The contribution of financial hardship, socioeconomic position and physical health to mental health problems among welfare recipients

The relationship between self-reported health status and signs of psychological distress within European urban contexts

Background

Self-reported health status (SRHS) reflects an individual's perception of their social, biological and psychological health, and has been linked to increased mortality risk and increased use of health services. Having a psychological co-morbidity can reduce health outcomes and increase healthcare costs. This paper investigates the relationship between SRHS and signs of psychological distress (PD) in European urban settings. The study sample comprised 20 439 adult respondents to surveys conducted across 37 urban areas. Data on SRHS, signs of PD and potential confounders were analysed in a multivariable logistic regression. After adjusting for potential confounders (gender, age, time lived in country and regularity of contact with family and friends), a significant association was found between PD and self-reported poor health for all urban areas, particularly in Western European countries (adjusted OR = 3.615, 95% CI: 3.333-3.920 P < 0.001). Time lived in country of residence, financial stability and regularity of contact with family and friends were negatively associated with signs of PD in the adjusted model. There is a statistically significant association between self-reported poor health and signs of PD. Although the relationship was present in all geographical locations, the confounders were protective factors for Western European countries. Since the two factors are linked, interventions that target one might reduce the impact on both. Further study into causality would be of use in predicting future healthcare costs, which could be reduced by integrating their management.

How financial hardship is associated with the onset of mental health problems over time

PURPOSE

Poor mental health has been consistently linked with the experience of financial hardship and poverty. However, the temporal association between these factors must be clarified before hardship alleviation can be considered as an effective mental health promotion and prevention strategy. We examined whether the longitudinal associations between financial hardship and mental health problems are best explained by an individual's current or prior experience of hardship, or their underlying vulnerability.

METHODS

We analysed nine waves (years: 2001-2010) of nationally representative panel data from the Household, Income, and Labour Dynamics in Australia survey (n = 11,134). Two components of financial hardship (deprivation and cash-flow problems) and income poverty were coded into time-varying and time-invariant variables reflecting the contemporaneous experience of hardship (i.e., current), the prior experience of hardship (lagged/12 months), and any experience of hardship during the study period (vulnerability). Multilevel, mixed-effect logistic regression models tested the associations between these measures and mental health.

RESULTS

Respondents who reported deprivation and cash-flow problems had greater risk of mental health problems than those who did not. Individuals vulnerable to hardship had greater risk of mental health problems, even at the times they did not report hardship. However, their risk of mental health problems was greater on occasions when they did experience hardship.

CONCLUSIONS

The results are consistent with the argument that economic and social programmes that address and prevent hardship may promote community mental health.