Multicenter prospective study to validate a new transient elastography device for staging liver fibrosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B

Aspartate Aminotransferase to Platelet Ratio Index and Fibrosis-4 Index for Detecting Liver Fibrosis in Patients With Autoimmune Hepatitis: A Meta-Analysis

Background

Aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) and fibrosis-4 index (FIB-4) are the two most widely studied noninvasive markers of liver fibrosis. We aimed to assess the diagnostic accuracy of APRI and FIB-4 for liver fibrosis in patients with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) using liver biopsy as the reference standard.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science databases were searched for studies (published as of May 1st, 2021) that assessed the diagnostic performance of APRI and FIB-4 for liver fibrosis in AIH. The summary area under receiver operating characteristics curve (AUROC), sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratios were used to assess the diagnostic accuracy of APRI and FIB-4 for detecting liver fibrosis.

Results

Fourteen studies (including 1015 patients) were selected with 13 studies each evaluating the use of APRI and FIB-4 for detecting different stages of fibrosis in AIH. For prediction of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis, the summary AUROC value was 0.66 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.61-0.70], 0.71 (95% CI: 0.67-0.75), and 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79) for APRI, and the summary AUROC value was 0.75 (95% CI: 0.71-0.79), 0.73 (95% CI: 0.69-0.77) and 0.79 (95% CI: 0.75-0.82) for FIB-4, respectively. The summary sensitivity and specificity for diagnosis of significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis, and cirrhosis were 90% and 36%, 78% and 55%, and 77% and 61% for APRI, and 70% and 70%, 65% and 70%, and 78% and 65% for FIB-4, respectively.

Conclusions

APRI and FIB-4 showed suboptimal diagnostic performance for identifying liver fibrosis in AIH with mediocre sensitivity and specificity.

Diagnostic Value of FibroTouch and Non-invasive Fibrosis Indexes in Hepatic Fibrosis with Different Aetiologies

BACKGROUND

Liver biopsy is the gold standard for staging liver fibrosis, but it has numerous drawbacks, mainly associated with bleeding and bile fistula risks. A number of non-invasive techniques have been investigated, but they all have their own disadvantages. To avoid the risks mentioned above and to improve the diagnostic value, we still need to search for a more accurate non-invasive method to evaluate the degree of liver fibrosis.

AIM

This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of FibroTouch versus other non-invasive fibrosis indexes in hepatic fibrosis of different aetiologies.

METHODS

This study retrospectively enrolled 227 patients with chronic hepatic liver disease admitted to the first hospital of Lanzhou University from 2017 to 2020. Liver biopsy was performed in all of the patients, and their biochemical indicators were all tested. Non-invasive indexes including the fibrosis index based on four factors (FIB-4), the aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), and the gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio index (GPRI) were all calculated. Transient elastography was performed using FibroTouch.

RESULTS

The correlation between FibroTouch and the pathology of liver fibrosis was significantly higher than that between the non-invasive fibrosis indexes and the biopsy results (r = 0.771, p < 0.05). The area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) of FibroTouch was significantly higher than that of FIB-4, APRI, and GPRI for the diagnosis of significant fibrosis (≥ S2 fibrosis stage), advanced fibrosis (≥ S3 fibrosis stage), and cirrhosis (= S4 fibrosis stage) (p < 0.05). The patients were grouped according to different aetiologies. The diagnostic value of FibroTouch had much higher credibility in different fibrosis stages for different causes compared with other non-invasive indexes. The AUC of FibroTouch showed both higher specificity and higher sensitivity than FIB-4, APRI, and GPRI for different liver fibrosis stages with different aetiologies.

CONCLUSIONS

FibroTouch demonstrates the highest diagnostic value for liver fibrosis and cirrhosis among non-invasive methods, showing better results than FIB-4, APRI, and GPRI, and surpassed only by liver biopsy. FibroTouch is reliable in assessing liver fibrosis with different aetiologies.

Liver stiffness measurement as a quantitative method for liver fibrosis in children with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease: A meta-analysis

AIM

This study assessed the diagnostic performance of liver stiffness measurement (LSM) in detecting liver fibrosis in paediatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) through meta-analysis.

METHODS

Online database searches of PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library and the Web of Science were conducted for studies that evaluated the performance of LSM for diagnosing liver fibrosis in paediatric patients with NAFLD until 1 January 2021. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 (QUADAS-2) tool was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Three measures were used to assess the performance of LSM for detecting liver fibrosis in paediatric patients with NAFLD, including the summary sensitivities and specificities, the summary area under the receiver operating characteristic curves and the summary diagnostic odds ratios.

RESULTS

Our final data included seven studies with a total of 436 paediatric patients with NAFLD for meta-analysis. The overall prevalence of mild fibrosis, significant fibrosis, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis was 66.3, 31.5, 14.9 and 1.2%, respectively. The summary sensitivity, specificity and area under the receiver operating characteristic values of LSM were 80, 92 and 0.94 for the prediction of mild fibrosis; 91, 97 and 0.98 for the prediction of significant fibrosis; and 89, 93 and 0.96 for the prediction of advanced fibrosis, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Liver stiffness measurement exhibited good diagnostic performance in predicting liver fibrosis and can be used as a non-invasive tool in the management of paediatric patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease.

A novel quantitative ultrasound technique for identifying non-alcoholic steatohepatitis

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There remains a need to develop a non-invasive, accurate and easy-to-use tool to identify patients with non-alcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Successful clinical and preclinical applications demonstrate the ability of quantitative ultrasound (QUS) techniques to improve medical diagnostics. We aimed to develop and validate a diagnostic tool, based on QUS analysis, for identifying NASH.

METHODS

A total of 259 Chinese individuals with biopsy-proven non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) were enrolled in the study. The histological spectrum of NAFLD was classified according to the NASH clinical research network scoring system. Radiofrequency (RF) data, raw data of iLivTouch, was acquired for further QUS analysis. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) method was used to select the most useful predictive features.

RESULTS

Eighteen candidate RF parameters were reduced to two significant parameters by shrinking the regression coefficients with the LASSO method. We built a novel QUS score based on these two parameters, and this QUS score showed good discriminatory capacity and calibration for identifying NASH both in the training set (area under the ROC curve [AUROC]: 0.798, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.731-0.865; Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = .755) and in the validation set (AUROC: 0.816, 95% CI 0.725-0.906; Hosmer-Lemeshow test, P = .397). Subgroup analysis showed that the QUS score performed well in different subgroups.

CONCLUSIONS

The QUS score, which was developed from QUS, provides a novel, non-invasive and practical way for identifying NASH.

Prognostic Value of Inflammatory Indicators in Chronic Hepatitis B Patients With Significant Liver Fibrosis: A Multicenter Study in China

Diagnosis of significant liver fibrosis is essential to facilitate the optimal treatment decisions and improve prognosis in patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB). We aimed to evaluate the value of inflammatory indicators and construct a nomogram that effectively predicts significant liver fibrosis among CHB patients. 563 CHB patients from two centers in China from 2014 to 2019 were divided into three cohorts (development, internal validation, and independent validation cohorts), assigned into cases with significant fibrosis (liver fibrosis stages ≥2) and those without. Multiple biochemical and serological inflammatory indicators were investigated. Inflammatory indicators, Alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate aminotransferase (AST), were significantly associated with significant liver fibrosis in CHB patients but limited predictive performance, and then we combined them with prothrombin time activity percentage (PTA) and liver stiffness measurement (LSM) were identified by multivariate logistic regression analysis. Based on these factors, we constructed the nomogram with excellent performance. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for the nomogram in the development, internal validation, and independent validation cohorts were 0.860, 0.877, and 0.811, respectively. Our nomogram based on ALT and AST that had excellent performance in predicting significant fibrosis of CHB patients were constructed.

Liver fibrosis is independently associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes mellitus

AIMS/INTRODUCTION

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease and type 2 diabetes mellitus are closely related, and often occur simultaneously in patients. Type 2 diabetes increases the risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy, resulting in intolerable pain and extremity amputation that reduces the quality of life. However, the role of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in the pathogenesis of diabetic peripheral neuropathy remains unclear. Thus, we evaluated the correlation of liver fibrosis and steatosis, which are representative histological morphologies of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease, with diabetic peripheral neuropathy in type 2 diabetes patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred twenty individuals with type 2 diabetes were recruited. All the patients were detected nerve conduction study for diabetic peripheral neuropathy and fibro touch for liver steatosis and fibrosis. Correlation of DPN with liver steatosis and fibrosis were analysed with binary logistic analysis.

RESULTS

Among the 520 patients, the prevalence of liver steatosis, fibrosis and diabetic peripheral neuropathy was 63.0% (n = 328), 18.1% (n = 94) and 52.1% (n = 271), respectively. The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was significantly elevated in patients with liver steatosis (55.7 vs 44.9%, P = 0.03) and fibrosis (61.5 vs 50%, P = 0.04), and it increased as liver stiffness measurement increased. Additionally, both hepatic steatosis (odds ratio 1.48, 95% confidence interval 1.04-2.11, P = 0.03) and fibrosis (odds ratio 1.60, 95% confidence interval 1.02-2.51, P = 0.04) were correlated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy. After adjusting for age, sex, weight, height, body mass index, waist hip ratio, duration of type 2 diabetes, blood glucose, homeostatic model assessment of insulin resistance, blood pressure, serum lipid, liver enzyme, urea, uric acid, creatinine and inflammatory factors, liver fibrosis remained associated with diabetic peripheral neuropathy (odds ratio 2.24, 95% confidence interval 1.11-4.53, P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The prevalence of diabetic peripheral neuropathy was elevated in patients with liver steatosis and fibrosis. Liver fibrosis was also independently associated with an increased risk of diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Assessment of liver fibrosis with liver and spleen stiffness measured by sound touch elastography, serum fibrosis markers in patients with chronic hepatitis B

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance of liver stiffness (LS) and spleen stiffness (SS) by using the sound touch elastography (STE) technique and compare with those of the splenic index, aspartate transaminase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 (FIB-4) index, King's score and combined models for diagnosing and staging fibrosis in chronic hepatitis B (CHB).

METHODS

One hundred patients with CHB underwent STE and serological tests. LS and SS values were measured with STE technique, and splenic index was calculated. Staging of fibrosis was determined with liver biopsy. Correlations between the individual parameters and the stage of fibrosis were evaluated with the Spearman correlation analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) was calculated to analyze the performance of all methods.

RESULTS

Among all individual parameters, LS showed the highest AUROC for diagnosing fibrosis of ≥S2, ≥S3, and S4 stages (AUROC: 0.70, 0.86, and 0.96, respectively; all P < 0.05). The AUROC of combined model 1 (LS and SS) and 2 (LS, SS, APRI, FIB-4 index, King's score) for diagnosing ≥S2, ≥S3, and S4 fibrosis were 0.70, 0.86, 0.97, and 0.70, 0.86, 0.96, respectively, which were higher than those of APRI, FIB-4 index and the King's score (P < 0.05). No significant differences were found between two combined models and LS for staging fibrosis (P > 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

LS measurement is reliable for diagnosing and staging fibrosis in CHB, with a better performance than SS, splenic index and serum biomarkers. It is also comparable with the performance of combined models.