1
|
Long B, Gottlieb M. Emergency medicine updates: Upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Am J Emerg Med 2024; 81:116-123. [PMID: 38723362 DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.04.052] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2024] [Revised: 04/20/2024] [Accepted: 04/27/2024] [Indexed: 06/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) is a condition commonly seen in the emergency department (ED). Therefore, it is important for emergency clinicians to be aware of the current evidence regarding the diagnosis and management of this disease. OBJECTIVE This paper evaluates key evidence-based updates concerning UGIB for the emergency clinician. DISCUSSION UGIB most frequently presents with hematemesis. There are numerous causes, with the most common peptic ulcer disease, though variceal bleeding in particular can be severe. Nasogastric tube lavage for diagnosis is not recommended based on the current evidence. A hemoglobin transfusion threshold of 7 g/dL is recommended (8 g/dL in those with myocardial ischemia), but patients with severe bleeding and hemodynamic instability require emergent transfusion regardless of their level. Medications that may be used in UGIB include proton pump inhibitors, prokinetic agents, and vasoactive medications. Antibiotics are recommended for those with cirrhosis and suspected variceal bleeding. Endoscopy is the diagnostic and therapeutic modality of choice and should be performed within 24 h of presentation in non-variceal bleeding after resuscitation, though patients with variceal bleeding may require endoscopy within 12 h. Transcatheter arterial embolization or surgical intervention may be necessary. Intubation should be avoided if possible. If intubation is necessary, several considerations are required, including resuscitation prior to induction, utilizing preoxygenation and appropriate suction, and administering a prokinetic agent. There are a variety of tools available for risk stratification, including the Glasgow Blatchford Score. CONCLUSIONS An understanding of literature updates can improve the ED care of patients with UGIB.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Brit Long
- SAUSHEC, Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, Fort Sam Houston, TX, USA.
| | - Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, IL, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhao L, Tie J, Wang G, Li Z, Xu J, Zhuge Y, Zhang F, Wu H, Wei B, Xue H, Li P, Wu W, Chen C, Wu Q, Xia Y, Sun X, Zhang C. Efficacy of TIPS plus extrahepatic collateral embolisation in real-world data: a validation study. BMJ Open Gastroenterol 2024; 11:e001310. [PMID: 38395452 PMCID: PMC10895241 DOI: 10.1136/bmjgast-2023-001310] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 01/23/2024] [Indexed: 02/25/2024] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The efficacy of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) plus extrahepatic collateral embolisation (TIPS+E) in reducing rebleeding and hepatic encephalopathy (HE) post-TIPS was recently reported in a meta-analysis, but further validation is essential. This study aims to confirm the effectiveness of TIPS+E using real-world data. METHODS The multicentre retrospective cohort included 2077 patients with cirrhosis who underwent TIPS±E (TIPS: 631, TIPS+E: 1446) between January 2010 and December 2022. Regression and propensity score matching (PSM) were used to adjust for baseline characteristic differences. After PSM, clinical outcomes, including rebleeding, HE, survival and further decompensation (FDC), were analysed. Baseline data from all patients contributed to the construction of prognostic models. RESULTS After PSM, 1136 matched patients (TIPS+E: TIPS=568:568) were included. TIPS+E demonstrated a significant reduction in rebleeding (HR 0.77; 95% CI 0.59 to 0.99; p=0.04), HE (HR 0.82; 95% CI 0.68 to 0.99; p=0.04) and FDC (HR 0.85; 95% CI 0.73 to 0.99; p=0.04), comparing to TIPS. Significantly, TIPS+E also reduced rebleeding, HE and FDC in subgroup of using 8 mm diameter stents and embolising of gastric varices+spontaneous portosystemic shunts (GV+SPSS). However, there were no differences in overall or subgroup survival analysis. Additionally, the random forest models showed higher accuracy and AUROC comparing to other models. Controlling post-TIPS portal pressure gradient (pPPG) within 7 mm Hg CONCLUSION Our real-world data validation confirms the high efficacy of TIPS+E in reducing rebleeding and HE, particularly when using 8 mm diameter stents, embolising GV+SPSS and maintaining an optimal pPPG.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lianhui Zhao
- Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
- Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jun Tie
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, National Clinical Research Centre for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Guangchuan Wang
- Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
- Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhengjie Li
- School of Automation, Qingdao University, Qingdao, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Jiao Xu
- Department of Liver Diseases and Digestive Interventional Radiology, National Clinical Research Centre for Digestive Diseases and Xijing Hospital of Digestive Diseases, Fourth Military Medical University, Xian, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China
| | - Yuzheng Zhuge
- Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsun Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Feng Zhang
- Gastroenterology, Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, Affiliated Hospital of Medical School, Nanjing University, Nanjing, Jiangsun Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Hao Wu
- Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Wei
- Gastroenterology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Hui Xue
- Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Peijie Li
- Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University, Xi'an, Shaanxi Province, China
| | - Wei Wu
- Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Chao Chen
- Gastroenterology, First Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Qiong Wu
- Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Yifu Xia
- Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Xiubin Sun
- Department of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| | - Chunqing Zhang
- Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital, Shandong University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
- Gastroenterology, Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong First Medical University, Jinan, Shandong Province, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Allaire M, Thabut D. Portal hypertension and variceal bleeding in patients with liver cancer: Evidence gaps for prevention and management. Hepatology 2024; 79:213-223. [PMID: 36631021 DOI: 10.1097/hep.0000000000000291] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND AIMS Portal hypertension (PHT) and HCC are 2 major complications of cirrhosis that often coexist in the same patient and impact the prognosis, especially in patients with acute variceal bleeding. In this review, we aim to discuss the best strategy for PHT screening and primary prophylaxis, as well as the management of acute variceal bleeding, to improve the management of PHT in HCC patients. RESULTS Recent therapeutic advances observed in the management of HCC, notably through the advent of immunotherapy, have led to a clear improvement in the survival of patients. The prevention of complications related to underlying cirrhosis, such as PHT and acute variceal bleeding, is now part of the management of HCC patients. The Baveno VII conference recently redefined screening and prophylaxis in patients with cirrhosis. However, data regarding the applicability of these criteria in patients with HCC have been sparse. From our point of view, the Baveno criteria are not appropriate to exclude high-risk esophageal varices (EV) in HCC patients, and endoscopy should be performed except in HCC patients with a liver stiffness measurement (LSM) ≥25 kPa, who should benefit from nonselective beta-blockers (NSSBs) without performing endoscopy. We are also in favor of using NSBBs as primary prophylaxis in patients with EV regardless of the size and with gastric varices since these patients display clinically significant PHT. CONCLUSIONS Appropriate evaluation and treatment of PHT remain major issues in improving the outcomes of HCC patients. Many questions remain unanswered, opening the field to many areas of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Manon Allaire
- AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Paris, France
- Centre de Recherche des Cordeliers, INSERM, Sorbonne Université, Université de Paris, Team Proliferation Stress and Liver Physiopathology, Paris, France
| | - Dominique Thabut
- AP-HP Sorbonne Université, Hôpital Universitaire Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service d'Hépato-gastroentérologie, Paris, France
- Sorbonne Université, INSERM, Centre de recherche Saint-Antoine (CRSA), Institute of Cardiometabolism and Nutrition (ICAN), Paris, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Krige J, Jonas E, Robinson C, Beningfield S, Kotze U, Bernon M, Burmeister S, Kloppers C. Novel CABIN score outperforms other prognostic models in predicting in-hospital mortality after salvage transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunting. World J Gastrointest Pathophysiol 2023; 14:34-45. [PMID: 37035274 PMCID: PMC10074947 DOI: 10.4291/wjgp.v14.i2.34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2022] [Revised: 02/23/2023] [Accepted: 03/10/2023] [Indexed: 03/21/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) is now established as the salvage procedure of choice in patients who have uncontrolled or severe recurrent variceal bleeding despite optimal medical and endoscopic treatment.
AIM To analysis compared the performance of eight risk scores to predict in-hospital mortality after salvage TIPS (sTIPS) placement in patients with uncontrolled variceal bleeding after failed medical treatment and endoscopic intervention.
METHODS Baseline risk scores for the Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) II, Bonn TIPS early mortality (BOTEM), Child-Pugh, Emory, FIPS, model for end-stage liver disease (MELD), MELD-Na, and a novel 5 category CABIN score incorporating Creatinine, Albumin, Bilirubin, INR and Na, were calculated before sTIPS. Concordance (C) statistics for predictive accuracy of in-hospital mortality of the eight scores were compared using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis.
RESULTS Thirty-four patients (29 men, 5 women), median age 52 years (range 31-80) received sTIPS for uncontrolled (11) or refractory (23) bleeding between August 1991 and November 2020. Salvage TIPS controlled bleeding in 32 (94%) patients with recurrence in one. Ten (29%) patients died in hospital. All scoring systems had a significant association with in-hospital mortality (P < 0.05) on multivariate analysis. Based on in-hospital survival AUROC, the CABIN (0.967), APACHE II (0.948) and Emory (0.942) scores had the best capability predicting mortality compared to FIPS (0.892), BOTEM (0.877), MELD Na (0.865), Child-Pugh (0.802) and MELD (0.792).
CONCLUSION The novel CABIN score had the best prediction capability with statistical superiority over seven other risk scores. Despite sTIPS, hospital mortality remains high and can be predicted by CABIN category B or C or CABIN scores > 10. Survival was 100% in CABIN A patients while mortality was 75% for CABIN B, 87.5% for CABIN C, and 83% for CABIN scores > 10.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jake Krige
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Cape Town 7925, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Eduard Jonas
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Cape Town 7925, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Chanel Robinson
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Cape Town 7925, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Steve Beningfield
- Department of Radiology, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Cape Town 7925, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Urda Kotze
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Cape Town 7925, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Marc Bernon
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Cape Town 7925, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Sean Burmeister
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, University of Cape Town Health Sciences Faculty, Cape Town 7925, Western Cape, South Africa
| | - Christo Kloppers
- Department of Surgical Gastroenterology, University of Cape Town, Faculty of Health Sciences, Cape Town 7925, Western Cape, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bridwell RE, Long B, Ramzy M, Gottlieb M. Balloon Tamponade for the Management of Gastrointestinal Bleeding. J Emerg Med 2022; 62:545-558. [PMID: 35065859 DOI: 10.1016/j.jemermed.2021.11.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/10/2021] [Revised: 10/26/2021] [Accepted: 11/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Acute gastrointestinal bleeding is a potentially life-threatening condition that requires rapid intervention. In critically ill patients who are refractory to other therapies, balloon tamponade devices can be lifesaving. OBJECTIVE We provide a review of balloon tamponade devices for gastric and esophageal variceal bleeding for emergency clinicians. DISCUSSION Balloon tamponade is intended for hemodynamically unstable patients with massive gastrointestinal bleeding and inability to perform endoscopy, failed endoscopy, delay in endoscopy, or the need to stabilize before transfer. There are 3 main tamponade devices: the Linton-Nachlas tube, the Sengstaken-Blakemore tube, and the Minnesota tube. Each tamponade device has some unique features including the number of balloons and ports. We describe the technique with pearls and pitfalls for placement. CONCLUSIONS It is essential for emergency physicians to be familiar with balloon tamponade for acute gastrointestinal bleeding. We review the common balloon tamponade devices, and this article is intended to serve as a resource for those interested in expanding their knowledge of balloon tamponade. © 2022 Elsevier Inc.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rachel E Bridwell
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Brit Long
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Brooke Army Medical Center, San Antonio, Texas
| | - Mark Ramzy
- Department of Emergency Medicine and Critical Care, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Michael Gottlieb
- Department of Emergency Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois
| |
Collapse
|