Risk factors associated with histological upgrade of gastric low-grade dysplasia on pretreatment biopsy

Risk factors for pathological upgrading and noncurative resection in patients with gastric mucosal lesions after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND

The pathological results obtained from endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) do not always align with the findings of postoperative endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Furthermore, as ESD becomes more widespread, the number of noncurative endoscopic cases increases; thus, an accurate preoperative diagnosis and an appropriate treatment method are crucial. The purpose of this study was to explore the risk factors for postoperative pathological upgrading and noncurative resection and to gather experience in clinical and pathological diagnosis.

METHODS

From March 2016 to November 2023, 292 ESD specimens were collected from 262 patients with gastric mucosal lesions. Clinicopathological information, the coincidence rate of pathological diagnosis between EFB and ESD specimens, and risk factors related to noncurative resection were analyzed retrospectively.

RESULTS

The overall upgraded pathological diagnosis rate between EFB and ESD was 26.4%. The independent predictors for the upgraded group included proximal stomach lesions, lesion size > 2 cm, surface ulceration, and surface nodules. Twenty of the 235 early gastric cancer (EGC) patients underwent noncurative ESD resection. Multivariate analysis showed that undifferentiated carcinoma and tumor infiltration into the submucosa were significantly associated with noncurative resection.

CONCLUSION

Biopsy cannot fully represent the lesions of gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN). When a suspected epithelial dysplasia is suspected, a careful endoscopic examination should be conducted to evaluate the lesion site, size, and surface characteristics to ensure an accurate diagnosis. Noncurative endoscopic resection is associated with undifferentiated carcinoma and submucosal infiltration. Clinicians must be familiar with these predictive factors for noncurative resection and select the appropriate treatment for their patients.

Risk factors of missed early gastric cancer in endoscopic resected population: a retrospective, case-control study

BACKGROUND

Missed early gastric cancer (MEGC) is prevalent during esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which is the first-line recommended strategy for detecting early gastric cancer (EGC). Hence, we explored the risk factors for MEGC and different types of MEGC, based on the endoscopic resected population.

METHODS

This retrospective, case-control study was conducted at Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital (NJDTH). We included patients who were diagnosed with EGC during screening EGD, underwent endoscopic resection, and were confirmed by postoperative pathology at the NJDTH from January 2014 to December 2021, and classified them into different types according to the different root causes of misses. Univariable, multivariable, subgroup and propensity score analyses were used to explore the risk factors for MEGC and different types of MEGC.

RESULTS

A total of 447 patients, comprising 345 with initially detected early gastric cancer (IDEGC) and 102 with MEGC, were included in this study. Larger size (≥ 1 cm) (OR 0.45, 95% CI 0.27-0.74, P = 0.002) and invasion depth of submucosa (OR 0.26, 95% CI 0.10-0.69, P = 0.007) were negatively associated with MEGC. Use of sedation (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.20-0.52, P < 0.001) and longer observation time (OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.37-0.96, P = 0.034) exhibited protective effect on MEGC.

CONCLUSIONS

Smaller and more superficial EGC lesions are more susceptible to misdiagnosis. The use of sedation and prolonged observation time during EGD could help reduce the occurrence of MEGC.

Endoscopic resection of gastric low-grade dysplasia with high risk factors is associated with decreased advanced neoplasia: a single-center retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

The natural course of gastric low-grade dysplasia (LGD) remains unclear, and there are inconsistent management recommendations among guidelines and consensus.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the incidence of advanced neoplasia in patients with gastric LGD and identify the related risk factors.

METHODS

Cases of biopsy demonstrated LGD (BD-LGD) at our center from 2010 to 2021 were reviewed retrospectively. Risk factors related to histological progression were identified, and outcomes of patients based on risk stratification were evaluated.

RESULTS

Ninety-seven (23.0%) of 421 included BD-LGD lesions were diagnosed as advanced neoplasia. Among 409 superficial BD-LGD lesions, lesion in the upper third of the stomach, H. pylori infection, larger size, and narrow band imaging (NBI)-positive findings were independent risk factors of progression. NBI-positive lesions and NBI-negative lesions with or without other risk factors had 44.7%, 1.7%, and 0.0% risk of advanced neoplasia, respectively. Invisible lesions, visible lesions (VLs) without a clear margin, and VLs with a clear margin and size ≤ 10 mm, or > 10 mm had 4.8%, 7.9%, 16.7%, and 55.7% risk of advanced neoplasia, respectively. In addition, endoscopic resection decreased the risk of cancer (P < 0.001) and advanced neoplasia (P < 0.001) in patients with NBI-positive lesions, but not in NBI-negative patients. Similar results were found in patients with VLs with clear margin and size > 10 mm. Moreover, NBI-positive lesions had higher sensitivity and lower specificity for predicting advanced neoplasia than VLs with a clear margin and size > 10 mm determined by white-light endoscopy (97.6% vs. 62.7%, P < 0.001; and 63.0% vs. 85.6%, P < 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Progression of superficial BD-LGD is associated with NBI-positive lesions, as well as with VLs with a clear margin (size > 10 mm) if NBI is unavailable, and selective resection of those lesions offers benefits for patients by decreasing the risk of advanced neoplasia.

Diagnosis and segmentation effect of the ME-NBI-based deep learning model on gastric neoplasms in patients with suspected superficial lesions - a multicenter study

Background

Endoscopically visible gastric neoplastic lesions (GNLs), including early gastric cancer and intraepithelial neoplasia, should be accurately diagnosed and promptly treated. However, a high rate of missed diagnosis of GNLs contributes to the potential risk of the progression of gastric cancer. The aim of this study was to develop a deep learning-based computer-aided diagnosis (CAD) system for the diagnosis and segmentation of GNLs under magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (ME-NBI) in patients with suspected superficial lesions.

Methods

ME-NBI images of patients with GNLs in two centers were retrospectively analysed. Two convolutional neural network (CNN) modules were developed and trained on these images. CNN1 was trained to diagnose GNLs, and CNN2 was trained for segmentation. An additional internal test set and an external test set from another center were used to evaluate the diagnosis and segmentation performance.

Results

CNN1 showed a diagnostic performance with an accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV) of 90.8%, 92.5%, 89.0%, 89.4% and 92.2%, respectively, and an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.928 in the internal test set. With CNN1 assistance, all endoscopists had a higher accuracy than for an independent diagnosis. The average intersection over union (IOU) between CNN2 and the ground truth was 0.5837, with a precision, recall and the Dice coefficient of 0.776, 0.983 and 0.867, respectively.

Conclusions

This CAD system can be used as an auxiliary tool to diagnose and segment GNLs, assisting endoscopists in more accurately diagnosing GNLs and delineating their extent to improve the positive rate of lesion biopsy and ensure the integrity of endoscopic resection.

Tumor heterogeneity and carcinoma in resected specimens of gastric low-grade dysplasia: A retrospective single center study

Lesions diagnosed as gastric low-grade dysplasia (LGD) may be pathologically upgraded to early gastric cancer (EGC) or high-grade dysplasia (HGD) after endoscopic resection (ER). In this study, we investigated the risk factors for pathological upgrades after ER and assessed the reason for these upgrades by retrospectively analyzing ER data between January 1999 and December 2019. We enrolled patients with LGD confirmed by forceps biopsy; the patients were classified into pathologically concordant (LGD) and upgraded (HGD and EGC) groups according to the pathology of their resected specimen. To determine the risk factors for upgrade, we compared the endoscopic findings of the concordant and upgraded groups via 1:1 matched case-control design. To find the reasons for discordance, all upgraded cases were pathologically re-evaluated. Among 1,643 cases of LGD, pathological upgrades were observed in 423 (25.7%) resected specimens and EGC was found in 111 (6.7%) lesions. After matching the upgraded and concordant cases, lesion sizes exceeding 1.5 cm (odds ratio (OR): 1.8; 95% CI: 1.1-3.0), mucosal nodularity (OR: 10.8; 95% CI: 5.6-21.0), heterogeneous color (OR: 3.0; 95% CI: 1.7-5.3), presence of erosion (OR: 2.7; 95% CI: 1.8-5.3), and open-type gastric atrophy (OR: 2.9; 95% CI: 1.7-4.9) were noted to be significantly associated with upgraded pathology to EGC. Among the EGC cases, 99 (89.2%) were found to have pre-existing dysplasia. In conclusion, endoscopic evaluations should be performed because of possible pathological upgrades and co-existence of carcinomas in LGDs, especially when they exhibit surface nodularity, erosion, heterogeneous color, and large size.

Chinese integrated guideline on the management of gastric precancerous conditions and lesions

The standardized diagnosis and management of gastric precancerous conditions and lesions are important to prevent gastric cancer. This guideline, created by 5 traditional Chinese medicine and Western medicine associations, based on the current morbidity and diagnosis and treatment of gastric precancerous conditions and lesions, provides specific key points and strategies for diagnosis and treatment in the following five aspects: definition and epidemiology, diagnosis and stage, surveillance, treatment and efficacy evaluation. It is hoped that these aspects, assessed by integrating Western medicine and traditional Chinese medicine and involving multidisciplinary participation, will play a guiding role in clinical diagnosis and treatment and achieve effective secondary prevention of gastric cancer.

Establishment and Validation of a Pathologic Upgrade Prediction Nomogram Model for Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia Patients After the Eradication of Helicobacter pylori

BACKGROUND

As yet, there is no unified method of treatment for the evaluation and management of gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) worldwide.

METHODS

Patients with gastric LGIN who had been treated with Helicobacter pylori eradication were gathered retrospectively. Based on several relevant characteristics described and analyzed by LASSO regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression, a prediction nomogram model was established. C-index, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration plot, and decision curve analysis (DCA) were adopted to evaluate the accuracy and reliability of the model.

RESULTS

A total of 309 patients with LGIN were randomly divided into the training groups and the validation groups. LASSO regression analysis and multivariable logistic regression identified that 6 variables including gender, size, location, borderline, number, and erosion were independent risk factors. The nomogram model displayed good discrimination with a C-index of .765 (95% confidence interval: .702-.828). The accuracy and reliability of the model were also verified by an AUC of .764 in the training group and .757 in the validation group. Meanwhile, the calibration curve and the DCA suggested that the predictive nomogram had promising accuracy and clinical utility.

CONCLUSIONS

A predictive nomogram model was constructed and proved to be clinically applicable to identify high-risk groups with possible pathologic upgrade in patients with gastric LGIN. Since it is regarded that strengthening follow-up or endoscopic treatment of high-risk patients may contribute to improving the detection rate or reducing the incidence of gastric cancer, the predictive nomogram model provides a reliable basis for the treatment of LGIN.

Clinical characteristics and risk factors for upgraded pathology in patients with gastric intraepithelial neoplasia after endoscopic submucosal dissection

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

The pathological results of endoscopic forceps biopsy (EFB) are frequently inconsistent with those after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) in patients with gastric intraepithelial neoplasia (GIN). The aim of this study was to explore the risk factors for upgraded pathology after ESD in the Wannan region of Anhui Province, in order to guide the best clinical treatment of GIN.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed at the First Affiliated Hospital of Wannan Medical College. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis were used to investigate the independent risk factors for pathology upgrade between EFB and ESD.

RESULTS

In total, 215 patients who were initially diagnosed with GIN from EFB and subsequently received treatment with ESD were eventually selected for analysis. Age >60 years, a lesion located in upper 2/3 of the stomach, a lesion size of >2 cm, a lesion surface with redness and nodules and a lesion with irregular or absent microglands were significantly associated with the upgraded group after ESD. Multivariate analysis suggested that a lesion size of >2 cm (odds ratio [OR], 1.499; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.222-1.909; P=0.026), a lesion surface with redness (OR, 1.508; 95%CI, 1.260-1.993; P=0.048) and nodules (OR, 1.390; 95%CI, 1.195-1.778; P=0.008) were independent predictors for the upgraded group.

CONCLUSIONS

For patients with suspected GIN by EFB, a lesion size of >2 cm, a lesion surface with redness and nodules should be taken into account before deciding on the ESD.

Endoscopic resections for superficial esophageal squamous cell epithelial neoplasia: focus on histological discrepancies between biopsy and resected specimens

BACKGROUND

Endoscopic resection has been used for high-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (HGIN) and superficial esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) with limited risk of lymph node metastasis. However, some of these lesions cannot be accurately diagnosed based on forceps biopsy prior to treatment. In this study we aimed to investigate how to solve this histological discrepancy and avoid over- and under-treatment.

METHODS

The medical records of patients with superficial esophageal squamous cell neoplasia who underwent endoscopic resection at our hospital from January 2012 to December 2019 were reviewed retrospectively. The histological discrepancy between the biopsy and resected specimens was calculated and its association with clinicopathological parameters was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 137 lesions from 129 patients were included. The discrepancy rate between forceps biopsy and resected specimens was 45.3% (62/137). Histological discrepancy was associated with the histological category of the biopsy (p < 0.001). In addition, 17 of the 30 (56.7%) biopsies that was diagnosed as indefinite/negative for neoplasia or low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia were upgraded to HGIN or ESCC after resection. The upgrade was due to lesion size ≥ 10 mm (p = 0.002) and type B intrapapillary capillary loops (p < 0.001). Moreover, 34 of the 83 biopsies that were diagnosed with HGIN were upgraded to ESCC after resection, which was related to lesion size (p = 0.001), location (p = 0.018), and pink color sign (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

Histological discrepancy between forceps biopsy and resected specimens is common in clinical practice. Recognizing the risk factors for each histological category of biopsy may reduce these discrepancies and improve clinical management.

Gastric cancer screening in low incidence populations: Position statement of AEG, SEED and SEAP

This positioning document, sponsored by the Asociación Española de Gastroenterología, the Sociedad Española de Endoscopia Digestiva and the Sociedad Española de Anatomía Patológica, aims to establish recommendations for the screening of gastric cancer (GC) in low incidence populations, such as the Spanish. To establish the quality of the evidence and the levels of recommendation, we used the methodology based on the GRADE system (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). We obtained a consensus among experts using a Delphi method. The document evaluates screening in the general population, individuals with relatives with GC and subjects with GC precursor lesions (GCPL). The goal of the interventions should be to reduce GC related mortality. We recommend the use of the OLGIM classification and determine the intestinal metaplasia (IM) subtype in the evaluation of GCPL. We do not recommend to establish endoscopic mass screening for GC or Helicobacter pylori. However, the document strongly recommends to treat H.pylori if the infection is detected, and the investigation and treatment in individuals with a family history of GC or with GCPL. Instead, we recommend against the use of serological tests to detect GCPL. Endoscopic screening is suggested only in individuals that meet familial GC criteria. As for individuals with GCPL, endoscopic surveillance is only suggested in extensive IM associated with additional risk factors (incomplete IM and/or a family history of GC), after resection of dysplastic lesions or in patients with dysplasia without visible lesion after a high quality gastroscopy with chromoendoscopy.

Endoscopic acanthosis nigricans appearance: A novel specific marker for diagnosis of low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia

BACKGROUND AND AIM

At present, there is no recognized diagnostic criteria for gastric low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN). The purpose of this study was to determine whether an "endoscopic acanthosis nigricans appearance (EANA)" could be a useful endoscopic marker for distinguishing LGIN lesions from peripheral non-neoplastic tissues.

METHODS

A retrospective study was conducted on 638 cases of suspected superficial lesions with endoscopic images from white light endoscopy and magnifying endoscopy combined with narrow band imaging. According to the pathological results of accurate biopsies, those lesions were divided into three groups: a control group, an LGIN group, and an early gastric cancer (EGC) group.

RESULTS

According to the presence of EANAs, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for differentiating between the LGIN and control groups were 24.8%, 97.3%, 78.3%, and 76.6%, respectively. The sensitivity (84.1%) and negative predictive value (92.4%) were significantly improved by combining EANA with types IV-VI pit pattern. The intervening part and mean gray value of glands, representing microsurface features and microvascular variation, were significantly larger or higher in EANA lesions than in the surrounding non-neoplastic mucosa. LGIN with EANA was more likely to be present in lesions of type 0-IIa. In addition, the prevalence of EANAs in EGC was 16.7%.

CONCLUSION

An EANA could be used as an auxiliary indicator for a diagnosis of LGIN in suspected lesions. It could also play a potential assistive role in the diagnosis of EGC lesions.

Analysis of Risk Factors of Gastric Low-Grade Intraepithelial Neoplasia in Asymptomatic Subjects Undergoing Physical Examination

Secondary prevention is an important strategy in gastric cancer. Low-grade intraepithelial neoplasia (LGIN) is the last stage of precancerous lesion, and its timely diagnosis can greatly improve the detection rate of early gastric cancer. We performed a prospective study to analyze the risk factors of gastric LGIN in asymptomatic subjects undergoing physical examination. A total of 3437 subjects were included in this study, and 2259 asymptomatic subjects were investigated from March 2015 to April 2018. Risk factors were evaluated, and the endoscopic features of LGIN and prognosis were described. The overall incidence of LGIN was 19.73% (678/3437), while the incidence of LGIN in the asymptomatic and symptomatic groups was 19.65% (444/2259) and 19.86% (234/1178), respectively (P = 0.884). The rate of Helicobacter pylori infection in this physical examination population was 39.13% (35.8% asymptomatic group, 45.5% symptomatic group; P ≤ 0.001). Risk factors including age, H. pylori infection, history of antibiotic misuse, and spicy and high-fat diet (all P < 0.05) were further verified by multivariate analysis as independent risk factors. History of antibiotic misuse and H. pylori infection showed significant associations with LGIN (odds ratio (OR) = 6.767, 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.873-11.825 and OR = 3.803, 95% CI 3.009-4.808, respectively). The most common endoscopic classification of LGIN was erosive gastritis (50.78%), and the major endoscopic appearance was Paris IIa (flat with slight elevation located mostly in the antrum). During the mean follow-up period of 15.02 months, 49.4% of LGIN regressed, 0.61% of LGIN progressed, and 50% of LGIN remained unchanged. History of antibiotic misuse and H. pylori infection were predominant risk factors of LGIN in asymptomatic subjects, and those individuals should consider early screening for gastric cancer.