Rescue balloon dilation of the ampulla for retrieving an impacted biliary extraction basket

"Post-cut": An endoscopic technique for managing impacted biliary stone within an entrapped extraction basket

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Ampullary impaction of an entrapped stone-basket complex is not an infrequent yet challenging event during endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). The aim of this study is to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of "post-cut" for the management of such scenarios.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with impacted biliary stone with an entrapped basket during ERCP at West China Hospital, Chengdu, China, from October 2004 to August 2014 were included in this retrospective study. Adequate biliary sphincterotomy was performed in all cases before attempted stone basket removal. Using free hand needle knife techniques, the authors extended the sphincterotomy along the long axis of the distal common bile duct to manage the biliary stone-basket impaction. In comparison with "pre-cut", the authors coined the term "post-cut" referring to this technique. The feasibility, safety, and potential complications of post-cut were analysed.

RESULTS

"Post-cut" was performed in consecutive 10 cases of impacted biliary stone within an entrapped extraction basket. The size of the removed stone ranged from 6 mm to 13 mm. The length of post-cut is 2 mm to 4 mm. The impacted basket was easily retrieved in all patients without complications, including bleeding, perforation, and pancreatitis.

CONCLUSION

"Post-cut" is a feasible, effective, and safe endoscopic technique when impaction of a biliary stone with an entrapped extraction basket develops.

Management of impacted common bile duct stones during a laparoscopic procedure: A Retrospective Cohort Study of 377 Consecutive Patients

INTRODUCTION

To explore the techniques for managing impacted common bile duct (CBD) stones during laparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE).

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 377 consecutive patients undergoing LCBDE from January 2008 to June 2015. Group 1 was defined as patients with impacted CBD stones. Group 2 included patients without impacted CBD stones. The outcomes of LCBDE were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

There were 65 patients in Group 1 and 312 patients in Group 2. The incidence of jaundice, abnormal liver function tests, cholangitis and pancreatitis was higher in Group 1. Forty-one patients with small impacted CBD stones were managed using the tipless Nitinol basket. Seventeen patients with large impacted CBD stones and 7 patients with small impacted CBD stones underwent laser lithotripsy via choledochoscopy. None of the patients in Group 1 was converted to open procedures for impacted CBD stones. Operation duration was 13.6 min longer in Group 1 (133.2 min). Postoperative hospital stay was significantly longer in Group 1 (9.7 ± 2.5 d) than in Group 2 (6.3 ± 1.8 d). There was no difference in the overall postoperative complication rate, retained stone rate, and recurrence rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Rational utilization of laser lithotripsy and an appropriate basket in LCBDE may avoid conversion to open procedures in patients with impacted CBD stones.