere to a GFD and those who were asymptomatic at the time of diagnosis. Intervention at diagnosis and follow-up to improve the patients' adaptation to the condition and its limitations should be implemented.