Endoscopic treatment of gastric antral vascular ectasia in real-life settings: Argon plasma coagulation or endoscopic band ligation?

[Gastrointestinal tract involvement in systemic sclerosis]

Gastrointestinal tract involvement in systemic sclerosis concerns more than 90% of patients but is of heterogeneous clinical expression. It can involve the entire intestinal tract and be responsible for multifactorial malnutrition, which is frequent in this disease. It is a major source of deterioration in the quality of life and can even be life-threatening. Management is complex and multidisciplinary, ranging from simple hygienic and dietary measures, to specialized endoscopic or surgical interventional procedures, also including medical treatments, particularly proton pump inhibitors and prokinetics, with potential side effects. Ongoing research for new diagnostic and therapeutic tools promises to improve the management and prognosis of these patients.

Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia (GAVE) a case report, review of the literature and update of techniques

Introduction and importance

Gastric Antral Vascular Ectasia is a rare disorder that causes up to 4 % of severe acute gastrointestinal bleeding. It affects elderly females with iron deficiency anemia due to chronic blood loss as a common presenting sign.

Case presentation

We report the case of a 70-year-old man admitted to the Urgency Department for severe asthenia associated with abdominal pain and severe anemia. An urgent upper endoscopic examination showed antral hyperemic streaks and vascular ectasias extending from the pyloric ring to the gastric body as well as signs of recent bleeding. Histological results demonstrated the pathognomonic features of GAVE.

Clinical discussion

The first line treatment is considered argon plasma coagulation (APC), given its wider availability, safety, efficacy and cost-effectiveness. In current literature, other therapies and different types of endoscopic treatments have been proposed, such as EBL, RFA and Yag: laser. To date, there is no specific recommendation that privileges one method over another in the treatment of GAVE, although APC has proven effective and even better in terms of complications and costs than the other techniques.

Conclusion

In our experience, endoscopic coagulation with APC probes is a relatively easy-to-use technique with low cost, minimal invasiveness and provides immediate results.

On the other hand, a standardized algorithm is also required concerning to the different subtypes to give the best treatment in every case.

Endoscopic treatment for gastric antral vascular ectasia

Gastric antral vascular ectasia (GAVE) is one of the uncommon causes of upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Major treatment of GAVE includes pharmacotherapy, endoscopy, and surgery. The efficacy and safety of pharmacotherapy have not been sufficiently confirmed; and surgery is just considered when conservative treatment is ineffective. By comparison, endoscopy is a common treatment option for GAVE. This paper reviews the currently used endoscopic approaches for GAVE, mainly including argon plasma coagulation (APC), radiofrequency ablation (RFA), and endoscopic band ligation (EBL). It also summarizes their efficacy and procedure-related adverse events. The endoscopic success rate of APC is 40-100%; however, APC needs several treatment sessions, with a high recurrence rate of 10-78.9%. The endoscopic success rates of RFA and EBL are 90-100% and 77.8-100%, respectively; and their recurrence rates are 21.4-33.3% and 8.3-48.1%, respectively. Hyperplastic gastric polyps and sepsis are major adverse events of APC and RFA; and Mallory-Weiss syndrome is occasionally observed after APC. Adverse events of EBL are rare and mild, such as nausea, vomiting, esophageal or abdominal pain, and hyperplastic polyps. APC is often considered as the first-line choice of endoscopic treatment for GAVE. RFA and EBL have been increasingly used as alternatives in patients with refractory GAVE. A high recurrence of GAVE after endoscopic treatment should be fully recognized and cautiously managed by follow-up endoscopy. In future, a head-to-head comparison of different endoscopic approaches for GAVE is warranted.