1
|
Peng D, Tan Y, Yang S, Zhou M, Lv L, Liang C, Zhu H, Li R, Liu D. Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy for Achalasia in Older Adults: A Retrospective Analysis of 39 Cases with a Minimum Follow-Up of 5 Years. Dysphagia 2023; 38:1286-1294. [PMID: 36725760 DOI: 10.1007/s00455-023-10554-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2022] [Accepted: 01/09/2023] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) has demonstrated favorable short-term safety and efficacy in older adults, while a comprehensive understanding of the long-term outcomes were vague. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes in older adults' 5-year postop after undergoing POEM to treatment achalasia. Older adults from a single hospital who received POEM between January 2010 and January 2017 were analyzed. Older persons were reached to evaluate their symptoms at present and encouraged repeat examinations for objective follow-up. The clinical success, POEM-related indicators, POEM-related adverse events, and quality of life were assessed. Thirty-nine older adults with a mean age of 70.82 ± 4.72 who underwent POEM were studied at a mean 84.23 ± 25.06 month follow-up. The preoperative diagnosis was achalasia type I in 7 older adults, achalasia type II in 26 older adults, and achalasia type III in 2 older adults. Sixteen older adults had prior treatment and 21 older adults suffered from comorbidities. The median operative time was 50 (25-120) minutes, and perioperative adverse events were recorded in four older adults. The current Eckardt scores were significantly lower than that before POEM (2.08 ± 2.12 vs. 6.58 ± 1.78, P < 0.001). Besides, long-term clinical success was gained in 66.7% of older adults. Three older adults received postop treatment for symptom recurrence. Ultimately, 80.6% of old adults expressed satisfaction with POEM, while 27.8% of older adults suffered from symptomatic reflux. In conclusion, POEM can provide symptomatic improvement in a large proportion of older adults with achalasia at 5-year postop.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dongzi Peng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Yuyong Tan
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Si Yang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Mei Zhou
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Liang Lv
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Chengbai Liang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Hongyi Zhu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
| | - Rong Li
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China.
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China.
| | - Deliang Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, China
- Research Center of Digestive Disease, Central South University, Changsha, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Khanzada MS, Salih AEA, Boland MR, Walsh TN. Safe oesophageal stent deployment using a checklist system instead of fluoroscopy. Surg Endosc 2022; 36:8364-8370. [PMID: 35534732 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-022-09295-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/22/2021] [Accepted: 04/18/2022] [Indexed: 01/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Stenting is the management of choice for many benign and malignant oesophageal conditions and in the interest of safety stent insertion has traditionally been performed under fluoroscopic guidance. But this incurs additional expense, time, radiation risk and for the foreseeable future, an increased risk of Covid infection to patients and healthcare personnel. We describe a protocol that obviates the need for fluoroscopic guidance, relying instead on a systematic checklist to ensure safe positioning of the guidewire and the accurate positioning of the stent. The aim of this retrospective study was to review our experience of stent insertion employing a checklist system and compare our outcomes with outcomes using fluoroscopy in the literature. METHODS We performed a retrospective review of a prospectively collected dataset of all patients undergoing oesophageal stent insertion between December 2007 and October 2019. The primary end points were patient safety parameters and complications of stent insertion. RESULTS Total of 163 stents were deployed of which 93 (57%) were in males and the median age was 67.9 years (25-92 years). Partially covered self-expanding metallic stents (SEMS) were used in 80% of procedures (130/163). One hundred nineteen stents (73%) were for malignant strictures and 127 (78%) were deployed for strictures in the lower third of the oesophagus. There was no stent misplacement, injury, perforation or death associated with the procedure. Vomiting was the main post-operative complication (14%). Severe odynophagia necessitated stent removal in 3 patients. Stent migration occurred in 17 (10%) procedures with a mean time to stent migration of 6.4 weeks (range 1-20 weeks). CONCLUSIONS Oesophageal stent placement without fluoroscopy is safe provided that a strict checklist is adhered to. The outcomes are comparable to the results of fluoroscopic stent placement in the literature, with considerable saving in time, cost, personnel, and risks of radiation and Covid exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Muhammad S Khanzada
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland.
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland.
| | - Abdelmonim E A Salih
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Michael R Boland
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| | - Thomas N Walsh
- Department of Surgery, Connolly Hospital Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland
- Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, 123 St. Stephen's Green, Dublin 2, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Haghdel M, Imanieh MH, Hosseinpour H, Ghasemi Y, Alizadeh AA. Development of Bio-artificial Esophageal Tissue Engineering Utilization for Circumferential Lesion Transplantation: A Narrative Review. IRANIAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCIENCES 2022; 47:406-421. [PMID: 36117582 PMCID: PMC9445863 DOI: 10.30476/ijms.2021.89194.1991] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2020] [Revised: 02/12/2021] [Accepted: 04/06/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
The esophagus is the gastrointestinal tract's primary organ that transfers bolus into the stomach with peristaltic motion. Therefore, its lesions cause a significant disturbance in the nutrition and digestive system. Esophageal disease treatment sometimes requires surgical procedures that involve removal and circumferential full-thickness replacement. Unlike other organs, the esophagus has a limited regeneration ability and cannot be transplanted from donors. There are various methods of restoring the esophageal continuity; however, they are associated with certain flaws that lead to a non-functional recovery. As an exponentially growing science, tissue engineering has become a leading technique for the development of tissue replacement to repair damaged esophageal segments. Scaffold plays a significant role in the process of tissue engineering, as it acts as a template for the regeneration of growing tissue. A variety of scaffolds have been studied to replace the esophagus. Due to the many tissue quality challenges, the results are still inadequate and need to be improved. The success of esophageal tissue regeneration will finally depend on the scaffold's capability to mimic natural tissue properties and provide a qualified environment for regeneration. Thereby, scaffold fabrication techniques are fundamental. This article reviews the recent developments in esophageal tissue engineering for the treatment of circumferential lesions based on scaffold biomaterial engineering approaches.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mobin Haghdel
- Department of Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Mohammad Hadi Imanieh
- Department of Pediatrics Gastroenterology, School of Medicine, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Hamidreza Hosseinpour
- Department of Surgery, Shiraz Laparoscopic Research Center, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Younes Ghasemi
- Department of Pharmaceutical Biotechnology, School of Pharmacy, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| | - Ali Akbar Alizadeh
- Department of Tissue Engineering, School of Advanced Medical Sciences and Technologies, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Tustumi F. Evaluating the Non-conventional Achalasia Treatment Modalities. Front Med (Lausanne) 2022; 9:941464. [PMID: 35814742 PMCID: PMC9263126 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2022.941464] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/11/2022] [Accepted: 06/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
IntroductionAchalasia is a primary esophageal dysmotility disorder. Despite the high volume of studies addressing the conventional treatments for achalasia, few are debated regarding the non-conventional treatments, such as cardiectomy, cardioplasty, endoluminal substances injection (ethanolamine oleate, polidocanol, botulinum toxin), stents, and certain drugs (beta-agonists, anticholinergic, nitrates, calcium channel blockers, and phosphodiesterase inhibitors).MethodsA critical review was performed.ResultsEndoscopic, surgical, and pharmacological treatments were included. A qualitative synthesis was presented.ConclusionNon-conventional therapeutic options for treating achalasia encompass medical, endoscopic, and surgical procedures. Clinicians and patients need to know all the tools for the management of achalasia. However, several currently available studies of non-conventional treatments lack high-quality evidence, and future randomized trials are still needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francisco Tustumi
- Department of Gastroenterology, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil
- *Correspondence: Francisco Tustumi
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Tang YF, Jin P, Tao YR, Xie H, Wang X, Yu D, Tang S, Sheng JQ. Comparison of fully coated anti-reflux metal stenting and per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia: a propensity score-matched retrospective study. BMC Gastroenterol 2022; 22:253. [PMID: 35585499 PMCID: PMC9118839 DOI: 10.1186/s12876-022-02282-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2021] [Accepted: 04/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Achalasia is a rare primary esophageal motility disorder disease. It is reported that the long-term effect of fully coated anti-reflux metal stent (FCARMS) implantation is satisfactory. Operated by a skilled and experienced endoscopist, the effect of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) treatment is equivalent to that of surgical myotomy. So far, there is still few evidence to prove FCARMS implantation or POEM which is better for achalasia. The choice of treatment for achalasia is still controversial. The aim of this study is to find a more suitable therapy for achalasia by comparing the efficacy of FCARMS implantation and POEM. Methods A propensity score (PS) matching (1:2) was used in this retrospective cohort study. Data collected from consecutive patients of Achalasia, receiving FCARMS implantation or POEM therapy at the department of gastroenterology, the Seventh Medical Center of the Chinese People’s Liberation Army General Hospital from May 2007 to May 2018. According to their previous treatment, they are divided into two groups, FCARMS group and POEM group. Clinical efficacy and complications were compared between the two groups. Results A total of 166 cases were collected, including 113 cases of FCARMS and 53 cases of POEM. By PS matching, 150 patients were enrolled (100 cases of FCARMS and 50 cases of POEM). By comparison, the FCARMS group has shorter operation time, shorter fasting time and lower hospitalization costs than the POEM group (p < 0.05). Common complications in the FCARMS group are nausea, vomiting, and stent shift. Repetitions of gastroscopy in the FCARMS group was more often, which were 3.8 ± 2.4 (vs 2.1 ± 1.8 of POEM) (p = 0.00 < 0.05) The 6-month remission rates of the FCARMS combination POEM group were 89% and 94%, respectively (p = 0.39), and the 2-year remission rates were 61% and 90%, respectively (p = 0.00). Conclusions Stent placement is a cost-effective and safe treatment option for achalasia. The short-term effect (less than 6 months) of FCARMS is similar to that of POEM, the long-term effect (more than 2 years), POEM is better than FCARMS. HRMIIis most suitable for POEM treatment. It indicate that Patients can choose treatment methods according to their own conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Fen Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Nanmencang 5#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.,Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Peng Jin
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Nanmencang 5#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.,Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yu-Rong Tao
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Nanmencang 5#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China.,Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hui Xie
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Nanmencang 5#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Xin Wang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Nanmencang 5#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Dongliang Yu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Nanmencang 5#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Shan Tang
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Nanmencang 5#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China
| | - Jian-Qiu Sheng
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Seventh Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Nanmencang 5#, Dongcheng District, Beijing, 100700, China. .,Senior Department of Gastroenterology, The First Medical Center of PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oude Nijhuis RAB, Zaninotto G, Roman S, Boeckxstaens GE, Fockens P, Langendam MW, Plumb AA, Smout A, Targarona EM, Trukhmanov AS, Weusten B, Bredenoord AJ. European guidelines on achalasia: United European Gastroenterology and European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility recommendations. United European Gastroenterol J 2021; 8:13-33. [PMID: 32213062 PMCID: PMC7005998 DOI: 10.1177/2050640620903213] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 31.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Achalasia is a primary motor disorder of the oesophagus characterised by absence of peristalsis and insufficient lower oesophageal sphincter relaxation. With new advances and developments in achalasia management, there is an increasing demand for comprehensive evidence-based guidelines to assist clinicians in achalasia patient care. METHODS Guidelines were established by a working group of representatives from United European Gastroenterology, European Society of Neurogastroenterology and Motility, European Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology and the European Association of Endoscopic Surgery in accordance with the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation II instrument. A systematic review of the literature was performed, and the certainty of the evidence was assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology. Recommendations were voted upon using a nominal group technique. RESULTS These guidelines focus on the definition of achalasia, treatment aims, diagnostic tests, medical, endoscopic and surgical therapy, management of treatment failure, follow-up and oesophageal cancer risk. CONCLUSION These multidisciplinary guidelines provide a comprehensive evidence-based framework with recommendations on the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of adult achalasia patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- R A B Oude Nijhuis
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - G Zaninotto
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - S Roman
- Digestive Physiology, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France
| | - G E Boeckxstaens
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing, Translational Research Centre for Gastrointestinal Disorders, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - P Fockens
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - M W Langendam
- Department of Clinical Epidemiology, Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A A Plumb
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, London, UK
| | - Ajpm Smout
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - E M Targarona
- Department of General and Digestive Surgery, Hospital De La Santa Creu I Sant Pau, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - A S Trukhmanov
- I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University, Ministry of Health of the Russian Federation (Sechenov University), Moscow, Russia
| | - Blam Weusten
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, St Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.,Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Albert J Bredenoord
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Amsterdam Gastroenterology and Metabolism, Amsterdam University Medical Centres, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Abstract
Idiopathic achalasia is an esophageal motor disorder characterized by the loss of the lower esophageal sphincter ganglion, resulting in impaired lower esophageal relaxation and absence of esophageal peristalsis. Patients commonly present with progressive dysphagia accompanied by reflux, heartburn, retrosternal pain, and severe weight loss. Diagnosis is primarily based on the patient's chief complaints, barium esophagography, and the most recent high-resolution manometry. Endoscopic assessment and endoscopic ultrasonography also have significant value with regard to the exclusion of esophageal anatomical lesions, neoplastic diseases, and pseudoachalasia. However, as most patients with achalasia demonstrate a gradual onset, early diagnosis is difficult. Currently, treatment of idiopathic achalasia, including pneumatic dilation, stent placement, and surgical myotomy, is aimed at reducing lower esophageal sphincter pressure and relieving the symptoms of dysphagia. Peroral endoscopic myotomy has gradually become the mainstream treatment because it causes less trauma and has a rapid recovery rate. This article reviews the main methods of diagnosis and treatment of achalasia, with an emphasis on the potential of peroral endoscopic myotomy and the advancements of immunotherapy for achalasia.
Collapse
|
8
|
Pisani S, Croce S, Chiesa E, Dorati R, Lenta E, Genta I, Bruni G, Mauramati S, Benazzo A, Cobianchi L, Morbini P, Caliogna L, Benazzo M, Avanzini MA, Conti B. Tissue Engineered Esophageal Patch by Mesenchymal Stromal Cells: Optimization of Electrospun Patch Engineering. Int J Mol Sci 2020; 21:ijms21051764. [PMID: 32143536 PMCID: PMC7084816 DOI: 10.3390/ijms21051764] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2020] [Revised: 02/28/2020] [Accepted: 03/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim of work was to locate a simple, reproducible protocol for uniform seeding and optimal cellularization of biodegradable patch minimizing the risk of structural damages of patch and its contamination in long-term culture. Two seeding procedures are exploited, namely static seeding procedures on biodegradable and biocompatible patches incubated as free floating (floating conditions) or supported by CellCrownTM insert (fixed conditions) and engineered by porcine bone marrow MSCs (p-MSCs). Scaffold prototypes having specific structural features with regard to pore size, pore orientation, porosity, and pore distribution were produced using two different techniques, such as temperature-induced precipitation method and electrospinning technology. The investigation on different prototypes allowed achieving several implementations in terms of cell distribution uniformity, seeding efficiency, and cellularization timing. The cell seeding protocol in stating conditions demonstrated to be the most suitable method, as these conditions successfully improved the cellularization of polymeric patches. Furthermore, the investigation provided interesting information on patches’ stability in physiological simulating experimental conditions. Considering the in vitro results, it can be stated that the in vitro protocol proposed for patches cellularization is suitable to achieve homogeneous and complete cellularizations of patch. Moreover, the protocol turned out to be simple, repeatable, and reproducible.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silvia Pisani
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.P.); (E.C.); (I.G.); (B.C.)
| | - Stefania Croce
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic & Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Enrica Chiesa
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.P.); (E.C.); (I.G.); (B.C.)
| | - Rossella Dorati
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.P.); (E.C.); (I.G.); (B.C.)
- Correspondence:
| | - Elisa Lenta
- Department of Paediatric Oncoaematology, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (E.L.); (M.A.A.)
| | - Ida Genta
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.P.); (E.C.); (I.G.); (B.C.)
| | - Giovanna Bruni
- Department of Chemistry, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Simone Mauramati
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngologist section, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Alberto Benazzo
- Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, 1090 Vienna, Austria;
| | - Lorenzo Cobianchi
- Department of Clinical, Surgical, Diagnostic & Pediatric Sciences, University of Pavia, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.C.); (L.C.)
| | - Patrizia Morbini
- Department of Diagnostic Medicine, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Laura Caliogna
- Orthopaedic and Traumatology, IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy;
| | - Marco Benazzo
- Department of Surgery, Otolaryngologist section, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.M.); (M.B.)
| | - Maria Antonietta Avanzini
- Department of Paediatric Oncoaematology, IRCCS Policlinico S. Matteo, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (E.L.); (M.A.A.)
| | - Bice Conti
- Department of Drug Sciences, University of Pavia, 27100 Pavia, Italy; (S.P.); (E.C.); (I.G.); (B.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Swanström LL. Achalasia: treatment, current status and future advances. Korean J Intern Med 2019; 34:1173-1180. [PMID: 30866609 PMCID: PMC6823561 DOI: 10.3904/kjim.2018.439] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/08/2018] [Accepted: 02/10/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Achalasia was first described in the 17th century and its treatment continues to be challenging. Palliative treatment involves disruption of the lower esophageal sphincter, which can be accomplished mechanically (balloon dilation or surgical myotomy) or chemically (Botox). True surgical treatment originated some 100 years ago and remained largely unchanged until the advent of thoracoscopic and then laparoscopic myotomy beginning in the 1980s. Because these procedures provided relatively definitive treatment and were well tolerated by patients, minimal invasive surgery assumed a primary role in the treatment algorithms for achalasia. In 2008, an endoscopic (incision-less) myotomy approach, per-oral endoscopic myotomy, was described. This even less invasive approach has rapidly been adopted in the majority of high-volume achalasia centers. Newer interventions, such as stenting and cell transplant, are under active investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lee L. Swanström
- Division of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, Portland, OR, USA
- IHU-Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
- Correspondence to Lee L. Swanström, M.D. Division of Surgery, Oregon Health Sciences University, 4805 Northeast Glisan, 6N60, Portland, OR 97213, USA Tel: +1-336-51080361 Fax: +1-333-88119099 E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zaninotto G, Bennett C, Boeckxstaens G, Costantini M, Ferguson MK, Pandolfino JE, Patti MG, Ribeiro U, Richter J, Swanstrom L, Tack J, Triadafilopoulos G, Markar SR, Salvador R, Faccio L, Andreollo NA, Cecconello I, Costamagna G, da Rocha JRM, Hungness ES, Fisichella PM, Fuchs KH, Gockel I, Gurski R, Gyawali CP, Herbella FAM, Holloway RH, Hongo M, Jobe BA, Kahrilas PJ, Katzka DA, Dua KS, Liu D, Moonen A, Nasi A, Pasricha PJ, Penagini R, Perretta S, Sallum RAA, Sarnelli G, Savarino E, Schlottmann F, Sifrim D, Soper N, Tatum RP, Vaezi MF, van Herwaarden-Lindeboom M, Vanuytsel T, Vela MF, Watson DI, Zerbib F, Gittens S, Pontillo C, Vermigli S, Inama D, Low DE. The 2018 ISDE achalasia guidelines. Dis Esophagus 2018; 31:5087687. [PMID: 30169645 DOI: 10.1093/dote/doy071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 155] [Impact Index Per Article: 25.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Achalasia is a relatively rare primary motor esophageal disorder, characterized by absence of relaxations of the lower esophageal sphincter and of peristalsis along the esophageal body. As a result, patients typically present with dysphagia, regurgitation and occasionally chest pain, pulmonary complication and malnutrition. New diagnostic methodologies and therapeutic techniques have been recently added to the armamentarium for treating achalasia. With the aim to offer clinicians and patients an up-to-date framework for making informed decisions on the management of this disease, the International Society for Diseases of the Esophagus Guidelines proposed and endorsed the Esophageal Achalasia Guidelines (I-GOAL). The guidelines were prepared according the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE-REX) tool, accredited for guideline production by NICE UK. A systematic literature search was performed and the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations were graded according to the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE). Given the relative rarity of this disease and the paucity of high-level evidence in the literature, this process was integrated with a three-step process of anonymous voting on each statement (DELPHI). Only statements with an approval rate >80% were accepted in the guidelines. Fifty-one experts from 11 countries and 3 representatives from patient support associations participated to the preparations of the guidelines. These guidelines deal specifically with the following achalasia issues: Diagnostic workup, Definition of the disease, Severity of presentation, Medical treatment, Botulinum Toxin injection, Pneumatic dilatation, POEM, Other endoscopic treatments, Laparoscopic myotomy, Definition of recurrence, Follow up and risk of cancer, Management of end stage achalasia, Treatment options for failure, Achalasia in children, Achalasia secondary to Chagas' disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Zaninotto
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - C Bennett
- Office of Research and Innovation, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Ireland
| | - G Boeckxstaens
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (Chrometa), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M Costantini
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterologica Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - M K Ferguson
- Department of Surgery, University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - J E Pandolfino
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - M G Patti
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, North Carolina, USA
| | - U Ribeiro
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - J Richter
- Department of Medicine, Temple University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - L Swanstrom
- Institute of Image-Guided Surgery, Strasbourg, France; Interventional Endoscopy and Foregut Surgery, Oregon Health Science University, Portland, Oregon, USA
| | - J Tack
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (Chrometa), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - G Triadafilopoulos
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Stanford Esophageal Multidisciplinary Program in Innovative Research Excellence (SEMPIRE), Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA
| | - S R Markar
- Department of Surgery and Cancer, Imperial College, London, UK
| | - R Salvador
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterologica Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - L Faccio
- Division of Surgery, Padova University Hospital, Padova, Italy
| | - N A Andreollo
- Faculty of Medical Science, State University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - I Cecconello
- Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - G Costamagna
- Digestive Endoscopy Unit, A. Gemelli Hospital, Catholic University, Rome, Italy
| | - J R M da Rocha
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - E S Hungness
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - P M Fisichella
- Department of Surgery, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Boston VA Healthcare System, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - K H Fuchs
- Department of Surgery, AGAPLESION-Markus-Krankenhaus, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - I Gockel
- Department of Visceral, Transplant, Thoracic and Vascular Surgery, University Hospital of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany
| | - R Gurski
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil
| | - C P Gyawali
- Division of Gastroenterology, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, Missouri, USA
| | - F A M Herbella
- Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Federal University of São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - R H Holloway
- Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, The University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
| | - M Hongo
- Department of Medicine, Kurokawa Hospital, Taiwa, Kurokawa, Miyagi, Japan
| | - B A Jobe
- Esophageal and Lung Institute, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, USA
| | - P J Kahrilas
- Department of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - D A Katzka
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, USA
| | - K S Dua
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, USA
| | - D Liu
- Department of Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, Hunan, China
| | - A Moonen
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (Chrometa), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - A Nasi
- Digestive Surgery Division, University of São Paulo School of Medicine, São Paulo, Brazil
| | - P J Pasricha
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, USA
| | - R Penagini
- Gastroenterology and Endoscopy Unit, Fondazione IRCCS Cà Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico; Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation; Università degli Studi, Milan, Italy
| | - S Perretta
- Institute for Image Guided Surgery IHU-Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
| | - R A A Sallum
- Department of Gastroenterology, Division of Surgery, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil
| | - G Sarnelli
- Department of Clinical Medicine and Surgery, "Federico II" University of Naples, Naples, Italy
| | - E Savarino
- Department of Surgical, Oncological and Gastroenterologica Sciences, University of Padua, Padua, Italy
| | - F Schlottmann
- Department of Surgery, Hospital Alemán of Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - D Sifrim
- Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, UK
| | - N Soper
- Department of Surgery, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois, USA
| | - R P Tatum
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - M F Vaezi
- Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Mayo Clinic, Scottsdale, Arizona, USA
| | - M van Herwaarden-Lindeboom
- Department of Pediatric Surgery, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - T Vanuytsel
- Department of Chronic Diseases, Metabolism and Ageing (Chrometa), Translational Research Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders (TARGID), University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - M F Vela
- Department of Surgery, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - D I Watson
- Department of Surgery, Flinders University, Adelaide, Australia
| | - F Zerbib
- Department of Gastroenterology, University of Bordeaux, Bordeaux, France
| | - S Gittens
- ECD Solutions, Atlanta, Georgia, USA
| | - C Pontillo
- ALMA (Association of patients with achalasia, ONLUS), Naples, Italy
| | - S Vermigli
- ALMA (Association of patients with achalasia, ONLUS), Naples, Italy
| | - D Inama
- ALMA (Association of patients with achalasia, ONLUS), Naples, Italy
| | - D E Low
- Department of Thoracic Surgery Virginia Mason Medical Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Endoscopic dilation for treatment of esophageal motility disorders. TECHNIQUES IN GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY 2018. [DOI: 10.1016/j.tgie.2018.06.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
|
12
|
Wang X, Tan Y, Lv L, Zhu H, Chu Y, Li C, Liu D. Peroral endoscopic myotomy versus pneumatic dilation for achalasia in patients aged ≥ 65 years. REVISTA ESPANOLA DE ENFERMEDADES DIGESTIVAS 2017; 108:637-641. [PMID: 27649684 DOI: 10.17235/reed.2016.4488/2016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIM Both peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) and pneumatic dilation (PD) has proved to be effective for treating achalasia in patients aged ≥ 65 years. However little is known about the comparison between POEM and PD. The aim of the study was to compare the safety and efficacy of POEM and PD for the treatment of achalasia in these patients. METHODS We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients aged 65 years-old or more who received POEM or PD for the treatment of achalasia at our hospital from January 2010 to December 2015, they were divided into the POEM group and the PD group. Demographics and data about safety and efficacy were collected retrospectively and compared between the two groups. RESULTS A total of 31 patients were enrolled, and 21 of them received POEM, while the other 10 received PD. The treatment success (Eckardt score ≤ 3) rate of POEM and PD at 3, 6, 12, 24 and 36 months after the treatment were comparable (p > 0.05). Treatment failure was noticed in 3 cases, 1 of them was in the POEM group and the other 2 in the PD group, there was no significant difference (p > 0.05). Multivariate analysis showed that sigmoid-type achalasia was a predictive factor of treatment failure. No severe complications were observed during operation and periodical follow-up. CONCLUSION Short-term and intermediate efficacy of POEM and PD for treating achalasia in patients aged ≥ 65 years was comparable. A large scale, randomized study with long-term follow-up is necessary in order to make a definitive conclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xuehong Wang
- the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
| | - Yuyong Tan
- Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, China
| | - Liang Lv
- the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
| | - Hongyi Zhu
- the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
| | - Yi Chu
- The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
| | - Chenjie Li
- the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University
| | - Deliang Liu
- Gastroenterology, The Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South Unive, China
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Londono R, Badylak SF. Regenerative Medicine Strategies for Esophageal Repair. TISSUE ENGINEERING PART B-REVIEWS 2015; 21:393-410. [PMID: 25813694 DOI: 10.1089/ten.teb.2015.0014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Pathologies that involve the structure and/or function of the esophagus can be life-threatening. The esophagus is a complex organ comprising nonredundant tissue that does not have the ability to regenerate. Currently available interventions for esophageal pathology have limited success and are typically associated with significant morbidity. Hence, there is currently an unmet clinical need for effective methods of esophageal repair. The present article presents a review of esophageal disease along with the anatomic and functional consequences of each pathologic process, the shortcomings associated with currently available therapies, and the latest advancements in the field of regenerative medicine with respect to strategies for esophageal repair from benchtop to bedside.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ricardo Londono
- 1 McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,2 School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Stephen F Badylak
- 1 McGowan Institute for Regenerative Medicine, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,3 Department of Bioengineering, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.,4 Department of Surgery, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| |
Collapse
|