Effects of mobile health interventions on health-related outcomes in older adults with type 2 diabetes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Improving the management of type 2 diabetes in China using a multifaceted digital health intervention in primary health care: the SMARTDiabetes cluster randomised controlled trial

Background

There is limited evidence, mainly from high-income countries, that digital health interventions improve type 2 diabetes (T2DM) care. Large-scale implementation studies are lacking.

Methods

A multifaceted digital health intervention comprising: (1) a self-management application ('app') for patients and lay 'family health promotors' (FHPs); and (2) clinical decision support for primary care doctors was evaluated in an open-label, parallel, cluster randomized controlled trial in 80 communities (serviced by a primary care facility for >1000 residents) in Hebei Province, China. People >40 years with T2DM and a glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥7% were recruited (∼25/community). After baseline assessment, community clusters were randomly assigned to intervention or control groups (1:1) via a web-based system, stratified by locality (rural/urban). Control arm clusters received usual care without access to the digital health application or family health promoters. The primary outcome was at the participant level defined as the proportion with ≥2 "ABC" risk factor targets achieved (HbA1c < 7.0%, blood pressure < 140/80 mmHg and LDL-cholesterol < 2.6 mmol/L) at 24 months.

Findings

A total of 2072 people were recruited from the 80 community clusters (40 urban and 40 rural), with 1872 (90.3%) assessed at 24 months. In the intervention arm, patients used FHPs for support more in rural than urban communities (252 (48.6%) rural vs 92 (21.5%) urban, p < 0.0001). The mean monthly proportion of active app users was 46.4% (SD 7.8%) with no significant difference between urban and rural usage rates. The intervention was associated with improved ABC control rates (339 [35.9%] intervention vs 276 [29.9%] usual care; RR 1.20, 95% CI 1.02-1.40; p = 0.025), with significant heterogeneity by geography (rural 220 [42.6%] vs 158 [31.0%]; urban 119 [27.9%] vs 118 [28.6%]; p = 0.022 for interaction). Risk factor reductions were mainly driven by improved glycaemic control (mean HbA1C difference -0.33%, 95% CI -0.48 to -0.17; p = 0.00025 and mean fasting plasma glucose difference -0.58 mmol, 95% CI -0.89 to -0.27; p = 0.00013). There were no changes in blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol levels.

Interpretation

A multifaceted digital health intervention improved T2DM risk factor control rates, particularly in rural communities where there may be stronger relationships between patients and doctors and greater family member support.

Funding

National Health and Medical Research CouncilGlobal Alliance for Chronic Diseases (ID 1094712).

Usability evaluation of the educational website "understanding my diabetes" for Mexican patients with type 2 diabetes

Background

Diabetes education is an integral part of the treatment for the metabolic control of patients with diabetes. The use of the Internet as a tool for diabetes education, as well as its acceptance, is still under study.

Aim

To assess the usability of the educational website "I understand my diabetes" designed for patients with type 2 diabetes attending primary care clinics.

Material and method

A cross-sectional study was done in 110 patients with type 2 diabetes from two family medicine clinics, each of whom was assigned a user account on the educational website "Entiendo mi diabetes." The web site assigned a user name and password to each patient. They were able to access the educational website at home. After a 15-day review period, participants were asked to evaluate usability using the Computer System Usability Questionnaire. Additionally, we developed an eight-item questionnaire usability focusing on diabetes care. Sociodemographic data, blood pressure, and anthropometric measurements were recorded. Glucose levels and lipid profiles were also measured.

Results

The patients with diabetes had a mean age of 52.7 years and a median of 5 years since they were diagnosed with diabetes. The website received a good usability rating from 89.1% of participants, with favorable assessments in all three dimensions: 87.3% for information, 85.5% for quality, and 88.2% for interface. Regarding usability specifically for diabetes care, 98.2% rated it as having good usability.

Conclusion

The website for education about the disease in patients "I understand my diabetes" had an adequate usability evaluation by patients, so they also considered it very useful for diabetes care. The diabetes care instrument had adequate usability and reliability.

Community-Dwelling Older Adults' Readiness for Adopting Digital Health Technologies: Cross-Sectional Survey Study

BACKGROUND

Digital health technologies offer the potential to improve the daily lives of older adults, maintain their health efficiently, and allow aging in place. Despite increasing evidence of benefits and advantages, readiness for adopting digital interventions among older people remains underexplored.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to explore the relationships between sociodemographic-, health-, and lifestyle-related factors and technology use in everyday life and community-dwelling older adults' readiness to adopt telemedicine, smartphones with texting apps, wearables, and robotics.

METHODS

This was a cross-sectional, population-based survey study with a stratified probabilistic sample of adults aged 75 years or older living in South Tyrol (autonomous province of Bolzano/Bozen, Italy). A random sample of 3600 community-dwelling older adults living at home was invited to complete a questionnaire including single items (older adults' readiness to use health technology) and scales (PRISMA-7; Program of Research on Integration of Services for the Maintenance of Autonomy). Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were performed to analyze the data.

RESULTS

In total, 1695 community-dwelling older adults completed the survey (for a response rate of 47%). In terms of potential digital health technology adoption, wearable devices were favored by 33.7% (n=571), telemedicine by 30.1% (n=510), smartphones and texting apps by 24.5% (n=416), and assistant robots by 13.7% (n=232). Sociodemographic-, health- and lifestyle-related factors, as well as the use of technology in everyday life, played a significant role in explaining readiness to adopt digital health technologies. For telemedicine, age ≥85 years (odds ratio [OR] 0.74, 95% CI 0.56-0.96), financial constraints (OR 0.68, 95% CI 0.49-0.95), and less than 2 hours of physical activity per week (OR 0.75, 95% CI 0.58-0.98) were associated with nonreadiness, while Italian-speaking participants (OR 1.54, 95% CI 1.16-2.05) and those regularly using computers (OR 1.74, 95% CI 1.16-2.60), smartphones (OR 1.69, 95% CI 1.22-2.35), and the internet (OR 2.26, 95% CI 1.47-3.49) reported readiness for adoption.

CONCLUSIONS

Community-dwelling older adults display varied readiness toward the adoption of digital health technologies, influenced by age, mother tongue, living situation, financial resources, physical activity, and current use of technology. The findings underscore the need for tailored interventions and educational programs to boost digital health technology adoption among community-dwelling older adults.

Effectiveness of a Smartphone App to Promote Physical Activity Among Persons With Type 2 Diabetes: Randomized Controlled Trial

BACKGROUND

Physical activity is well known to have beneficial effects on glycemic control and to reduce risk factors for cardiovascular disease in persons with type 2 diabetes. Yet, successful implementation of lifestyle interventions targeting physical activity in primary care has shown to be difficult. Smartphone apps may provide useful tools to support physical activity. The DiaCert app was specifically designed for integration into primary care and is an automated mobile health (mHealth) solution promoting daily walking.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of a 3-month-long intervention promoting physical activity through the use of the DiaCert app among persons with type 2 diabetes in Sweden. Our primary objective was to assess the effect on moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) at 3 months of follow-up. Our secondary objective was to assess the effect on MVPA at 6 months of follow-up and on BMI, waist circumference, hemoglobin A1c, blood lipids, and blood pressure at 3 and 6 months of follow-up.

METHODS

We recruited men and women with type 2 diabetes from 5 primary health care centers and 1 specialized center. Participants were randomized 1:1 to the intervention or control group. The intervention group was administered standard care and access to the DiaCert app at baseline and 3 months onward. The control group received standard care only. Outcomes of objectively measured physical activity using accelerometers, BMI, waist circumference, biomarkers, and blood pressure were assessed at baseline and follow-ups. Linear mixed models were used to assess differences in outcomes between the groups.

RESULTS

A total of 181 study participants, 65.7% (119/181) men and 34.3% (62/181) women, were recruited into the study and randomized to the intervention (n=93) or control group (n=88). The participants' mean age and BMI were 60.0 (SD 11.4) years and 30.4 (SD 5.3) kg/m2, respectively. We found no significant effect of the intervention (group by time interaction) on MVPA at either the 3-month (β=1.51, 95% CI -5.53 to 8.55) or the 6-month (β=-3.53, 95% CI -10.97 to 3.92) follow-up. We found no effect on any of the secondary outcomes at follow-ups, except for a significant effect on BMI at 6 months (β=0.52, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.84). However, mean BMI did not differ between the groups at the 6-month follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

We found no evidence that persons with type 2 diabetes being randomized to use an app promoting daily walking increased their levels of MVPA at 3 or 6 months' follow-up compared with controls receiving standard care. The effect of the app on BMI was unclear, and we found nothing to support an effect on secondary outcomes. Further research is needed to determine what type of mHealth intervention could be effective to increase physical activity among persons with type 2 diabetes.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03053336; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03053336.

Effect of emerging digital technologies and methodologies combined with incentives on HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a parallel, open randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a common metabolic disease that requires long-term management and treatment. Digital intervention, as an emerging medical model, has been widely used in the treatment of T2DM patients. Behavioral economics theory provides a favorable perspective for studying the effect of digital intervention because it can reveal the decision-making mechanisms behind human behavior and provide more effective interventions for digital intervention. The purpose of this trial is to evaluate the impact of behaviorally based digital intervention on T2DM patients' HbA1c, self-monitoring of blood glucose (SMBG) testing rate, diabetes self-efficacy, and other indicators compared to conventional treatment.

METHODS

This trial is a prospective randomized controlled trial conducted at the First People's Hospital of Kunshan City from April 1, 2023, to December 31, 2024, with a follow-up period of 3 months. The specific randomization method was established and implemented through the EDC clinical trial center's randomization system. We will measure and collect baseline data from three groups, including Group A: digital intervention + virtual incentives + conventional treatment, Group B: digital intervention + physical incentives + conventional treatment, and Group C: conventional treatment. HbA1c, weight, SMBG testing rate, diabetes self-efficacy, and diabetes-related medical expenses will be recorded at baseline, 1 month, 2 months, and 3 months for all three groups. The Shapiro-Wilk test will be used to test for normality, and Pearson correlation analysis will be used for correlation analysis. Dropouts will be analyzed separately. Analysis of variance or exact probability calculation will be used to compare demographic data and other baseline indicators.

DISCUSSION

This study is a novel clinical trial that integrates multiple disciplines (economics and medicine) and uses digital technology to deliver the intervention. Most published studies were offline interventions based on behavioral economics theory, but very few were on online interventions for T2DM patients. This study has both novelty and social value.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Chinese Clinical Trial Registry ChiCTR2300070753. Registered on 2023/04/22.