DisCoTune: versatile auxiliary plasmids for the production of disulphide-containing proteins and peptides in the E. coli T7 system

Recent advances in recombinant production of soluble proteins in E. coli

BACKGROUND

E. coli still remains the most commonly used organism to produce recombinant proteins in research labs. This condition is mirrored by the attention that researchers dedicate to understanding the biology behind protein expression, which is then exploited to improve the effectiveness of the technology. This effort is witnessed by an impressive number of publications, and this review aims to organize the most relevant novelties proposed in recent years.

RESULTS

The examined contributions address several of the known bottlenecks related to recombinant expression in E. coli, such as improved glycosylation pathways, more reliable production of proteins whose folding depends on the formation of disulfide bonds, the possibility of controlling and even benefiting from the formation of aggregates or the need to overcome the dependence of bacteria on antibiotics during bacterial culture. Nevertheless, the majority of the published papers aimed at identifying the conditions for optimal control of the translation process to achieve maximal yields of functional exogenous proteins.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite community commitment, the critical question of what really is the metabolic burden and how it affects both host metabolism and recombinant protein production remains elusive because some experimental results are contradictory. This contribution aims to offer researchers a tool to orient themselves in this complexity. The new capacities offered by artificial intelligence tools could help clarifying this issue, but the training phase will probably require more systematic experimental approaches to collect sufficiently uniform data.

A comparative study of the performance of E. coli and K. phaffii for expressing α-cobratoxin

Three-finger toxins (3FTxs) have traditionally been obtained via venom fractionation of whole venoms from snakes. This method often yields functional toxins, but it can be difficult to obtain pure isoforms, as it is challenging to separate the many different toxins with similar physicochemical properties that generally exist in many venoms. This issue can be circumvented via the use of recombinant expression. However, achieving the correct disulfide bond formation in recombinant toxins is challenging and requires extensive optimization of expression and purification methods to enhance stability and functionality. In this study, we investigated the expression of α-cobratoxin, a well-characterized 3FTx from the monocled cobra (Naja kaouthia), in three different expression systems, namely Escherichia coli BL21 (DE3) cells with the csCyDisCo plasmid, Escherichia coli SHuffle cells, and Komagataella phaffii (formerly known as Pichia pastoris). While none of the tested systems yielded α-cobratoxin identical to the variant isolated from whole venom, the His6-tagged α-cobratoxin expressed in K. phaffii exhibited a comparable secondary structure according to circular dichroism spectra and similar binding properties to the α7 subunit of the nicotinic acetylcholine receptor. The findings presented here illustrate the advantages and limitations of the different expression systems and can help guide researchers who wish to express 3FTxs.

Truncation-Free Genetic Code Expansion with Tetrazine Amino Acids for Quantitative Protein Ligations

Quantitative labeling of biomolecules is necessary to advance areas of antibody-drug conjugation, super-resolution microscopy imaging of molecules in live cells, and determination of the stoichiometry of protein complexes. Bio-orthogonal labeling to genetically encodable noncanonical amino acids (ncAAs) offers an elegant solution; however, their suboptimal reactivity and stability hinder the utility of this method. Previously, we showed that encoding stable 1,2,4,5-tetrazine (Tet)-containing ncAAs enables rapid, complete conjugation, yet some expression conditions greatly limited the quantitative reactivity of the Tet-protein. Here, we demonstrate that reduction of on-protein Tet ncAAs impacts their reactivity, while the leading cause of the unreactive protein is near-cognate suppression (NCS) of UAG codons by endogenous aminoacylated tRNAs. To overcome incomplete conjugation due to NCS, we developed a more catalytically efficient tRNA synthetase and developed a series of new machinery plasmids harboring the aminoacyl tRNA synthetase/tRNA pair (aaRS/tRNA pair). These plasmids enable robust production of homogeneously reactive Tet-protein in truncation-free cell lines, eliminating the contamination caused by NCS and protein truncation. Furthermore, these plasmid systems utilize orthogonal synthetic origins, which render these machinery vectors compatible with any common expression system. Through developing these new machinery plasmids, we established that the aaRS/tRNA pair plasmid copy-number greatly affects the yields and quality of the protein produced. We then produced quantitatively reactive soluble Tet-Fabs, demonstrating the utility of this system for rapid, homogeneous conjugations of biomedically relevant proteins.

A concise guide to choosing suitable gene expression systems for recombinant protein production

This overview guides both novices and experienced researchers facing challenging targets to select the most appropriate gene expression system for producing a particular protein. By answering four key questions, readers can determine the most suitable gene expression system following a decision scheme. This guide addresses the most commonly used and accessible systems and provides brief descriptions of the main gene expression systems' key characteristics to assist decision making. Additionally, information has been included for selected less frequently used "exotic" gene expression systems.

Folding of heterologous proteins in bacterial cell factories: Cellular mechanisms and engineering strategies

The expression of correctly folded and functional heterologous proteins is important in many biotechnological production processes, whether it is enzymes, biopharmaceuticals or biosynthetic pathways for production of sustainable chemicals. For industrial applications, bacterial platform organisms, such as E. coli, are still broadly used due to the availability of tools and proven suitability at industrial scale. However, expression of heterologous proteins in these organisms can result in protein aggregation and low amounts of functional protein. This review provides an overview of the cellular mechanisms that can influence protein folding and expression, such as co-translational folding and assembly, chaperone binding, as well as protein quality control, across different model organisms. The knowledge of these mechanisms is then linked to different experimental methods that have been applied in order to improve functional heterologous protein folding, such as codon optimization, fusion tagging, chaperone co-production, as well as strain and protein engineering strategies.

Venom biotechnology: casting light on nature's deadliest weapons using synthetic biology

Venoms are complex chemical arsenals that have evolved independently many times in the animal kingdom. Venoms have attracted the interest of researchers because they are an important innovation that has contributed greatly to the evolutionary success of many animals, and their medical relevance offers significant potential for drug discovery. During the last decade, venom research has been revolutionized by the application of systems biology, giving rise to a novel field known as venomics. More recently, biotechnology has also made an increasing impact in this field. Its methods provide the means to disentangle and study venom systems across all levels of biological organization and, given their tremendous impact on the life sciences, these pivotal tools greatly facilitate the coherent understanding of venom system organization, development, biochemistry, and therapeutic activity. Even so, we lack a comprehensive overview of major advances achieved by applying biotechnology to venom systems. This review therefore considers the methods, insights, and potential future developments of biotechnological applications in the field of venom research. We follow the levels of biological organization and structure, starting with the methods used to study the genomic blueprint and genetic machinery of venoms, followed gene products and their functional phenotypes. We argue that biotechnology can answer some of the most urgent questions in venom research, particularly when multiple approaches are combined together, and with other venomics technologies.

Modern venomics-Current insights, novel methods, and future perspectives in biological and applied animal venom research

Venoms have evolved >100 times in all major animal groups, and their components, known as toxins, have been fine-tuned over millions of years into highly effective biochemical weapons. There are many outstanding questions on the evolution of toxin arsenals, such as how venom genes originate, how venom contributes to the fitness of venomous species, and which modifications at the genomic, transcriptomic, and protein level drive their evolution. These questions have received particularly little attention outside of snakes, cone snails, spiders, and scorpions. Venom compounds have further become a source of inspiration for translational research using their diverse bioactivities for various applications. We highlight here recent advances and new strategies in modern venomics and discuss how recent technological innovations and multi-omic methods dramatically improve research on venomous animals. The study of genomes and their modifications through CRISPR and knockdown technologies will increase our understanding of how toxins evolve and which functions they have in the different ontogenetic stages during the development of venomous animals. Mass spectrometry imaging combined with spatial transcriptomics, in situ hybridization techniques, and modern computer tomography gives us further insights into the spatial distribution of toxins in the venom system and the function of the venom apparatus. All these evolutionary and biological insights contribute to more efficiently identify venom compounds, which can then be synthesized or produced in adapted expression systems to test their bioactivity. Finally, we critically discuss recent agrochemical, pharmaceutical, therapeutic, and diagnostic (so-called translational) aspects of venoms from which humans benefit.

Strategies for Heterologous Expression, Synthesis, and Purification of Animal Venom Toxins

Animal venoms are complex mixtures containing peptides and proteins known as toxins, which are responsible for the deleterious effect of envenomations. Across the animal Kingdom, toxin diversity is enormous, and the ability to understand the biochemical mechanisms governing toxicity is not only relevant for the development of better envenomation therapies, but also for exploiting toxin bioactivities for therapeutic or biotechnological purposes. Most of toxinology research has relied on obtaining the toxins from crude venoms; however, some toxins are difficult to obtain because the venomous animal is endangered, does not thrive in captivity, produces only a small amount of venom, is difficult to milk, or only produces low amounts of the toxin of interest. Heterologous expression of toxins enables the production of sufficient amounts to unlock the biotechnological potential of these bioactive proteins. Moreover, heterologous expression ensures homogeneity, avoids cross-contamination with other venom components, and circumvents the use of crude venom. Heterologous expression is also not only restricted to natural toxins, but allows for the design of toxins with special properties or can take advantage of the increasing amount of transcriptomics and genomics data, enabling the expression of dormant toxin genes. The main challenge when producing toxins is obtaining properly folded proteins with a correct disulfide pattern that ensures the activity of the toxin of interest. This review presents the strategies that can be used to express toxins in bacteria, yeast, insect cells, or mammalian cells, as well as synthetic approaches that do not involve cells, such as cell-free biosynthesis and peptide synthesis. This is accompanied by an overview of the main advantages and drawbacks of these different systems for producing toxins, as well as a discussion of the biosafety considerations that need to be made when working with highly bioactive proteins.