1
|
Green SM, Leroy PL, Roback MG, Irwin MG, Andolfatto G, Babl FE, Barbi E, Costa LR, Absalom A, Carlson DW, Krauss BS, Roelofse J, Yuen VM, Alcaino E, Costa PS, Mason KP. An international multidisciplinary consensus statement on fasting before procedural sedation in adults and children. Anaesthesia 2019; 75:374-385. [PMID: 31792941 PMCID: PMC7064977 DOI: 10.1111/anae.14892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 61] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 09/18/2019] [Indexed: 01/29/2023]
Abstract
The multidisciplinary International Committee for the Advancement of Procedural Sedation presents the first fasting and aspiration prevention recommendations specific to procedural sedation, based on an extensive review of the literature. These were developed using Delphi methodology and assessment of the robustness of the available evidence. The literature evidence is clear that fasting, as currently practiced, often substantially exceeds recommended time thresholds and has known adverse consequences, for example, irritability, dehydration and hypoglycaemia. Fasting does not guarantee an empty stomach, and there is no observed association between aspiration and compliance with common fasting guidelines. The probability of clinically important aspiration during procedural sedation is negligible. In the post-1984 literature there are no published reports of aspiration-associated mortality in children, no reports of death in healthy adults (ASA physical status 1 or 2) and just nine reported deaths in adults of ASA physical status 3 or above. Current concerns about aspiration are out of proportion to the actual risk. Given the lower observed frequency of aspiration and mortality than during general anaesthesia, and the theoretical basis for assuming a lesser risk, fasting strategies in procedural sedation can reasonably be less restrictive. We present a consensus-derived algorithm in which each patient is first risk-stratified during their pre-sedation assessment, using evidence-based factors relating to patient characteristics, comorbidities, the nature of the procedure and the nature of the anticipated sedation technique. Graded fasting precautions for liquids and solids are then recommended for elective procedures based upon this categorisation of negligible, mild or moderate aspiration risk. This consensus statement can serve as a resource to practitioners and policymakers who perform and oversee procedural sedation in patients of all ages, worldwide.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S M Green
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Loma Linda University, Loma Linda, CA, USA
| | - P L Leroy
- Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - M G Roback
- University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - M G Irwin
- Department of Anaesthesiology, University of Hong Kong, Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong
| | - G Andolfatto
- University of British, Columbia Department of Emergency Medicine, Lions Gate Hospital, North Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - F E Babl
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Royal Children's Hospital, Parkville, Vic., Australia
| | - E Barbi
- Department of Pediatrics, Institute for Maternal and Child Health-IRCCS 'Burlo Garofolo', Trieste, Italy
| | - L R Costa
- Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Federal University of Goias, Goiania-Goias, Brazil
| | - A Absalom
- Department of Anaesthesia, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - D W Carlson
- Department of Pediatrics, Southern Illinois University School of Medicine, Springfield, IL, USA
| | - B S Krauss
- Department of Pediatrics, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | - J Roelofse
- Departments of Anaesthesia, University of the Western Cape, Stellenbosch University, Tygerberg, Republic of South Africa
| | - V M Yuen
- Department of Anaesthesiology, Hong Kong Children's Hospital and Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - E Alcaino
- Department of Paediatric Dentistry, University of Sydney, Westmead Centre for Oral Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - P S Costa
- Department of Pediatrics, Federal University of Goias, Goiania-Goias, Brazil
| | - K P Mason
- Department of Anesthesia, Harvard Medical School, Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Vanella G, Hassan C, De Bellis M, Giardini M, Grasso E, Laterza F, Tarantino O, Di Giulio E. IMPlementing split Regimen OVEr Single dose using a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (IMPROVES study). Endosc Int Open 2019; 7:E1457-E1467. [PMID: 31673618 PMCID: PMC6805191 DOI: 10.1055/a-0996-8118] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/09/2019] [Accepted: 06/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and aims A split-dose regimen for colonoscopy is recommended by international guidelines, but its adoption is still suboptimal. Our aim was to assess whether a Plan-Do-Study-Act approach (PDSA), a scientific method promoting quality improvement, would be able to improve adherence to a split-dose regimen, and to identify factors influencing its adoption. Methods This study consisted of three phases: Cycle 1: a cross-sectional assessment of split-dose adherence in consecutive outpatients/inpatients undergoing colonoscopies in 74 Italian centers; Educational intervention: regional meetings with literature review, analysis of Cycle 1 data, and discussion on corrective measures; local diffusion of educational material and tools for improvement; Cycle 2: reassessment of split-dose adherence after spontaneous local interventions. Demographic, clinical, and procedural variables were systematically collected. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify predictors of split-dose adoption. Results In total, 8213 patients (mean age = 60.29 years (SD = 13.58), men = 54 %, outpatients = 88.4 %) were enrolled between 2013 and 2016 (Cycle 1 = 4189 patients and Cycle 2 = 4024 patients). Split-dose adoption rose from 29.1 % in Cycle 1 to 51.1 % in Cycle 2 ( P < 0.0001), and being enrolled in Cycle 2 independently predicted split-dose adherence (OR = 2.9; 95 %CI 2.6 - 3.3). The adoption improved in all time slots, including colonoscopies scheduled before 0930. The main corrective measures were: rescheduling of colonoscopies after 0930 (between 0930 and 1130: OR = 2.6; 95 %CI 2.3 - 3.1; after 1130: OR = 7; 95 %CI 5.9 - 8.4); the cleansing regimen communicated by the Endoscopy unit (via form: OR = 1.6; 95 %CI 1.3 - 1.9; via visit: OR = 2.1; 95 %CI 1.7 - 2.5); a decrease in the use of deep sedation (OR = 2; 95 %CI 1.7 - 2.5). Conclusions An educational intervention with observation-driven corrections through a PDSA approach was able to substantially increase the adoption of a split-dose regimen.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giuseppe Vanella
- Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Mario De Bellis
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori – IRCCS – Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy
| | | | | | | | | | - Emilio Di Giulio
- Sant’Andrea Hospital, Faculty of Medicine and Psychology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy,Corresponding author Emilio Di Giulio, MD Sapienza University of RomeFaculty of Medicine and PsychologySant’Andrea University HospitalVia di Grottarossa, 1035-103900189 RomeItaly+39-06-33776692
| |
Collapse
|