1
|
Yagnik KJ, Erickson D, Bancos I, Choby G, Laack N, Van Gompel JJ. Stereotactic Radiosurgery Outcomes in Medically and Surgically Failed or Nonsurgical Candidates with Medically Failed Prolactinomas: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Neurol Surg B Skull Base 2023; 84:538-547. [PMID: 37854534 PMCID: PMC10581828 DOI: 10.1055/a-1934-9028] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2022] [Accepted: 08/29/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective Prolactinomas are treated with dopamine agonists (DAs) as first-line therapy and transsphenoidal surgery as an alternative approach for medically failed tumors. We sought to summarize the efficacy of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the medically and surgically failed prolactinomas as well as in nonsurgical candidates with medically failed prolactinomas by systematic review and meta-analysis. Method A literature search was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guideline. Results A total of 11 articles (total N = 709) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-three percent of patients were able to achieve endocrine remission at a mean follow-up of 54.2 ± 42.2 months with no association between stopping DA and endocrine remission. Sixty-two percent of patients were able to achieve endocrine control with DA therapy and 34% of patients were able to decrease the dose of DA dose when compared with pre-SRS DA dose at the end of the follow-up period. However, 54% of patients required DA at the end of the follow-up to control hyperprolactinemia. Ninety percent of patients were able to achieve radiologic control at the end of the follow-up in comparison to pre-SRS imagings. Furthermore, 26% of patients newly developed hypopituitarism (one or more pituitary hormones) post-SRS throughout the follow-up period. Conclusion This systematic review and meta-analysis demonstrates SRS as an effective adjunct therapy in medically failed nonsurgical candidates or surgically and medically recalcitrant prolactinomas with a 33% chance of achieving endocrine remission, 62% of patients achieved hormonal control with DA and GKRS (gamma knife radio-surgery), with a 34% chance of decreasing DA dose and 90% chance of achieving radiologic control.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Karan J. Yagnik
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Dana Erickson
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Irina Bancos
- Department of Endocrinology, Metabolism and Nutrition, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Garret Choby
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Nadia Laack
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| | - Jamie J. Van Gompel
- Department of Neurological Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abstract
A small subset of lactotroph adenomas is resistant to dopamine agonists (DA) and can also demonstrate aggressive or even malignant behavior. The implicated mechanisms are not clearly defined. Management can be challenging and requires a multidisciplinary approach. In DA resistant prolactinomas, switching to another DA could be the first option to consider. Further strategies include surgery and radiotherapy used alone or in combination. In cases of aggressive or malignant prolactinomas, temozolomide could be offered. Immune checkpoint inhibitors have been also recently proposed as an alternative approach. The place of other treatments (e.g., metformin, selective estrogen modulators, somatostatin analogues, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin and peptide radio-receptor therapy) remains to be carefully assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandrine A Urwyler
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (ISMR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, IBR Tower, Level 2, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK
| | - Niki Karavitaki
- Institute of Metabolism and Systems Research (ISMR), College of Medical and Dental Sciences, University of Birmingham, IBR Tower, Level 2, Birmingham, B15 2TT, UK.
- Centre for Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Birmingham Health Partners, Birmingham, UK.
- Department of Endocrinology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Mathieu D, Kotecha R, Sahgal A, De Salles A, Fariselli L, Pollock BE, Levivier M, Ma L, Paddick I, Regis J, Yomo S, Suh JH, Rubens M, Sheehan JP. Stereotactic radiosurgery for secretory pituitary adenomas: systematic review and International Stereotactic Radiosurgery Society practice recommendations. J Neurosurg 2021; 136:801-812. [PMID: 34479203 DOI: 10.3171/2021.2.jns204440] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/27/2020] [Accepted: 02/19/2021] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE A systematic review was performed to provide objective evidence on the use of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in the management of secretory pituitary adenomas and develop consensus recommendations. METHODS The authors performed a systematic review of the English-language literature up until June 2018 using the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed (Medline), Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched. A total of 45 articles reporting single-institution outcomes of SRS for acromegaly, Cushing's disease, and prolactinomas were selected and included in the analysis. RESULTS For acromegaly, random effects meta-analysis estimates for crude tumor control rate, crude endocrine remission rate, and any new hypopituitarism rates were 97.0% (95% CI 96.0%-98.0%), 44.0% (95% CI 35.0%-53.0%), and 17.0% (95% CI 13.0%-23.0%), respectively. For Cushing's disease, random effects estimates for crude tumor control rate, crude endocrine remission rate, and any new hypopituitarism rate were 92.0% (95% CI 87.0%-95.0%), 48.0% (95% CI 35.0%-61.0%), and 21.0% (95% CI 13.0%-31.0%), respectively. For prolactinomas, random effects estimates for crude tumor control rate, crude endocrine remission rate, and any new hypopituitarism rate were 93.0% (95% CI 90.0%-95.0%), 28.0% (95% CI 19.0%-39.0%), and 12.0% (95% CI 6.0%-24.0%), respectively. Meta-regression analysis did not show a statistically significant association between mean margin dose with crude endocrine remission rate or mean margin dose with development of any new hypopituitarism rate for any of the secretory subtypes. CONCLUSIONS SRS offers effective tumor control of hormone-producing pituitary adenomas in the majority of patients but a lower rate of endocrine improvement or remission.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Mathieu
- 1Division of Neurosurgery, Université de Sherbrooke, Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
| | - Rupesh Kotecha
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Arjun Sahgal
- 3Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Antonio De Salles
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, University of California, Los Angeles, California
| | - Laura Fariselli
- 5Radiotherapy Unit-Neurosurgery Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Neurologico Carlo Besta, Milan, Italy
| | - Bruce E Pollock
- 6Department of Neurologic Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota
| | - Marc Levivier
- 7Department of Neurosurgery and Gamma Knife Center, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Lijun Ma
- 8Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, San Francisco, California
| | - Ian Paddick
- 9Medical Physics Ltd., Reading, United Kingdom
| | - Jean Regis
- 10Cromwell Hospital, London, United Kingdom.,11Functional and Stereotaxic Neurosurgery Department, Clinical Neuroscience Federation, La Timone Hospital, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France
| | - Shoji Yomo
- 12Division of Radiation Oncology, Aizawa Comprehensive Cancer Center, Aizawa Hospital, Matsumoto, Japan
| | - John H Suh
- 13Department of Radiation Oncology, Taussig Cancer Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio; and
| | - Muni Rubens
- 2Department of Radiation Oncology, Miami Cancer Institute, Baptist Health South Florida, Miami, Florida
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 14Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Hung YC, Lee CC, Yang HC, Mohammed N, Kearns KN, Nabeel AM, Abdel Karim K, Emad Eldin RM, El-Shehaby AMN, Reda WA, Tawadros SR, Liscak R, Jezkova J, Lunsford LD, Kano H, Sisterson ND, Martínez Álvarez R, Martínez Moreno NE, Kondziolka D, Golfinos JG, Grills I, Thompson A, Borghei-Razavi H, Maiti TK, Barnett GH, McInerney J, Zacharia BE, Xu Z, Sheehan JP. The benefit and risk of stereotactic radiosurgery for prolactinomas: an international multicenter cohort study. J Neurosurg 2019; 133:717-726. [PMID: 31374549 DOI: 10.3171/2019.4.jns183443] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/23/2018] [Accepted: 04/03/2019] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The most common functioning pituitary adenoma is prolactinoma. Patients with medically refractory or residual/recurrent tumors that are not amenable to resection can be treated with stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS). The aim of this multicenter study was to evaluate the role of SRS for treating prolactinomas. METHODS This retrospective study included prolactinomas treated with SRS between 1997 and 2016 at ten institutions. Patients' clinical and treatment parameters were investigated. Patients were considered to be in endocrine remission when they had a normal level of prolactin (PRL) without requiring dopamine agonist medications. Endocrine control was defined as endocrine remission or a controlled PRL level ≤ 30 ng/ml with dopamine agonist therapy. Other outcomes were evaluated including new-onset hormone deficiency, tumor recurrence, and new neurological complications. RESULTS The study cohort comprised 289 patients. The endocrine remission rates were 28%, 41%, and 54% at 3, 5, and 8 years after SRS, respectively. Following SRS, 25% of patients (72/289) had new hormone deficiency. Sixty-three percent of the patients (127/201) with available data attained endocrine control. Three percent of patients (9/269) had a new visual complication after SRS. Five percent of the patients (13/285) were recorded as having tumor progression. A pretreatment PRL level ≤ 270 ng/ml was a predictor of endocrine remission (p = 0.005, adjusted HR 0.487). An increasing margin dose resulted in better endocrine control after SRS (p = 0.033, adjusted OR 1.087). CONCLUSIONS In patients with medically refractory prolactinomas or a residual/recurrent prolactinoma, SRS affords remarkable therapeutic effects in endocrine remission, endocrine control, and tumor control. New-onset hypopituitarism is the most common adverse event.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yi-Chieh Hung
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
- 2Departments of Neurosurgery and Surgery, Chi-Mei Medical Center, Tainan
- 3Department of Recreation and Healthcare Management, Chia Nan University of Pharmacy and Science, Tainan
| | - Cheng-Chia Lee
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
- 5School of Medicine, National Yang-Ming University, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Huai-Che Yang
- 4Department of Neurosurgery, Neurological Institute, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei
| | - Nasser Mohammed
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Kathryn N Kearns
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Ahmed M Nabeel
- 6Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo
- 7Department of Neurosurgery, Benha University, Qalubya, Egypt
| | - Khaled Abdel Karim
- 6Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo
- 17Clinical Oncology, Ain Shams University, Cairo; and
| | - Reem M Emad Eldin
- 6Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo
- 18Department of Radiation Oncology, National Cancer Institute, Cairo University, Cairo, Egypt
| | - Amr M N El-Shehaby
- 6Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo
- Departments of16Neurosurgery and
| | - Wael A Reda
- 6Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo
- Departments of16Neurosurgery and
| | - Sameh R Tawadros
- 6Gamma Knife Center Cairo, Nasser Institute Hospital, Cairo
- Departments of16Neurosurgery and
| | - Roman Liscak
- 8Department of Stereotactic and Radiation Neurosurgery, Na Homolce Hospital, Prague
| | - Jana Jezkova
- 9Department of Endocrinology and Metabolism, 3rd Department of Medicine, First Faculty of Medicine, Charles University and General University Hospital, Prague, Czech Republic
| | - L Dade Lunsford
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | - Hideyuki Kano
- 10Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania
| | | | | | | | - Douglas Kondziolka
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health System, New York, New York
| | - John G Golfinos
- 12Department of Neurosurgery, NYU Langone Health System, New York, New York
| | - Inga Grills
- 13Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | - Andrew Thompson
- 13Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Health System, Royal Oak, Michigan
| | | | | | - Gene H Barnett
- 14Department of Neurosurgery, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, Ohio
| | - James McInerney
- 15Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Brad E Zacharia
- 15Department of Neurosurgery, Penn State Health Milton S. Hershey Medical Center, Hershey, Pennsylvania
| | - Zhiyuan Xu
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| | - Jason P Sheehan
- 1Department of Neurological Surgery, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chanson P, Maiter D. The epidemiology, diagnosis and treatment of Prolactinomas: The old and the new. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol Metab 2019; 33:101290. [PMID: 31326373 DOI: 10.1016/j.beem.2019.101290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 84] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023]
Abstract
Prevalence and incidence of prolactinomas are approximately 50 per 100,000 and 3-5 new cases/100,000/year. The pathophysiological mechanism of hyperprolactinemia-induced gonadotropic failure involves kisspeptin neurons. Prolactinomas in males are larger, more invasive and less sensitive to dopamine agonists (DAs). Macroprolactin, responsible for pseudohyperprolactinemia is a frequent pitfall of prolactin assay. DAs still represent the primary therapy for most prolactinomas, but neurosurgery has regained interest, due to progress in surgical techniques and a high success rate in microprolactinoma, as well as to some underestimated side effects of long-term DA treatment, such as impulse control disorders or impaired quality of life. Recent data show that the suspected effects of DAs on cardiac valves in patients with prolactinomas are reassuring. Finally, temozolomide has emerged as a valuable treatment for rare cases of aggressive and malignant prolactinomas that do not respond to all other conventional treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philippe Chanson
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Service d'Endocrinologie et des Maladies de la Reproduction, Centre de Référence des Maladies Rares de l'Hypophyse, Hôpital de Bicêtre, F-94275, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; UMR-S1185 Université Paris-Sud, Univ Paris-Saclay, F-94276, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France; Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale (Inserm) U1185, F-94276, Le Kremlin Bicêtre, France.
| | - Dominique Maiter
- Service d'Endocrinologie et Nutrition, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Wong A, Eloy JA, Couldwell WT, Liu JK. Update on prolactinomas. Part 2: Treatment and management strategies. J Clin Neurosci 2015; 22:1568-74. [PMID: 26243714 DOI: 10.1016/j.jocn.2015.03.059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2015] [Accepted: 03/18/2015] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
The authors present an update on the various treatment modalities and discuss management strategies for prolactinomas. Prolactinomas are the most common type of functional pituitary tumor. Effective hyperprolactinemia treatment is of great importance, due to its potential deleterious effects including infertility, gonadal dysfunction and osteoporosis. Dopamine agonist therapy is the first line of treatment for prolactinomas because of its effectiveness in normalizing serum prolactin levels and shrinking tumor size. Though withdrawal of dopamine agonist treatment is safe and may be implemented following certain recommendations, recurrence of disease after cessation of the drug occurs in a substantial proportion of patients. Concerns regarding the safety of dopamine agonists have been raised, but its safety profile remains high, allowing its use during pregnancy. Surgery is typically indicated for patients who are resistant to medical therapy or intolerant of its adverse side effects, or are experiencing progressive tumor growth. Surgical resection can also be considered as a primary treatment for those with smaller focal tumors where a biochemical cure can be expected as an alternative to lifelong dopamine agonist treatment. Stereotactic radiosurgery also serves as an option for those refractory to medical and surgical therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anni Wong
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Suite 8100, 90 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07103, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - Jean Anderson Eloy
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Suite 8100, 90 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07103, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA
| | - William T Couldwell
- Department of Neurosurgery, Clinical Neurosciences Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT, USA
| | - James K Liu
- Center for Skull Base and Pituitary Surgery, Neurological Institute of New Jersey, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Suite 8100, 90 Bergen Street, Newark, NJ 07103, USA; Department of Neurological Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA; Department of Otolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Rutgers University, New Jersey Medical School, Newark, NJ, USA.
| |
Collapse
|