Emergencies in radiology: a survey of radiologists and radiology trainees

Clinical governance implications of a Victorian coronial finding regarding contrast-related anaphylaxis for health services and private providers of radiology services

What is known about the topic? Anaphylaxis is a rare but inherent risk of treatments and investigational agents. What does this paper add? Using a recent coronial finding in Victoria, this letter explores clinical governance responsibilities of health services and private providers of radiology services with respect to anaphylaxis recognition and management. What are the implications for practitioners? There is a strong case for health service and corporate governance teams (for stand-alone clinics) to ensure that all staff have recent, adequate training to recognise and initiate treatment of anaphylaxis. Reliance on an ambulance response is not enough.

Use of High-fidelity simulation training for radiology healthcare professionals in the management of acute medical emergencies

OBJECTIVES

Life-threatening emergencies are relatively uncommon in the radiology department, but when encountered, require timely intervention. With an increasing number of critically unwell patients visiting the radiology department each year for both diagnostic and interventional procedures, it is vital that radiology staff are trained to provide basic resuscitation before further assistance arrives. Simulation training is a well-validated, effective method for rehearsing low-frequency, high-acuity events in a supportive and safe environment. The aim of our study was to investigate whether the introduction of a focussed, multidisciplinary simulation course would improve healthcare professional's knowledge and confidence when managing common medical emergencies; including cardiac arrest, anaphylaxis and airway obstruction.

METHODS

A multidisciplinary group of radiology staff attended a dedicated simulation teaching course. Participants completed a pre- and post-test questionnaire which assessed a range of knowledge domains and their perceived confidence with dealing with the clinical scenarios. The delegates were then asked to repeat this questionnaire 6 months after taking part in the course to assess their retention of skills and knowledge.

RESULTS

Knowledge scores increased by a mean difference of 4 points (p < 0.001). The mean pre- and post-course perceived confidence scores were 4.4/10 and 8/10, respectively.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This study suggests that embedding simulation training into the radiology curriculum improves healthcare professional's knowledge and perceived confidence when dealing with common medical emergencies. Although previous studies have looked at the use of simulation training for radiology trainees in the management of selected medical emergencies, to the authors' knowledge, this is the first study to demonstrate these benefits across a range of clinical scenarios, within an interprofessional environment.

Survey of clinician opinions on the role of proton beam therapy in Australia and New Zealand

INTRODUCTION

We surveyed the Australian and New Zealand (ANZ) radiation oncology community to assess their perceptions, understanding and experience of the current role of proton beam therapy (PBT) and the existing referral process to access PBT overseas, ahead of the development of the first PBT centre in Australia.

METHODS

The survey was conducted between September and October 2019 using a 17-question instrument, which was distributed by email to all 632 radiation oncology fellows and trainees listed in the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists database.

RESULTS

One hundred and one respondents completed the survey, with an overall response rate of 16%. Most respondents were based in Australia (93%), with the majority working in public centres only (59%); 51% were > 10 years post fellowship and 17% were trainees. Most respondents (76%) reported moderate or high levels of confidence in the role of PBT. Only 28% had previously referred a patient for PBT overseas, with the most common referral indication being chordoma. Of those who had not previously referred a patient, 48% were not convinced about the rationale of PBT over current therapies available locally, 33% were not aware of the referral process, and 24% had concerns about the timeliness of a decision for government-funded PBT abroad.

CONCLUSION

This survey has demonstrated that, although there is reasonable confidence in the role of PBT among ANZ radiation oncologists, there are a number of important aspects of PBT awareness, education and access that need to be developed prior to commencement of PBT in Australia.